Turns out Palin was a member of AIP - The Alaska Independence Party that
wants alaska to SECEDE from america!!! McCoot did a hell of a job vetting
her.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/1/4231/18477/878/581881
Believing anything written on "the daily kos" ? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
They are the same kooks claiming her last child was really her daughter's
What a bunch of mar00ns
She also brought down WTC7.
And they were right about that too. No one believes this new palin lie
about her daughter bristol being pregnant now. Look for her to have a
"miscarriage" real soon.
LMAO
Keep drinking the kool-aid ------uber kook
Try again.......kook
Just like your 911 claims, you are completely wrong.
http://www.polartrec.com/node/3944
Hypocrite ---
"One who plays a part; especially, one who, for the purpose of winning
approbation of favor, puts on a fair outside seeming; one who feigns to be
other and better than he is; a false pretender to virtue or piety; one who
simulates virtue or piety."
I didn't believe it at first... but I've done just a bit of digging.
Gov. Palin did not announce "her" pregnancy until a month before Trig
was born. (She'd have been seven months pregnant when she announced
this, and apparently hiding it VERY well. I would LOVE to see a photo
of the pregnant governor -- who lives in the public eye -- just before
she made this announcement... Anyone have one?)
Gov. Palin was in Texas when "her" water broke, a month early. While
experiencing a high-risk pregnancy (her own age, carrying a Down
Syndrome baby, and having signs of impending delivery a month early),
she DECIDED TO FLY TO ALASKA to have "her" baby in a town of 4,500
people.
Apparently, the flight crew didn't notice that a woman about to
deliver was boarding their plane. Nor did she advise the crew, at
about 36 weeks, that she was experiencing amniotic leakage and
contractions.
Palin did not take maternity leave. Fine. But to return to a full
schedule of work TWO DAYS AFTER GIVING BIRTH PREMATURELY TO A SPECIAL-
NEEDS BABY????
"FAMILY VALUES"??? WHERE???!?!?!?
Of course, this evidence is circumstantial. I'd like to see the birth
certificate. And if it's shown that she IS the mother, I'd like to
see
a genetic test (since she's Governor of the state in which "she" gave
birth).
Your lack of rebuttal is noted.
>
You do know there are pics of her pregnant, right? Of course, you
probably think they are faked. And what exactly would have been the
point of lying about the last kid? Kos is one of those sites that flails
between semi-truth weirdness, and outright kooktardery.
Your own case of kooktardery seems to be getting worse. So much the
better, for us sane folks to goof on you.
--
BDK
BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster
Yea, unfortunately there are uber kooks on both sides.
Your ignorance reflects your vote.
<snicker> the arrogance of a liebral, how predictable.
You probably will die if you can't label people.
> On Sep 1, 2:59 pm, "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote:
>> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Turns out Palin was a member of AIP - The Alaska Independence Party
>> > that wants alaska to SECEDE from america!!! McCoot did a hell of a
>> > job vetting her.
>>
>> >http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/1/4231/18477/878/581881- Hide
>> >quote
> d text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> I didn't believe it at first... but I've done just a bit of digging.
>
>
> Gov. Palin did not announce "her" pregnancy until a month before Trig
> was born. (She'd have been seven months pregnant when she announced
> this, and apparently hiding it VERY well. I would LOVE to see a photo
> of the pregnant governor -- who lives in the public eye -- just before
> she made this announcement... Anyone have one?)
Go here:
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2008/09/looks_like_sara/
Could it have been photoshopped? I suppose. How deep are you willing to
get into conspiracy theories?
> Gov. Palin was in Texas when "her" water broke, a month early. While
> experiencing a high-risk pregnancy (her own age, carrying a Down
> Syndrome baby, and having signs of impending delivery a month early),
> she DECIDED TO FLY TO ALASKA to have "her" baby in a town of 4,500
> people.
It sounds a little odd, but how strange is it that a woman would want to
have her child in her home town?
