Towelheads in the army
Big Bart
I been saying all along how we aint gotta let no towelheads across the
border into our country and now cause the stupid lefty librels felt
sorry for the towelheads and spics they let em in and now we got a
towelhead president and the towelheads let in his muslim bros in the
army!!!!
That stupid towelhead mother fuckerpiece of shit killed our boys who
were gonna go waste the towelheads in Iraq. shoot sure makes it easier
for the towelheads when they can waste our boys here in our own army.
we gotta stop this muslim scorge now.
--
white men dont fear big bart's here
Wayne
"Big Bart" <bartw...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:z8XIm.3518$Sw5....@newsfe16.iad...
> Now you see the shit thats happened now that we got a Muslum president??
>
> I been saying all along how we aint gotta let no towelheads
The term "towelhead" is an offensive term, and you should apologize for
saying it. They do not wear towels.
It is a material similar to what is used for sheets.
Thus a more acceptable term would be "sheet head".
Klaus Schadenfreude
Would you fucking learn to spell before you go off on one of your
ignorant redneck diatribes?
Thanks!
The Wiz
He got his oint across, you Arab ass kisser.
Phxbrd
I see our gene pool needs cleaning again.
Phxbrd
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eli8f5hj8vmntm9gl...@4ax.com...
"Stupid is as Stupid does."
-Forrest Gump
Alex DeLarge
...we tried, you're still here.
Lookout
wrote:
>Now you see the shit thats happened now that we got a Muslum president??
>
>I been saying all along how we aint gotta let no towelheads across the
>border into our country and now cause the stupid lefty librels felt
>sorry for the towelheads and spics they let em in and now we got a
>towelhead president and the towelheads let in his muslim bros in the
>army!!!!
Bush has killed over 4,000 US soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines in
Iraq for no good reason. Should we keep all redneck christians out of
the White House. On that one I would agree with you.
>That stupid towelhead mother fuckerpiece of shit killed our boys who
>were gonna go waste the towelheads in Iraq. shoot sure makes it easier
>for the towelheads when they can waste our boys here in our own army.
>we gotta stop this muslim scorge now.
Ok...Tim McVie. Should we keep all white christians out of the
military? I know there are at least 2 incidences of US Army shooting
their own over in Iraq..both were white males. Should we keep all
white males out of the military?
Mr.Smartypants
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:20:35 -0600, Big Bart <bartw90...@aol.com>
YES!!
Nothing but hot looking young females in the military.
When they hit 30 or want to get married they have to retire.
Sanders Kaufman
news:ncs8f5lua34mpfrk5...@4ax.com...
> Should we keep all redneck christians out of
> the White House. On that one I would agree with you.
I sure would like to see THAT one asked at the next debate - "Do you believe
in talking snakes and ghosts?"
Alex DeLarge
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:20:35 -0600, Big Bart <bartw...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Now you see the shit thats happened now that we got a Muslum president??
>>
>> I been saying all along how we aint gotta let no towelheads across the
>> border into our country and now cause the stupid lefty librels felt
>> sorry for the towelheads and spics they let em in and now we got a
>> towelhead president and the towelheads let in his muslim bros in the
>> army!!!!
>
> Bush has killed over 4,000 US soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines
He has?
What did he use to do that with, how did he get the free time to be in
the field?
CITE?
Alex DeLarge
Ya, babies in combat just doesn't cut it!
Alex DeLarge
> "Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ncs8f5lua34mpfrk5...@4ax.com...
>
>> Should we keep all redneck christians out of
>> the White House. On that one I would agree with you.
>
> I sure would like to see THAT one a
Of course you would, you're a fascist.
Lookout
AHAHA. You're so right! I married a girl I met in the Army.
Lookout
Palin would answer "yes".
Alex DeLarge
Sanders Kaufman
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:20:13 -0600, "Sanders Kaufman"
>>I sure would like to see THAT one asked at the next debate - "Do you
>>believe
>>in talking snakes and ghosts?"
>>
> Palin would answer "yes".
She and GW should start a televangelism ministry together.
I'd tune in to that one EVERY WEEK!
I'd even DVR it.
Lookout
There would be a new college drinking game..every time W fucked up a
bible verse you do a shot!
Sarah Ehrett
wrote:
:>Bush has killed over 4,000 US soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines in
:>Iraq for no good reason. Should we keep all redneck christians out of
:>the White House.
LOL. GW a redneck?
You take that back! :)
I'm a transplanted New Englander currently down here in Maryland and
not for one nanosecond do I consider myself a redneck/toothless
waterman.
