Profit Drive Swine Flu Propaganda - Pump Up the Volume - Part VI
Jan Drew
Profit Drive Swine Flu Propaganda - Pump Up the Volume - Part VI
by Evelyn Pringle, health freedom writer
(NaturalNews) This article is part five in a six-part series. Be sure
to read part five at http://www.naturalnews.com/027363_a...
Most American are unaware that flu vaccines still contain thimerosal
and that to avoid mercury, they have to ask for mercury-free shots. On
November 13, 2007, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ran the headline:
"Most flu shots contain mercury, but few know it."
Thimerosal consists of 49.6% ethyl mercury. The Environmental
Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration have not set an
exposure limit for ethyl mercury.
"The federal agencies have, however, set exposure limits for another
organic and closely related form of mercury, methyl mercury - the type
that comes from coal-fired power plants and is found in fish," the
Journal said. "They use that standard when estimating the safety of
ethyl mercury."
"A typical 0.5 milliliter flu shot contains 25 micrograms - or 50,000
parts per billion - of mercury," the Journal reported.
"The EPA classifies a liquid with 200 parts per billion of mercury as
hazardous waste," it advised. "The limit for drinking water is 2 parts
per billion."
Using the standards set for methyl mercury consumption, "an average
130-pound person getting the flu shot would exceed the daily limit by
more than four times," the Journal reported.
"A 22-pound baby would get more than 25 times the amount of mercury
considered safe," it said.
"Mercury is among the most toxic heavy metals and is known to poison
the central nervous system, liver, gastrointestinal tract and other
systems in the body," the Journal reported.
When the influenza vaccines "are injected into pregnant woman and
infants as young as six months, those vaccines contain 50,000 ppb
mercury," warns Deirdre Imus in a November 19, 2007, Huffington Post
article titled, "Over Medicated and Over-Vaccinated: The Unintended
Consequence of Medicines Meant to Protect."
This amount of mercury is 250 times higher than hazardous waste, she
notes, and, according to EPA guidelines, this amount can only be
considered safe if a person weighs 550 pounds. "Even trace amounts of
mercury in vaccines can be anywhere from 600 to 2000 ppb," she
advises.
People need to ask for a thimerosal-free vaccine if they want it,
health officials told the Journal. "But many people aren't aware that
mercury is in the flu shot," the Journal found.
"I didn't know," said Kate Strzok, a 23-year-old Oak Creek woman, as
she walked out of the Piggly Wiggly where she had just gotten the flu
shot. "Interesting that they don't tell you."
PutChildrenFirst.org, a parent-led organization advocating for vaccine
safety, announced the results of a survey on November 13, 2006,
conducted during October 27-30, 2006, by Zogby International of over
9,000 Americans, to learn their plans for getting flu shots, their
knowledge of its ingredients, and who they held responsible for making
sure vaccines are safe.
The survey showed that an overwhelming majority of Americans were
unaware that most flu shots contained mercury. After learning that
mercury was an ingredient, 74% of those polled said they were less
likely to get a flu shot and 86% of parents said they were less likely
to allow their children to get a shot.
"The survey reveals that Americans are overwhelmingly in the dark
about what is in most flu shots," said Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN, president
of SafeMinds, a nonprofit organization committed to ending mercury-
induced neurological disorders, in a press release.
"They do not want a known neurotoxin injected into their children, and
they believe Congress and medical professionals must be more vigilant
about keeping vaccines safe and mercury-free," she advised.
"With everything we know about the dangers of mercury and the havoc it
can wreak on young, developing brains," she said, "there is no excuse
for any vaccine to contain mercury."
Lisa Handley is a founding parent of PutChildrenFirst whose son had an
adverse reaction to a flu shot with mercury in 2003. "I know firsthand
how life-changing a flu shot with mercury can be, since our son began
his regression into autism after his flu shot," she stated in the
press release.
Damning Reports
On October 5, 2009, the Maternal & Child Health Bureau of Health
Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and
Human Services released a study evaluating the number of children in
the US who currently have a Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnosis,
titled, "The Prevalence of Parent-Reported Diagnosis of Autism
Spectrum Disorder among Children in the United States, 2007."
The study evaluated data from a national Survey of Children's Health
and found that 1 in 91 children between the ages of 3 and 17 currently
carry an ASD diagnosis.
"Even more alarming, for the subset of children between ages 6 and 14
immunized during the 1990's the prevalence is actually 1 in 71
children with an autism diagnosis," Age of Autism reports.
"This age group represents children in the U.S. with the highest
exposure to thimerosal, the mercury preservative routinely used until
CDC, AAP and industry recommended its removal "as soon as possible"
from all childhood vaccines," AoA advises.
"We are especially alarmed by these findings because the seasonal
influenza and H1N1 vaccines contain mercury well in excess of EPA safe
exposure guidelines," said Theresa Wrangham, president of SafeMinds,
in a statement to President Obama calling for a ban on mercury in
vaccines given to pregnant women and young children.
Another new study found that giving Hepatitis B vaccine to newborn
boys may triple the risk of developing an autism spectrum disorder. An
abstract of the study was published in the September, 2009 "Annals of
Epidemiology" journal. "Boys who received the hepatitis B vaccine
during the first month of life had 2.94 greater odds for ASD compared
to later - or unvaccinated boys," wrote Carolyn Gallagher and Melody
Goodman of the graduate program in public health at Stony Brook
University Medical Center in New York.
On September 30, 2009, Age of Autism Editor-at-Large, Mark Blaxill,
reported on a new study in the journal "Neurotoxicology," by a
research team led by scientists from the University of Pittsburgh and
Thoughtful House, that found exposure to a birth dose of a hepatitis B
vaccine that included thimerosal caused significant delays in the
development of several survival reflexes in male rhesus macaque
monkeys.
"In the first safety study of its kind of the hepatitis vaccine birth
dose, the researchers showed that male macaques vaccinated at birth
with a hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) took more than twice as long as
unexposed macaques to acquire three standardized skills typically used
to measure infant brain development," Blaxill wrote.
The study showed vaccinated monkeys learned more slowly to (1) turn
their head in response to a brush on the cheek (root reflex); (2) open
their mouth in response to a brush on the forehead (snout reflex); and
(3) suck on a nipple placed in their mouth (suck reflex). The
researchers found the unvaccinated monkeys developed normally.
The study is part of a larger research program looking at the safety
of the vaccine schedule in children from birth to age four.
