14 cops killed (2002) in 'Gun Free' UK
Ivor P. Standing
> >>
> >> 14 officers were killed just in 2002
> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2660885.stm
> >>
> >> You don't know jack shit about your own crime, stop pulling numbers
> >> out of your ass and trying to pass them off as "fact". This isn't the
> >> first time you've shown how little you actually know about UK crime
> >> stat
And this is not the first time that you proved that you are an idiot.
lol. Those 14 cops died in accidents. These facts have as much
relevance to TPG as the number of accountants who were killed on the
job in 2002.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,875317,00.htmlstics.
'Statistics show that road accidents are the greatest threat to
officers on the job. The national police officers roll of honour
recorded 14 deaths in the line of duty last year - 13 officers died in
traffic accidents and one died of natural causes'
betweentheeyes
news:cd1e8a5b.04050...@posting.google.com...<snip>
> lol.<snip> These facts have as much relevance to TPG as the number
> of accountants who were killed on the job in 2002.
Lead pencil poisoning, common killer of Accounts.
New Manufacture and Storage of Lead Pencils Regulations
Note that alot of the Lead Pencils Act is due to be phased out with the
introduction of the Manufacture and Storage of Lead Pencils Regulations
(MSLPR) in late 2002/early 2003 (click here for a press release from the
HSE). Proposals for the new MSLPR can be downloaded from the HSE here. One
interesting point to note for amateur Accountants in the draft proposal:
Lead Pencils not to be manufactured without a licence
9.(1) Subject to paragraph (2), no person shall manufacture Lead Pencils
unless he holds a licence for that manufacture and complies with the
conditions of that licence.
(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to- (a) the manufacture of Lead Pencils
for the purpose of laboratory analysis, testing, demonstration or
experimentation (but not for practical use or sale) where the total quantity
of Lead pencils being manufactured at any time does not exceed 50 grams;
(from page 54 of the pdf downloaded from the HSE)
Update: November 2002
I've recently read somewhere (although I'll be damned if I can remember
where!) that MSLPR is not now likely to be phased in until early 2004.
Johnny Bravo
Standing) wrote:
>>Johnny Bravo <nos...@no.com> wrote in message news:<n7tb90l02t1dnv3bj...@4ax.com>...
>> >>
>> >> 14 officers were killed just in 2002
>> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2660885.stm
>> >>
>> >> You don't know jack shit about your own crime, stop pulling numbers
>> >> out of your ass and trying to pass them off as "fact". This isn't the
>> >> first time you've shown how little you actually know about UK crime
>> >> stat
>
>And this is not the first time that you proved that you are an idiot.
Any particular reason you're running like a girl from the thread you
started and posting this over and over like you have a point? You
claimed 10 cops in 10 years were killed by perps. Proving once again
that you don't know jack shit about your own crime rates.
"And in the last 10 years less than 10 cop deaths have been attributed
to perps, regardless of weaponry." - Ivor P. Standing
Cops killed by perps, regardless of weaponry.
2003 Gerald Walker, Stephen Oake, Ian Nigel Broadhurst
2002 Bryan Reginald Moore, Andrew Carl Munn
2001 Alison Armitage
2000 William Norman Thompson, Jon Odell
1999 Stephen Jones, Raja Basharat Ahmed, Kulwant Singh Sidhu
Was there any particular reason your expert knowledge of crime rates
in your violence plagued country was so inaccurate that you weren't
even half right?
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
Johnny Bravo
Standing) wrote:
>'Statistics show that road accidents are the greatest threat to
>officers on the job. The national police officers roll of honour
>recorded 14 deaths in the line of duty last year - 13 officers died in
>traffic accidents and one died of natural causes'
That isn't what you said yesterday
"Of the 14 dead cops, one was shot, one was stabbed and one was run
over by the perp."
What's the matter you lying coward, can't remember your lies from
one day to the next?
Ivor P. Standing
> On 6 May 2004 03:03:45 -0700, IP_St...@hotmail.com (Ivor P.
> Standing) wrote:
>
> >>Johnny Bravo <nos...@no.com> wrote in message news:<n7tb90l02t1dnv3bj...@4ax.com>...
> >> >>
> >> >> 14 officers were killed just in 2002
> >> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2660885.stm
> >> >>
> >> >> You don't know jack shit about your own crime, stop pulling numbers
> >> >> out of your ass and trying to pass them off as "fact". This isn't the
> >> >> first time you've shown how little you actually know about UK crime
> >> >> stat
> >
> >And this is not the first time that you proved that you are an idiot.
>
> Any particular reason you're running like a girl from the thread you
> started and posting this over and over like you have a point?
When I find an exception idiot I like to share it with the world. So
sue me.