GW Bush is a transplanted New Englander [was born in New Haven
Connecticut and educated at Yale and Harvard] currently living in
Texas. I can guarantee you GW Bush is not a redneck. He's a good old
boy from the privileged blue bloods in New England.
Alex DeLarge
Topaz
Today let's talk about some of the things that have changed in America
since September 11. I'm not thinking about all of the new rigamarole
at airports. I'm more interested in the changes in the Politically
Correct party line laid down for the lemmings by the media. I'm
interested in changes in the way Americans view the world. And I'm
interested in the changed prospects for the future of America.
The most interesting thing about the new party line is its stupidity.
The Jews were caught by surprise last month, and they had to whip up
something in a hurry in order to deflect blame from Israel and from
the U.S. government's support for Israel. Apparently the best they
could do on a moment's notice is the explanation that Osama bin Laden
attacked us simply because he hates our freedom and democracy. Since
they first cooked up that explanation they've refined it quite a bit.
Both the Foreign Ministry in Israel and the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee, Israel's enormously powerful lobby in Washington,
have been circulating "talking papers" to their own people, to
politicians, and to everyone else who is likely to be making a public
statement about America's new war or about Washington's past policy in
the Middle East.
These "talking papers" tell people how to counter what the Jews call
Osama bin Laden's "lies" and also how to respond to anyone who
suggests that our government's support of Israel might have had
something to do with the September 11 attack. The papers warn people
never to raise this subject, but if someone else insists on talking
about it, it is to be countered with the explanation that support for
Israel had nothing at all to do with the attack, that we would have
been attacked even if we weren't supporting Israel, and that the only
reason for the attack is Osama bin Laden's irrational hatred of
America's freedom and democracy.
I believe that it's clear that many people actually believe this
nonsense, judging by the number of cars with red, white, and blue
ribbons tied to their antennas. But these are the people who believe
everything Tom Brokaw or their beloved Big Brother in the White House
tells them. If George Bush came on TV and told them with that
mock-solemn expression of his that a Martian invasion force had just
landed, that the Martians were demanding one million sacrificial
virgins as their price for not destroying Hollywood and Washington,
and that U.S. Army troops would be going door to door to collect
virgins, the folks with the ribbons on their antennas would believe
it, and they would prepare to hand over any virgins in their
households. They would consider it their patriotic duty. The party
line may change from time to time, but lemmings never change.
Well, the lemmings may believe that U.S. support for Israel had
nothing to do with the September 11 attack or with the anthrax-laden
letters now going around, but no one else believes it. Last week the
media bosses were kicking themselves because they had let the text of
a statement Osama bin Laden had made be published in the United
States. They said that they had made a mistake in putting this
statement before the American public. They wouldn't publish any
further Osama bin Laden statements, they said, because the statements
might contain secret instructions for his operatives.
Everyone I've spoken with laughed at that excuse. In his last
statement Osama bin Laden said that Americans would not be secure and
would have no peace of mind as long as Palestinians were not secure in
their own land. That's the sort of powerful and simple message that
even Sally Soccer Mom and Joe Sixpack might understand, and that's
what the Jewish media bosses don't want the public to hear. They're
not worried about secret instructions; they're worried about the
lemmings figuring out what's going on.
Actually, I think there's very little danger of that. And really, the
changes I'm more interested in are in the outlook of the minority of
the population able to think for itself: the minority that doesn't
believe whatever Tom Brokaw says. You know, I've been talking to this
minority for years-decades, actually-warning them about the
consequences of letting their government get out of control, warning
them of the consequences of permitting the Jews of Hollywood and New
York to run our country through their control of our mass media,
warning them of the consequences of continuing to sit on their hands
and keep their mouths shut from fear of being denounced by the media
as "anti-Semites" or "racists."
And I wasn't having as much success as I wanted at getting them to pay
attention and change their ways. Many of those who listened wouldn't
do anything because what I was warning them about didn't seem quite
real. Despite all the changes they could see around them-the
deterioration of our cities and our schools, the darkening of the
racial complexion of America, the trashing of our culture by the mass
media, the increasingly obvious efforts of the Jewish media bosses to
persuade our young women that they should bed down with
non-Whites-despite everything, they themselves managed to remain
comfortable and economically secure, so the things I was warning them
about didn't seem quite real. They had convinced themselves that they
were above it all, that they could continue to watch the destruction
of their country and their people all around them, and it would never
affect them personally: that they could remain secure and comfortable
while everything around them went to hell.