Dr Andrew Wakefield, Executive Director of Thoughtful House, and a co-
investigator of the project, told Age of Autism that he found it
particularly concerning "that in spite of the recommendation to remove
thimerosal from vaccines a decade ago, millions of people, many of
them children and pregnant mothers, are about to get mercury in their
shots."
A 2006 study in the "Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons," by
Dr David Ayoub and Dr F Edward Yazback, titled, Influenza Vaccinations
During Pregnancy: A Critical Assessment of the Recommendations of the
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), states:
"The ACIP policy recommendation of routinely administering influenza
vaccine during pregnancy is ill-advised and unsupported by current
scientific literature, and it should be withdrawn. Use of thimerosal
during pregnancy should be contraindicated."
"Because the benefits of influenza vaccination during pregnancy appear
lacking, a safety-benefit analysis should not tolerate any risk to
vaccine recipients or their offspring, even at a theoretical level,"
the doctors conclude.
Back on February 28, 2005, the Associated Press reported that lower
"IQ levels linked to mercury exposure in the womb costs the United
States $8.7 billion a year in lost earnings potential," citing a study
by researchers at New York's Mount Sinai hospital published in the
journal, "Environmental Health Perspectives."
The Mount Sinai Center for Children's Health and the Environment
combined a number of previous studies to determine hundreds of
thousands of babies are born every year with lower IQ associated with
mercury exposure.
Lead researcher and pediatician, Leonard Trasande, reported that
annually between 316,588 and 637,233 infants are born with umbilical
cord blood mercury levels linked to IQ loss.
As an example, Dr Trasande said, each year about 4% of babies are with
blood mercury levels between 7.13 and 15 micrograms per liter. That
level of mercury causes an IQ loss of 1.6 points, the researchers
concluded.
A 1.6 point drop could cost a person more than $31,000 in potential
earnings over a lifetime due to missed educational opportunities or
jobs, the study calculated. The researchers found the IQ losses linked
to mercury ranged from one-fifth of an IQ point to as much as 24
points.
"The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that about 8 percent of
American women of childbearing age have enough mercury in their blood
to put a fetus at risk," the Associated Press noted.
dr_jeff
> http://www.naturalnews.com/z027372_mercury_flu_shot_vaccines.html
Copyrighted material deleted.
So what? What percentage of the mercury in a woman's body comes from
vaccines? 0.1% or so? What about the mercury in fish, in the air from
coal-burning power plants, etc.? Wouldn't you be fore effective if you
lobbied against these rather than life-saving vaccines?
Peter B
"dr_jeff" <u...@msu.edu> wrote in message
news:7oidnZuRH82qyZ7W...@giganews.com...
The following is a list of some of the more common sources of mercury:
Adhesives
Air conditioner filters
Body powders
Broken thermometer
Cosmetics
Dental fillings
Diuretics
Fabric softeners
Felt floor waxes
Gold
Polishes
Fungicides
Industrial wastes
Inoculations
Laxatives
Mercurochrome
Paints
Photoengraving
Psoriatic ointments
Seafood
Sewage disposal
Skin lightening cream
Tanning leather
Thermostats
Tarmac
Tattooing
Wood preservatives & much more.
PeterB - Original
Vaccines are unpredictable and dangerous, period.
Peter B
"PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message
news:c2a9ab47-2224-4938...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
========================================
Real men do not have periods.
Take this with your vaccine.
Toxiclenz the most Vibrant Food on Earth! Comes from Diatomaceous Earth!
How can vaccines be unpredictable when they are.......
Tested against known historical problems
Tested in the real world with animals
Tested in the real world with willing humans.
Then you have all the freaks telling you of this or that problem, death,
or whatever made up out of fear or paranoia, who then post their
feelings all over the Net so much so that everyone knows the ins n outs.
Besides out of all the reported deaths you guys post here after
searching the whole earth for possibilities there are maybe one in 500
have any real but distinct possibilities.
tools
tools
Peter B
"tools" <too...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c92dnbDju9rkYZ7W...@giganews.com...
I cannot get it WK Liar, can you?
Oh, that's right. You feel free to say anything you want to, your wittle
mind says it is just fine to do so.
Peter B
Take that as a compliment Dr. Jeff, he says he knowingly lies alot. :)
tools
just do not seem to get it. You think that an NG is important. You even
think that your posts here are important. Bwahahaha! Dude, you are not
important.
tools
Peter B
What you don't get is personal pride, honor, well being.
Lying is not joking and you cannot pretend it is. Face it, you admitted
to everyone your intentions, the value of your word, and your personal
integrity. The cost of 5+C dollars is far less expensive than ones
integrity.
I never considered myself important to you, but my word is important and
I back it up. What you fail to understand and to your detriment, is that
everyone who followed that thread knows now who you are.
Plain and simple, you *have* no value. You are even a tad less
trustworthy/reliable than Janet, and on par with Autrey.
Peter B
Yes, but as a liar your word never means what it says. Get it?
PeterB - Original
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:c2a9ab47-2224-4938...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
What is that supposed to mean?
> Tested in the real world with animals
You were tested?
> Tested in the real world with willing humans.
Yes, like HRT and Vioxx were tested on "willing" humans. I'll bet
many or most of them wish they had it to do over again.
> Then you have all the freaks telling you of this or that problem, death,
> or whatever made up out of fear or paranoia, who then post their
> feelings all over the Net so much so that everyone knows the ins n outs.
So cite any source of published scientific data proving vaccine
safety. You can't do it, can you?
> Besides out of all the reported deaths you guys post here after
> searching the whole earth for possibilities there are maybe one in
> 500 have any real but distinct possibilities.
It isn't the public's responsibility to prove that vaccines are
unsafe. It's your responsibility, as a promoter of vaccine on behalf
of your sponsors, to prove that they ARE. So far, you haven't done
squat.
Peter B
==============================================
You mean you haven't a clue re the history of vac's? Oh MY!
> Tested in the real world with animals
You were tested?
========================================
LOL, yes, many times.
> Tested in the real world with willing humans.
Yes, like HRT and Vioxx were tested on "willing" humans. I'll bet
many or most of them wish they had it to do over again.
=================================================
So ask them.
> Then you have all the freaks telling you of this or that problem,
> death,
> or whatever made up out of fear or paranoia, who then post their
> feelings all over the Net so much so that everyone knows the ins n
> outs.
So cite any source of published scientific data proving vaccine
safety. You can't do it, can you?
===========================================
You claim to know so much about the industry but here you point out that
it was all just a lie?
