Taking money from a conservative is like taking candy from a baby.
TMT
Obama-bashers see literary gold
Eamon Javers Eamon Javers Sun Jul 5, 8:52 pm ET
As much as both men might hate to admit it, Barack Obama has been
very, very good to Mark Levin.
Levin is living the talk-radio dream: His three-hour broadcast is
aired on more than 150 stations to more than 5 million listeners a
day. And he has the hottest subject in the world: Obama.
The president, Levin pronounces almost daily, is a failure, a liar and
a “statist” who is trying to destroy individual freedom. The
broadcaster is accompanied by a Greek chorus of callers whose love for
Levin is rivaled only by their disdain for the president of the United
States.
His book “Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto” debuted at
No. 1 on The New York Times best-seller list and has remained on the
list for a remarkable 13 weeks, selling, Levin says, a total of
800,000 copies to date. (Nielsen BookScan puts the number at 714,000,
but its figures don’t include sales from Wal-Mart and a handful of
other prominent outlets.)
That’s a monster hit by publishing standards, and industry insiders
say it is largely due to a wave of anxiety coursing through
conservative and red-state America over the direction of Obama’s
policies.
“I’m seeing a lot of people, conservatives and other people, who are
starting to get extremely concerned that permanent damage can be done
or is being done to their country,” Levin told POLITICO.
Much has been made of the favorable media coverage Obama is receiving
as television broadcasters pursue ratings and magazine editors pursue
newsstand sales, but there’s an equal and opposite reaction going on
in the world of conservative media. Frustration with Barack Obama is
fueling listener intensity and book-buying binges at the same time it
gives a boost to the careers of conservative figures like Levin, whose
fans call him “the Great One.”
“Barack Obama is great for business for talk-radio folks on the
right,” said Michael Harrison, publisher of the industry magazine
Talkers. “This is simple psychology and mathematics. The whole name of
the game is to create a niche where people are motivated and see
danger lurking.”
That’s as true in book publishing as in talk radio. “We are very
bullish on our books coming out for the rest of this year,” says Marji
Ross, president of Regnery Publishing, a conservative house. “Our
little motto here is, what’s bad for the country could be good for our
business.”
In July, Regnery will put out commentator Michelle Malkin’s “Culture
of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies.”
“The fact that President Obama is in the White House and so aggressive
makes all of these books more urgent and probably will make them sell
better than they would have,” says Ross.
Three of the top five best-selling nonfiction books on Amazon.com last
week were written by conservatives: The paperback edition of Glenn
Beck’s “Common Sense: The Case Against an Out-of-Control Government,
Inspired by Thomas Paine ” was No. 1. Levin’s “Liberty & Tyranny” was
No. 2, and Dick Morris’s “Catastrophe” was No. 4. According to Nielsen
BookScan, Beck’s paperback has sold 258,000 copies, and “Catastrophe”
has sold 33,000.
Morris’s book, co-authored with his wife, Eileen McGann, is
extravagantly subtitled “How Obama, Congress and the Special Interests
Are Transforming a Slump Into a Crash, Freedom Into Socialism, and a
Disaster Into a Catastrophe ... and How to Fight Back.”The highest-
ranking Obama book on Amazon’s list is former Newsweek reporter
Richard Wolffe’s look at the 2008 campaign, “Renegade: The Making of a
President,” which occupies eighth place. Nielsen BookScan says the
book has sold 30,000 copies to date.
On television, the Fox News Channel announced that it had all of cable
news’ top 10 shows in total viewers in the second quarter, anchored by
conservative hosts including Beck, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. The
network is on pace for its best year ever — posting numbers that are
even better in 2009 than they were during the hard-fought campaign
year of 2008.
And there’s much more to come. Threshold Editions, the conservative
imprint of Simon & Schuster, has three books waiting in the wings —
all potential big sellers. Beck is back with “Arguing With Idiots:
America’s Next Epic Battle: 1776 vs. 1984” on sale Sept. 29. Jerome
Corsi, best known for his role in the anti-John Kerry Swift Boat
Veterans for Truth’s effort, will have a book out Oct. 13 called
“America for Sale: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global
Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty.” Conservative talk radio
host Jerry Doyle will join their ranks with “Have You Seen My Country
Lately?” which is due out on Dec. 29.
A host of mainstream conservative politicians are also taking pen to
paper. Threshold signed former Vice President Dick Cheney to a book
deal in June. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s book “On Solid Ground” is
due in January. And Republican National Committee Chairman Michael
Steele has an upcoming tome called “Right Now.”
What’s driving this thriving cottage industry is a sense of
frustration and anger among the Republican Party’s core conservative
base — and a power vacuum at the top of the party that lacks a
national leader to set its course. At a time of near-total electoral
defeat for conservative politicians, conservative pundits have become
the most powerful voices on the right. Indeed, conservative
broadcasting legend Rush Limbaugh got in a public tiff earlier this
year with Steele that left Democrats cackling that Limbaugh, not the
chairman, was the true leader of the GOP.
The emotions fueling this media boomlet sometimes border on a barely
suppressed rage. A website maintained by Levin’s fans, where people
chew over the host’s ideas and new book, brims with anger at the
president. Wrote one reader: “I CANT SLEEP SEEING this country being
destroyed DAMM IT OVER my dead body i will let this happen/THESE
BASTARDS HAVE GOT TO BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY.”
Wrote another: “Bottomline, do you know of any way we can remove these
idiots before this country goes down the crapper? I WILL HELP!!!
Should I buy a gun? Should I store produce, etc?”
And a third took the rhetoric a step further: “Another American
revolution will have to be fought — there will be blood.”
That last comment provoked a response from the website’s moderator,
who wrote: “That has KOOK written all over it.”