Osama bin Laden jolted some of them awake on September 11: some of
those whose attention I hadn't been able to catch with my own
warnings. He convinced some of them that what they had been observing
going on around them for years was in fact real: that continuing to
ignore the degenerative processes promoted by the media and the
government and hoping for the best really wasn't a good strategy for
personal survival. In particular, he convinced many members of the
thinking minority that losing control of our government really is a
serious matter, that permitting our government to be used by the Jews
against their neighbors in the Middle East- and also against the
genuine interests of the American people- could have real consequences
at home.
I have the feeling that many of these thinking people are paying at
least a little more attention now to the things we've been talking
about here every week. The fact that the number of people who download
these broadcasts from my Web site each Saturday has nearly doubled
since September 11 is a pretty good indication of this, I believe.
Just as I'm getting more hate mail from the red-white-and-blue-ribbon
types, I'm also getting more thoughtful responses from the people who
understand and care. Which is to say, I think I have an audience now
that not only is bigger but also is more attentive and responsive.
That is really important.
I'm not discouraged by the fact that the attentive and responsive
people still constitute only a minority of a minority. I'm encouraged
by the fact that the attentive people now make up a larger minority of
the thinking portion of the population than they did before September
11. Important things always are done by minorities. Majorities don't
make decisions; individuals do; small minorities do. History is made
by active minorities. Sometimes an active minority may use the passive
majority as a tool or a weapon, but the minority always acts in accord
with its own will.
What's important is which minority is making the decisions, which
minority is active at any particular moment. For at least the past 60
years it's been the wrong minority, an alien minority that is
implacably hostile to our people. If we are to survive, that must
change. Our minority must become active instead. Our minority must
grow to include more of the thinking portion of our population. And
that is happening now. That's been happening since September 11.
The people who understand and care have been forced to begin paying
attention. I have a very strong premonition that there will be other
things in the reasonably near future that will make them pay even
closer attention.
The Bush government, just like the Clinton government before it,
thinks that it can stop terrorism with cruise missiles and smart
bombs. But just think for a moment: whether Osama bin Laden survives
the Bush government's current war against Israel's enemies in the
Middle East or not, he already has become immortal. In the eyes of
Muslims he has been elevated to a status in heaven alongside Mohammed.
His name will be praised, and stories will be told about him around
campfires throughout the Muslim world for countless generations to
come, long after the Bush government has gone and been forgotten.
Cruise missiles can't take Osama bin Laden's immortality away from
him. There's nothing the Bush government can do to diminish his glory
in the Muslim world. In fact, the more cruise missiles and smart bombs
the United States unleashes on the Muslim world, the higher will Osama
bin Laden's esteem rise; the more will his strike against the United
States seem justified to his fellow Muslims.
Don't be fooled by the tame "house Muslims" the media bosses have been
trotting out to explain to the lemmings that violence is abhorrent to
"real Muslims." The real Muslims are the ones rioting against the
government in Pakistan now. The real Muslims are the ones singing
Osama bin Laden's praises now. And there will be no shortage of other
young Muslims lusting for a share in his glory, lusting to have their
praises sung around campfires too. Cruise missiles don't frighten
them. There are enough of them already in this country to keep things
jumping, thanks to the government's insane immigration policy of
recent decades.
At the University of California in Los Angeles a library worker,
53-year-old Jonnie Hargis, has been suspended without pay because he
sent out an e-mail letter criticizing U.S. support for Israel's
aggression. The university administration explained that it has a
policy against using university computers for political messages, but
Hargis, who has worked at the UCLA library for 22 years, pointed out
that no one who has been sending out pro-Israel and pro-war messages
has been punished.
There are similar situations at other universities around the country.
Jews and neo-conservatives post belligerent, bloodthirsty messages
calling for the annihilation of all of the Jews' enemies in the Middle
East, including Iraq and Iran as well as Afghanistan. Anyone who calls
instead for eliminating the cause of the September 11 attack- that is,
for stopping the blind support by the U.S. government of Israel's
aggression- is censured and threatened with expulsion or with being
fired.
There are still people around who can remember how it was at our
universities during the Vietnam war. That was when treason ruled on
campuses. Students burned their draft cards and put up Viet Cong flags
and posters of Ho Chi Minh in their dormitories. Jewish activists in
groups such as Students for a Democratic Society organized pro-Viet
Cong rallies on campuses. Professors encouraged this activity, and
administrators didn't interfere, citing free speech.