That you really don't have a clue, never did any personal research on
it, nor read all the recently published articles in the news as well as
here in the ng's?
Now you're claiming you were just a fraud.
> Besides out of all the reported deaths you guys post here after
> searching the whole earth for possibilities there are maybe one in
> 500 have any real but distinct possibilities.
It isn't the public's responsibility to prove that vaccines are
unsafe. It's your responsibility, as a promoter of vaccine on behalf
of your sponsors, to prove that they ARE. So far, you haven't done
squat.
============================================
No my job man. I have no sponsors, hence no responsibility thank you for
pointing that out.
And yes, I have done squat, all over your......well, no sense in rubbing
it in, eh?. ;)
PeterB - Original
>
> > How can vaccines be unpredictable when they are.......
> > Tested against known historical problems
>
> What is that supposed to mean?
> ==============================================
> You mean you haven't a clue re the history of vac's? Oh MY!
I was suggesting that you explain your poorly written sentence. As
for the history of vaccine, it's filled with considerable death and
debility. If you like, I can post an article.
> > Tested in the real world with animals
>
> You were tested?
> ========================================
> LOL, yes, many times.
So your idiocy has a medical cause. Always good to have a diagnosis.
> > Tested in the real world with willing humans.
>
> Yes, like HRT and Vioxx were tested on "willing" humans. I'll bet
> many or most of them wish they had it to do over again.
> =================================================
> So ask them.
I don't have to. Unlike you, most people aren't morons.
> > Then you have all the freaks telling you of this or that problem,
> > death,
> > or whatever made up out of fear or paranoia, who then post their
> > feelings all over the Net so much so that everyone knows the ins n
> > outs.
>
> So cite any source of published scientific data proving vaccine
> safety. You can't do it, can you?
> ===========================================
> You claim to know so much about the industry but here you point
> out that it was all just a lie?
Meaning you can't cite a single source of published science to back up
your bogus claims about vaccine effectiveness or safety.
> That you really don't have a clue, never did any personal research
> on it, nor read all the recently published articles in the news as well
> as here in the ng's?
These diversions you use to avoid responding to my challenge only
prove what an idiot you are. Either cite published scientific data
proving vaccine safety or admit you can't. Well?
> Now you're claiming you were just a fraud.
You were the subject of that particular adjective, shadow poster.
> > Besides out of all the reported deaths you guys post here after
> > searching the whole earth for possibilities there are maybe one in
> > 500 have any real but distinct possibilities.
>
> It isn't the public's responsibility to prove that vaccines are
> unsafe. It's your responsibility, as a promoter of vaccine on behalf
> of your sponsors, to prove that they ARE. So far, you haven't done
> squat.
> ============================================
> No my job man. I have no sponsors, hence no responsibility thank you for
> pointing that out.
Defending an industry whose profits are derived from death and illness
says that you do.
Peter B
On Nov 19, 1:40 am, "Peter B" <origin...@frag.com> wrote:
>
> > How can vaccines be unpredictable when they are.......
> > Tested against known historical problems
>
> What is that supposed to mean?
> ==============================================
> You mean you haven't a clue re the history of vac's? Oh MY!
I was suggesting that you explain your poorly written sentence. As
for the history of vaccine, it's filled with considerable death and
debility. If you like, I can post an article.
================================================
That's ok, no need to parrot more crap. As to my poorly written
sentance, it was my sentance as said exactly what I meant. That you are
clueless, well........DOH!
> > Tested in the real world with animals
>
> You were tested?
> ========================================
> LOL, yes, many times.
So your idiocy has a medical cause. Always good to have a diagnosis.
====================================================
Not those kind of a tests, maroon.
> > Tested in the real world with willing humans.
>
> Yes, like HRT and Vioxx were tested on "willing" humans. I'll bet
> many or most of them wish they had it to do over again.
> =================================================
> So ask them.
I don't have to. Unlike you, most people aren't morons.
=================================================
Sure, you read their minds, just like mine, right? BWAAHAHAHAHAHA!
> > Then you have all the freaks telling you of this or that problem,
> > death,
> > or whatever made up out of fear or paranoia, who then post their
> > feelings all over the Net so much so that everyone knows the ins n
> > outs.
>
> So cite any source of published scientific data proving vaccine
> safety. You can't do it, can you?
> ===========================================
> You claim to know so much about the industry but here you point
> out that it was all just a lie?
Meaning you can't cite a single source of published science to back up
your bogus claims about vaccine effectiveness or safety.
==============================================
Nope, it just isn't my job man, Your claims were bogus as you are still
alive after taking all the vaccines, hypocrite.
> That you really don't have a clue, never did any personal research
> on it, nor read all the recently published articles in the news as
> well
> as here in the ng's?
These diversions you use to avoid responding to my challenge only
prove what an idiot you are. Either cite published scientific data
proving vaccine safety or admit you can't. Well?
=================================================
Nope, just stop evading the truth. Stop your lying and deceit. You don't
care one bit whether or not stuff is posted since you evade or try to
the truth while whoring yourself out over some pamplet by yet another
maroon.
> Now you're claiming you were just a fraud.
You were the subject of that particular adjective, shadow poster.
================================================
Then why is it that you follow me all over the place? Why are you known
as my puppy dawg?
> > Besides out of all the reported deaths you guys post here after
> > searching the whole earth for possibilities there are maybe one in
> > 500 have any real but distinct possibilities.
>
> It isn't the public's responsibility to prove that vaccines are
> unsafe. It's your responsibility, as a promoter of vaccine on behalf
> of your sponsors, to prove that they ARE. So far, you haven't done
> squat.
> ============================================
> No my job man. I have no sponsors, hence no responsibility thank you
> for
> pointing that out.
Defending an industry whose profits are derived from death and illness
says that you do.
===================================================
Hardly, you lie, and your ignorance stinks to high heaven. Now your
trying to say it is big business who create illness? You are a
disgusting maggot. The only people I know who profit from death are
undertakers, and personally I am glad they take care of that job.
Go shreik your shrill shill elsewhere, maggot.
PeterB - Original
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:2ccd610f-5846-4d14...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 19, 1:40 am, "Peter B" <origin...@frag.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > How can vaccines be unpredictable when they are.......
> > > Tested against known historical problems
>
> > What is that supposed to mean?
> > ==============================================
> > You mean you haven't a clue re the history of vac's? Oh MY!
>
> I was suggesting that you explain your poorly written sentence. As
> for the history of vaccine, it's filled with considerable death and
> debility. If you like, I can post an article.
> ================================================
> That's ok, no need to parrot more crap. As to my poorly written
> sentance, it was my sentance as said exactly what I meant. That you are
> clueless, well........DOH!
Still can't spell the word sentence, eh? Here is the article on just
how deadly vaccine has been over the years, since you asked:
From the article, "Smallpox Vaccine: Does it Work?" published at
Holistic Pediatric Association's website.
"During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when smallpox
epidemics ran rampant, the introduction of smallpox vaccination was
often followed by an increased incidence of the disease. Many vaccine
critics accused the smallpox vaccine of precipitating these
epidemics. A disastrous smallpox epidemic occurred in England during
the period 1871-1873 at a time when the compulsory smallpox
vaccination law had resulted in nearly universal coverage. A Royal
Commission was appointed in 1889 to investigate the history of
vaccination in the United Kingdom. Evidence mounted that smallpox
epidemics increased dramatically after 1854, the year the compulsory
vaccination law went into effect. In the London epidemic of 1857-1859,
there were more than 14,000 deaths; in the 1863-1865 outbreak 20,000
deaths; and from 1871 to 1873 all of Europe was swept by the worst
smallpox epidemic in recorded history. In England and Wales alone,
45,000 people died of smallpox at a time when, according to official
estimates, 97 percent of the population had been vaccinated.
"When Japan started compulsory vaccination against smallpox in 1872
the disease steadily increased each year. In 1892 more than 165,000
cases occurred with 30,000 deaths in a completely vaccinated
population. During the same time period Australia had no compulsory
vaccination laws, and only three deaths occurred from smallpox over a
15-year period.
"Germany adopted a compulsory vaccination law in 1834, and rigorously
enforced re-vaccinations. Yet during the period 1871-1872 there were
125,000 deaths from smallpox. In Berlin itself 17,000 cases of
smallpox occurred among the vaccinated population, of whom 2,240 were
under ten years of age, and of these vaccinated children 736 died.
"In the Philippines, global public health measures were instituted
when the United States began its occupation to establish a self-
reliant government in the early 1900s. The incidence of smallpox
steadily declined and the compulsory vaccine campaign was credited
with this dramatic reduction. However, in the years 1917 to 1919, the
Philippines experienced the worst epidemic of smallpox in the
country's history with over 160,000 cases and over 70,000 deaths in a
completely vaccinated population. Over 43,000 deaths from smallpox
occurred in 1919 alone. The entire population of the Philippines at
the time was only 11 million.
"Vaccine failures of this magnitude may have several causes. The
vaccine used could have been defective. During that period it was
difficult to verify what the vaccine actually contained. The vaccine
could have been contaminated with smallpox virus and actually caused
epidemics. Or vaccine critics may have been correct in asserting that
Jenner's cowpox vaccine, which is essentially the same vaccine used
today, simply did not work to prevent smallpox."
Copyright 2009 Holistic Pediatric Association
Peter Bowditch
>Meaning you can't cite a single source of published science to back up
>your bogus claims about vaccine effectiveness or safety.
Would PubMed do as a single source?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
Search for "vaccine safety"
Results: 1 to 20 of 7879
Search for "vaccine efficacy"
Results: 1 to 20 of 14143
--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
tools
would put that kind of money on a NG argument. You sir are an idiot. As
to my integrity, it's just fine. Your opinion of it is worthless, like
you. You are an ass who comes to an Alternative NG everyday to try to do
harm to Alternative Medicine. I have less use for people like you than
the dog shit that sticks to the bottom of my shoe.
tools
> "tools" <too...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:f4Wdndv9IdRvM5nW...@giganews.com...
>> Peter B wrote:
>>> "tools" <too...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:c92dnbfju9qqZp7W...@giganews.com...
>>>> dr_jeff wrote:
>>>>> Jan Drew wrote:
>>>>>> http://www.naturalnews.com/z027372_mercury_flu_shot_vaccines.html
>>>>> Copyrighted material deleted.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what? What percentage of the mercury in a woman's body comes
>>>>> from vaccines? 0.1% or so? What about the mercury in fish, in the
>>>>> air from coal-burning power plants, etc.? Wouldn't you be fore
>>>>> effective if you lobbied against these rather than life-saving
>>>>> vaccines?
>>>> Putz.
>>> Take that as a compliment Dr. Jeff, he says he knowingly lies alot.
>>> :)
>> Um, Petey, do you know what a "Putz" is?
>
> Yes, but as a liar your word never means what it says. Get it?
>
tools
tools
PeterB - Original
> PeterB - Original <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Meaning you can't cite a single source of published science to
> >back up your bogus claims about vaccine effectiveness or
> >safety.
>
> Would PubMed do as a single source?
Pubmed is not a source, it's a resource. You should cite particular
studies within that resource on which your opinions are based.
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
>
> Search for "vaccine safety"
>
> Results: 1 to 20 of 7879
As has been explained to you many times, a keyword search result does
not mean the study is favorable to your position, it just means that
your word string is found somewhere in the text. In this case, you
didn't even perform your query on the term "vaccine safety," so your
result included articles where those two words show up in any order or
even paragraphs apart. Using your method, I can prove the hazards of
vaccine by merely doing a search on "vaccine risk" and producing well
over 16,000 results. I know you won't answer honestly, but do you
accept this much larger search result is proof of the hazards of
vaccines -- Yes or No?
> Search for "vaccine efficacy"
>
> Results: 1 to 20 of 14143
See above.
Peter B
ROTFLOL!! Sticks to the bottom of your shoes, eh? Live in a dog pound,
caretaker of a pooch pound? Or is that your typical trailer trash
thoroughfare. ;)
Whether or not I'm a sucker for putting up a bet, or an idiot, I never
lost my integrity nor do I have to rescue my self sullied name or
reputation. Call me more names, whatever, the onus is on you. As to ng
harm? you tout yourself as a homie, and now are known as a lying self
centered homie without integrity, honor or reputation. I would consider
that far more harmful than someone who would come in here and spread a
little truth about your lies.
Peter B
BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You are still ever the liar, thanks for coming out of the closet.
Jan Drew
> http://www.naturalnews.com/z027372_mercury_flu_shot_vaccines.html
>
> Profit Drive Swine Flu Propaganda - Pump Up the Volume - Part VI
> by Evelyn Pringle, health freedom writer
>
> (NaturalNews) This article is part five in a six-part series. Be sure
> to read part five athttp://www.naturalnews.com/027363_a...