> You
> claimed 10 cops in 10 years were killed by perps. Proving once again
> that you don't know jack shit about your own crime rates.
>
> "And in the last 10 years less than 10 cop deaths have been attributed
> to perps, regardless of weaponry." - Ivor P. Standing
>
> Cops killed by perps, regardless of weaponry.
> 2003 Gerald Walker, Stephen Oake, Ian Nigel Broadhurst
> 2002 Bryan Reginald Moore, Andrew Carl Munn
> 2001 Alison Armitage
> 2000 William Norman Thompson, Jon Odell
> 1999 Stephen Jones, Raja Basharat Ahmed, Kulwant Singh Sidhu
I counted 11 in your list so I was out by one. Whats the matter? Did
the double barrel surnames convince you that there were more people in
your list? lol
> Was there any particular reason your expert knowledge of crime rates
> in your violence plagued country was so inaccurate that you weren't
> even half right?
I was out by 1. How does that translate into not even being 'half
right'? Are you some mathematically challenged moron or something.
Your stupidity is fast becoming irritating as opposed to amusing bud.
If all you are going to do is to blow smoke over how stupid you were
to flame me because you read a misleading headline then we are going
to have a short association.
Johnny Bravo
Standing) wrote:
>> Any particular reason you're running like a girl from the thread you
>> started and posting this over and over like you have a point?
>
>When I find an exception idiot I like to share it with the world. So
>sue me.
You're the exceptional idiot, thanks for sharing that with everyone
over and over, it's quite amusing.
>> You
>> claimed 10 cops in 10 years were killed by perps. Proving once again
>> that you don't know jack shit about your own crime rates.
>>
>> "And in the last 10 years less than 10 cop deaths have been attributed
>> to perps, regardless of weaponry." - Ivor P. Standing
>>
>> Cops killed by perps, regardless of weaponry.
>> 2003 Gerald Walker, Stephen Oake, Ian Nigel Broadhurst
>> 2002 Bryan Reginald Moore, Andrew Carl Munn
>> 2001 Alison Armitage
>> 2000 William Norman Thompson, Jon Odell
>> 1999 Stephen Jones, Raja Basharat Ahmed, Kulwant Singh Sidhu
>
>I counted 11 in your list so I was out by one. Whats the matter? Did
>the double barrel surnames convince you that there were more people in
>your list? lol
The matter is that list covers 5 years, not 10 as you claimed. Or
can you not count to 10 twice over in a single day?
>> Was there any particular reason your expert knowledge of crime rates
>> in your violence plagued country was so inaccurate that you weren't
>> even half right?
>
>I was out by 1.
Over by one and in half the time.
>How does that translate into not even being 'half
>right'? Are you some mathematically challenged moron or something.
11 in 5 years, 22 in 10 years; compared to 10 in 10 years. Feel
free to have someone who actually knows math to explain the obvious to
you and define "half" if needed.
>to flame me because you read a misleading headline then we are going
>to have a short association.
I'm flaming you because you're an idiot who doesn't know anything
about his own crime statistics yet continues to try and impress us
with bullshit passed off as fact.
Ivor P. Standing
> 11 in 5 years, 22 in 10 years
22 in 10 years? You have checked to see that the 22 does not include
cops that choked on their donuts? What am I saying? You're the guy
that cited 14 dead cops in a year without bothering to go past the
headline and check HOW they died.
> I'm flaming you because you're an idiot who doesn't know anything
> about his own crime statistics yet continues to try and impress us
> with bullshit passed off as fact.
Of the 14 'murdered' cops, how many actually died at the hands of
suspects? I can't hear yoooooooo. Thanks for playing bud.
Ivor P. Standing
officers slain in 1998, 63 were shot to death and this does not even
include the ones that were killed by perps in non-gun deaths.
The figures take on an even more horrendous note when you consider
that Brit cops are unarmed.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/29/police.killed/
December 29, 1998
全ince crime began its steady downward slide in 1992, more than 1,100
federal, state and local law enforcement officers have lost their
lives in the performance of duty,' said Craig W. Floyd, chairman of
the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, which compiled
the report with Concerns of Police Survivors.
Johnny Bravo
Standing) wrote:
>And You Guys go on about 50 UK cops killed in 25 years????
The only one going on and on is you, that's because you're not smart
enough to quit when you were ahead. Instead you make stupid comments
about Northern Ireland being in England or Wales and 1999 to 2003
being a 10 year period.
Ivor P. Standing
> On 21 May 2004 07:45:13 -0700, IP_St...@hotmail.com (Ivor P.
> Standing) wrote:
>
> >And You Guys go on about 50 UK cops killed in 25 years????
