Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Zionists blame US Jews for their hatred of their black immigrants

39 views
Skip to first unread message

brad herschel

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 6:05:30 PM6/1/12
to
On Jun 1, 6:11 am, GLOBALIST <free.tun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jews in Israel Start Race Riot Against African Immigrants
>
> The British Guardian Newspaper (terrible Brit Leftist rag) seems to be the only mainstream media in the English speaking world reporting on the large race riot in Israel (Editor’s note: some other British media such as the Telegraph are now reporting this story. The heavily Jewish dominated American press seems to be censoring the story. As a general rule the British press will publish news stories that put Israel in a negative light, the American press, outside of hard line Leftist publications, will not publish negative stories about Israel)(link). Israeli Jews have turned violently against Black African illegal immigrant/asylum seekers from the Sudan. The Israeli government is apparently getting ready to deport most or all of the Black Africans. But, it remains to be seen just where the Israelis are going to deport these Black African invaders. Somehow I suspect the “powers that be” will want to get these Black Africans to Europe, UK or Minnesota.
>
> We’ve written with great alarm and much sadness that the American Jewish Community overwhelmingly supports massive 3rd World immigration in to the United States. Virtually every Jewish American Senator and Congressman receives an immigration grade of F from NumbersUSA. (link). Dr. Kevin Macdonald has documented the American Jewish community’s leading role in changing America’s restrictive, pro European immigration laws in 1965 (link). And this week, the tax exempt Leftist Ford Foundation has given Abe Foxman and the ADL $500,000 to “Support Research on Anti-Immigrant Groups, Anti-Bias Education”
>
> But, Jews in Israel want Israel to be a Jewish ethno state. So Jews in Israel do the things that White Americans want the American government to do here – build walls to keep out immigration invasions, deport dangerous illegal aliens. And if Jimmy Carter or the UK Guardian Newspaper object, they don’t care.
>
> Calling the issue “very grave” and a threat to the “social fabric,” Netanyahu said, “If we do not stop the entry, the problem, there are now 60,000 illegal infiltrators; could easily grow to 600,000 illegal infiltrators. This would inundate the state and, to a considerable degree, cancel out its image as a Jewish and democratic state.”
>
> Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – Jerusalem Post



"We’ve written with great alarm and much sadness that the American
Jewish Community overwhelmingly supports massive 3rd World immigration
in to the United States. Virtually every Jewish American Senator and
Congressman receives an immigration grade of F from NumbersUSA.
(link). Dr. Kevin Macdonald has documented the American Jewish
community’s leading role in changing America’s restrictive, pro
European immigration laws in 1965 (link). And this week, the tax
exempt Leftist Ford Foundation has given Abe Foxman and the ADL
$500,000 to “Support Research on Anti-Immigrant Groups, Anti-Bias
Education”

Every single major Jewish organization supports amnesty for illegal
aliens, unrestricted legal immigration, and gun control.

Americans must simply understand the Jewish agenda. It's that simple.

Old Pif

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 6:46:51 PM6/1/12
to
On Jun 1, 6:05 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Every single major Jewish organization  supports amnesty for illegal
> aliens, unrestricted legal immigration, and gun control.
>

For America it is much more important support or the lack thereof for
outsourcing. Immigrants legal and illegal come find no job and go
home. Where Americans - black, white of polka dot - can possibly go?

brad herschel

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 7:38:26 PM6/1/12
to
On Jun 1, 3:46 pm, Old Pif <old...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 1, 6:05 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Economy doomed to continued creep downward. America is no longer
competitive in the
global market. Germany, pop. 80million sells more than USA with 308
million. Of course,
a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work in hi-tech
society.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 8:57:41 PM6/1/12
to
We have freeloaders....

--
*He has the most who is most content with the least* -Diogenes-

-Kum bay ya-

Scout

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 9:06:19 PM6/1/12
to


"brad herschel" <bradhe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6515d305-0d27-472e...@x39g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...
No, we have a big chunk of our population that refuses to work at all, much
less learn the skills needed to work in a hi-tech society.