>
> Most American are unaware that flu vaccines still contain thimerosal
> and that to avoid mercury, they have to ask for mercury-free shots. On
> November 13, 2007, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ran the headline:
> "Most flu shots contain mercury, but few know it."
>
> Thimerosal consists of 49.6% ethyl mercury. The Environmental
> Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration have not set an
> exposure limit for ethyl mercury.
>
> "The federal agencies have, however, set exposure limits for another
> organic and closely related form of mercury, methyl mercury - the type
> that comes from coal-fired power plants and is found in fish," the
> Journal said. "They use that standard when estimating the safety of
> ethyl mercury."
>
> "A typical 0.5 milliliter flu shot contains 25 micrograms - or 50,000
> parts per billion - of mercury," the Journal reported.
>
> "The EPA classifies a liquid with 200 parts per billion of mercury as
> hazardous waste," it advised. "The limit for drinking water is 2 parts
> per billion."
>
> Using the standards set for methyl mercury consumption, "an average
> 130-pound person getting the flu shot would exceed the daily limit by
> more than four times," the Journal reported.
>
> "A 22-pound baby would get more than 25 times the amount of mercury
> considered safe," it said.
>
> "Mercury is among the most toxic heavy metals and is known to poison
> the central nervous system, liver, gastrointestinal tract and other
> systems in the body," the Journal reported.
>
> When the influenza vaccines "are injected into pregnant woman and
> infants as young as six months, those vaccines contain 50,000 ppb
> mercury," warns Deirdre Imus in a November 19, 2007, Huffington Post
> article titled, "Over Medicated and Over-Vaccinated: The Unintended
> Consequence of Medicines Meant to Protect."
>
> This amount of mercury is 250 times higher than hazardous waste, she
> notes, and, according to EPA guidelines, this amount can only be
> considered safe if a person weighs 550 pounds. "Even trace amounts of
> mercury in vaccines can be anywhere from 600 to 2000 ppb," she
> advises.
>
> People need to ask for a thimerosal-free vaccine if they want it,
> health officials told the Journal. "But many people aren't aware that
> mercury is in the flu shot," the Journal found.
>
> "I didn't know," said Kate Strzok, a 23-year-old Oak Creek woman, as
> she walked out of the Piggly Wiggly where she had just gotten the flu
> shot. "Interesting that they don't tell you."
>
> PutChildrenFirst.org, a parent-led organization advocating for vaccine
> safety, announced the results of a survey on November 13, 2006,
> conducted during October 27-30, 2006, by Zogby International of over
> 9,000 Americans, to learn their plans for getting flu shots, their
> knowledge of its ingredients, and who they held responsible for making
> sure vaccines are safe.
>
> The survey showed that an overwhelming majority of Americans were
> unaware that most flu shots contained mercury. After learning that
> mercury was an ingredient, 74% of those polled said they were less
> likely to get a flu shot and 86% of parents said they were less likely
> to allow their children to get a shot.
>
> "The survey reveals that Americans are overwhelmingly in the dark
> about what is in most flu shots," said Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN, president
> of SafeMinds, a nonprofit organization committed to ending mercury-
> induced neurological disorders, in a press release.
>
> "They do not want a known neurotoxin injected into their children, and
> they believe Congress and medical professionals must be more vigilant
> about keeping vaccines safe and mercury-free," she advised.
>
> "With everything we know about the dangers of mercury and the havoc it
> can wreak on young, developing brains," she said, "there is no excuse
> for any vaccine to contain mercury."
>
> Lisa Handley is a founding parent of PutChildrenFirst whose son had an
> adverse reaction to a flu shot with mercury in 2003. "I know firsthand
> how life-changing a flu shot with mercury can be, since our son began
> his regression into autism after his flu shot," she stated in the
> press release.
>
> Damning Reports
> On October 5, 2009, the Maternal & Child Health Bureau of Health
> Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and
> Human Services released a study evaluating the number of children in
> the US who currently have a Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnosis,
> titled, "The Prevalence of Parent-Reported Diagnosis of Autism
> Spectrum Disorder among Children in the United States, 2007."
>
> The study evaluated data from a national Survey of Children's Health
> and found that 1 in 91 children between the ages of 3 and 17 currently
> carry an ASD diagnosis.
>
> "Even more alarming, for the subset of children between ages 6 and 14
> immunized during the 1990's the prevalence is actually 1 in 71
> children with an autism diagnosis," Age of Autism reports.
>
> "This age group represents children in the U.S. with the highest
> exposure to thimerosal, the mercury preservative routinely used until
> CDC, AAP and industry recommended its removal "as soon as possible"
> from all childhood vaccines," AoA advises.
>
> "We are especially alarmed by these findings because the seasonal
> influenza and H1N1 vaccines contain mercury well in excess of EPA safe
> exposure guidelines," said Theresa Wrangham, president of SafeMinds,
> in a statement to President Obama calling for a ban on mercury in
> vaccines given to pregnant women and young children.
>
> Another new study found that giving Hepatitis B vaccine to newborn
> boys may triple the risk of developing an autism spectrum disorder. An
> abstract of the study was published in the September, 2009 "Annals of
> Epidemiology" journal. "Boys who received the hepatitis B vaccine
> during the first month of life had 2.94 greater odds for ASD compared
> to later - or unvaccinated boys," wrote Carolyn Gallagher and Melody
> Goodman of the graduate program in public health at Stony Brook
> University Medical Center in New York.
>
> On September 30, 2009, Age of Autism Editor-at-Large, Mark Blaxill,
> reported on a new study in the journal "Neurotoxicology," by a
> research team led by scientists from the University of Pittsburgh and
> Thoughtful House, that found exposure to a birth dose of a hepatitis B
> vaccine that included thimerosal caused significant delays in the
> development of several survival reflexes in male rhesus macaque
> monkeys.
>
> "In the first safety study of its kind of the hepatitis vaccine birth
> dose, the researchers showed that male macaques vaccinated at birth
> with a hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) took more than twice as long as
> unexposed macaques to acquire three standardized skills typically used
> to measure infant brain development," Blaxill wrote.
>
> The study showed vaccinated monkeys learned more slowly to (1) turn
> their head in response to a brush on the cheek (root reflex); (2) open
> their mouth in response to a brush on the forehead (snout reflex); and
> (3) suck on a nipple placed in their mouth (suck reflex). The
> researchers found the unvaccinated monkeys developed normally.
>
> The study is part of a larger research program looking at the safety
> of the vaccine schedule in children from birth to age four.
>
> Dr Andrew Wakefield, Executive Director of Thoughtful House, and a co-
> investigator of the project, told Age of Autism that he found it
> particularly concerning "that in spite of the recommendation to remove
> thimerosal from vaccines a decade ago, millions of people, many of
> them children and pregnant mothers, are about to get mercury in their
> shots."
>
> A 2006 study in the "Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons," by
> Dr David Ayoub and Dr F Edward Yazback, titled, Influenza Vaccinations
> During Pregnancy: A Critical Assessment of the Recommendations of the
> Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), states:
>
> "The ACIP policy recommendation of routinely administering influenza
> vaccine during pregnancy is ill-advised and unsupported by current
> scientific literature, and it should be withdrawn. Use of thimerosal
> during pregnancy should be contraindicated."
>
> "Because the benefits of influenza vaccination during pregnancy appear
> lacking, a safety-benefit analysis should not tolerate any risk to
> vaccine recipients or their offspring, even at a theoretical level,"
> the doctors conclude.
>
> Back on February 28, 2005, the Associated Press reported that lower
> "IQ levels linked to mercury exposure in the womb costs the United
> States $8.7 billion a year in lost earnings potential," citing a study
> by researchers at New York's Mount Sinai hospital published in the
> journal, "Environmental Health Perspectives."
>
> The Mount Sinai Center for Children's Health and the Environment
> combined a number of previous studies to determine hundreds of
> thousands of babies are born every year with lower IQ associated with
> mercury exposure.
>
> Lead researcher and pediatician, Leonard Trasande, reported that
> annually between 316,588 and 637,233 infants are born with umbilical
> cord blood mercury levels linked to IQ loss.
>
> As an example, Dr Trasande said, each year about 4% of babies are with
> blood mercury levels between 7.13 and 15 micrograms per liter. That
> level of mercury causes an IQ loss of 1.6 points, the researchers
> concluded.
>
> A 1.6 point drop could cost a person more than $31,000 in potential
> earnings over a lifetime due to missed educational opportunities or
> jobs, the study calculated. The researchers found the IQ losses linked
> to mercury ranged from one-fifth of an IQ point to as much as 24
> points.
>
> "The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that about 8 percent of
> American women of childbearing age have enough mercury in their blood
> to put a fetus at risk," the Associated Press noted.
Peter B
===================================================
A very unscientific self serving article accepted by dopes and agenda
oriented idiots.
Here is a clue for you. Indians died in America due to smallpox on
blankets. Alaskans died of the common cold spread via normal
interactions. My guess it you are too stupid to understand why and what
the association is.
Peter B
WOW, a PKB? I think so!
You called someone a putz, then "scum "calles" me names" All because I
said you were a liar? Talk about hypersensitivity, you were the one who
was all proud about doing that a few posts ago. Can you say major
hypocrite? I think SO!
Are you hurt? Obviously. Why? shrugs, who knows? You seemed to rather
enjoy reveling in your hatred and disgust for those that have more than
you, especially when it comes to integrity in spite of being a self
proclaimed liar and proud of it.
Get out of the gutter and your shoes won't be covered with feces all the
time.
Peter B
Such a poor hack job that the attributions as all screwed up, brilliant,
donkey breath.
Peter B
news:0f5235b7-6561-455b...@a31g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 17, 8:49�pm, Jan Drew <jdrew63...@aol.com> wrote:
> http://www.naturalnews.com/z027372_mercury_flu_shot_vaccines.html
>
t
district.
> Whether or not I'm a sucker for putting up a bet, or an idiot, I never
> lost my integrity nor do I have to rescue my self sullied name or
> reputation. Call me more names, whatever, the onus is on you. As to ng
> harm? you tout yourself as a homie, and now are known as a lying self
> centered homie without integrity, honor or reputation. I would consider
> that far more harmful than someone who would come in here and spread a
> little truth about your lies.
>
Since you are a "believer", what you "think" matters little, as by
"believing", you have shown that you do not "think".
t
t
Peter B
"t" <too...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:06-dnZ5iHcw0l5vW...@giganews.com...
You just showed your ignorance, no one is surprised. :(
Peter B
"t" <too...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:06-dnZtiHcx_lpvW...@giganews.com...
So embarrassed you reverted on your nym? lol
PeterB - Original
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:8691f333-577f-408d...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
Is that why you cannot cite published science on vaccine safety?
Don't tell me: your belief in magic beans, I mean vaccine, requires
no evidence. But we knew that, didn't we?
> Here is a clue for you. Indians died in America due to smallpox on
> blankets. Alaskans died of the common cold spread via normal
> interactions. My guess it you are too stupid to understand why and
> what the association is.
Here is a clue for you. How or when infectious diseases have spread
is irrelevant. If you cannot cite published science on vaccine
safety, your promotion of vaccine is based on personal faith, not
science.
t
t
point? Here is the bottom line, I am better than you. I am healthier
than you, stronger than you, I will live longer than you. You are a
nasty, old, worn, willfully ignorant boob. >
PeterB - Original
<chirp>
PeterB - Original
Silence = No Proof of Claim.
Peter B
=====================================================
Thanks, that was pure proof of your unwillingness to discuss freely, to
think about thoughts other than your own, and total disregard for others
due to you self serving agenda's that you use to shill products for
profit.
Nothing I said here had anything to do with faith, or personal faith. It
had to do with science and deductive reasoning. You missed the ball on
all counts. You copy others writing styles since you lack your own, you
cut n paste garbage posting it as your own, thus proving you are a total
fraud..
Of course there is one other alternative to you inability to reason out
my free clue. That is?
You are dumber than a rock.
Peter B
"PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cf96981-2441-400b...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
<chirp>
========================================================
The sound of a Dodo bird.
Peter B
Since you are a self confessed liar, I find it hard to believe anything
you wrote here. Especially since I know my condition and you don't.
t
Crawl back under you rock. Or to put in terms you can understand, get
thee behind me Satan.
Peter B
Funny, a self-confessed liar calling me Satan. LOL.
Well, not that you are a being of your word, but get thee gone, stop
dawging.
PeterB - Original
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:4cf96981-2441-400b...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
> <chirp>
> ========================================================
> The sound of a Dodo bird.
IOW, you have nothing in response to the point made that vaccine
safety isn't provable using the method described. Thanks for proving
it.
Peter B
======================================================
Nope, I didn't pretend anything, nor do I make the mating sounds of a
Dodo bird. You can pretend all that you will, it won't change one thing.
How about you and Janet performing a duet, and post it to YouTube, call
yourselves the shrieking sista's.
