Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Governor Sanford SHATTERS Obama 'Gay' Candidate
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Dänk 42Ø
May 9, 2013, 3:29:06 AM5/9/13
to
On Wed, 08 May 2013 22:52:57 -0700, JohnJohnsn wrote:
> On May 8, 10:15 pm, some leftard quacked:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:21:29 -0700, JohnJohnsn wrote:
>>
>>> On May 8, 10:50 am, some leftard quacked:
>>
>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 08:46:46 -0700, JohnJohnsn wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 8, 10:17 am, some leftard quacked:
>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:05:41 -0700, JohnJohnsn wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On May 8, 4:33 am, BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com> raved:
>>
>>>>>>>> In a sharp rebuke to queer marriage, here in SC former Governour
>>>>>>>> Sanford landslided past a dyke. Obama had campaigned and promised
>>>>>>>> a gay win but Charlestown voters unanimously rejected perverts.
>>
>>>>>>> Sanford's Democrat opponent, Elizabeth Colbert Busch, is
>>>>>>> pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-big union, pro-gun control,
>>>>>>> and is the sister of political TV show host Stephen Colbert.
>>
>>>>>> Only half those statements are false, which for you is doing pretty
>>>>>> good.
>>
>>>>> You need to take that up with the source, quack; South Carolinian
>>>>> William H. Sloan:
>>
>>>>> In Sanford vs. Colbert Busch, I Could Hold My Nose No Longer and
>>>>> Voted Green
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> In the debate with Sanford last week, Colbert Busch confirmed her
>>>>> full support of the liberal agenda: She's pro-abortion, pro-gay
>>>>> marriage, pro-big union, and she also seems to be pro-gun control.
>>>>> These are things neither I nor a majority of people in Summerville
>>>>> or the rest of the district support. Sadly, she seems nothing more
>>>>> than a woman of slogans who is blindly for jobs. In addition, if she
>>>>> is elected in 2014, she would vote for Nancy Pelosi for House
>>>>> speaker. Therefore, she deserves no consideration of my vote. [...]
>>>>>http://news.yahoo.com/sanford-vs-colbert-busch-could-hold-nose-
no-160700420.html
>>
>>>> Some moronic hack writing a hit piece?
>>
>>> Poor old Lyin' Socialist Weasel quack: too stupid to realize that he
>>> just described the article's author, William H. Sloan, a dyed-in-the-
>>> wool registered Democrat lawyer from Summerville SC, as a "moronic
>>> hack". <chuckle> :)
>>
>> Do you think I'm a Democrat, or that I would give a flying fuck what
>> this Sloan calls himself?
>>
> Well, quack; since for years now you've labeled yourself as a "Lyin'
> Socialist Weasel" and the Democrat Party is the closest to being the
> party of socialists capable of actually winning at the polls (Bernie
> Sanders excepted, of course), why would _anyone_ believe that you aren't
> a Democrat voter?
>>
>>>> Sounds like your cuppa tea, Big Pig. I'm sure you're a better man
>>>> for clinging to it.
>>
>>> Sloan is one of yours, quack, so in effect you are calling yourself a
>>> "moronic hack;" a Freudian Slip of a size proportional to your own:
>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/quack
>>
>> The man is writing drivel. That makes him one of yours.
>>
> Well, quack; since he voted Green Party he sounds more like you
> personally.
I voted for the Green Candidate in 2008. Not that I subscribe to ultra-
left Green ideology myself, but the Libertarian Party lost my respect
when it ran "former" Republican (a Reagan-era drug warrior) Bob Barr as
its candidate. (The LP ran another "former" Republican, Gary Johnson, in
2012, so they've lost my vote forever!)
The Green candidate (Cynthia McKinney) opposed the TARP bailout (Senator
Barack Hussein Obama [D-IL] and 38 of his Democrap colleagues voted for
it). Ms. McKinney also continued to demand Emperor Bush's impeachment
even after Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Democraps moved impeachment off
the table to make room for a more important farm subsidy bill. So she
got my vote! (Interestingly, though quack HAD been fiercely demanding
Emperor Bush's impeachment, he suddenly changed his position when the
Democraps changed theirs. My own position did not change.)