> Apparently, the flight crew didn't notice that a woman about to
> deliver was boarding their plane. Nor did she advise the crew, at
> about 36 weeks, that she was experiencing amniotic leakage and
> contractions.
Dontcha think the flight crew would have bent the rules for the Governor
of Alaska? And dontcha think that CYA dictates that everyone pretend
that "don't ask, don't tell" was in force?
> Palin did not take maternity leave. Fine. But to return to a full
> schedule of work TWO DAYS AFTER GIVING BIRTH PREMATURELY TO A SPECIAL-
> NEEDS BABY????
This wasn't Palin's first appearance at the Maternity Rodeo. Do you know
her medical condition at birth? If the baby spent time in neonatal
intensive care, then Mom's real work wouldn't have started until he came
home. And, really, how hard is it to be governor of Alaska when you
belong to the party that doesn't think government has any productive role
to play in people's lives?
> "FAMILY VALUES"??? WHERE???!?!?!?
If the kid is thriving, what's the problem?
> Of course, this evidence is circumstantial. I'd like to see the birth
> certificate.
What do you think that's gonna tell you? You think she faked the birth
without giving thought to how to fake the birth certificate?
> And if it's shown that she IS the mother, I'd like to see
> a genetic test (since she's Governor of the state in which "she" gave
> birth).
Just out of curiosity, how do suppose it can be shown without a genetic
test that she is the mother?
And what business is it of yours? She's the Governor. What does her kid
(or grandkid) have to do with that?
<snicker> still no rebuttal.
<YAWN>
******answer****
Yea, and such a baby probably isn't going to be released from the hospital
for several weeks.
So what exactly would you expect her to do? Sit around outside and watch
through the window?
Perhaps she felt it necessary to maintain her income in order to pay the
medical bills?
But that isn't what happened, is it?
"We say, we're not Americans we're Alaskans." From a meeting of
the Alaska Independence Party.
Secession is illegal. Palin should resign as a VP candidate and
as Governor of Alaska.
--
Yours truly,
The Lone Weasel
Cite the law.
"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:pPZuk.284$393.149@trnddc05...
Palin's story is total bullshit.
1. About the first pregnancy
2. About the second pregnancy
McCain again demonstrates "Poor Judgment"
****answer*****
On the contrary, I've seen nothing to show it was anything but that, and
would consider it highly suspect that such a child would be released for at
least 2 weeks after delivery.
Or course, if you can show me that the baby was released to go home before
this time, I'm certainly willing to reconsider, but I don't think you can.
Really?
So who exactly do you think were having her children?
State of Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700, 724-726 (1868)
If you need help reading it just let me know.
Hey, I bet you think that the second amendment ISN'T an
individual right!
ROFLMAO!!!
Nice try kook, but the decision did not say secession was illegal.
But that's not what happened. The baby was over 6 pounds, nothing
apparently wrong with him. Went home with mommy. Or "mommy".
Unconstitutional means illegal, dumbass. If you're just
searching the text for the words "illegal" or
"unconstitutional", note that it's 19th C. legal writing and
you just have to read it to know what it says.
I give you the page numbers and you refuse to read the full
citation you wanted.
Dismissed.
Ah. You haven't heard.
The story about the first pregnancy: Either that child, too, was pre-
term, or she was pregnant when she eloped.
Story about the second pregnancy: Nobody knew she was pregnant. One
day, at supposedly 7 months along, she kinda said "Oh, BTW, I'm 7
months pregnant". When her water broke pre-term, she apparently just
ignored it -- but if that first pregnancy had been pre-term, she
actually would have had a history of pre-term deliveries, and getting
up to make a speech in Texas, and then getting on a plane to ALASKA,
instead of seeking medical attention, just doesn't make sense.
"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:pPZuk.284$393.149@trnddc05...
>
You skipped over the "Alaska secessionist" organization.
She joined such an organization when America desperately needs Alaskan oil?
She looks like a traitor to America.