The switch to red, white, and blue ribbons and saluting the flag came
rather suddenly last month, and a lot of thinking people understand
why it came. They understand that it is when America is involved in a
war to promote Jewish interests that pledging allegiance to the flag
suddenly is declared fashionable. When Israel's welfare is threatened,
Jews, ordinarily noted for their cynicism and irreverence, suddenly
put their hands over their hearts and begin singing The Star-Spangled
Banner, and they glare at anyone who isn't singing loudly enough. And
people who make the mistake of asking why get fired or suspended. But
you know, firing people or suspending people who have dissenting
opinions doesn't go down well with the independent thinkers. And I'll
guarantee you:
there will be a lot more dissent before this war is over. And the
Jewish media won't be able to hide it all.
What we are beginning to see now is a sharpening division between the
Jews, their bought politicians, and the "I pledge allegiance,"
authoritarian types on one side, and everyone else on the other side.
We also saw a division, along different lines, during the Vietnam war,
with the authoritarians and the Jews on opposite sides instead of the
same side. I believe that the division this time will develop faster
and become sharper.
I don't know how the war itself will develop. It was clear before it
began that the U.S. military machine is quite capable of flattening
Afghanistan or any other Third World country without suffering any
significant losses to its own personnel, simply because we can hit
them from a distance with a great deal of destructive power, and they
don't have the means to hit back-except through what we call
"terrorism." It is certain that there will be more terrorism,
although, of course, I cannot predict the form it will take or its
magnitude.
I can predict, however, that the media and the politicians will
denounce it as "cowardly" and will act as if America has been wronged:
that whatever form the next blow against America takes and wherever it
comes from, it will be declared "unprovoked." And I can predict that
the polls published by the media will continue to show nearly every
American wildly enthusiastic about the war, even as the opposition to
the war grows.
One interesting thing about the opposition this time is that it is
growing both among the Gentile Left and among genuine patriots. During
the Vietnam war the members of the Gentile Left all were on the Jewish
side. Despite the current agreement between leftists and patriots on
the single issue of ending support for Israel and limiting the war in
the Middle East, I don't see much chance of real collaboration between
these two elements.
The Gentile Left is still hopelessly confused on such essential
issues as race and feminism and homosexuality and permissiveness. But
the war is indeed driving a wedge between Jews and Gentile leftists-a
deeper wedge than that driven by the development of Jewish
neo-conservatism after the Vietnam war, and for that we should be
thankful.
There may be other hopeful developments as well. The assassination in
Jerusalem this week of one of Israel's most bloodthirsty Jewish
militants by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
certainly was a welcome move. Until now all of the assassins have been
Jews, and all of the victims have been Palestinians. It's too soon to
know whether or not this one act of retribution against the Israeli
leadership will be followed by other successful blows, but it may be
that the events of recent weeks have emboldened the Palestinians to
act with more imagination and enterprise than before.
Looking ahead a bit, there are several signs of hope here on our own
home front. The heightened sense of reality among non-lemmings, the
lessening of their sense of detachment, the stronger realization that
they cannot survive by continuing to sit on their hands and watch the
Jews destroy the world around them- this is the single most important
consequence of recent events. This, together with the growing
alienation between Gentile leftists and Jews, leaves the Jews in a
weaker position than they have been in a long time. They will crack
their whips more frantically than before, trying to keep everyone in
line, but the principal effect of that will be to generate even more
resentment against them.
Things are a bit brittle now. A few dozen more anthrax cases, another
truck bomb in a well chosen location, and substantial changes could
take place in a hurry: a stock market panic, martial law measures by
the Bush government, and a sharpening of the debate as to how we got
ourselves get into this mess in the first place. As the debate
sharpens, the Jews and their collaborators will pull out all of the
stops in an effort to stifle it, but I don't think that even a
declaration of martial law can stifle it now. Too many people already
smell the stink in Washington. Too many people already understand on
whose hands is the blood of 6,000 innocent Americans who died last
month. Too many people understand the true motivation behind the
current war against Israel's enemies in the Middle East. The genie is
out of the bottle now, and not even Mr. Bush's new anti-terrorism
agency-what does he call it? -- the Office of Homeland Security? --
not even this new Federal agency can put it back in the bottle.
It's a strange thing: in a novel I wrote more than 12 years ago - the
title is Hunter-I talked about the formation of a new anti-terrorism
agency, separate from the FBI. And I pointed out that the principal
aim of the new agency would not be to protect the public from
terrorism, but to protect the government from an increasingly restless
and disillusioned public: a sort of modern Praetorian Guard. I think
that we'll be seeing more developments in that direction in the next
few months, with the timing depending upon when the next surprise
comes and its magnitude.
