Who is Obama really!"
Tom Potter
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081006/ap_on_el_pr/mccain
"ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -
Behind in the polls, Republican John McCain on Monday
called Democratic rival Barack Obama a liar
as he leveled his harshest criticism yet,
and said the campaign boils down to one basic question:
Who is Obama really?
It appears that McCain thinks that unless one
has been part of the corrupt Washington or New York scene,
that one has no identity.
It is very obvious from his books, his speeches,
and his life that Obama is an intelligent, educated,
civil, multicultural individual, who had a Black father,
a White mother, an Asian step-father, was raised
by White Grandparents,
who is dedicated to, and loyal to,
his wife, kids, and someone who puts the
well being of the common man,
above Washington insiders, Wall Street
and the Military.
And here is what Obama is NOT!
He is not a man who abandoned his sick wife,
and took up with the daughter of a rich beer merchant
with criminal connections, nor is he a loose cannon
who has been intimate with the Bankers that have
raped the common man,
and he is not a man who' doesn't know how
many houses he has.
No doubt, Obama does not have a long
Washington and New York history,
and that, along with his life experiences,
his family and personal traits,
is why he is America's best hope to return
America's government and economy to the common man.
The bottom line is:
being covered with Washington and New York slime
is not the only measure of who one is.
--
Tom Potter
http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dingleberry.htm
Klaus Schadenfreude
>
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081006/ap_on_el_pr/mccain
>
>"ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -
>Behind in the polls, Republican John McCain on Monday
>called Democratic rival Barack Obama a liar
>as he leveled his harshest criticism yet,
>and said the campaign boils down to one basic question:
>Who is Obama really?
He's not as nutty as Tom Potter, but close. At least his wife isn't a
figment of his imagination.
Eric Gisse
[snip]
Gordon Liddy
Charles Keating
Those who live in glass houses...
slate_leeper
<tdp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>It appears that McCain thinks
Translates to "my opinion of what I think his opinion...."
So much for factual reporting.
--
Protect your civil rights!
Let the politicians know how you feel.
Join or donate to the NRA today!
http://membership.nrahq.org/default.asp?campaignid=XR014887
FRANKIE LEE
**Then you are sure ignorant.
Stanley F. Nelson
which office he already has my early vote (in Texas).
Those who have not yet decided have only this choice to make: vote for
yesterday or vote for tomorrow, hearing a certain voice and following a
certain vision of America's re-gained greatness.
Stanley F. Nelson
Dallas.
bigdog
mitchs...@gmail.com
>
> I'm glad McCain promised not to wage a negative campaign.
murderous, actually -
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/06/mccain-does-nothing-as-cr_n_132366.html
Tom Potter
"slate_leeper" <bycy...@spamex.com> wrote in message news:
83lme49uncer8s5fj...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 02:12:29 -0700 (PDT), Tom Potter
-Translates to "my opinion of what I think his opinion...."
-
- So much for factual reporting.
As "slate_leeper" seems to object
to my interpretation of what John McCain
was driving at when he said the campaign
boils down to one basic question:
" Who is Obama really?"
I trust that "slate_leeper" will post his
interpretation of what McCain meant.
It is obvious that McCain is either ignorant,
or is trying to con ignorant people into
thinking that the campaign boils down to one basic question:
Who is Obama really?
As rational, intelligent folks know,
the campaign boils down to many questions.
Has Bush done a good job in governing America?
Will McCain or Obama govern most like Bush?
Who can best restore the trust and respect for America
and Americans, McCain or Obama?
Who can best build bridges between Christians and Muslims,
Blacks and Whites, America and Russia, America and the world?
Who will operate unilaterally like Bush has,
and who will be more responsive to Congress, the American public,
and the courts?
Who will build walls between races, religions, and nations,
and who will build bridges?
Who tens to be a loose cannon, and might
create even more problems for America?
Who's economic policies are best suited for these time?
Regarding the last question,
I must point out that bailing out Wall Street by printing money
will cause inflation, and most of the money will continue to
flow into the pockets of the people who created the problem.
Allowing the free market to operate will cause a serious
but short term recession, and the value of real assets will
not be devalued by inflation.