Oh, and quack cannot (legally) vote at all, since he is not a U.S.
citizen. Almost 100% of his posts (cut and pasted, but sometimes the few
words he is able to compose in his drug-addled brain) are bleating pro-
Democrat and rabidly anti-Republican. Greens are completely irrelevant
to him, a "wasted" vote.
>>>>> Now, quack: are you man enough to issue a public apology?
>>
>> Oh, you must be the clown we ran off a couple of years ago. He was big
>> on demanding apologies without any sane reason, too.
>>
> Don't know who you're talking about here, quacked: I've been a "tenant"
of
> T.P.G. for more tht twenty years now -- never left here.
I'm posting from alt.society.liberalism, and while quack may respond to
messages crossposted to talk.politics.guns, all the posts originating
from him (almost all of them cut and pasted from other sources) are
crossposted to the alt.fan.rush-limbaugh group. quack is obsessed with
the fat fool, crossing the line between ordinary political differences
into serious mental illness.
Oh, and quack will ***NEVER*** apologize for anything! He has accused me
of lying on so many occasions, and nothing from credible citations to
personal tourist photographs will persuade him otherwise. He is such a
fuckin' tard that I should not even be wasting my valuable time
responding to his schizophrenic paranoia. Your mistake is responding to
him -- no matter how much you think you are insulting him -- because this
just feeds his delusions of grandeur and narcissism.
> On May 8, 10:15 pm, some leftard quacked:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:21:29 -0700, JohnJohnsn wrote:
>>
>>> On May 8, 10:50 am, some leftard quacked:
>>
>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 08:46:46 -0700, JohnJohnsn wrote:
>>
>>>>> On May 8, 10:17 am, some leftard quacked:
>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:05:41 -0700, JohnJohnsn wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On May 8, 4:33 am, BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com> raved:
>>
>>>>>>>> In a sharp rebuke to queer marriage, here in SC former Governour
>>>>>>>> Sanford landslided past a dyke. Obama had campaigned and promised
>>>>>>>> a gay win but Charlestown voters unanimously rejected perverts.
>>
>>>>>>> Sanford's Democrat opponent, Elizabeth Colbert Busch, is
>>>>>>> pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-big union, pro-gun control,
>>>>>>> and is the sister of political TV show host Stephen Colbert.
>>
>>>>>> Only half those statements are false, which for you is doing pretty
>>>>>> good.
>>
>>>>> You need to take that up with the source, quack; South Carolinian
>>>>> William H. Sloan:
>>
>>>>> In Sanford vs. Colbert Busch, I Could Hold My Nose No Longer and
>>>>> Voted Green
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> In the debate with Sanford last week, Colbert Busch confirmed her
>>>>> full support of the liberal agenda: She's pro-abortion, pro-gay
>>>>> marriage, pro-big union, and she also seems to be pro-gun control.
>>>>> These are things neither I nor a majority of people in Summerville
>>>>> or the rest of the district support. Sadly, she seems nothing more
>>>>> than a woman of slogans who is blindly for jobs. In addition, if she
>>>>> is elected in 2014, she would vote for Nancy Pelosi for House
>>>>> speaker. Therefore, she deserves no consideration of my vote. [...]
>>>>>http://news.yahoo.com/sanford-vs-colbert-busch-could-hold-nose-
no-160700420.html
>>
>>>> Some moronic hack writing a hit piece?
>>
>>> Poor old Lyin' Socialist Weasel quack: too stupid to realize that he
>>> just described the article's author, William H. Sloan, a dyed-in-the-
>>> wool registered Democrat lawyer from Summerville SC, as a "moronic
>>> hack". <chuckle> :)
>>
>> Do you think I'm a Democrat, or that I would give a flying fuck what
>> this Sloan calls himself?
>>
> Well, quack; since for years now you've labeled yourself as a "Lyin'
> Socialist Weasel" and the Democrat Party is the closest to being the
> party of socialists capable of actually winning at the polls (Bernie
> Sanders excepted, of course), why would _anyone_ believe that you aren't
> a Democrat voter?
>>
>>>> Sounds like your cuppa tea, Big Pig. I'm sure you're a better man
>>>> for clinging to it.
