Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

CCRKBA - LAUTENBERG LEGISLATION CLOAKS GUN BAN AGENDA AS ANTI-TERROR TOOL

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Cole Firearms Inc.

unread,
Jun 23, 2009, 1:57:29 AM6/23/09
to
NEWS RELEASE
LAUTENBERG LEGISLATION CLOAKS GUN BAN AGENDA AS ANTI-TERROR TOOL
BELLEVUE, WA � Legislation introduced today by veteran anti-gun New
Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg is designed to expand his gun
prohibition agenda under the cloak of national security, the Citizens
Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said.

Sen. Lautenberg�s new �Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous
Terrorists Act of 2009� would place unprecedented authority in the hands
of the Attorney General to deny someone their Second Amendment rights
without having been convicted, or even charged, with any crime. Instead,
under this legislation, someone whose name is added � for whatever
reason � to a terrorist watch list can suddenly find himself or herself
prohibited from exercising their constitutionally-protected rights based
on nothing more than suspicion.

�Frank Lautenberg has devoted his entire political career to stripping
as many citizens as possible of their firearm civil rights,� noted
CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. �His motivation appears to be a
Government Accountability Office report that asserts 963 cases of known
or suspected terrorists trying to buy firearms over a five-year period
from 2004 through February of this year. However, in 90 percent of those
cases, the purchases were allowed after the buyer cleared an FBI instant
background check.

�Lautenberg calls this the �terror loophole�,� he added, �yet neither
he, nor anyone else, can adequately explain how someone gets their name
on a so-called �terrorist watch list,� and there appears to be no way to
get one�s name off such a list once it is there.

�In Lautenberg�s world view,� Gottlieb observed, �any American citizen
interested in owning a gun is a potential terrorist. Would he add all of
our names to such a watch list, thus stripping us of our Second
Amendment rights, without first being charged, prosecuted and convicted
of some crime? Probably he would.

�In 2007,� Gottlieb recalled, �Lautenberg lamented that a similar bill
went nowhere. He claimed it was blocked because too many of his
colleagues �knuckled under to the gun lobby.� Better that Congress
protect gun owners� civil rights than be browbeaten by a knucklehead.�

These Dogs Don't Hunt: The Democrats' War on Guns

This book is a must read for every gun owner concerned about the
election results.
Buy now at a discount
from www.amazon.com

< Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family >

Copyright � 2009 Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms,
All Rights Reserved.
Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
James Madison Building
12500 N.E. Tenth Place
Bellevue, WA 98005 Voice: 425-454-4911
Toll Free: 800-426-4302
FAX: 425-451-3959
email: Informati...@ccrkba.org

edi...@netpath.net

unread,
Jun 23, 2009, 7:26:42 AM6/23/09
to
"Terrorist watch lists" are a lot like former Pres. Nixon's "enemies
list." NO publicly-stated criteria for who gets on them, NO impartial
judges but instead any executive-branch person who didn't like what
someone said makes the decision, NO right to confront witnesses or
have lawyers as required under the Sixth Amendment.

http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com - your source for hard-to-find stuff!

nraclaptrap

unread,
Jun 23, 2009, 8:50:25 AM6/23/09
to
"Cole Firearms Inc." <colefir...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:J1_%
l.3539$Rb6....@flpi147.ffdc.sbc.com:

> Sen. Lautenberg's new "Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous
> Terrorists Act of 2009" would place unprecedented authority in the

hands
> of the Attorney General to deny someone their Second Amendment rights
> without having been convicted, or even charged, with any crime.

Senator Lautenberg wants to disarm the National Guard? I don't believe
that. Who says...

Oh, Gottlieb again. Don't worry Cole, nobody's going to disarm your
state National Guard because that would violate the Second Amendment as
an infringement on the right of the People to have a well-regulated
militia.

And as we know, when it comes down to natural disasters and your ass is
floating down the river, you'll want the National Guard saving it, not
your gunbuddies.

That's because a well-regulated militia is necessary to the security of a
free state, while a heavily armed paranoid gunloon isn't even necessary
to his own security, let alone anybody else's.