Welfare was intended to be a safety net, not a hammock.

It's time to kick out those using it as a hammock.


Bill Graham

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 9:07:20 PM6/1/12
to
BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 6/1/2012 7:38 PM, brad herschel wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 3:46 pm, Old Pif <old...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jun 1, 6:05 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Economy doomed to continued creep downward. America is no longer
>> competitive in the
>> global market. Germany, pop. 80million sells more than USA with 308
>> million. Of course,
>> a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work in hi-tech
>> society.
>>
> We have freeloaders....

We not only have 'em.... We are making more of them every day. AAMOF, they
are probably our main product. Now, if we could only figure out a way to
export them to the rest of the world.....

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 9:35:19 PM6/1/12
to
Offer them free stuff to leave, then lock the door and hide when they
come back.

deadrat

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 10:40:04 PM6/1/12
to
Who do you suppose are on long-term welfare, Sparky?

It's children and indigents who need nursing-home care.

Get over yourself.


Mitchell Holman

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 11:16:46 PM6/1/12
to
"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:jqboug$m7r$1...@dont-email.me:

>
>
> "brad herschel" <bradhe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6515d305-0d27-472e...@x39g2000yqx.googlegroups.com.
> ..
>> On Jun 1, 3:46 pm, Old Pif <old...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jun 1, 6:05 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Economy doomed to continued creep downward. America is no longer
>> competitive in the
>> global market. Germany, pop. 80million sells more than USA with 308
>> million. Of course,
>> a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work in hi-tech
>> society.
>
> No, we have a big chunk of our population that refuses to work at all,
> much less learn the skills needed to work in a hi-tech society.



Kinda like never-held-a-job Bristol Palin?




Scout

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 3:29:23 PM6/2/12
to


"deadrat" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:Bb6dndy4I-WZ4FTS...@giganews.com...
Because it's become a life style...and a pretty profitable one too, given
that most people on welfare have more disposable income than many of those
that work for a living.

>
> It's children and indigents who need nursing-home care.

Right, and when parents have children simply for the income.......

That was indeed my first real exposure to this issue, when I listened in on
a young distraught woman having a conversation with a much older lady, and
how the young lady was telling her grandmother how she didn't want more
children and that 4 were enough, and the grandmother was telling her how she
would start losing her benefits if she didn't get herself knocked up pretty
soon, and volunteered to raise the child for a big cut of the money.

Sorry, but is this the purpose of welfare?

I think not.



Scout

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 3:31:12 PM6/2/12
to


"Mitchell Holman" <nomailcomcast.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA065E2689F739...@216.196.121.131...
I believe she has held a job. Wasn't she governor for awhile?

deadrat

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 7:37:03 PM6/2/12
to
On 6/2/12 2:29 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "deadrat" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
> news:Bb6dndy4I-WZ4FTS...@giganews.com...
>> On 6/1/12 8:06 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "brad herschel" <bradhe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6515d305-0d27-472e...@x39g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> On Jun 1, 3:46 pm, Old Pif <old...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 1, 6:05 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Economy doomed to continued creep downward. America is no longer
>>>> competitive in the
>>>> global market. Germany, pop. 80million sells more than USA with 308
>>>> million. Of course,
>>>> a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work in hi-tech
>>>> society.
>>>
>>> No, we have a big chunk of our population that refuses to work at all,
>>> much less learn the skills needed to work in a hi-tech society.
>>>
>>> Welfare was intended to be a safety net, not a hammock.
>>>
>>> It's time to kick out those using it as a hammock.
>>
>> Who do you suppose are on long-term welfare, Sparky?
>
> Because it's become a life style...and a pretty profitable one too,
> given that most people on welfare have more disposable income than many
> of those that work for a living.

Ever lived on welfare? It's by all accounts a pretty bleak existence.
People on welfare don't have more disposable income than those who work.
In fact, those Medicaid recipients in nursing homes get $30 a month.

>> It's children and indigents who need nursing-home care.
>
> Right, and when parents have children simply for the income.......