Why would McCain pick such a person after vetting her?
Despite all you lip flapping, secession is still not illegal.
It is all about the process.
Your arrogance is your undoing.
is willful negligence.
You haven't read the case I cited for you. I cited the pages
for you.
US Supreme Court rulings are binding legal precedent, part of
the fundamental law of the land. That's why Chief Justice
Chase's ruling, the text I cited, is law.
Which you are afraid to read, because it shows that secession
of states unconstitutional, and thus illegal.
> Your arrogance is your undoing.
Your ignorance is incurable if you refuse to learn.
Next please.
>>
>
> You do know there are pics of her pregnant, right? Of course, you
> probably think they are faked.
Hell yes, they're fake. Sarah Palin has not produced a shred of evidence
that bristol is prego. She just says so!!
animal02 wrote:
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> > Turns out Palin was a member of AIP - The Alaska Independence Party that
> > wants alaska to SECEDE from america!!! McCoot did a hell of a job vetting
> > her.
> >
> > http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/1/4231/18477/878/581881
>
> Believing anything written on "the daily kos" ? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
oh!@ an informed moron!
Tim Miller wrote:
136:49 subpartB - the part about HYPOCRACY?
Tim Miller wrote:
> The Lone Weasel wrote:
> > Tim Miller <replyton...@invalid.invalid> said:
> >> The Lone Weasel wrote:
> >>> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> >>> <xeto...@yahoo.com> said:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Turns out Palin was a member of AIP - The Alaska
> >>>> Independence Party that wants alaska to SECEDE from
> >>>> america!!! McCoot did a hell of a job vetting her.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/1/4231/18477/878/5818
> >>>> 81
> >>> "We say, we're not Americans we're Alaskans." From a
> >>> meeting of the Alaska Independence Party.
> >>>
> >>> Secession is illegal.
> >> Cite the law.
> >
> > State of Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700, 724-726 (1868)
> >
> > If you need help reading it just let me know.
> >
> >
> Christ on a bicycle, you're an idiot...
>
Your mother was a bicycle!
animal02 wrote:
Your undoing is your stupidity? Fool?
The Lone Weasel wrote:
funny - great entertainment - keep it up! heeeee heeeee
Well, that's doesn't reallly matter. Since GPS, CD, DVD+rw, digital
computers, adaptive A.I.
Parallel Procssors, PV Cells, fiber optics, Ebooks, BLOGS, XML,
Laser Printers,
USB, micocomputers, Optical Computers, and Robots were invented.
since Lawyers are well-known to be a zero IQ process.
>
> Your arrogance is your undoing.- Hide quoted text -
********answer
So you say, but still waiting cite. However, if what you are saying is true,
then there is no need for her to take time off to care for the baby anymore
than any other woman who has had a child and returned to work within days of
delivery.
So what was your point again?
Ok, what about it?
> She joined such an organization when America desperately needs Alaskan
> oil?
Gee, and maybe she is concerned over the fact that Alaska isn't adequately
compensated for it?
> She looks like a traitor to America.
Only if you are an idiot and don't know the definition of traitor, but then
that would describe you, wouldn't it?
> Why would McCain pick such a person after vetting her?
Maybe because he thinks she would be a good VP.
After all, you've yet to show that she wouldn't and she seems willing to
consider options to protect the citizens she is responsible for, unlike
Obama.
"The union between Texas and the other States was as complete, as
perpetual, and as indissoluble as the union between the original
States. There was no place for reconsideration, or revocation, except
through revolution, or through consent of the States."
Eat shit lardass.
It would be wrong to cut off contact with the terror group just because
they may have killed people "in a way that we hate."
-- Bill Clinton.
Do 'this', in memory of HIM!
Why shouldn't we have a purple faced raging BILL
that close to Absolute Power pursuing an a
gressive advocacy on behalf of the
desperate and deliberately Evil?
This is Clinton's Bridge the 21st Century.