As can be seen by the experience of Germany in the 1930's,
their economy boomed while the economies of the
rest of the world was sinking into a deep depression.
What Germany did, was to insure the flow of money,
but rather than let the same, old fat cats control the
money, the German government made sure that the
money flowed into the hands of creative entrepreneurs,
consumers, and productive government agencies.
In other words, "Trickle down" is not working at this time,
and hasn't for several years.
What needs to be done is put money in the hands of
job creators, consumers, and government infrastructure,
( Not WPA and CCC, but needed infrastructure
built by private sector low bidders.)
and let the money "trickle" from there.
Who will best do this, McCain or Obama?
And as I mentioned,
Obama is an intelligent, educated, multicultural
guy who worked his way up from the bottom,
and he is loyal to his wife and family.
On the other hand, McCain was a spoiled brat,
loose cannon, playboy, who abandoned his sick wife,
and married the daughter of a beer merchant
with underworld connections, and like Bush,
he has no perception of what life is like for
the working class, nor the entrepreneurs
The bottom line is:
Anyone who says that
the campaign boils down to one basic question:
" Who is Obama really?"
is dishonest,
and anyone who believes that is stupid.
Tom Potter
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschade...@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:a4ime4h8uul61ikrq...@4ax.com...
I am pleased to see that my pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
continues to be a faithful reader of my posts,
and that they motivate him to respond to them.
I was surprised to see that my pal Klaus
appears to be projecting his mental condition
onto Obama who is preferred by most Americans,
and onto me, a guy who held responsible positions
for four Fortune 500 companies,
( Bendix, Philco-Ford, Burroughs and Hewlett Packard)
had a top secret crypto clearance,
and the best P.I. score in boot camp.
As a guy who always enjoyed playing
basketball, tennis, and golf against the best
competition I could find so I could improve,
I will be looking forward to hearing from my pal,
what positions and accomplishment he has
that makes him superior to Obama, me,
and no doubt the vast majority of the folks on the planet,
so I can use him as a role model,
if in fact he can demonstrate his superiority
in any way that society would consider positive.
TigerLuck
--
Sinatra & Sarah do Witchcraft
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqs_2CVcWb0
Meet Pastor Muthee -- the man who laid hands on Sarah Palin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsnrIVj9IbM
Frankie
> Yor nex Prez
>
> --
>
> Meet Pastor Muthee -- the man who laid hands on Sarah Palinhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsnrIVj9IbM
**Obama cannot win.He is too dumb.
Klaus Schadenfreude
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschade...@qwest.net> wrote in message
>news:a4ime4h8uul61ikrq...@4ax.com...
>> In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Who is Obama really?
>>
>> He's not as nutty as Tom Potter, but close. At least his wife isn't a
>> figment of his imagination.
>
>I am pleased to see that my pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>continues to be a faithful reader of my posts,
>and that they motivate him to respond to them.
Of course you're pleased. You're a raving, lying lunatic starving for
attention.
>I was surprised to see that my pal Klaus
>appears to be projecting his mental condition
>onto Obama who is preferred by most Americans,
You'd like to think so, but, then again, you're the brain-dead
simpleton who's has also claimed Chinese cops don't wear sunglasses,
and that there are only 200 cops in Peking.
Tom Potter
> In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschade...@qwest.net> wrote in message
>>news:a4ime4h8uul61ikrq...@4ax.com...
>>> In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>Who is Obama really?
>>>
>>> He's not as nutty as Tom Potter, but close. At least his wife isn't a
>>> figment of his imagination.
>>
>>I am pleased to see that my pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>continues to be a faithful reader of my posts,
>>and that they motivate him to respond to them.
>
> Of course you're pleased. You're a raving, lying lunatic starving for
> attention.
If I were "a raving, lying lunatic starving for attention."
I'd do as my sociopathic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude" does,
-- avoid addressing serious issues
by ranting, raving and mud slinging.
Rranting, raving and mud slinging by lunatics
always draws a crowd.
stfranc...@yahoo.com
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschadenfre...@qwest.net> wrote in message
>
> news:mk8pe41og6fcafod7...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschadenfre...@qwest.net> wrote in message
> >>news:a4ime4h8uul61ikrq...@4ax.com...
