On 15 May 2013 18:04:26 GMT, in misc.health.alternative, vitty guy
wrote:
>
>>> "YES, according to the insanity of the conventional medicine Quacks it
>>> is perfectly okay for females to have their breasts cut off. =A0But,
>>> THESE women better not take vitamin D cause something bad might happen
>>> to them."
>>>
>>> The risk for her before surgery with the demonstrated genetic mutation wa=
>>s
>>> 85 percent. =A0It falls to less then 5 percent of the wider population af=
>>ter.
>>>
>>> This is evidence based medicine, where is the same to show for this genet=
>>ic
>>> mutation that any other approach produces any result worth the gamble?
>>> There is none, only quack folk tales.
>>>
>>> Good we have such as quackwatch to keep tabs on the folk tales.
>>
>>
>>
>>109,000 vicinity of conventional medicine dye each year from properly
>>prescribed and administered prescription medications.
"dye"? What color?
>>New born babies are aborted / murdered before they pass completely out
>>of the birth canal. Fear not, a physician has finally been convicted
>>of first degree murder on that issue. :)
>>
>>Better for women to get their breasts cut off, for men to have their
>>prostate removed, and for both genders to have sections of their colon
>>cut out THEN for people to prevent cancer by taking REASONABLE amounts
>>of vitamin D. Physicians don't want something bad to happen to the
>>public, after all. :(
>>
>>ROFLOL
>>
>>If you believe that load of bull, then you fools have my condolences.
>
>Hmmm, the good old strawman argument. A search on quackwatch shows a very
>positive set of hvit d and its on the benefits of its proper intake and
>supplementation where called for:
>
>
http://www.quackwatch.org/search/webglimpse.cgi?ID=1&query=vitamin+d&othersite=
>
>So our resident bitter old man to whom the world did not come running nor
>wikipedia swoon has found a partner in the common sense idea of proper vit
>d levels. It's the folk at quackwatch don't ya know.
Here is a case of an overdose of Vit D. Gull null self inflected
poisoning.
http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/null.html
<cite>
In April 2010, Null sued the manufacturer of Gary Null's Ultimate
Power Meal. The complaint alleged:
The product was produced with 1,000 times as much vitamin D as it
should have. By consuming two servings a day, Null consumed 60
million IU during the month he used the product.
Null began having severe symptoms in December 2009 and believes he
nearly died from kidney toxicity.
It took three months to "get his blood seemingly back to where he
was able to function, but he continued to occasionally urinate
blood."
While he was ill, Null "had dozens of his customers calling him,
as well as threatening and condemning him," and six users of the
product were hospitalized with severe kidney damage [17].
During the next few days, Null's Web sites posted at least three
reactions to publicity about the suit. One said that he was
"completely and totally healthy and everything is fine." Another said
that "none of the retail product reached the market" and he had
"returned to complete health." But after a Los Angeles Times blog
noted that these statements contradicted what the lawsuit said, Null
replaced them with one that said he was "feeling substantially
better." Two weeks later, he filed an amended complaint that omitted
all of the allegations related to his own alleged illness and claimed
only that his company had suffered damage to its reputation [18].
Since then, three lawsuits have been filed against Null, his company,
and the suppliers. Two were filed by product users who became ill
[19, 20], and the third was filed by the estate of a woman whose
illness led to death [21]. The first two suits were settled with
undisclosed terms. It may be interesting to see whether the remaining
suit uncovers anything about Null's credentials.
17. Complaint.
(
http://www.casewatch.org/civil/null/complaint.shtml)
Gary Null and Gary Null & Associates against Triarco Industries, Inc.
New York State Supreme Court Case No. 10601070, filed April 26, 2010.
18. Amended complaint.
(
http://www.casewatch.org/civil/null/amended_complaint.pdf) Gary Null
& Associates against Triarco Industries, Inc. New York State Supreme
Court Case No. 10601070, filed May 10, 2010.
19. Verified complaint.
(
http://www.casewatch.org/civil/null/schmidt/complaint.shtml)
William Schmidt and Jennifer Maslowski against Archon Vitamin Corp.,
Triarco Industries, Gary Null & Associates, Inc., and Gary Null,
individually. New York State Supreme Court, filed May 10, 2010.
20. Verified complaint.
(
http://www.casewatch.org/civil/null/amato/complaint.pdf)
Patricia Amato against Archon Vitamin Corp., Triarco Industries, Gary
Null & Associates, Inc., and Gary Null, individually. New York State
Supreme Court, filed June 8, 2010.
21.Complaint.
(
http://www.casewatch.org/civil/null/shulman/complaint.pdf)
Jack A. Shulman individually and as executor of the estate of Helen
K. Shulman against Triarco Industries, Archon Vitamin Corp, Gary Null
& Associates, Inc., Gary Null's Uptown Whole Foods, Inc., Gary Null
Consulting, Inc. and Gary Null, individually. New York State Supreme
Court, filed Dec 29, 2011.
</cite>