Yeah, Sparky. Raising children is such a profit center.

> That was indeed my first real exposure to this issue, when I listened in
> on a young distraught woman having a conversation with a much older
> lady, and how the young lady was telling her grandmother how she didn't
> want more children and that 4 were enough, and the grandmother was
> telling her how she would start losing her benefits if she didn't get
> herself knocked up pretty soon, and volunteered to raise the child for a
> big cut of the money.
>
> Sorry, but is this the purpose of welfare?

Based on some story you just made up?

> I think not.

You've sold me right there, Sparky.

deadrat

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 7:38:17 PM6/2/12
to
You're thinkin' of her mother, Sarah. She was governor of Alaska 'til
she quit.

Scout

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 8:31:09 PM6/2/12
to


"deadrat" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:pLGdnS2EBvp0PlfS...@giganews.com...
Correct, sorry, you're talking of the daughter..

"That month, Palin and her son began living in a condo she had purchased in
Anchorage, where she was working at a dermatologist's office ...."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Palin#Memoir

Looks like she was holding a job.....


Scout

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 8:28:50 PM6/2/12
to


"deadrat" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:pLGdnTKEBvo9PlfS...@giganews.com...
> On 6/2/12 2:29 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "deadrat" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
>> news:Bb6dndy4I-WZ4FTS...@giganews.com...
>>> On 6/1/12 8:06 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "brad herschel" <bradhe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:6515d305-0d27-472e...@x39g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 1, 3:46 pm, Old Pif <old...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Jun 1, 6:05 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Economy doomed to continued creep downward. America is no longer
>>>>> competitive in the
>>>>> global market. Germany, pop. 80million sells more than USA with 308
>>>>> million. Of course,
>>>>> a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work in hi-tech
>>>>> society.
>>>>
>>>> No, we have a big chunk of our population that refuses to work at all,
>>>> much less learn the skills needed to work in a hi-tech society.
>>>>
>>>> Welfare was intended to be a safety net, not a hammock.
>>>>
>>>> It's time to kick out those using it as a hammock.
>>>
>>> Who do you suppose are on long-term welfare, Sparky?
>>
>> Because it's become a life style...and a pretty profitable one too,
>> given that most people on welfare have more disposable income than many
>> of those that work for a living.
>
> Ever lived on welfare?

I've been on unemployement a couple of times, but I tend to work for a
living.

> It's by all accounts a pretty bleak existence.

Then you really don't know either.

> People on welfare don't have more disposable income than those who work.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/entitlement-america-head-household-making-minimum-wage-has-more-disposable-income-family-mak
http://www.sherdog.net/forums/f54/aoe2s-entitlement-tour-60k-vs-welfare-disposable-income-1475725/


> In fact, those Medicaid recipients in nursing homes get $30 a month.

That is hardly representative of the vast number of able bodied adults on
welfare.

>>> It's children and indigents who need nursing-home care.
>>
>> Right, and when parents have children simply for the income.......
>
> Yeah, Sparky. Raising children is such a profit center.
>
>> That was indeed my first real exposure to this issue, when I listened in
>> on a young distraught woman having a conversation with a much older
>> lady, and how the young lady was telling her grandmother how she didn't
>> want more children and that 4 were enough, and the grandmother was
>> telling her how she would start losing her benefits if she didn't get
>> herself knocked up pretty soon, and volunteered to raise the child for a
>> big cut of the money.
>>
>> Sorry, but is this the purpose of welfare?
>
> Based on some story you just made up?

Feel free to do the statistics. Where I live it's not uncommon to see 6-7
children living in a welfare household.


Metspitzer

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 8:49:43 PM6/2/12
to
Just for laughs, go by your local health dept and count the number of
high dollar SUVs

BeamMeUpScotty☠

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 9:04:27 PM6/2/12
to
Never got a dime from the government, but when I was poor it really
didn't matter where the money wasn't coming from, I had to go find
someone to pay me for doing something.


Fortunately I knew how to do something....