Regnery’s Ross says that kind of rhetoric is increasingly common. “I
hear a lot of people talking about revolution,” she says. “I don’t
think it is the crazy right-wing terrorist revolution — it’s a sense
that there’s been an abdication of responsibility, and at some point
soon, there will be a reckoning or a tipping point.”
Levin says the anger on the right is driven by a sense of helplessness
in the face of sweeping changes imposed by the Obama administration.
“Damage is being done that will be difficult to reverse even in future
elections,” he said, citing health care reform and cap-and-trade
energy legislation as two examples. “You could spend the next 20 to 30
years trying to argue why some small aspect of it ought to be changed.
You’re changing your form of government completely.”
But his book is not an anti-Obama screed, Levin says. He began writing
it in the summer of 2007, before Obama was the leading Democratic
contender for president. He finished it after the election and added
several sections specifically on Obama. Levin said his book is an
attempt to lay down the basic philosophical tenets of conservatism at
a time when he feels they may be under attack. “I’ve had this book in
my head for years,” Levin said. “It’s just that Obama so perfectly
illustrates the statist that I write about. I guess it’s more his
timing than my timing that has drawn attention to the book.”
To conservative talk-radio hosts, Obama presents much more of a threat
to the country than Bill Clinton ever did. Levin says Obama is more of
a “hard left” politician with a more sweeping agenda.
And on a business level, that represents opportunity. Andrew Wilkow, a
36-year-old conservative host of “The Wilkow Majority” on SIRIUS XM
Radio, says the Clinton years helped fuel the rise of Limbaugh. And
it’s possible the same thing may happen with Obama.
Kathryn McGarr contributed to this story.
> His book "Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto" debuted at
> No. 1 on The New York Times best-seller list and has remained on the
> list for a remarkable 13 weeks, selling, Levin says, a total of
> 800,000 copies to date. (Nielsen BookScan puts the number at 714,000,
> but its figures don't include sales from Wal-Mart and a handful of
> other prominent outlets.)
>
> That's a monster hit by publishing standards, and industry insiders
> say it is largely due to a wave of anxiety coursing through
> conservative and red-state America over the direction of Obama's
> policies.
Still, it's a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions of YOUR dollars
that Obama has given away and will continue to give away.
--
So, how's that whole "hopey - changey"
thing working out for you so far?
> Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:36cba8ea-56d0-4b0f- a25a-4a9...@d36g2000prb.googlegroups.com:
>
>> His book "Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto" debuted at No.
>> 1 on The New York Times best-seller list and has remained on the list
>> for a remarkable 13 weeks, selling, Levin says, a total of 800,000
>> copies to date. (Nielsen BookScan puts the number at 714,000, but its
>> figures don't include sales from Wal-Mart and a handful of other
>> prominent outlets.)
>>
>> That's a monster hit by publishing standards, and industry insiders say
>> it is largely due to a wave of anxiety coursing through conservative
>> and red-state America over the direction of Obama's policies.
>
> Still, it's a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions of YOUR
> dollars
> that Obama has given away
Is that ignorance or prevarication? Please provide cites showing that
Obama has "given away" trillions of dollars.
> and will continue to give away.
That is also a lie. Obama is _spending_ a lot of money, so far about $50
Billion, attempting to rectify the results of programs and policies that
your team bankrupted the nation with.
"More of the same" isn't going to fix the problems you guys left. You'd
better hope that Obama's policies are successful rather than bitching
about the disasters your team wrought and trying to shift responsibility
to others.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/lpcbrm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Obama hasn't yet started to clean up Bush's mess. When did you say he spent
billions?
He should have Bush arrested.
And when he gets into Clinton's mess he will really be spending some
serious cash.....oh, he already is and has.
Bret Cahill
Obama is too busy making his own mess to piddle with the minor problems
Bush left.
Just fine.
The tax hikes on the rich will bring about another economic boom like
Clinton's high tax economic boom.
Next question?
Bret Cahill
You mean the high tax Clinton economic boom, the longest expansion in
the history of the republic?
Clinton balanced the budget and Repugs impeached Clinton.
The high tax Clinton economic boom discredited Reaganomics so bad even
Rove abandoned the "WilL wOrk for FoOd, GoD BleSs" Reaganomics economy
in favor of jingoism:
"Either you support the president [and his economic policies] or yer a
Saddam lover."
America hating Repugliars may love bankrupting the country but
Democrats always have to clean up the mess.
Bret Cahill
You mean a drop in the bucket trillions that Bush gave away?
Funny how you overlooked that...you must not pay taxes....freeloader.
TMT
Clinton left Bush a surplus...and Bush spent your grandchildren's
inheritance.
TMT
I know it is hard for a winger to stay focused but please stay on
focus.
Where were you when Bush spent trillions?
TMT
Bullshit. He, like all modern Presidents, spend more than was collected
in taxes. The fact that the intergovernment "loans" (ie theft of the SS
trust fund and just about every other federal trust fund) doesn't alter
that.
New York and California are using your CLINTON *HIGH TAX* plans and they
are Bankrupt.... *WHY* ???????????
> Bret Cahill
Good luck with that one Bret....
I'll say. He's building a whole steaming pile of his own.
> When did you say he spent billions?
I said trillions. With a T.
> He should have Bush arrested.
That might serve as a distraction when his fuckups really start to become
obvious to even the clueless.
Will Obama strangle the military like Clinton did to, to make that happen?
How will he manage that when he doesn't seem to want to bring any troops home?
Oh, that's two questions, huh?
That ain't the topic, shithead.
>> When did you say he spent billions?
>
> I said trillions. With a T.
Which would be incorrect.
Kindly provide an accounting of the stimulus dollars. Didn't think
you could.
> > and will continue to give away.
>
> That is also a lie. Obama is _spending_ a lot of money, so far about $50
> Billion, attempting to rectify the results of programs and policies that
> your team bankrupted the nation with.