Of course, I don't know what will happen next to shatter already
jangled nerves, but it is likely that something will happen. My advice
to responsible patriots now is this: Expect a surprise, and remain
calm when it comes. But don't wait for it to come to raise your voice.
Speak out now. Don't be intimidated by the mindless yahoos waving
their flags or by the government or by the media. If you point out
calmly and in a reasoned way who is responsible for what happened to
America last month you will have more people agreeing with you than
you might imagine. If you call for your fellow Americans to join you
in regaining control of their government, the response will be greater
than at any time in recent years.
Thanks for being with me again today.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
The Wiz
Muslim, a witch doctor or fallen Jew is out.
The Wiz
You still fear Palin. I'll bet strong women smell your fear and pick on
you Henry Waxman picking his nose.
The Wiz
are projecting your fear of your messiah being brought down by his
incompetence, and stupidity. People are fed up with dumb. He makes Bush
look as smart as Steven Hawking. Obama has learned that one doesn't get
Affirmative Action points for trying to run a country. In real life,
there are no passing grades for mediocrity and incompetence.
Lookout
wrote:
I grew up in Mass and now live in Alabama. Bush is a redneck.
One sure way of knowing..when he was asked...AFTER 9/11 if he had made
any mistakes..he couldn't think of one. NOT ONE! That's a redneck..a
man who can't admit he's made a mistake when the whole world was
watching him do it.
Lookout
wrote:
Palin is a fucking idiot. Your party deserves her.
The Chief Instigator
> Lookout is a pedophile.
Accusing others of possessing your faults, Jeff?
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Manitoba 1 (November 5)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, November 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
Alex DeLarge
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:25:40 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <nine...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:59:31 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> :>Bush has killed over 4,000 US soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines in
>> :>Iraq for no good reason. Should we keep all redneck christians out of
>> :>the White House.
>>
>> LOL. GW a redneck?
>>
>> You take that back! :)
>>
>> I'm a transplanted New Englander currently down here in Maryland and
>> not for one nanosecond do I consider myself a redneck/toothless
>> waterman.
>>
>> GW Bush is a transplanted New Englander [was born in New Haven
>> Connecticut and educated at Yale and Harvard] currently living in
>> Texas. I can guarantee you GW Bush is not a redneck. He's a good old
>> boy from the privileged blue bloods in New England.
>
> I grew up in Mass and now live in Alabama. Bush is a redneck.
No you lying asshole, he is NOT!
Why do you always deny reality?
Are you sick in the head?
Alex DeLarge
You are repeatedly beaten and derided here, the libitards have EARNED you.
Alex DeLarge
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:44:50 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>> Lookout is a pedophile.
>
> Accusing others of possessing your faults, Jeff?
>
The Wiz
If she frightens the sissy men of the left so easily, I'm glad she's a
conservative. I'll be you're afraid to read Ann Coulter because you will
cry yourself to sleep. Bwaaahhhhhhhhhh....
The Chief Instigator
Enjoy your drugged fantasy, Jeff.
Klaus Schadenfreude
>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> In talk.politics.guns Big Bart <bartw...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Now you see the shit thats happened now that we got a Muslum president??
>>>
>>> I been saying all along how we aint gotta let no towelheads across the
>>> border into our country and now cause the stupid lefty librels felt
>>> sorry for the towelheads and spics they let em in and now we got a
>>> towelhead president and the towelheads let in his muslim bros in the
>>> army!!!!
>>>
>>> That stupid towelhead mother fuckerpiece of shit killed our boys who
>>> were gonna go waste the towelheads in Iraq. shoot sure makes it easier
>>> for the towelheads when they can waste our boys here in our own army.
>>> we gotta stop this muslim scorge now.
>>
>> Would you fucking learn to spell before you go off on one of your
>> ignorant redneck diatribes?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>He got his oint across, you Arab ass kisser.
^^^^
So did I, inbred fuckwit. [chuckle]
Lookout
wrote:
Afraid? Why would I be afraid of someone who has no effect on me what
so ever? You seem to understand that concept much better than I do.
The Wiz
The only point you have is on the top of your Arab ass kissing head.
The Wiz
Alex DeLarge
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:45:09 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:44:50 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>>>> Lookout is a pedophile.
>>> Accusing others of possessing your faults, Jeff?
>>>
>> Rice University net-stalking firing time, Patty?
>
> Enjoy your drugged fantasy, Jeff.
>
Shall I repost the google archive on that sad affair, Patty?
Lookout
Alex DeLarge
Prescott Niles
> Lookout should be tried for treason.
Lookout should be placed in this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Europe_Chippers_1.jpg
Alex DeLarge
That should do the trick!
Klaus Schadenfreude
that you're an inbred redneck that can barely spell, much less post
something intelligent.
The Chief Instigator
> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:45:09 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>>> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:44:50 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>>>>> Lookout is a pedophile.
>>>> Accusing others of possessing your faults, Jeff?
>>>>
>>> Rice University net-stalking firing time, Patty?
>>
>> Enjoy your drugged fantasy, Jeff.
>>
>
> Shall I repost the google archive on that sad affair, Patty?
If you want to be ripped for spam (not that you care), no one will bother
with your mental problems. I'm sorry you weren't over in North Richland
Hills so Paula Ollie could pop you with a few thrown pool balls. Even you
might notice that.
Alex DeLarge
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:52:05 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:45:09 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>>>> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:44:50 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>>>>>> Lookout is a pedophile.
>>>>> Accusing others of possessing your faults, Jeff?
>>>>>
>>>> Rice University net-stalking firing time, Patty?
>>> Enjoy your drugged fantasy, Jeff.
>>>
>> Shall I repost the google archive on that sad affair, Patty?
>
> If you want to be ripped for spam
No "spam" just facts, Patty.
Prescott Niles
Worked swell in the movie "Fargo".
Cheaper then a trial, too!
Alex DeLarge
C'mon now, don't cut the lawyers out of this ;-)
Prescott Niles
The prosectution lawyers can get a rebate.
Lookout
wrote:
Gee..how American of you.
You haven't earned the freedoms I served to give you.
Lookout
There goes klaus editing post trying to be funny.
Alex DeLarge
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:18:28 -0500, Prescott Niles <TheK...@bass.gov>
> wrote:
>
>> Alex DeLarge wrote:
>>> Lookout should be tried for treason.
>>
>> Lookout should be placed in this
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Europe_Chippers_1.jpg
>
> Gee..how American of you.
We always clean up our waste cuttings.
Alex DeLarge
Prescott Niles
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:18:28 -0500, Prescott Niles <TheK...@bass.gov>
> wrote:
>>Alex DeLarge wrote:
>>
>>>Lookout should be tried for treason.
>>
>>
>>Lookout should be placed in this
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Europe_Chippers_1.jpg
>
>
> Gee..how American of you.
I just want to save us REAL Americans money.
And with you becoming mulch... that is a good thing!
> You haven't earned the freedoms I served to give you.
You have never served anything in any way, shape, or form, to preserve
what I already have, you commie rat bastard.
Now go tell yer "daughter" how to play with the guns she finds.
Better remind her "But, Don't shoot Daddy when we play our super secret
naked games while mommy is sleepy."
The Wiz
Go do a lap dance on Anderson Cooper.
The Wiz
Whose side were you on?
Lookout
wrote:
AHAHAHAH And like the little punk you are you attack my family. I love
pissing off little twerps like you.
Nobammer
> "Big Bart" <bartw...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:z8XIm.3518$Sw5....@newsfe16.iad...
>
>>Now you see the shit thats happened now that we got a Muslum president??
>>
>>I been saying all along how we aint gotta let no towelheads
>
> -
> The term "towelhead" is an offensive term, and you should apologize for
> saying it. They do not wear towels.
> It is a material similar to what is used for sheets.
>
> Thus a more acceptable term would be "sheet head".
How about diaperhead. Diapers hold shit and could also be referred to as
Shitheads.
Alex DeLarge
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:09:51 -0500, Prescott Niles <TheK...@bass.gov>
> wrote:
>
>> Lookout wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:18:28 -0500, Prescott Niles <TheK...@bass.gov>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Alex DeLarge wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lookout should be tried for treason.
>>>>
>>>> Lookout should be placed in this
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Europe_Chippers_1.jpg
>>>
>>> Gee..how American of you.
>> I just want to save us REAL Americans money.
>> And with you becoming mulch... that is a good thing!
>>
>>
>>> You haven't earned the freedoms I served to give you.
>> You have never served anything in any way, shape, or form, to preserve
>> what I already have, you commie rat bastard.
>>
>> Now go tell yer "daughter" how to play with the guns she finds.
>>
>> Better remind her "But, Don't shoot Daddy when we play our super secret
>> naked games while mommy is sleepy."
>
> AHAHAHAH And like the little punk you are you attack my family.
He didn't say anything about your litter-mates.
> I love pissing off little twerps like you.
And we love shitting on you.
Alex DeLarge
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:52:05 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:45:09 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>>>> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:44:50 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>>>>>> Lookout is a pedophile.
>>>>> Accusing others of possessing your faults, Jeff?
>>>>>
>>>> Rice University net-stalking firing time, Patty?
>>> Enjoy your drugged fantasy, Jeff.
>>>
>> Shall I repost the google archive on that sad affair, Patty?
>
> If you want to be ripped for spam (not that you care), no one will bother
> with your mental problems. I'm sorry you weren't over in North Richland
> Hills so Paula Ollie could pop you with a few thrown pool balls. Even you
> might notice that.
>
* first posted 02/03/04 by "Hank Kimball (County Agent)"
http://tinyurl.com/yqrca
Here is Stalker Patrick begrudgingly giving me credit for his getting fired
from
Rice University and losing all those benefits. He was warned but as any
other
obsessive type he just doesn't know when to stop!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szk1xr8ea25.fsf%40fnord.io.co...
(Archived locally as: PatrickGivesMEcredit)
Subject: Re: R. Scott "Doc Tavish" Bradbury In His Own Words
From: Patrick Humphrey <patr...@io.com>
Date: 13 Dec 2003 14:29:06 -0600
Message-ID: <szk1xr8...@fnord.io.com>
James Seymour McTavish <JS_McTavis...@NoSpamPlease.net> writes:
{...]
>You're the one nursing a grudge! You got fired and now you're miffed. You
>got
>fired because of all the evidence I gave Rice University concerning your
>stalking people on their time and using their facilities!
Sorry, but that's not the truth you want. What actually happened is none of
your business, and that's the University's opinion, with which I concur.
[...]
>>>Care to deny you were fired from Rice University?
:.
>>I've never denied that. what you can't accept is that you don't know
why.
:.
>I know why and yet your remain in denial! Rice did not contact me for
>naught!
>I sent them hundreds of headers spanned over years which proved you were
>stalking up and down USENET harassing people when you were supposed to be
>doing your job!
Keep patting yourself on the back for something you were a bit player in at
best.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
As for me being a "bit player at best" in Patrick's firing is Patrick not
wanting to admit I got him fired! Rice University's own security department
under Rice President (at the time) Malcolm Gillis contacted me and asked for
headers showing the dates and times of Patrick's stalkings. They
investigated
and not too much later Patrick was fired! Patrick violated his employee's
policy
regarding Rice University's computer facilities as shown here:
Rice University "Appropriate Use of Computing Facilities" Policy (832-99)
http://www.professor.rice.edu/professor/Appropriate_Use_of_Computer_R...
(New link active February 3, 2004. Archived locally as RICEedu832-99)
Rice University General Policy No. 832-99
Appropriate Use of Computer Resources
Introduction
The University's computer and information network is a continually growing
and changing resource that supports thousands of users and systems. These
resources are vital for the fulfillment of the academic, research and
business needs of the University community. Their use is provided as a
privilege. In order to ensure a reasonable and dependable level of
service, it is essential that each individual faculty member, staff
member, and student must exercise responsible, ethical behavior when using
these resources. Misuse by even a few individuals has the potential to
disrupt University business, and, even worse, the legitimate academic and
research work of faculty and students...
The unauthorized use of resources is prohibited and, in many cases, may be
violations of the law. We are guided by the law in noting that
unauthorized use includes, but is not limited to the following types of
activities.
Harassment or threats to specific individuals, or a class of individuals:
* Using e-mail or newsgroups to threaten or stalk someone...
Questions Relating to This Policy
The examples of unauthorized use set forth above are not meant to be
exhaustive. Answers to commonly asked questions about the appropriate use
of University computer and information network resources and examples of
actions that would violate this policy are discussed on the Information
Technology web page. Additional questions about this policy or of the
applicability of this policy to a particular situation should be referred
to: violat...@rice.edu. The Vice President for Information Technology is
the final authority on questions of appropriate use of University
resources. Whenever you are in doubt regarding an issue of questionable
use, it is in your best interest to resolve the issue before pursuing any
questionable use of University resources.
Malcolm Gillis, President
Policy No. 832-93
August 25, 1993
Revised: February 15, 1999
<end>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=jjfd3to0llfo108h5e98jmbdmge9...