--


NRACLAPTRAP

Gray Ghost

unread,
Jun 23, 2009, 11:56:24 AM6/23/09
to
"Cole Firearms Inc." <colefir...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:J1_%l.3539
$Rb6....@flpi147.ffdc.sbc.com:

> NEWS RELEASE


> LAUTENBERG LEGISLATION CLOAKS GUN BAN AGENDA AS ANTI-TERROR TOOL

> BELLEVUE, WA � Legislation introduced today by veteran anti-gun New

> Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg is designed to expand his gun
> prohibition agenda under the cloak of national security, the Citizens
> Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said.
>

> Sen. Lautenberg�s new �Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous
> Terrorists Act of 2009� would place unprecedented authority in the hands

> of the Attorney General to deny someone their Second Amendment rights
> without having been convicted, or even charged, with any crime. Instead,

> under this legislation, someone whose name is added � for whatever
> reason � to a terrorist watch list can suddenly find himself or herself

> prohibited from exercising their constitutionally-protected rights based
> on nothing more than suspicion.
>

> �Frank Lautenberg has devoted his entire political career to stripping
> as many citizens as possible of their firearm civil rights,� noted
> CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. �His motivation appears to be a

> Government Accountability Office report that asserts 963 cases of known
> or suspected terrorists trying to buy firearms over a five-year period
> from 2004 through February of this year. However, in 90 percent of those
> cases, the purchases were allowed after the buyer cleared an FBI instant
> background check.
>

> �Lautenberg calls this the �terror loophole�,� he added, �yet neither

> he, nor anyone else, can adequately explain how someone gets their name

> on a so-called �terrorist watch list,� and there appears to be no way to
> get one�s name off such a list once it is there.
>
> �In Lautenberg�s world view,� Gottlieb observed, �any American citizen

> interested in owning a gun is a potential terrorist. Would he add all of
> our names to such a watch list, thus stripping us of our Second
> Amendment rights, without first being charged, prosecuted and convicted
> of some crime? Probably he would.
>

> �In 2007,� Gottlieb recalled, �Lautenberg lamented that a similar bill

> went nowhere. He claimed it was blocked because too many of his

> colleagues �knuckled under to the gun lobby.� Better that Congress
> protect gun owners� civil rights than be browbeaten by a knucklehead.�


>
>
>
>
>
> These Dogs Don't Hunt: The Democrats' War on Guns
>
> This book is a must read for every gun owner concerned about the
> election results.
> Buy now at a discount
> from www.amazon.com
>
>
>
>< Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family >
>

> Copyright � 2009 Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms,

> All Rights Reserved.
> Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
> James Madison Building
> 12500 N.E. Tenth Place
> Bellevue, WA 98005 Voice: 425-454-4911
> Toll Free: 800-426-4302
> FAX: 425-451-3959
> email: Informati...@ccrkba.org
>
>

I wonder if the Democrats will send Bush a thank you card for the terrorist
watch list since it appears thaey now favor it?

--
Always remember:

Bull Connor was a Democrat!

jf...@ix.netcom.com

unread,
Jun 24, 2009, 5:11:50 PM6/24/09
to
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:50:25 -0500, nraclaptrap
<nracl...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>"Cole Firearms Inc." <colefir...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in news:J1_%
>l.3539$Rb6....@flpi147.ffdc.sbc.com:
>
>> Sen. Lautenberg's new "Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous
>> Terrorists Act of 2009" would place unprecedented authority in the
>hands
>> of the Attorney General to deny someone their Second Amendment rights
>> without having been convicted, or even charged, with any crime.
>
>Senator Lautenberg wants to disarm the National Guard? I don't believe
>that. Who says...
>
>Oh, Gottlieb again. Don't worry Cole, nobody's going to disarm your
>state National Guard because that would violate the Second Amendment as
>an infringement on the right of the People to have a well-regulated
>militia.
>

Where does it say that specifically in the Second Amendment?

>And as we know, when it comes down to natural disasters and your ass is
>floating down the river, you'll want the National Guard saving it, not
>your gunbuddies.
>

Didn't work like that after Hurricane Andrew in South Florida or
after the Los Angeles riots of 1992.


>That's because a well-regulated militia is necessary to the security of a
>free state, while a heavily armed paranoid gunloon isn't even necessary
>to his own security, let alone anybody else's.

Then why do we have a police force?

0 new messages