Oh, bullshit!!! His budget alone dwarfs that. Now lets talk about
stimulus dollars spent and promised.
Please provide an accounting. Bet you can't because he can't.
> "More of the same" isn't going to fix the problems you guys left. You'd
> better hope that Obama's policies are successful rather than bitching
> about the disasters your team wrought and trying to shift responsibility
> to others.
You haven't seen disaster. Wait til Obama finishes playing out his
very first hand.
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://tinycurly.com/lpcbrm
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. As they say about health care; "if you think it's expensive now, wait
until it's free."
>LOL....do the wingers realize how they are being used by other
>conservatives?
>
>Taking money from a conservative is like taking candy from a baby.
Speaking of babies, did you bring some diapers for your visit to
Sunnyside Terrace? You'll need them if you ever get the balls to knock
on the door.
___________
"I will be bringing the local cops with me to visit you so be sure you
have enough doughnuts for all of us. ;<)"
-Too Many Tools, 5/30/09
"Try posting your real address just once and I will
guarantee you a visit."
-Too Many Tools, 6/2/09, right before
he scrambled for excuses not to show up.
"Got a valid address yet winger?
I would like to arraign[sic] a visit for you."
-Too Many Tools, 6/19/09, still hoping
someone actually believes him.
"Give us a valid address and we can arraign a playdate with some
friends."
-Too Many Tools 7-1-2009 STILL trying to get
someone to believe him
"Show a picture of your mailbox then...with you in front of it. ;<)"
-Too Many Tools 7-2-2009 changing the conditions in
another desperate attempt to weasel out of visiting
Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> In talk.politics.guns Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> LOL....do the wingers realize how they are being used by other
>> conservatives?
>>
>> Taking money from a conservative is like taking candy from a baby.
>
> Speaking of babies, did you bring some diapers for your visit to
> Sunnyside Terrace? You'll need them if you ever get the balls to knock
> on the door.
Door? Hell, it's going to take more balls than he's got simply to get to
the city, much less the neighborhood, much less the street, much less
the property, then an only then would he get to the door, and there is
absolutely no way he would ring the bell or stick around until someone
answers the door.
This, from the cockroach who promised to support Barak Obama just as he
supported George Bush.
Liar or hypocrite?
>Taking money from a conservative is like taking candy from a baby.
You don't have a clue to what Obama, Pelosi and Reid are stealing from you.
Wake up when bread is $10 a loaf.
Link to that discussion please.
TMT
You mean the same military that Bush has run into the ground...along
most of the Guard.
If you knew anything about it, you would know we have needed
rebuilding for years.
Bush would not do it.
It was cheaper for him to let American soldiers die than to provide
them with the proper tools of war.
TMT
Shithead yourself winger.
And you are the shithead who is trying to change the subject.
How do you like knowing that the right wing book writers are shearing
the conservative sheeple and laughing all the way to the bank.
And the irony is that those writers and talk show hosts don't even
believe what they are telling you.
Winger = SUCKER
Laugh...laugh...laugh...
TMT
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f6546556-b43c-419d...@i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
Yep, just like you leave a surplus here, every time you post.
"Talk-n-head" <Talk-...@talk-n-dog.com> wrote in message
news:nut4m.15315$Wx7....@newsfe04.iad...
> Revealing Wingnuts wrote:
>> "Jim Alder" <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9C40794F0D931...@216.196.97.142...
>>> Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>> news:36cba8ea-56d0-4b0f-
>>> a25a-4a9...@d36g2000prb.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> His book "Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto" debuted at
>>>> No. 1 on The New York Times best-seller list and has remained on the
>>>> list for a remarkable 13 weeks, selling, Levin says, a total of
>>>> 800,000 copies to date. (Nielsen BookScan puts the number at 714,000,
>>>> but its figures don't include sales from Wal-Mart and a handful of
>>>> other prominent outlets.)
>>>>
>>>> That's a monster hit by publishing standards, and industry insiders
>>>> say it is largely due to a wave of anxiety coursing through
>>>> conservative and red-state America over the direction of Obama's
>>>> policies.
>>> Still, it's a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions of YOUR
>>> dollars
>>> that Obama has given away and will continue to give away.
>>
>> Obama hasn't yet started to clean up Bush's mess. When did you say he
>> spent
>> billions?
>> He should have Bush arrested.
>>
>>
> and yet it was Obama's people talking to Blagovitch "the Senate seat
> salesman".
They all sat in the same seat. It's the evil chair. They played musical
chairs while Michael Jackson provided the music.
What did senator Obama do? He rubber stamped president Bush. What has
president Obama done? He's copied president Bush. Some change.
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07...@live.com...
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:25:42 -0500, Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>>"HH&C" <almostcutm...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:e0bc8034
>>>-e03-4714-8b43...@c1g2000yqi.googlegroups.com:
> ----snip----
>>> You haven't seen disaster. Wait til Obama finishes playing out his
>>> very first hand.
>
> This, from the cockroach who promised to support Barak Obama just as he
> supported George Bush.
>
> Liar or hypocrite?
>
Can't speak for him, but I know I am supporting Barack Obama just as you
supported George Bush. Although you had a 7.5 year head start, so I have a
lot of catching up to do!
"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:Yfx4m.22188$Qk7....@newsfe22.iad...
>
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> In talk.politics.guns Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> LOL....do the wingers realize how they are being used by other
>>> conservatives?
>>>
>>> Taking money from a conservative is like taking candy from a baby.
>>
>> Speaking of babies, did you bring some diapers for your visit to
>> Sunnyside Terrace? You'll need them if you ever get the balls to knock
>> on the door.
>
> Door? Hell, it's going to take more balls than he's got simply to get to
> the city, much less the neighborhood, much less the street, much less the
> property, then an only then would he get to the door, and there is
> absolutely no way he would ring the bell or stick around until someone
> answers the door.