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/117871.gif
---
LIB's plead for a Morality which holds COMPROMISE as it's standard of
Value, making it possible to judge Virtue on the basis of the number of
Values which one is willing to Betray.
"The road to tyranny begins with the destruction of the Truth"
-- Clinton'95
Actually, I think that was Elvis in his pink UFO, acting on the orders
of the Grays.
--
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana, 1863 - 1952
Cheers,
Bama Brian
Libertarian
>
> "Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:K41vk.22055$vX2....@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>
>>
>> "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
>> news:pPZuk.284$393.149@trnddc05...
>>>
>>> "Guillaume Ier de Normandie" <guillaumed...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>> in message
>>> news:cca8a3ab-b86a-48bc...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
Think about it this way: suppose Obama had been a member of a fringe
political party. What would McCain have to say?
>> She joined such an organization when America desperately needs
>> Alaskan oil?
>
> Gee, and maybe she is concerned over the fact that Alaska isn't
> adequately compensated for it?
Maybe, but you'd think a loyal American with a passing knowledge of our
history wouldn't support secession. But then again, Palin thinks the
founding fathers wrote the Pledge of Allegiance. I wonder what she
thought "indivisible" meant back then?
>> She looks like a traitor to America.
>
> Only if you are an idiot and don't know the definition of traitor, but
> then that would describe you, wouldn't it?
>
>
>> Why would McCain pick such a person after vetting her?
>
> Maybe because he thinks she would be a good VP.
Pretty much brings his judgment into question, eh?
> After all, you've yet to show that she wouldn't and she seems willing
> to consider options to protect the citizens she is responsible for,
> unlike Obama.
You don't think Obama is willing to "protect the citizens," but you are
willing to take Palin as a VP because nobody can prove a negative?
what did these hillbillies expect from a diaper clad, drooling, lying,
deranged, hillbilly imbecile ?
"Leighow said the governor and her son are healthy and resting
comfortably today [April 18].":
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/380134.html
The small-town hospital at which the baby was delivered did not have a
neonatal intensive care unit:
> However, if what you are saying is true,
> then there is no need for her to take time off to care for the baby anymore
> than any other woman who has had a child and returned to work within days of
> delivery.
A woman who is trying to force her take on "family values" on the rest
of the country really should exhibit same for herself and her family.
Giving birth to a disabled child, but prioritizing work instead of
that newborn, is not a demonstration of strong family values.
> So what was your point again?-
Having trouble keeping up?
1. Palin is a hypocrite
2. Something is very fishy about this pregnancy and birth
Her concern was that she wanted independence for Alaska. She wanted
Alaska to secede from the United States of America.
Treason is illegal Secession is treason.
Ask Obama, he's a Professor of Constitutional Law.
Bush is a Professor of... AWOL.
Bush's incompetence isn't Clinton's responsibility.
As evidence are suggesting that BILL stain her dress?
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/420.jpg
How TYPICAL!
How TYPICAL that Muslim Mannie wants the TALIBAN to rule America and
has in fact stated that American presidents should obey Taliban
directives.
Mannie, why do you hate America? You neglected to answer.
"LeRoy Blue" <lero...@billon.net> wrote in message
news:8agpb4dihfvo2ggou...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 20:11:37 -0400, "Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>>Palin's story is total bullshit.
>>
>>1. About the first pregnancy
>>2. About the second pregnancy
>>
>>McCain again demonstrates "Poor Judgment"
>
> Your opinion, Which of coursetags it as being bigoted and intolerant.
This is politics and you
are totally naive to believe
the bullshit you are being fed.
******answer
And when Alaska is independent then the rest of the US will have to deal
fairly with Alaska and not rape it of it's resources without compensation.
So your point would be??????
****answer
Which HARDLY indicates that the infant has been released from the hospital.
Further when you consider it is the spokeswoman of the medical center you
are quoting, then how would she know anything about how either is resting
unless they were STILL THERE????