> >>> In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>Who is Obama really?
>
> >>> He's not as nutty as Tom Potter, but close. At least his wife isn't a
> >>> figment of his imagination.
>
> >>I am pleased to see that my pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
> >>continues to be a faithful reader of my posts,
> >>and that they motivate him to respond to them.
>
> > Of course you're pleased. You're a raving, lying lunatic starving for
> > attention.
>
> If I were "a raving, lying lunatic starving for attention."
> I'd do as my sociopathic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude" does,
> -- avoid addressing serious issues
> by ranting, raving and mud slinging.
>
> Rranting, raving and mud slinging by lunatics
> always draws a crowd.
>
> --
> Tom Potter
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
frankie is stupid jesus fucker and his mother whore in stinkapore
Tim_Miller
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschade...@qwest.net> wrote in message
> news:mk8pe41og6fcafod7...@4ax.com...
>> In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschade...@qwest.net> wrote in message
>>> news:a4ime4h8uul61ikrq...@4ax.com...
>>>> In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Who is Obama really?
>>>> He's not as nutty as Tom Potter, but close. At least his wife isn't a
>>>> figment of his imagination.
>>> I am pleased to see that my pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>> continues to be a faithful reader of my posts,
>>> and that they motivate him to respond to them.
>> Of course you're pleased. You're a raving, lying lunatic starving for
>> attention.
>
> If I were "a raving, lying lunatic starving for attention."
There's no "if" about it, potter.
Klaus Schadenfreude
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschade...@qwest.net> wrote in message
>news:mk8pe41og6fcafod7...@4ax.com...
>> In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <kschade...@qwest.net> wrote in message
>>>news:a4ime4h8uul61ikrq...@4ax.com...
>>>> In talk.politics.guns Tom Potter <tdp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Who is Obama really?
>>>>
>>>> He's not as nutty as Tom Potter, but close. At least his wife isn't a
>>>> figment of his imagination.
>>>
>>>I am pleased to see that my pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>continues to be a faithful reader of my posts,
>>>and that they motivate him to respond to them.
>>
>> Of course you're pleased. You're a raving, lying lunatic starving for
>> attention.
>
>If I were "a raving, lying lunatic starving for attention."
There's no "if," Tom. It's a proven fact.
>I'd do as my sociopathic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude" does,
>-- avoid addressing serious issues
>by ranting, raving and mud slinging.
If you were serious about "addressing serious issues" you'd address
them in the appropriate forum.
But you don't. Because what you want is ATTENTION, you loon.
>Rranting, raving and mud slinging by lunatics
>always draws a crowd.
I'll always be here to remind you that you claimed there were only 200
cops in Peking, loon.
mike3
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 02:12:29 -0700 (PDT), Tom Potter
>
> >It appears that McCain thinks
>
> Translates to "my opinion of what I think his opinion...."
>
> So much for factual reporting.
>
McCain is no better than Obama. Both are bad. Although I'd think
McCain is worse, but neither
are _good_.
Both want a continuation of imperial and destructive politics in one
form or another. And it looks
like the few that had any inkling of what to do were thrown by the
side and most likely will not
win... This is a big, big problem.
I'm getting tired of all this McCain/Obama junk, as it's just bad vs
really bad, there's no GOOD
there.
Tom Potter
"Tim_Miller" <replyinn...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:gcm24l$hns$3...@registered.motzarella.org...
I would like to thank "Tim_Miller"
for demonstrating that
"If I were a raving, lying lunatic starving for attention.",
I would emulate him and his buddy "Klaus Schadenfreude",
and attack the messenger,
rather than address the message in
a rational, intelligent, civilized way.
Although Timmy seems to be an uneducated, immature boy,
who reacts emotionally and attacks messengers
whose posts bend him all out of shape,
he may have made a few rational, intelligent, civilized posts
to the newsgroups, and hopefully he will direct the readers to them
in order to demonstrate that he has the capability to address issues
in an intelligent, civilized, moral, mature way.