>
He hasn't come out of his moms (both of them) basement in years, except to
visit his friend in his dads (both of them) basement.
On January 20, Obama got *what he* asked for, NOW it's Obama's mess.
ALL our presidents have to deal with the cards they are dealt, they are
all evaluated on what they do with what was given them.... So far Obama
has made it worse.
In 3.5 years, it will be worse, or he will have capitulated to a
rational Capitalist economic plan and dropped his beloved Socialism.
You Liberals would know, your taxing the sugar to take the candy.
Do you just say any stupid shit that pops into your stupid head?
> If you knew anything about it, you would know we have needed
> rebuilding for years.
Yeah, a little over EIGHT years ago it needed it. And it got it.
> Bush would not do it.
Bush DID it, dumb ass.
> It was cheaper for him to let American soldiers die than to provide
> them with the proper tools of war.
If a Democrat president presided over two wars simultanously for seven
years and only 4000 soldiers died, you morons would wet your panties
applauding what a brilliant military tactician he was.
You Liberals would know, you're taxing the sugar to take the candy.
Yes, a big steaming pile of surplus.
You mean the two wars that have cost this Country more than WWII did?
And were never paid for?
Sounds like gross negligence to me.
Oh yes he was a Republican...that explains it.
TMT
Laugh...laugh...laugh...
How do you like knowing that the right wing book writers are shearing
the conservative sheeple and laughing all the way to the bank.
And the irony is that those writers and talk show hosts DON'T EVEN
BELIEVE WHAT THEY ARE TELLING YOU!
And yet, you are strangely silent when it comes to all the money that
Obama spent and hasn't been paid for either. Indeed, for what Obama
spent in his first 100 days we could have held those wars twice over,
and still have money left over.
Does it still sound like gross negligence, or shall we simply accept
your double standard?
sounds like inflation and over printing of the Dollar by the Federal
Reserve for the purpose of redistribution of wealth.
That's Capitalism and I like it. I support the Ideas not the writers.
The ideas are free.
> And the irony is that those writers and talk show hosts DON'T EVEN
> BELIEVE WHAT THEY ARE TELLING YOU!
That is why we let some like Colin Powell and McCain fall by the
wayside. Where are their Progressive best-sellers?
Utter nonsense. You do not shoot a bullet at the collective hearts of
society then hand the gun to your successor and claim that it's his
responsibility even while the bullet is in flight.
This mess, including Obama's ascent to the White House, is a direct
result and responsibility of Bush, neocons and Republicans.
> ALL
> our presidents have to deal with the cards they are dealt, they are all
> evaluated on what they do with what was given them.... So far Obama has
> made it worse.
More nonsense, the DOW (as a major indicator) has halted it's collapse
and begun to recover.
> In 3.5 years, it will be worse, or he will have capitulated to a
> rational Capitalist economic plan and dropped his beloved Socialism.
Aren't you the guy who predicted a quick win in Iraq and Afghanistan and
that Sarah Palin / John McCain would win last November?
No, YOU are.
> How do you like knowing that the right wing book writers are shearing
> the conservative sheeple and laughing all the way to the bank.
>
> And the irony is that those writers and talk show hosts don't even
> believe what they are telling you.
Maybe you should READ a book before you criticize those who write them,
dumb ass.
Wrong. Funds were authorized but to my knowledge only about $50 Billion
has been "spent." Where were you when Bush loaned out the first $700
Billion last year?
No matter how much needs to be loaned, printed, borrowed no president can
sit idly while the nation disintegrates economically. Republican or
Democrat, none will sit by while Rome burns.
Where were you while Bush's policies, the very policies which
precipitated this titanic disaster, was formulated and executed? I seem
to remember that you were in the cheering section urging more of the same.
Don't bitch about the result of your policies now. Or try to blame then
on the next guy.
> Does it still sound like gross negligence, or shall we simply accept
> your double standard?
Pot, kettle, black.
> Jim Alder <jimal...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Jim Alder <jimal...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>> >> Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > His book "Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto" debuted at
>> >> >> > No. 1 on The New York Times best-seller list and has remained on
the
>> >> >> > list for a remarkable 13 weeks, selling, Levin says, a total of
>> >> >> > 800,000 copies to date. (Nielsen BookScan puts the number at
714,000,
>> >> >> > but its figures don't include sales from Wal-Mart and a handful of
>> >> >> > other prominent outlets.)
>>
>> >> >> > That's a monster hit by publishing standards, and industry insiders
>> >> >> > say it is largely due to a wave of anxiety coursing through
>> >> >> > conservative and red-state America over the direction of Obama's
>> >> >> > policies.
>>
>> >> >> � �Still, it's a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions of YOUR
>> >> >> dollars that Obama has given away and will continue to give away.
>>
>> >> > Just fine.
>>
>> >> > The tax hikes on the rich will bring about another economic boom like
>> >> > Clinton's high tax economic boom.
>>
>> >> > Next question?
>>
>> >> � �Will Obama strangle the military like Clinton did to, to make that
>> >> happen? How will he manage that when he doesn't seem to want to bring
any
>> >> troops home?
>>
>> >> � �Oh, that's two questions, huh?
>>
>> > You mean the same military that Bush has run into the ground...along most
>> > of the Guard.
>>
>> � �Do you just say any stupid shit that pops into your stupid head?
Hmmm. No answer. I guess we can call that a 'yes.'
>> > If you knew anything about it, you would know we have needed rebuilding
for
>> > years.
>>
>> � � Yeah, a little over EIGHT years ago it needed it. And it got it.
>>
>> > Bush would not do it.
>>
>> � �Bush DID it, dumb ass.
>>
>> > It was cheaper for him to let American soldiers die than to provide them
>> > with the proper tools of war.