--
*He has the most who is most content with the least* -Diogenes-

-Kum bay ya- ☠

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 9:13:19 PM6/2/12
to
Therefore, you are in full support of US businesses, led by the US
Chamber of Commerce, right Brad?

-Ramon

ps: I challenge your Germany exports figure.

------------------------------

The U.S. Chamber’s Plan for Immigration Reform
Immigration Policy Priorities for 2012

"provide a pathway to legal status for undocumented workers currently
in the United States."

------------------------------

For those far conservatives who despise big businesses, here's the
position of medium and small businesses on immigration:

http://www.immigrationworksusa.org/

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 9:20:08 PM6/2/12
to
On Jun 1, 6:38 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work
> in hi-tech society.

Most of high tech is liberal (*). Isn't that a little presumptuous of
you, trying to teach high tech to the creators and leaders of high
tech?

-Ramon

(*) Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg the Google boys, and
pretty much all of them.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 9:34:07 PM6/2/12
to
[a poster wrote:]
> There will always be winners and losers.

Indeed - And the only way to set them apart, one that respects:

- The Constitutions of the US and the other civilized countries

- The Universal Human Rights

is Competition under the rules of Capitalism.

The bottom line is that there are only 3 ways to allocate scarce
resources:

http://patriot.net/~ramon/misc/GOP-Stake.gif

(1) The donkey ideas at the extreme becomes socialism. We DO NOT want
that!

(2) The anti-business folks tend to racism and White Supremacy. We
DEFINITELY DO NOT want that!!

Ergo, by default there is only one approach left. It was wisely chosen
by the Founders.

The Economic System of the US is -and will forever be- CAPITALISM.
Don't like it? STFU or pack your bags.

http://www.aa.com (click on "International Travel, One way")

-Ramon

Scout

unread,
Jun 2, 2012, 9:53:17 PM6/2/12
to


"BeamMeUpScotty☠" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
message news:4FCAB81B...@blackhole.nebulax.com...
Nor have I taken a dime from the government. Unemployment Insurance is
something I or my employer pays for. Why shouldn't I collect the benefits of
insurance my labor paid for?


deadrat

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 2:01:38 AM6/3/12
to
Not my claim, Sparky. It's yours, thus so's the burden of production.

> Where I live it's not uncommon to see
> 6-7 children living in a welfare household.

And your touching personal anecdotes don't count as evidence, cause
where I live people living on welfare never have children. See how that
works?

deadrat

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 2:05:04 AM6/3/12
to
On 6/2/12 8:34 PM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> On Jun 1, 6:38 pm, brad herschel<bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 3:46 pm, Old Pif<old...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 1, 6:05 pm, brad herschel<bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Economy doomed to continued creep downward. America is no longer
>> competitive in the
>> global market. Germany, pop. 80million sells more than USA with 308
>> million. Of course,
>> a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work in hi-tech
>> society.
>
> [a poster wrote:]
> > There will always be winners and losers.
>
> Indeed - And the only way to set them apart, one that respects:
>
> - The Constitutions of the US and the other civilized countries
>
> - The Universal Human Rights
>
> is Competition under the rules of Capitalism.

If the 1% weren't so exhausted by stuffing themselves with tax breaks
and subsidies and bailouts, they might have the energy to laugh at you.

Why do you run to support the people who pick your pockets?

<snipped: made-up nonsense/>

deadrat

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 2:05:53 AM6/3/12
to
Ah, so you don't mind government-mandated insurance programs?


Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 3:28:36 AM6/3/12
to
Winston Churchill:
Democracy is the worst political system... except for the other ones.

Ramon's Corollary:
Capitalism is the worst economic system... except for the other ones.

You clearly ignore (not sure whether by choice or genuine) that
another name for capitalism is FREE markets.

Since both systems above are the only ones based on FREEDOM, they are
improvable, some say perfectible.

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 3:44:43 AM6/3/12
to

On Jun 3, 1:05 am, deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
> <snipped: made-up nonsense/>

I suggest you go to your nearest community college and take a course
of Economics, a subject you clearly ignore.

I will give you the first lesson for free: Economics deals with the
allocation of scarce resources: cars, hot chicks, houses, jobs, etc.
Since there is plenty of air and sand, there is no economics of those.
The economic system chosen by a country decides who gets the girls,
houses and jobs (and whether illegal folks are allowed to work, IN
PRACTICE).

Racists (Topaz, brad herschel, VERMIN, etc.) insist to be given a
blank check in advance, without having to prove themselves in the
marketplace: they HATE having to compete. That is why they are anti-
business:

http://patriot.net/~ramon/misc/GOP-Stake.gif

Since they are far right, they hate the donkey as well.

NB: This is America, we don't cotton to no pinko commies here.

-Ramon
Proud Member of the US Chamber of Commerce (regular and Hispanic)
So quit calling me commie, will ya'?
100% Supporter of the position on immigration being
lobbied and led by The US Chamber of Commerce
---------------------------------------------

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 3:59:07 AM6/3/12
to
On Jun 1, 8:06 pm, "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:
> "brad herschel" <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6515d305-0d27-472e...@x39g2000yqx.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jun 1, 3:46 pm, Old Pif <old...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 1, 6:05 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Economy doomed to continued creep downward. America is no longer
> > competitive in the
> > global market. Germany, pop. 80million sells more than USA with 308
> > million. Of course,
> > a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work in hi-tech
> > society.
>

> No, we have a big chunk of our population that refuses
> to work at all,

That is a lie. The "chunk" is not that big. You are imagining black
"welfare queens".

> much less learn the skills needed to work in a hi-tech society.
>
> Welfare was intended to be a safety net, not a hammock.
>
> It's time to kick out those using it as a hammock.

(a) Welfare is less than 1% of the US budget, and yet it is used as a
subterfuge to justify racism and hatred.

(b) Most people stay on welfare temporarily. Old ones come out, new
ones come in.

-Ramon

deadrat

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 4:04:50 AM6/3/12
to
On 6/3/12 2:44 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 1:05 am, deadrat<a...@b.com> wrote:
> > <snipped: made-up nonsense/>
>
> I suggest you go to your nearest community college and take a course
> of Economics, a subject you clearly ignore.

Oh, look! An ignoramus attempts to lecture me on economics.
>
<snipped: naive nonsense/>

<snipped: namecalling/>
<snip/>

Bill Graham

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 4:25:13 AM6/3/12
to
Amont the many freedoms that people can enjoy, the freedom to earn money
doing the job you like is one of the best. I can remember my parents qsking
me, "What do you want to be when you grow up?" Thank God I didn't have to
say, "Whatever the government wants me to be."

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 4:43:27 AM6/3/12
to
On Jun 3, 3:04 am, deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
> On 6/3/12 2:44 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 1:05 am, deadrat<a...@b.com>  wrote:
> >   >  <snipped: made-up nonsense/>
>
> > I suggest you go to your nearest community college and take a course
> > of Economics, a subject you clearly ignore.
>

> Oh, look!  An ignoramus attempts to lecture me on economics.
>

Actually, I suggested that YOU yourself take the initiative to learn,
to improve on a deficient area.

De nada,

-Ramon

ps: You have too much XML, too little of the rest.

BeamMeUpScotty☠

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 10:43:20 AM6/3/12
to
Internet was DoD and they are hardly Liberal..... Star Wars was Liberal
Ronald Reagan.


True that child porn was a major factor in the internet becoming a
private use Liberal item.


The Liberal CIA just attacked IRAN'S nuclear program with high tech
Liberal computer bombs.

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 10:35:29 AM6/3/12
to
> Actually, I suggested that YOU yourself take the initiative to learn,
> to improve on a deficient area.
>
> De nada,

If you're so knowledgeable about all things Latino,

1. post the name of the Mexican equivalent of Jerry Springer, and,

2. post what cyclists should yell at chihuahua ankle biters. The
locals don't seem to understand "Tranquilo!"