PeterB - Original
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:89a51eb7-d7a9-42e6...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 20, 9:31 pm, "Peter B" <origin...@frag.com> wrote:
>
> > "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:4cf96981-2441-400b...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > <chirp>
> > ========================================================
> > The sound of a Dodo bird.
>
> IOW, you have nothing in response to the point made that vaccine
> safety isn't provable using the method described. Thanks for proving
> it.
> ======================================================
Fraudian slip. I never used the word "pretend."
, nor do I make the mating sounds of a
> Dodo bird. You can pretend all that you will, it won't change one thing.
No proof of vaccine safety then. Proving you're a fraud and a con.
> How about you and Janet performing a duet, and post it to YouTube, call
> yourselves the shrieking sista's.
Let us know when you find an argument.
Peter B
=======================================================
There has been tons of articles on the subject, you refused to look them
up. You are also evidence of their saftey, many years of taking vaccines
and yet you are still here like millions of others.
Let me know when you are no longer a hypocrite. K?
PeterB - Original
> "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1099d76a-b05e-482d...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 22, 1:15 am, "Peter B" <origin...@frag.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:89a51eb7-d7a9-42e6...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
> > On Nov 20, 9:31 pm, "Peter B" <origin...@frag.com> wrote:
>
> > > "PeterB - Original" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:4cf96981-2441-400b...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > <chirp>
> > > ========================================================
> > > The sound of a Dodo bird.
>
> > IOW, you have nothing in response to the point made that vaccine
> > safety isn't provable using the method described. Thanks for proving
> > it.
> > ======================================================
> > Nope, I didn't pretend anything...
>
> Fraudian slip. I never used the word "pretend."
>
> , nor do I make the mating sounds of a
>
> > Dodo bird. You can pretend all that you will, it won't change one
> > thing.
>
> No proof of vaccine safety then. Proving you're a fraud and a con.
>
> > How about you and Janet performing a duet, and post it to YouTube,
> > call
> > yourselves the shrieking sista's.
>
> Let us know when you find an argument.
> =======================================================
Don't believe everything you read. Just because it's written down
somewhere doesn't make it true. Like your word "perfunctionary."
Remember?
, you refused to look them
> up. You are also evidence of their saftey, many years of taking vaccines...
No, I said I had NOT taken vaccine for many years. Compared to most
people in a First World nation, in fact, I've had far less than my
"fair share."
> and yet you are still here like millions of others.
Adverse side effects to a medication is not confined to mortality.
> Let me know when you are no longer a hypocrite. K?
Hypocrites are inconsistent. Idiots are incoherent. Sorry, but I'm
consistent and you're an Idiot.
Peter B
======================================================
Its my word? If it got its idea across properly then it works. Now as to
your crap above that, and my word,
you have just given solid evidence of why any document citing to you is
worthless. It is rather like throwing pearls to pigs. You set yourself
up as the god of reason and are unwilling to learn, understand, or care
about the truth until someone crams it down your chicken throat.
Scientific of non-scientific is all the same to you. That is why
ignorance appears to win every time. The idiot dwells in his/her folly
and there is no reality outside their slop.
, you refused to look them
> up. You are also evidence of their saftey, many years of taking
> vaccines...
No, I said I had NOT taken vaccine for many years. Compared to most
people in a First World nation, in fact, I've had far less than my
"fair share."
======================================================
But you had more than enough to prove my point.
> and yet you are still here like millions of others.
Adverse side effects to a medication is not confined to mortality.
=====================================================
LOL, how to say something when you want to say nothing? ROTFLOL
> Let me know when you are no longer a hypocrite. K?
Hypocrites are inconsistent. Idiots are incoherent. Sorry, but I'm
consistent and you're an Idiot.
=====================================================
No, you are a hypocrite AND an idiot. See my reply to you above, and
don't ever bother to ask for a cite from anyone ever again. Stupid is as
stupid does and that is your world. ;)
Jan Drew
> Jan Drew wrote:
> >http://www.naturalnews.com/z027372_mercury_flu_shot_vaccines.html
>
> Copyrighted material deleted.
ZZzz.
Restored:
http://www.naturalnews.com/z027372_mercury_flu_shot_vaccines.html
Profit Drive Swine Flu Propaganda - Pump Up the Volume - Part VI
by Evelyn Pringle, health freedom writer
(NaturalNews) This article is part five in a six-part series. Be sure
to read part five at http://www.naturalnews.com/027363_a...
Most American are unaware that flu vaccines still contain thimerosal
and that to avoid mercury, they have to ask for mercury-free shots.
On
November 13, 2007, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ran the headline:
"Most flu shots contain mercury, but few know it."
Thimerosal consists of 49.6% ethyl mercury. The Environmental
Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration have not set an
exposure limit for ethyl mercury.
"The federal agencies have, however, set exposure limits for another
organic and closely related form of mercury, methyl mercury - the
type
that comes from coal-fired power plants and is found in fish," the
Journal said. "They use that standard when estimating the safety of
ethyl mercury."
"A typical 0.5 milliliter flu shot contains 25 micrograms - or 50,000
parts per billion - of mercury," the Journal reported.
"The EPA classifies a liquid with 200 parts per billion of mercury as
hazardous waste," it advised. "The limit for drinking water is 2
parts
per billion."
Using the standards set for methyl mercury consumption, "an average
130-pound person getting the flu shot would exceed the daily limit by
more than four times," the Journal reported.
"A 22-pound baby would get more than 25 times the amount of mercury
considered safe," it said.
"Mercury is among the most toxic heavy metals and is known to poison
the central nervous system, liver, gastrointestinal tract and other
systems in the body," the Journal reported.
When the influenza vaccines "are injected into pregnant woman and
infants as young as six months, those vaccines contain 50,000 ppb
mercury," warns Deirdre Imus in a November 19, 2007, Huffington Post
article titled, "Over Medicated and Over-Vaccinated: The Unintended
Consequence of Medicines Meant to Protect."
This amount of mercury is 250 times higher than hazardous waste, she
notes, and, according to EPA guidelines, this amount can only be
considered safe if a person weighs 550 pounds. "Even trace amounts of
mercury in vaccines can be anywhere from 600 to 2000 ppb," she
advises.
People need to ask for a thimerosal-free vaccine if they want it,
health officials told the Journal. "But many people aren't aware that
mercury is in the flu shot," the Journal found.
"I didn't know," said Kate Strzok, a 23-year-old Oak Creek woman, as
she walked out of the Piggly Wiggly where she had just gotten the flu
shot. "Interesting that they don't tell you."