So tell me, you really didn't read and consider what your source said before
you posted it did you? You just looked for the first thing that sounded like
what you wanted and you ran with it.
Now you look like an idiot.
********************
>
> Further when you consider it is the spokeswoman of the medical center you
> are quoting, then how would she know anything about how either is resting
> unless they were STILL THERE????
>
> So tell me, you really didn't read and consider what your source said
> before you posted it did you? You just looked for the first thing that
> sounded like what you wanted and you ran with it.
C'mon, be nice: the left is trying build a smear and you're getting in the
way by insisting on facts.
For shame!
> Now you look like an idiot.
This was never in question. Emmy is a weapons grade idiot.
The baby was released with the mother.
Zero evidence exists otherwise.
If you have evidence that this healthy baby was held in the hospital,
which did not have a neonatal intensive care unit, please link to it.
Otherwise, STFU.
They were still there.
Do you have trouble reading? Or clicking on links?
The story is dated April 18. The day of Trig's birth.
BOTH were in the hospital, resting comfortably, according to the
hospital, at that time.
BOTH.
No indication of the baby being held over.
Assumption: Baby left with Mama, just as virtually ALL babies do.
You can prove otherwise?
Have at it.
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
-HEAD-
Sec. 2383. Rebellion or insurrection
-STATUTE-
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any
rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United
States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or
both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United
States.
################################################
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
-HEAD-
Sec. 2386. Registration of certain organizations
-STATUTE-
(A) For the purposes of this section:
"Attorney General" means the Attorney General of the United
States;
"Organization" means any group, club, league, society, committee,
association, political party, or combination of individuals,
whether incorporated or otherwise, but such term shall not include
any corporation, association, community chest, fund, or foundation,
organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable,
scientific, literary, or educational purposes;
"Political activity" means any activity the purpose or aim of
which, or one of the purposes or aims of which, is the control by
force or overthrow of the Government of the United States or a
political subdivision thereof, or any State or political
subdivision thereof;
An organization is engaged in "civilian military activity" if:
(1) it gives instruction to, or prescribes instruction for, its
members in the use of firearms or other weapons or any substitute
therefor, or military or naval science; or
(2) it receives from any other organization or from any
individual instruction in military or naval science; or
(3) it engages in any military or naval maneuvers or
activities; or
(4) it engages, either with or without arms, in drills or
parades of a military or naval character; or
(5) it engages in any other form of organized activity which in
the opinion of the Attorney General constitutes preparation for
military action;
An organization is "subject to foreign control" if:
(a) it solicits or accepts financial contributions, loans, or
support of any kind, directly or indirectly, from, or is
affiliated directly or indirectly with, a foreign government or a
political subdivision thereof, or an agent, agency, or
instrumentality of a foreign government or political subdivision
thereof, or a political party in a foreign country, or an
international political organization; or
(b) its policies, or any of them, are determined by or at the
suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or
political subdivision thereof, or an agent, agency, or
instrumentality of a foreign government or a political
subdivision thereof, or a political party in a foreign country,
or an international political organization.
(B)(1) The following organizations shall be required to register
with the Attorney General:
Every organization subject to foreign control which engages in
political activity;
Every organization which engages both in civilian military
activity and in political activity;
Every organization subject to foreign control which engages in
civilian military activity; and
Every organization, the purpose or aim of which, or one of the
purposes or aims of which, is the establishment, control, conduct,
seizure, or overthrow of a government or subdivision thereof by the
use of force, violence, military measures, or threats of any one or
more of the foregoing.
Every such organization shall register by filing with the
Attorney General, on such forms and in such detail as the Attorney
General may by rules and regulations prescribe, a registration
statement containing the information and documents prescribed in
subsection (B)(3) and shall within thirty days after the expiration
of each period of six months succeeding the filing of such
registration statement, file with the Attorney General, on such
forms and in such detail as the Attorney General may by rules and
regulations prescribe, a supplemental statement containing such
information and documents as may be necessary to make the
information and documents previously filed under this section
accurate and current with respect to such preceding six months'
period. Every statement required to be filed by this section shall
be subscribed, under oath, by all of the officers of the
organization.
(2) This section shall not require registration or the filing of
any statement with the Attorney General by:
(a) The armed forces of the United States; or
(b) The organized militia or National Guard of any State,
Territory, District, or possession of the United States; or
(c) Any law-enforcement agency of the United States or of any
Territory, District or possession thereof, or of any State or
political subdivision of a State, or of any agency or
instrumentality of one or more States; or
(d) Any duly established diplomatic mission or consular office of
a foreign government which is so recognized by the Department of
State; or
(e) Any nationally recognized organization of persons who are
veterans of the armed forces of the United States, or affiliates of
such organizations.
(3) Every registration statement required to be filed by any
organization shall contain the following information and documents:
(a) The name and post-office address of the organization in the
United States, and the names and addresses of all branches,
chapters, and affiliates of such organization;
(b) The name, address, and nationality of each officer, and of
each person who performs the functions of an officer, of the
organization, and of each branch, chapter, and affiliate of the
organization;
(c) The qualifications for membership in the organization;
(d) The existing and proposed aims and purposes of the
organization, and all the means by which these aims or purposes are
being attained or are to be attained;
(e) The address or addresses of meeting places of the
organization, and of each branch, chapter, or affiliate of the
organization, and the times of meetings;
(f) The name and address of each person who has contributed any
money, dues, property, or other thing of value to the organization
or to any branch, chapter, or affiliate of the organization;
(g) A detailed statement of the assets of the organization, and
of each branch, chapter, and affiliate of the organization, the
manner in which such assets were acquired, and a detailed statement
of the liabilities and income of the organization and of each
branch, chapter, and affiliate of the organization;
(h) A detailed description of the activities of the organization,
and of each chapter, branch, and affiliate of the organization;
(i) A description of the uniforms, badges, insignia, or other
means of identification prescribed by the organization, and worn or
carried by its officers or members, or any of such officers or
members;
(j) A copy of each book, pamphlet, leaflet, or other publication
or item of written, printed, or graphic matter issued or
distributed directly or indirectly by the organization, or by any
chapter, branch, or affiliate of the organization, or by any of the
members of the organization under its authority or within its
knowledge, together with the name of its author or authors and the
name and address of the publisher;
(k) A description of all firearms or other weapons owned by the
organization, or by any chapter, branch, or affiliate of the
organization, identified by the manufacturer's number thereon;
(l) In case the organization is subject to foreign control, the
manner in which it is so subject;
(m) A copy of the charter, articles of association, constitution,
bylaws, rules, regulations, agreements, resolutions, and all other
instruments relating to the organization, powers, and purposes of
the organization and to the powers of the officers of the
organization and of each chapter, branch, and affiliate of the
organization; and
(n) Such other information and documents pertinent to the
purposes of this section as the Attorney General may from time to
time require.
All statements filed under this section shall be public records
and open to public examination and inspection at all reasonable
hours under such rules and regulations as the Attorney General may
prescribe.
(C) The Attorney General is authorized at any time to make,
amend, and rescind such rules and regulations as may be necessary
to carry out this section, including rules and regulations
governing the statements required to be filed.
(D) Whoever violates any of the provisions of this section shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
Whoever in a statement filed pursuant to this section willfully
makes any false statement or willfully omits to state any fact
which is required to be stated, or which is necessary to make the
statements made not misleading, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
The poster insists that the baby was held at the hospital and was not
released with the mother.
There is no evidence of that, and it would be an unusual circumstance
worthy of reporting if it were the case.
Yet he insists it's the case. With zero evidence.
> For shame!
Indeed.
DELICIOUS!!
> Scout wrote:
>> "Emerson Wainwright" <emersonw...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> On Sep 2, 6:00 am, "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>> "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>>> "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
>>>>> "Guillaume Ier de Normandie" <guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>> news:cca8a3ab-b86a-48bc...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com.