>>
>> � �If a Democrat president presided over two wars simultanously for seven
>> years and only 4000 soldiers died, you morons would wet your panties
>> applauding what a brilliant military tactician he was.
>>
> You mean the two wars that have cost this Country more than WWII did?
Oh please. It's called inflation, you flaming moron.
> And were never paid for?
>
> Sounds like gross negligence to me.
No one gives a fuck what anything sounds like to you.
> Oh yes he was a Republican...that explains it.
> On Jul 6, 10:44 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Left Winger = SUCKER
>
> Laugh...laugh...laugh...
"Still alive and well" (courtesy of Rick Derringer) at 318 Sunnyside
Terrace, 08807
"One Too Many Fools" is not going to be able to grasp financial concepts
like that. It's "Libs good, Conservatives bad." That's as complex as he gets.
NO the DOW was a Measuring stick.... and all you have done is to put new
marks on the stick to make it look like it recovered.
(A) you removed GM from the DJI and then put another "company" in the
*AVERAGE* to get that average back up, but that actual loss is still there.
(B) You have *PRINTED* (2 trillion dollars plus).... That devalued the
dollar and raised the relative value of hard assets like corporate owned
property.
SO if you think you have recovered then buy all in and I'll have a
really good laugh as this precurser to the real Depression fades into an
*economic apocalypse* .
Obama has painted himself into into a corner with the economy, we are
now destined to crash, the only question is how long Obama can
manipulate things to look good, because when he stumbles and the fools
like you get slapped in the face with the reality of losing your ass,
the whole thing will tank.
>> In 3.5 years, it will be worse, or he will have capitulated to a
>> rational Capitalist economic plan and dropped his beloved Socialism.
>
> Aren't you the guy who predicted a quick win in Iraq and Afghanistan and
> that Sarah Palin / John McCain would win last November?
I never predict quick wins, even when you win... you haven't won, and I
knew McCain was a loser. I had hope for Palin in 2012. I think she is
looking more long term.
Kinda hard to keep GM in the DJIA when it's no longer being traded on
the NYSE, ain't it?
> (B) You have *PRINTED* (2 trillion dollars plus).... That devalued the
> dollar and raised the relative value of hard assets like corporate owned
> property.
The Executive branch has no ability to print money. It does not control
the money supply.
> SO if you think you have recovered then buy all in and I'll have a
> really good laugh as this precurser to the real Depression fades into an
> *economic apocalypse* .
It could certainly happen, but you will then be one of a very few who
will be laughing. Is your partisanship so controlling over you that you
would actually be gleeful if the Obama administration failed to stave
off economic collapse?
> Obama has painted himself into into a corner with the economy,
Obama didn't create the current economy, although the burden of it now
rests on his shoulders.
> we are
> now destined to crash, the only question is how long Obama can
> manipulate things to look good,
Most economists agree that there is a large psychological component to
the state of the economy. To the degree that Obama can instill some
confidence in our economic prospects, that's a good thing. Fortunately,
Obama, like Reagan, has the ability to inspire confidence in his
leadership. Unfortunately, as with Reagan, that confidence may be
somewhat misplaced.
> Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Sounds like gross negligence to me.
>
> No one gives a fuck what anything sounds like to you.
Obviously you do.
Well, when one is as ignorant as you, stating you don't know about it,
doesn't exactly show anything except that you don't know what you're
talking about.
Yes but that's no reason to proclaim the problem solved when all that
was done was you selected new winners to place in a list that measures
"performance". It sort of destroys all the past data and you have to
start new as though you had faulty data. (reset to Zero)
What if 50% of the market fails and you pick new successful businesses
to measure the DJIA? You'd pick those that are sound, but the market
has decreased by 50% of the companies so you are ignoring that the
market is 50% of the size of what it was. You might say wow a recovery
and yet the GDP could be 50% of what it was, the economy could be
falling off a cliff and the DJIA is looking like it's recovering while
in fact nothing is any better.
>> (B) You have *PRINTED* (2 trillion dollars plus).... That devalued the
>> dollar and raised the relative value of hard assets like corporate owned
>> property.
>
> The Executive branch has no ability to print money. It does not control
> the money supply.
The Federal Reserve is Monetizing the debt, or buying Obama's Paper.
Where does the money come from for the Federal Reserve buy Obama's Debt?
They print the money.
Funny how that works out..... They have meetings and the Federal
reserve gets new powers to regulate and by-golly another trillion gets
printed?
>> SO if you think you have recovered then buy all in and I'll have a
>> really good laugh as this precursor to the real Depression fades into an
>> *economic apocalypse* .
>
> It could certainly happen, but you will then be one of a very few who
> will be laughing. Is your partisanship so controlling over you that you
> would actually be gleeful if the Obama administration failed to stave
> off economic collapse?
>
There is always humor. If I laugh when I make money, why not laugh when
I lose money?
>> Obama has painted himself into a corner with the economy,
>
> Obama didn't create the current economy, although the burden of it now
> rests on his shoulders.
And Obama is the one spending wildly and attacking the private sector.
There were several places to start, Obama is making things worse.
>> we are
>> now destined to crash, the only question is how long Obama can
>> manipulate things to look good,
>
> Most economists agree that there is a large psychological component to
> the state of the economy. To the degree that Obama can instill some
> confidence in our economic prospects, that's a good thing. Fortunately,
> Obama, like Reagan, has the ability to inspire confidence in his
> leadership. Unfortunately, as with Reagan, that confidence may be
> somewhat misplaced.
Confidence is great but when your credit cards are at their limit...
Confidence won't pay the mortgage. Obama's credit cards are filled to
the Limit. Obama can *Print, Borrow or tax* Obama has Printed and
Borrowed, all that's left is tax and that will set the economy in a
spiral down into the toilet. We won't recover with that monkey on our back.
So here we go, and Obama is about to hit the trifecta, when he raises
taxes he will be captain of a sinking ship. He will be left with
nowhere to turn and no way out. It will mean a long and hard
Depression. As with most Depressions it too will have been a creation
of our Government.
In this case, he does. Very, very little of that stimulus money has been
spent......which brings up an interesting question. Why was absolute
urgency expressed that it had to be signed before the signers (Congress)
had any time to read or review it?
--
Sleep well, tonight........
RD (The Sandman)
" All experience is great provided you live through it.
If it kills you, you have gone too far."
Painter Alice Neel, in the New Yorker.
There are other market indices you can look at. The DJIA is privately
managed, and I don't think the administration is either manipulating it
or proclaiming our economic problems solved.
> What if 50% of the market fails and you pick new successful businesses
> to measure the DJIA? You'd pick those that are sound, but the market
> has decreased by 50% of the companies so you are ignoring that the
> market is 50% of the size of what it was. You might say wow a recovery
> and yet the GDP could be 50% of what it was, the economy could be
> falling off a cliff and the DJIA is looking like it's recovering while
> in fact nothing is any better.
The DJIA doesn't measure the size of the economy as a whole. It is one
of many measures of the NYSE. The size of the economy is measured by
the GDP, among other indicators.
>>> (B) You have *PRINTED* (2 trillion dollars plus).... That devalued the
>>> dollar and raised the relative value of hard assets like corporate owned
>>> property.
>> The Executive branch has no ability to print money. It does not control
>> the money supply.
>
> The Federal Reserve is Monetizing the debt, or buying Obama's Paper.
> Where does the money come from for the Federal Reserve buy Obama's Debt?
>
> They print the money.
>
> Funny how that works out..... They have meetings and the Federal
> reserve gets new powers to regulate and by-golly another trillion gets
> printed?
I'm not a big fan of the Fed, but the time has come for some sort of
improved regulation and oversight of the financial industry.
>>> SO if you think you have recovered then buy all in and I'll have a
>>> really good laugh as this precursor to the real Depression fades into an
>>> *economic apocalypse* .
>> It could certainly happen, but you will then be one of a very few who
>> will be laughing. Is your partisanship so controlling over you that you
>> would actually be gleeful if the Obama administration failed to stave
>> off economic collapse?
>>
> There is always humor. If I laugh when I make money, why not laugh when
> I lose money?
>
>>> Obama has painted himself into a corner with the economy,
>> Obama didn't create the current economy, although the burden of it now
>> rests on his shoulders.
>
> And Obama is the one spending wildly and attacking the private sector.
> There were several places to start, Obama is making things worse.
Time will tell. But the fact is that the "private sector" has been
attacking the national interest, the economy, and most average Americans
for some time now.
>>> we are
>>> now destined to crash, the only question is how long Obama can
>>> manipulate things to look good,
>> Most economists agree that there is a large psychological component to
>> the state of the economy. To the degree that Obama can instill some
>> confidence in our economic prospects, that's a good thing. Fortunately,
>> Obama, like Reagan, has the ability to inspire confidence in his
>> leadership. Unfortunately, as with Reagan, that confidence may be
>> somewhat misplaced.
>
> Confidence is great but when your credit cards are at their limit...
> Confidence won't pay the mortgage. Obama's credit cards are filled to
> the Limit. Obama can *Print, Borrow or tax* Obama has Printed and
> Borrowed, all that's left is tax and that will set the economy in a
> spiral down into the toilet. We won't recover with that monkey on our back.
We won't recover by doing nothing, either.
> So here we go, and Obama is about to hit the trifecta, when he raises
> taxes he will be captain of a sinking ship. He will be left with
> nowhere to turn and no way out. It will mean a long and hard
> Depression. As with most Depressions it too will have been a creation
> of our Government.
The ship was already sinking when he became it's captain. But anyone
who claims he knows with certainty exactly what caused the ship to start
sinking, or exactly what will stop it from sinking, is lying.
To carry the ship analogy further, what Obama is doing is
counter-flooding. This is taking on additional water intentionally, to
keep a sinking ship on an even keel so repairs can be made, and to
prevent a sudden and catastrophic capsize from occurring. Done
correctly, it can save the ship.
You forgot...
We won, you lost.
Laugh....laugh....laugh....
TMT
Yes...the Dow was your measuring stick.
Now that it doesn't reflect your winger opinion you want to change the
measuring stick.
Looks like you are a flip flopping conservative to me.
A hypocrite by any other name still stinks like a Republican.
TMT
Yep and *BOTH* sides of the aisle need to realize that.
>>>> SO if you think you have recovered then buy all in and I'll have a
>>>> really good laugh as this precursor to the real Depression fades
>>>> into an *economic apocalypse* .
>
>>> It could certainly happen, but you will then be one of a very few
>>> who will be laughing. Is your partisanship so controlling over you
>>> that you would actually be gleeful if the Obama administration
>>> failed to stave off economic collapse?
>>>
>> There is always humor. If I laugh when I make money, why not laugh
>> when I lose money?
>>
>>>> Obama has painted himself into a corner with the economy,
>
>>> Obama didn't create the current economy, although the burden of it
>>> now rests on his shoulders.
>>
>> And Obama is the one spending wildly and attacking the private
>> sector. There were several places to start, Obama is making things
>> worse.
>
> Time will tell. But the fact is that the "private sector" has been
> attacking the national interest, the economy, and most average
> Americans for some time now.
It is also the only entity paying the taxes that provide the revenue the
government relies on. Reducing the private sector cuts down on that tax
base.
>>>> we are
>>>> now destined to crash, the only question is how long Obama can
>>>> manipulate things to look good,
>>> Most economists agree that there is a large psychological component
>>> to the state of the economy. To the degree that Obama can instill
>>> some confidence in our economic prospects, that's a good thing.
>>> Fortunately, Obama, like Reagan, has the ability to inspire
>>> confidence in his leadership. Unfortunately, as with Reagan, that
>>> confidence may be somewhat misplaced.
>>
>> Confidence is great but when your credit cards are at their limit...
>> Confidence won't pay the mortgage. Obama's credit cards are filled to
>> the Limit. Obama can *Print, Borrow or tax* Obama has Printed and
>> Borrowed, all that's left is tax and that will set the economy in a
>> spiral down into the toilet. We won't recover with that monkey on our
>> back.
>
> We won't recover by doing nothing, either.
That's true......but allowing some companies to go bankrupt and being
replaced by more efficiently run companies instead of bailing them out
goes a long ways toward doing that.
>> So here we go, and Obama is about to hit the trifecta, when he raises
>> taxes he will be captain of a sinking ship. He will be left with
>> nowhere to turn and no way out. It will mean a long and hard
>> Depression. As with most Depressions it too will have been a
>> creation of our Government.
>
> The ship was already sinking when he became it's captain. But anyone
> who claims he knows with certainty exactly what caused the ship to
> start sinking, or exactly what will stop it from sinking, is lying.
Yep.
> To carry the ship analogy further, what Obama is doing is
> counter-flooding. This is taking on additional water intentionally,
> to keep a sinking ship on an even keel so repairs can be made, and to
> prevent a sudden and catastrophic capsize from occurring. Done
> correctly, it can save the ship.
We shall see. The problem is that it is our progeny and their progeny
who have to do the final bailing.
LOL....yeah he does.
He is just playing hard to get.
Next he will be telling us his (fake) address is.
TMT
Notice how wingers love being taken advantage of by other wingers?
Even when the winger writers and talk show hosts admit they are lying,
the winger sheeple just keep lapping it up?
Hmmm...let me try.
Obama has big ears.
Okay...now send me money.
Laugh...laugh...laugh...
TMT
Palin's a SUPER-flyweight.
I doubt that any serious Republicans will accept her.
Neither will most Americans
I hope she succeeds in getting a nomination.
She's God's gift to the Democrats if she does.
>On Jul 6, 10:44�am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Find Sunnyside yet?
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3vo755d2t49m41sv8...@4ax.com...
> In talk.politics.guns Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jul 6, 10:44 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Find Sunnyside yet?
He couldn't find his ass unless it got handed to him.
One thing he CAN find- time to write about his new love interest Sarah
Palin!
You think he's typing all his posts with one hand now?
If you're going to the trouble to unblock me, why do you divert? Why
cannot you answer the question?
If you think health care is expensive now, just wait til it's free.
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://tinycurly.com/lpcbrm
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Winston has already declared Obama a war criminal for continuing to
prosecute what he and Smudge call an "illegal" war.
But Smudge won't do so. He lost the courage of his convictions when
he lost the object of his hatred.
1. It is not free.
2, There is no proposal for "free"
3. There NEVER was a proposal for "FREE"
Your post is a lie.
I thought YOU guys forgot. You keep telling us what is wrong with Bush.
> Laugh....laugh....laugh....
Giggling idiot.
> On Jul 7, 2:18�pm, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:39:14 -0500, Jim Alder <jimal...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>> > Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> Sounds like gross negligence to me.
>>
>> > � � No one gives a fuck what anything sounds like to you.
>>
>> Obviously you do.
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Curly
>>
> LOL....yeah he does.
Try shutting the fuck up and see if anyone notices, idiot.
Free Health Care? - by Walter E. Williams
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=2753
Free Healthcare For Kids
April 26, 2009 5:43 PM
The recession has impacted the health of children across the nation, but a
special program has been created to provide free medical services for young
patients. Seth Doane reports from Detroit.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4968879n
Free HEALTHCARE Bumper sticker
http://www.zazzle.com/free_healthcare_bumper_sticker-128997148038058442
THE DEMOCRATIC DEBATE - Edwards proposed that children's health care should be
free.
http://www.thebluestate.com/2007/10/live-chat-tuesd.html
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:25:27 GMT, Curly Surmudgeon
> <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:53:18 -0400, Scout
>><me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>>> On Jul 7, 12:13 am, Jim Alder <jimal...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>>>> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:92ebdaf5-7ef3-4438-
>>>>> b9ab-ef4691f6f...@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 6, 5:57 pm, Jim Alder <jimal...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:e8b45b79-6266-451f-a2ff-
>>>>>>> a80da83ea...@q40g2000prh.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>>> His book "Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto"
>>>>>>>>>> debuted at No. 1 on The New York Times best-seller list and has
>>>>>>>>>> remained on the list for a remarkable 13 weeks, selling, Levin
>>>>>>>>>> says, a total of 800,000 copies to date. (Nielsen BookScan puts
>>>>>>>>>> the number at 714,000,
>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>> its figures don't include sales from Wal-Mart and a handful of
>>>>>>>>>> other prominent outlets.)
>>>>>>>>>> That's a monster hit by publishing standards, and industry
>>>>>>>>>> insiders say it is largely due to a wave of anxiety coursing
>>>>>>>>>> through
>>>>> conservative
>>>>>>>>>> and red-state America over the direction of Obama's policies.
>>>>>>>>> Still, it's a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions of
>>>>>>>>> YOUR
>>>>>>>>> dollars that Obama has given away and will continue to give
>>>>>>>>> away. --
>>>>>>>>> So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for
>>>>>>>>> you so
>>>>> far?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just fine.
>>>>>>>> The tax hikes on the rich will bring about another economic boom
>>>>>>>> like Clinton's high tax economic boom. Next question?
>>>>>>> Will Obama strangle the military like Clinton did to, to make
>>>>>>> that
>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>> How will he manage that when he doesn't seem to want to bring any
>>>>>>> troops
>>>>> home?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, that's two questions, huh?