Subject: Rice University's Investigation of Patrick L. Humphrey Still in
Progress Message-ID: <jjfd3to0llfo108h5e98jmbdmge9gr3...@4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:10:28 GMT
Received: from hydrant.ruf.rice.edu (hydrant.ruf.rice.edu [128.42.31.100])
by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA01072
for <xxx...@flash.net>; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:22:47 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [128.42.207.8] (gen-coun-03.rice.edu [128.42.207.8])
by hydrant.ruf.rice.edu (8.11.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id eBCGMkX27315;
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:22:46 -0600 (CST)
X-Sender: cagar...@pop.ruf.rice.edu
Message-Id: <l03130301b65bfdda0baf@[128.42.207.8]>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20001211080837.00860...@pop.flash.net>
References: <l03130312b6557e7f6587@[128.42.207.8]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:19:17 -0600
To: Scott Bradbury <xxx...@flash.net>
From: Carlos Garcia <cagar...@rice.edu>
Subject: Re: Your Complaint
X-UIDL: e2a2bfcec00f3bb5f0ccb0709fcb8abe
Mr. Bradbury, I would appreciate it if you would forward to me the
messages that you referred to below. Unfortunately the person who will be
investigating this matter caught the flu last week, but I expect her back
soon. When she returns I will give her any messages you have forwarded to
me. Thank you. Carlos Garcia
- Show quoted text -
For the record Mr. Garcia has been provided with the examples of Patrick
saying his superiors are laughing me, throwing my complaints in the
wastebasket etc. We will see if Rice is honorable and will take care of
their misbehaving and gold bricking staff member.
Merry Christmas Patrick-- I tried to warn you BUT you would not shut up
and you did imply your superiors approve of your harassment and stalking.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Here is another person who got tired of being stalked by Patrick from Rice
University:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3ba90f9e_4%40corp.newsgroups....
From: "Pontiff Maximus" <police.law...@bigfoot.com>
References: <hdshqtgal907pbvic5ko6u9g8orjcb7...@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Attention: Mr. Malcolm Gillis, Patrick L. Humphrey is Still
Stalking People on Rice U's Time
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:46:03 -0500
Message-ID: <3ba90f9...@corp.newsgroups.com>
This is a formal complaint about one of your employees:
Patrick L Humphrey
name: Humphrey, Patrick L
class: staff
department: Operations Center
title: Computer Operator
mailstop: Operations Center MS119
office: 109 Mudd Building
phone: 713-348-XXXX
email: patr...@rice.edu
homepage: http://is.rice.edu/~patrick/
nickname: patrick
Subject: Stalking of several people using the Rice University Computers.
Your employee has been for several years stalking me on the Internet. I am a
police officer and he posts my address's where I live and work. He calls up
my Internet service Provider and make false complaints. I would appreciate
if you could have him stop this type of harassment.
Please email me back so I may inform you of the details with your phone
number.
To whom it may Concern:
CC: p...@rice.edu
http://www.chami.com/tips/internet/111896I.html
Type in patr...@io.com for the finger.
It will tell you that he is accessing his account while at work at Rice.
finger: : no such user.
Login: Patrick Name: Patrick L. Humphrey
Directory: /home/p/Patrick Shell: /usr/local/bin/tcsh
Office: West of Eden, 713 348-4989 Home Phone: 713 266-7764
Last login Wed Sep 19 09:41 (CDT) on pts/49 from wolf.is.rice.edu
Mail last read Wed Sep 19 02:41 2001 (CDT)
Login from Rice? Hummmm.......
-------------------------------
For those sick unto death of Patrick's relentless stalking people
on Rice University's time please contact his employer who would like
to know and be shown positive proofs he may act upon. It is hard for Rice
to terminate employees without an established history of misconduct
on their part.
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~presiden/
PRESIDENT'S OFFICE
Malcolm Gillis, President
Rice University- MS-1
Phone (713) 348-XXXX or (713) 348-XXXX
Fax (713) 348-XXXX
X...@rice.edu
203 Lovett Hall
Carlos Garcia
Associate General Counsel
Rice University- M.S. 94
P.O. Box 1892
Houston, Texas 77251-1892
TEL: 713/348-XXXX
FAX: 713/348-XXXX
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
==================================================================================================================
Alex DeLarge
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:45:09 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>> The Chief Instigator wrote:
>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:44:50 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>>>> Lookout is a pedophile.
>>> Accusing others of possessing your faults, Jeff?
>>>
>> Rice University net-stalking firing time, Patty?
>
> Enjoy your drugged fantasy, Jeff.
>
Alex DeLarge
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:44:50 -0700, Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote:
>> Lookout is a pedophile.
>
> Accusing others of possessing your faults, Jeff?
>