Can't wait to read your filing with the FEC. Be sure to record the laughter
when they throw your dumb ass out.
--
Always remember:
Bull Connor was a Democrat!
Poor kook, reading comprehension isn't one of your strong points.
>
> Which you are afraid to read, because it shows that secession
> of states unconstitutional, and thus illegal.
>
>> Your arrogance is your undoing.
>
> Your ignorance is incurable if you refuse to learn.
<snicker> maybe you should learn to read.
>
> Next please.
>
>
Nice try moron, but the ruling doesn't say that. Try again
> Ask Obama, he's a Professor of Constitutional Law.
> Bush is a Professor of... AWOL.
>
>
keep worshipping your messiah LMAO
BBBBBBBBBBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
would have said the same thing in a single word there el hertz donut
got my Cadillac washed and waxed yet ?
the "DOG" been around with those drug sniffing dawgs yet ?
I may be slow but I'm ahead of you.
>> Which you are afraid to read, because it shows that
>> secession of states unconstitutional, and thus illegal.
>>
>>> Your arrogance is your undoing.
>>
>> Your ignorance is incurable if you refuse to learn.
>
> <snicker> maybe you should learn to read.
Let's see you read the material I cited and explain why
Chase's opinion is not binding legal precedent, punk.
Can you find the case and the page number before noon
tomorrow? Let's see if you can...
Laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh.
--
Yours truly,
The Lone Weasel
"I finally just plonked him as being to stupid
and intolerant to bother with."
-- Gray Ghost (Frank) the illiterate lying repug.
DELICIOUS!!
******
And clearly neither of you understand the meaning of either rebellion or
insurrection.
****answer
Fine, then show it was so.
********
Zero evidence exists otherwise.
*****answer
It certainly would if the baby was kept for more observation/care.
However, since you don't seem to care about the facts you haven't bothered
to look for evidence for what really did occur. You merely assume.
****************8
If you have evidence that this healthy baby was held in the hospital,
which did not have a neonatal intensive care unit, please link to it.
Otherwise, STFU.
******answer
I'm not the one making the assertion that she is a bad mother. It's those
who are doing so that are responsible for proving their case.
I will simply note that if, as you say, the baby was well enough to be
released from the hospital, then there is no reason to assume that she
couldn't resume her normal activities while seeing to the care of her baby.
They were still there.
BOTH.
*****answer
Well, no fucking shit Sherlock, probably because hospitals don't predict
what they are going to do in the future.
The problem is the story was posted to show that the baby wasn't held over,
which this story doesn't prove. Nor does it prove the baby wasn't held over.
In short, it doesn't say anything either way and hence doesn't refute or
establish anything about the point in question.
<snip>
The poster insists that the baby was held at the hospital and was not
released with the mother.
*****answer
On the contrary, I simply pointed out that most babies born this premature
are generally held for observation and care beyond the time the mother is
released. I have no idea if this is the case in this instance, nor have I
made an assertion either way. I'm simply offered this as a point of
observation to the contention that she was being a bad mother by returning
to work within days of giving birth.
*************
There is no evidence of that, and it would be an unusual circumstance
worthy of reporting if it were the case.
****answer
on the contrary, keeping a baby, particularly a premature baby over for
observation/care is hardly an unusual circumstance.
**********
Yet he insists it's the case. With zero evidence.
****answer
You're not paying attention are you?
Attributes are screwed up. Need to watch your snipping there.
Secession is treason. But then, so is outing an undercover
CIA agent.
Alex
Why did Democrats Out that CIA agent?
> Alex
>
>
>
Cite.
Neither. He was never convicted of treason.
He was indicted, and held without bail, but under a writ of habeas corpus he
was released on bail for $100,000. The federal government latered entered a
"nolle prosequi" in the case prior to trial and all charges were dismissed.
Now, once again, I ask for a cite.
David Greenglass was recruited into Soviet espionage by his wife, Ruth
Greenglass, at the behest of his sister Ethel Rosenberg, and
brother-in-law, Julius Rosenberg.[1] The Rosenbergs were executed in
1953 after being convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage with regard
to American atomic secrets. Greenglass shared an interest in Communism
with the Rosenbergs.
Davis was indicted for treason and thrown in prison for about
3 years. While the Supreme Court was deciding whether or not
to quash his indictment, a general amnesty went into effect on
December 25, 1868 and Davis was freed.
But the Virginia grand jury that indicted Davis for treason
must have charged him with that crime.
Secession is treason.
> Which you are afraid to read, because it shows that secession
> of states unconstitutional, and thus illegal.
NOT illegal. I know this is a foreign document to you and the VPC who
pays your Lexus bill, but fact is that secession is made legal right
in the Declaration of Independence. What is illegal is for a state to
unilaterally secede without following proper procedure.
> Next please.
Yes, "next please" indeed!
You are the most arrogant and bigmouth liar I've ever seen. You simply
MUST be one of those VPC liberal lawyers, right? How much do they pay
you to spam the net with their lying propaganda. Or are you really
stupid enough that you actually believe it?
Tell us again about that "collective' right!!!!
Militia!!!!!! HE SAID "MILITIA"!!!!!!!!!!!
Moron.
> So you say, but still waiting cite. However, if what you are saying is true,
> then there is no need for her to take time off to care for the baby anymore
> than any other woman who has had a child and returned to work within days of
> delivery.
>
> So what was your point again?
Heh, did you see the convention tonight? Giuliani answered these
stupid Lib claims that Palin can't be VP because her large family
would keep her from work too much! Giuliani simply asked "When did
they ever ask a MAN that question?
All the women in the hall simply went nuts hooting and hollering!
They just loved Lib being pointed out as being the sexist pigs that
they get so much joy from accusing everyone else of being.
Then you can cite the federal statute or exact clause in the
US Constiution that says so, dumbass.
I cited the US Supreme Court case that expressly verifies that
secession is unconstitutional and therefore illegal.
Your turn.
No worries there. He has a inherent dislike for facts and a shed full of
shovels.
--
Always remember:
Bull Connor was a Democrat!
>>> Which you are afraid to read, because it shows that
>>> secession of states unconstitutional, and thus illegal.
>>
>> NOT illegal. I know this is a foreign document to you and
>> the VPC who pays your Lexus bill, but fact is that
>> secession is made legal right in the Declaration of
>> Independence.
The Declaration of Independence is not a document of law.
Nobody has ever been indicted for violating the DoI.
>> What is illegal is for a state to
>> unilaterally secede without following proper procedure.
There is no proper procedure for secession. See the Civil
War. I cite the US Supreme Court case that tells you why
secession is unconstitutional and illegal, what did you do
with it?
You lost it, apparently.
>>> Next please.
>>
>> Yes, "next please" indeed!
Okay. Next.
The only problem Weasel old boy, is that aisde from the mouse in your pocket,
no rational human being on the planet in any party is going to ask you for an
opinion on Constitutional Law.
I'm just stating facts that anybody can look up for
themselves. I cited Scalia's opinion to you and because you
hadn't read it and never will, you cited NRA handouts and
declared victory and ran away. When I cited Chief Justice
Samuel Chase's opinion you just contradicted it declared
victory and ran under the porch.
Other short people overcome their height issues. But you use
shortness as a crutch. Face it, Frank - you're not big enough
to use crutches. You have to use chopsticks, not that there's
anything wrong with that, and typing with your little fists is
nothing to be ashamed of, but refusing to use that pea-brain
that god gave you, that's just stupid.
Wake up, Frank; or just throw yourself in front of a hungry
cat and get it over with. I've done all I can do to set you
straight...
One last point: if you'd stop wearing a tiny gerbil suit and
playing in Benji's rectum you might have a little more self-
respect. At least wear a condom over yourself.