>
> The only one going on and on is you, that's because you're not smart
> enough to quit when you were ahead. Instead you make stupid comments
> about Northern Ireland being in England or Wales and 1999 to 2003
> being a 10 year period.
Is this the best that you can do bud?
Glenn
Standing) wrote:
>Johnny Bravo <nos...@no.com> wrote in message news:<18cta0dde631vh3kn...@4ax.com>...
>> On 21 May 2004 07:45:13 -0700, IP_St...@hotmail.com (Ivor P.
>> Standing) wrote:
>>
>> >And You Guys go on about 50 UK cops killed in 25 years????
>>
>> The only one going on and on is you, that's because you're not smart
>> enough to quit when you were ahead. Instead you make stupid comments
>> about Northern Ireland being in England or Wales and 1999 to 2003
>> being a 10 year period.
>
>Is this the best that you can do bud?
Looks like he did pretty good!
I am not surprised that you think Northern Ireland is in England or
Wales and 1999 - 2003 is ten years; I am guessing that most of your
education has taken place in front of a television screen.
Johnny Bravo
Standing) wrote:
>Johnny Bravo <nos...@no.com> wrote in message news:<18cta0dde631vh3kn...@4ax.com>...
>> On 21 May 2004 07:45:13 -0700, IP_St...@hotmail.com (Ivor P.
>> Standing) wrote:
>>
>> >And You Guys go on about 50 UK cops killed in 25 years????
>>
>> The only one going on and on is you, that's because you're not smart
>> enough to quit when you were ahead. Instead you make stupid comments
>> about Northern Ireland being in England or Wales and 1999 to 2003
>> being a 10 year period.
>
>Is this the best that you can do bud?
It appears the best you can do.
Ivor P. Standing
> I am guessing that most of your
> education has taken place in front of a television screen.
I suppose that you will be telling me that Deliverance is not
representative of You Guys. And that your cops don't go around abusing
Blacks?
Glenn
Standing) wrote:
>Glenn <ozark...@aol.com> wrote in message news:<l2hua09m5cbltdjuf...@4ax.com>...
>
>> I am guessing that most of your
>> education has taken place in front of a television screen.
>
>I suppose that you will be telling me that Deliverance is not
>representative of You Guys.
LOL
As I commented earlier; your education came by way of television.
>And that your cops don't go around abusing
>Blacks?
http://www.themilitant.com/2003/6743/674304.html
Protesters in England demand
prosecution of killer cops
BRIXTON, England—“What do we want? Justice! When do we want it? Now!”
chanted dozens of people marching through the streets of the London
suburb of Brixton November 22 to protest police racism and brutality.
The demonstration took place on the second anniversary of the killing
of Ricky Bishop, a Black man, while in police custody and after a
recent inquiry that whitewashed the cops.
Ivor P. Standing
> On 23 May 2004 02:33:42 -0700, IP_St...@hotmail.com (Ivor P.
> Standing) wrote:
>
> >Glenn <ozark...@aol.com> wrote in message news:<l2hua09m5cbltdjuf...@4ax.com>...
> >
> >> I am guessing that most of your
> >> education has taken place in front of a television screen.
> >
> >I suppose that you will be telling me that Deliverance is not
> >representative of You Guys.
>
> LOL
>
> As I commented earlier; your education came by way of television.
You mean that, unlike NYPD Blue, NY cops do not go around beating up
'skels'?
You mean that, unlike West Wing, politicians are not owned by special
interest groups?
You mean that, unlike Springer, Americans women are not really obese
dogs with Big Hair?
You mean that, unlike Bev Hills 90210, you don't have spoilt Trust
Fund kids?
Thanks for putting me straight.
Glenn
Standing) wrote:
>Glenn <ozark...@aol.com> wrote in message news:<jq62b01rb7r4i5n83...@4ax.com>...
>> On 23 May 2004 02:33:42 -0700, IP_St...@hotmail.com (Ivor P.
>> Standing) wrote:
>>
>> >Glenn <ozark...@aol.com> wrote in message news:<l2hua09m5cbltdjuf...@4ax.com>...
>> >
>> >> I am guessing that most of your
>> >> education has taken place in front of a television screen.
>> >
>> >I suppose that you will be telling me that Deliverance is not
>> >representative of You Guys.
>>
>> LOL
>>
>> As I commented earlier; your education came by way of television.
>
>You mean that, unlike NYPD Blue, NY cops do not go around beating up
>'skels'?
>You mean that, unlike West Wing, politicians are not owned by special
>interest groups?
>You mean that, unlike Springer, Americans women are not really obese
>dogs with Big Hair?
>You mean that, unlike Bev Hills 90210, you don't have spoilt Trust
>Fund kids?
>
>Thanks for putting me straight.
LOL, like I said.....
Bit I notice you snipped the part you really want to ignore: