Received: by 10.68.232.42 with SMTP id tl10mr3769308pbc.7.1335386670058;
        Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni98118pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: ### Zimmerman must be charged with PERJURY! ###
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:44:02 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <jn9nnd$8ga$1@dont-email.me>
References: <jn2k48$r4f$1@dont-email.me> <2f9d96b3-2195-4b53-9be6-bbc1fd8d6d08@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> <jn3le8$r61$1@dont-email.me> <lrmap7dtroosdm65j7j48t0rm9mbo24nrm@4ax.com> <jn3ut3$qv4$1@dont-email.me> <VsudnS-A17mEEwvSnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@mchsi.com> <qupdp7pvmf8io77818l1glvlto46ssdchh@4ax.com> <jn78uq$3e6$1@dont-email.me> <t2dep7p9oc93ovo1qqgr79r7vkkdl5tpvg@4ax.com> <jn7d31$ub6$1@dont-email.me> <67ufp7lh5og415bi9capce60h10c5p6d41@4ax.com> <XnsA040704DE3979hopewell@216.196.121.131> <pfigp7hted45qebcipoks80ijd0q5vaq7u@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="DruOTQkZgrj/77hloWuLOw";
	logging-data="8714"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7e9gbHc/kqsOgCi8eJs1U"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
In-Reply-To: <pfigp7hted45qebcipoks80ijd0q5vaq7u@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
Importance: Normal
Cancel-Lock: sha1:z6UPcye4t17pgML3ozSHpSaJFDk=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



<d...@dudu.org> wrote in message 
news:pfigp7hted45qebcipoks80ijd0q5vaq7u@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:02:22 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>d...@dudu.org wrote in news:67ufp7lh5og415bi9capce60h10c5p6d41@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:30:16 -0400, "Scout"
>>> <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>><d...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>>>news:t2dep7p9oc93ovo1qqgr79r7vkkdl5tpvg@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:19:45 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>> <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>><d...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:qupdp7pvmf8io77818l1glvlto46ssdchh@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:27:05 -0700, "Oglethorpe"
>>>>>>> <antike...@go.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>message news:jn3ut3$qv4$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <d...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:lrmap7dtroosdm65j7j48t0rm9mbo24nrm@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:28:41 -0400, Flint
>>>>>>>>>> <age...@section31.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On 4/23/2012 3:31 AM, Nancy Luft wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, Flint<age...@section31.org>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/22/2012 6:40 PM, d...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:21:15 -0700 (PDT), Nancy Luft
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nanl...@yahoo.com>    wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greetings!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a copy of my latest email to keep you all updated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ### Zimmerman must be charged with PERJURY! ###
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And falisifying evidence and obstruction of justice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You both are legal dipshits.  No trial has been held yet,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nor has Zimmerman offered testimony at one yet.  Therefore,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hew can't have possibly committed perjury... ainb't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible, no how, no way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On top of it, the police and prosecutor already admitted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence to refute Zim's claim of self defense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Their case is DoA...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MFB
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Zimmerman did testify under oath last Friday at his bond
>>>>>>>>>>>> hearing ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> please read the news!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>At a fucking bail hearing, Nancy drew...  His guilt has not
>>>>>>>>>>>been yet been determined at trial.   What he said at the bail
>>>>>>>>>>>hearing has absolutely no relevance to his guilt or innocence,
>>>>>>>>>>>most of which will probably not even be admitted as evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>during the trial phase, hence no 'perjury', Nancy
>>>>>>>>>>>Pigbitchslutfuckingcuntskankcumreceptacle.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's still testifying under oath, idiot.  And he perjured
>>>>>>>>>> himself, as well as falsified evidence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep, and while I see you making the accusation.... what I fail
>>>>>>>>> to see is
>>>>>>>>> any evidence, much less proof, of the perjury you claim he
>>>>>>>>> committed. Hell, you've already told us he's guilty of murder
>>>>>>>>> despite quite a bit of
>>>>>>>>> evidence that suggests it could be self defense. One gets the
>>>>>>>>> idea you're
>>>>>>>>> a bit prejudicial and thus your claims lack objectivity.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The evidence is overwhelming for self defense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What evidence?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Exactly....since we all know you ignore any evidence except that
>>>>>>which supports your prejudicial opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I see.  You don't have any evidence it was SD.  Like I told you.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe if you read my comment to him before you posted your reply you
>>>>wouldn't have made yourself look so stupid....but then you can't help
>>>>looking stupid, can you?
>>>>
>>> So show the evidence it was self defense.
>>>
>>
>>Show the evidence it wasn't.
>
> They charged him with 2nd degree murder.

That's not evidence it wasn't self defense.

I will simply accept your admission you consider anyone charged with a crime 
to be guilty no matter what the actual facts are.


>  They wouldn't do that if he
> had concrete evidence that shows he was assaulted.

If Zimmerman was assaulted then wouldn't that suggest self defense rather 
than murder?