Bret Cahill


Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 11:00:57 AM6/3/12
to
On Jun 3, 9:43 am, BeamMeUpScotty☠
<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> On 6/2/2012 9:20 PM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>
> > On Jun 1, 6:38 pm, brad herschel <bradhersc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >  > a big chunk of our population lacks the ability to work
> >  > in hi-tech society.
>
> > Most of high tech is liberal (*). Isn't that a little presumptuous of
> > you, trying to teach high tech to the creators and leaders of high
> > tech?
>
> > -Ramon
>
> > (*) Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg the Google boys, and
> > pretty much all of them.
>

> Internet was DoD and they are hardly Liberal.....

The DoD is neither liberal nor conservative. They are American.

We were quite busy at MIT (liberal, as all institutions with a lot of
gray matter), inventing the Internet when Al Gore showed up, giving us
invaluable help. He was recently indicted to the Internet Hall of
Fame.

(Gracias, Al!!!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Al_Gore_and_information_technology

NB: The US Army and US Marine Corps are proud sponsors of the National
Council of La Raza: I dare you to find ANY evidence of support from
our military to your side, on immigration.

-Ramon

BeamMeUpScotty☠

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 11:02:59 AM6/3/12
to
If you paid into it you deserve the proceeds, I agree(That's why it
should be voluntary and NOT forced Socialism). And to this point I
have gone 35 years and I have yet to collect from unemployment..... but
you are welcome. Maybe if they called it unemployment and vacation
insurance I would but probably not. I just never needed it. Nothing
wrong with taking it. I'm just not one that wants to fill out paper
work to ask the government for what is mine. That's why I treat it as
theft and treat the money as stolen and not recoverable.


I would rather have my money in my hands to start with and I intend to
ignore the government at every turn. To me they simply don't exist in
my private life, they can try to inject themselves into my private life
and I reject it by NOT ever filling out any of their paperwork or
seeking out and entering any of the governments offices.


Government chooses to hide from and bury it's head to separate its self
from religion*(No religious stuff like the ten commandments in
government buildings), so why shouldn't I do that same thing to to
ignore government in my private affairs in my house and personal life
where government has no powers to interfere and are separated by the
constitution from MY LIFE. I don't want to hear from the government
about my private life. It's NOT any of their business, I can construct
a constitutional wall as easily as they can create separation of Church
and State and ban religion from any government office or property.

Gray Ghost

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 11:16:11 AM6/3/12
to
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in news:057b3113-754f-43c0-
9f7a-bab...@h9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com:

> Proud Member of the US Chamber of Commerce (regular and Hispanic)
> So quit calling me commie, will ya'?
> 100% Supporter of the position on immigration being
> lobbied and led by The US Chamber of Commerce
> ---------------------------------------------

So it's foreign interests that are pushing the immigration issue? Thanks
for clarifying that!

--
Ramon F Herrera, Secret Foreign Agent of a Secret Foreign Government,
funneling Secret Foreign Money through the criminal Chamber of Commerce.

Obama and Slow Joe
Said it was so,
They weren't lieing
Say it ain't so!

The same chamber that he uses his membership in to "prove" what a good
American he is.

Why won't he address this? What has he got to hide?

deadrat

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 4:42:57 PM6/3/12
to
Boy, it sure sucks to be you, doesn't it? Why not move somewhere else
so you don't have to burdened with your government? You're obviously
not happy here, and we'll be glad to be shut of you. Win-win, I think
they call it.

May I suggest Saudi Arabia or Syria or Iran?

Or how about Somalia, the rightard paradise? No government regulation
there. No government to speak of.


BeamMeUpScotty☠

unread,
Jun 3, 2012, 6:58:58 PM6/3/12
to
Suggest anything you want, I don't accept you as my Lord and master any
more than I accept Obama in that position.


> Or how about Somalia, the rightard paradise? No government regulation
> there. No government to speak of.

You obviously have me confused with a communist.... They believe in the
UTOPIA of all government fading away.

I'm a realist and I think we need just enough government to secure our
individual rights.

I recognize that much, if government feels the need to do more, I push back.
0 new messages