>>
>>> Sloan is one of yours, quack, so in effect you are calling yourself a
>>> "moronic hack;" a Freudian Slip of a size proportional to your own:
>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/quack
>>
>> The man is writing drivel. That makes him one of yours.
>>
> Well, quack; since he voted Green Party he sounds more like you
> personally.
I voted for the Green Candidate in 2008. Not that I subscribe to ultra-
left Green ideology myself, but the Libertarian Party lost my respect
when it ran "former" Republican (a Reagan-era drug warrior) Bob Barr as
its candidate. (The LP ran another "former" Republican, Gary Johnson, in
2012, so they've lost my vote forever!)
The Green candidate (Cynthia McKinney) opposed the TARP bailout (Senator
Barack Hussein Obama [D-IL] and 38 of his Democrap colleagues voted for
it). Ms. McKinney also continued to demand Emperor Bush's impeachment
even after Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Democraps moved impeachment off
the table to make room for a more important farm subsidy bill. So she
got my vote! (Interestingly, though quack HAD been fiercely demanding
Emperor Bush's impeachment, he suddenly changed his position when the
Democraps changed theirs. My own position did not change.)
Oh, and quack cannot (legally) vote at all, since he is not a U.S.
citizen. Almost 100% of his posts (cut and pasted, but sometimes the few
words he is able to compose in his drug-addled brain) are bleating pro-
Democrat and rabidly anti-Republican. Greens are completely irrelevant
to him, a "wasted" vote.
>>>>> Now, quack: are you man enough to issue a public apology?
>>
>> Oh, you must be the clown we ran off a couple of years ago. He was big
>> on demanding apologies without any sane reason, too.
>>
> Don't know who you're talking about here, quacked: I've been a "tenant"
of
> T.P.G. for more tht twenty years now -- never left here.
I'm posting from alt.society.liberalism, and while quack may respond to
messages crossposted to talk.politics.guns, all the posts originating
from him (almost all of them cut and pasted from other sources) are
crossposted to the alt.fan.rush-limbaugh group. quack is obsessed with
the fat fool, crossing the line between ordinary political differences
into serious mental illness.
Oh, and quack will ***NEVER*** apologize for anything! He has accused me
of lying on so many occasions, and nothing from credible citations to
personal tourist photographs will persuade him otherwise. He is such a
fuckin' tard that I should not even be wasting my valuable time
responding to his schizophrenic paranoia. Your mistake is responding to
him -- no matter how much you think you are insulting him -- because this
just feeds his delusions of grandeur and narcissism.
David Friedman
May 9, 2013, 1:00:07 PM5/9/13
to
In article <fsWdnUXx6qffzRbM...@earthlink.com>,
I agree with you about Barr, and didn't vote for him. But Gary Johnson,
as best I can tell, was on the libertarian wing of the Republican party,
and about as libertarian as governor as practical.
Do you object to Ron Paul on the grounds that he was elected multiple
times as a Republican?
--
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/
_Salamander_: http://tinyurl.com/6957y7e
_How to Milk an Almond,..._ http://tinyurl.com/63xg8gx
Dänk 42Ø <da...@ak47.com> wrote:
> I voted for the Green Candidate in 2008. Not that I subscribe to ultra-
> left Green ideology myself, but the Libertarian Party lost my respect
> when it ran "former" Republican (a Reagan-era drug warrior) Bob Barr as
> its candidate. (The LP ran another "former" Republican, Gary Johnson, in
> 2012, so they've lost my vote forever!)
I think that's unfair.
> I voted for the Green Candidate in 2008. Not that I subscribe to ultra-
> left Green ideology myself, but the Libertarian Party lost my respect
> when it ran "former" Republican (a Reagan-era drug warrior) Bob Barr as
> its candidate. (The LP ran another "former" Republican, Gary Johnson, in
> 2012, so they've lost my vote forever!)
I agree with you about Barr, and didn't vote for him. But Gary Johnson,
as best I can tell, was on the libertarian wing of the Republican party,
and about as libertarian as governor as practical.
Do you object to Ron Paul on the grounds that he was elected multiple
times as a Republican?
--
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/
_Salamander_: http://tinyurl.com/6957y7e
_How to Milk an Almond,..._ http://tinyurl.com/63xg8gx
0 new messages