PutChildrenFirst.org, a parent-led organization advocating for
vaccine
safety, announced the results of a survey on November 13, 2006,
conducted during October 27-30, 2006, by Zogby International of over
9,000 Americans, to learn their plans for getting flu shots, their
knowledge of its ingredients, and who they held responsible for
making
sure vaccines are safe.
The survey showed that an overwhelming majority of Americans were
unaware that most flu shots contained mercury. After learning that
mercury was an ingredient, 74% of those polled said they were less
likely to get a flu shot and 86% of parents said they were less
likely
to allow their children to get a shot.
"The survey reveals that Americans are overwhelmingly in the dark
about what is in most flu shots," said Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN,
president
of SafeMinds, a nonprofit organization committed to ending mercury-
induced neurological disorders, in a press release.
"They do not want a known neurotoxin injected into their children,
and
they believe Congress and medical professionals must be more vigilant
about keeping vaccines safe and mercury-free," she advised.
"With everything we know about the dangers of mercury and the havoc
it
can wreak on young, developing brains," she said, "there is no excuse
for any vaccine to contain mercury."
Lisa Handley is a founding parent of PutChildrenFirst whose son had
an
adverse reaction to a flu shot with mercury in 2003. "I know
firsthand
how life-changing a flu shot with mercury can be, since our son began
his regression into autism after his flu shot," she stated in the
press release.
Damning Reports
On October 5, 2009, the Maternal & Child Health Bureau of Health
Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and
Human Services released a study evaluating the number of children in
the US who currently have a Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnosis,
titled, "The Prevalence of Parent-Reported Diagnosis of Autism
Spectrum Disorder among Children in the United States, 2007."
The study evaluated data from a national Survey of Children's Health
and found that 1 in 91 children between the ages of 3 and 17
currently
carry an ASD diagnosis.
"Even more alarming, for the subset of children between ages 6 and 14
immunized during the 1990's the prevalence is actually 1 in 71
children with an autism diagnosis," Age of Autism reports.
"This age group represents children in the U.S. with the highest
exposure to thimerosal, the mercury preservative routinely used until
CDC, AAP and industry recommended its removal "as soon as possible"
from all childhood vaccines," AoA advises.
"We are especially alarmed by these findings because the seasonal
influenza and H1N1 vaccines contain mercury well in excess of EPA
safe
exposure guidelines," said Theresa Wrangham, president of SafeMinds,
in a statement to President Obama calling for a ban on mercury in
vaccines given to pregnant women and young children.
Another new study found that giving Hepatitis B vaccine to newborn
boys may triple the risk of developing an autism spectrum disorder.
An
abstract of the study was published in the September, 2009 "Annals of
Epidemiology" journal. "Boys who received the hepatitis B vaccine
during the first month of life had 2.94 greater odds for ASD compared
to later - or unvaccinated boys," wrote Carolyn Gallagher and Melody
Goodman of the graduate program in public health at Stony Brook
University Medical Center in New York.
On September 30, 2009, Age of Autism Editor-at-Large, Mark Blaxill,
reported on a new study in the journal "Neurotoxicology," by a
research team led by scientists from the University of Pittsburgh and
Thoughtful House, that found exposure to a birth dose of a hepatitis
B
vaccine that included thimerosal caused significant delays in the
development of several survival reflexes in male rhesus macaque
monkeys.
"In the first safety study of its kind of the hepatitis vaccine birth
dose, the researchers showed that male macaques vaccinated at birth
with a hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) took more than twice as long as
unexposed macaques to acquire three standardized skills typically
used
to measure infant brain development," Blaxill wrote.
The study showed vaccinated monkeys learned more slowly to (1) turn
their head in response to a brush on the cheek (root reflex); (2)
open
their mouth in response to a brush on the forehead (snout reflex);
and
(3) suck on a nipple placed in their mouth (suck reflex). The
researchers found the unvaccinated monkeys developed normally.
The study is part of a larger research program looking at the safety
of the vaccine schedule in children from birth to age four.
Dr Andrew Wakefield, Executive Director of Thoughtful House, and a
co-
investigator of the project, told Age of Autism that he found it
particularly concerning "that in spite of the recommendation to
remove
thimerosal from vaccines a decade ago, millions of people, many of
them children and pregnant mothers, are about to get mercury in their
shots."
A 2006 study in the "Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons," by
Dr David Ayoub and Dr F Edward Yazback, titled, Influenza
Vaccinations
During Pregnancy: A Critical Assessment of the Recommendations of the
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), states:
"The ACIP policy recommendation of routinely administering influenza
vaccine during pregnancy is ill-advised and unsupported by current
scientific literature, and it should be withdrawn. Use of thimerosal
during pregnancy should be contraindicated."
"Because the benefits of influenza vaccination during pregnancy
appear
lacking, a safety-benefit analysis should not tolerate any risk to
vaccine recipients or their offspring, even at a theoretical level,"
the doctors conclude.
Back on February 28, 2005, the Associated Press reported that lower
"IQ levels linked to mercury exposure in the womb costs the United
States $8.7 billion a year in lost earnings potential," citing a
study
by researchers at New York's Mount Sinai hospital published in the
journal, "Environmental Health Perspectives."
The Mount Sinai Center for Children's Health and the Environment
combined a number of previous studies to determine hundreds of
thousands of babies are born every year with lower IQ associated with
mercury exposure.
Lead researcher and pediatician, Leonard Trasande, reported that
annually between 316,588 and 637,233 infants are born with umbilical
cord blood mercury levels linked to IQ loss.
As an example, Dr Trasande said, each year about 4% of babies are
with
blood mercury levels between 7.13 and 15 micrograms per liter. That
level of mercury causes an IQ loss of 1.6 points, the researchers
concluded.
A 1.6 point drop could cost a person more than $31,000 in potential
earnings over a lifetime due to missed educational opportunities or
jobs, the study calculated. The researchers found the IQ losses
linked
to mercury ranged from one-fifth of an IQ point to as much as 24
points.
"The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that about 8 percent
of
American women of childbearing age have enough mercury in their blood
to put a fetus at risk," the Associated Press noted.
Peter B
> NOT dr_jeff <u...@msu.edu> wrote:
>> Jan Drew wrote:
>> >http://www.naturalnews.com/z027372_mercury_flu_shot_vaccines.html
>>
>> Copyrighted material deleted.
>
> ZZzz.
>
> Restored:
>
Copyrighted material deleted