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you
>>>>>>> so far?
>>>>>> You mean the same military that Bush has run into the
>>>>>> ground...along most of the Guard.
>>>>> Do you just say any stupid shit that pops into your stupid head?
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you knew anything about it, you would know we have needed
>>>>>> rebuilding for years.
>>>>> Yeah, a little over EIGHT years ago it needed it. And it got it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bush would not do it.
>>>>> Bush DID it, dumb ass.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It was cheaper for him to let American soldiers die than to provide
>>>>>> them with the proper tools of war.
>>>>> If a Democrat president presided over two wars simultanously for
>>>>> seven
>>>>> years and only 4000 soldiers died, you morons would wet your panties
>>>>> applauding what a brilliant military tactician he was.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so
>>>>> far?
>>>>
>>>> You mean the two wars that have cost this Country more than WWII did?
>>>>
>>>> And were never paid for?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like gross negligence to me.
>>>
>>> And yet, you are strangely silent when it comes to all the money that
>>> Obama spent and hasn't been paid for either. Indeed, for what Obama
>>> spent in his first 100 days we could have held those wars twice over,
>>> and still have money left over.
>>
>>Wrong. Funds were authorized but to my knowledge only about $50 Billion
>>has been "spent." Where were you when Bush loaned out the first $700
>>Billion last year?
>>
>>No matter how much needs to be loaned, printed, borrowed no president
>>can sit idly while the nation disintegrates economically. Republican or
>>Democrat, none will sit by while Rome burns.
>>
>>Where were you while Bush's policies, the very policies which
>>precipitated this titanic disaster, was formulated and executed? I seem
>>to remember that you were in the cheering section urging more of the
>>same.
>>
>>Don't bitch about the result of your policies now. Or try to blame then
>>on the next guy.
>>
>>> Does it still sound like gross negligence, or shall we simply accept
>>> your double standard?
>>
>>Pot, kettle, black.
>
> I've reached the conclusion that he doesn't have a firm grasp on
> reality.
Not even a tenuous grasp...
Because presidential elections were in progress and a new witch was
needed to distract from other issues plus Bush/Cheney proved that scaring
the electorate into precipitous action is a great way to pass shitty
legislation that would fail under observation.
"Patriot Act."
Yeh, well. Intelligent people understand that there is no free health
care. Then you have the democrats...
Yet you are unable to demonstrate that I am an ignorant person. No one
is knowledgeable of every factoid, issue, or variance of human
existence. Those who claim absolute knowledge are either liars or
deluded.
Hurling ad homenims and an absence of any fact to the contrary indicates
that you are less informed than I.
> doesn't exactly show anything except that you don't know what you're
> talking about.
And your inability to substantiate your obviously wrong "Indeed, for what
Obama spent in his first 100 days we could have held those wars twice
over, and still have money left over" indicates that you are not only
ignorant of the details but of the issue in general.
Or you are lying.
> Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:218c27fa-673f-4409- a6f4-28d...@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Jul 7, 2:18 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:39:14 -0500, Jim Alder <jimal...@ssnet.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >> Sounds like gross negligence to me.
>>>
>>> > No one gives a fuck what anything sounds like to you.
>>>
>>> Obviously you do.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards, Curly
>>>
>> LOL....yeah he does.
>
> Try shutting the fuck up and see if anyone notices, idiot.
You will.
No Democrats are proposing "free health care"
"Free health care" is a Republican scare tactic.
Universal Health Care is not free health care.
A public option gets rid of the crooked insurance companies
that limit health care for their insured
He's an ignorant liar.
Smudge already told him to quit replying to me, but he doesn't
listen. He's hoping for a spanking.
And replaces them with what, honest government employees?
Here;s anightmare scenario - the Republicans win back the House, Senate and
White House. All of your paranoid delusions about Republicans come true. Now
you've got Republican controlled health care. How's that taste?
--
Always remember:
Bull Connor was a Democrat!
"Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:h33cvp$k8p$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.07...@live.com...
>> "Indeed, for what
>> Obama spent in his first 100 days we could have held those wars twice
>> --
>> Regards, Curly
>
> He's an ignorant liar.
>
Yes, he is.
"Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:h33ctj$k04$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Why don't you just go buy your own Universal Health Care and leave everyone
else the fuck alone?
Because, while you might, many won't and don't. Then they show up in
the ER, either with minor ailments, or already gravely ill. afterwards,
we get stuck with the resulting hideously expensive bill. Since we are
going to be paying anyway, we'd rather find a way to do it more
rationally and efficiently.
"Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:h33ok2$m3v$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Oh I see, you want us to buy it for you. Typical lib.
"Jeff Mc" <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote in message
news:rvd5m.65036$b9.5...@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
They can go buy their own Universal Healthcare too.
But many don't, and we have to pick up the tab.
"Jeff Mc" <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote in message
news:HHd5m.65040$b9.2...@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
Looks like it's already Universal then, and you don't seem to like it.
I'll try again:
No Democrats are proposing "free health care"
"Free health care" is a Republican scare tactic.
Universal Health Care is not free health care.
A public option gets rid of the crooked insurance companies
that limit health care for their insured.
Typical RRR...seriously limited comprehension.
That's why it cost more than twice as much as it needs to
and gets poor results.
>
> "HH&C" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e55774b5-4294-4659...@24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jul 8, 4:15 am, Jim Alder <jimal...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>> "Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote innews:h30vel$eml$1...@news.eternal-
>>> september.org:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:7c0b68c3-ee78-480c-a451-8b499ad24891
@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
Come on, Sid! I just quoted Edwards!
> "Free health care" is a Republican scare tactic.
> Universal Health Care is not free health care.
> A public option gets rid of the crooked insurance companies
> that limit health care for their insured
>
>
>
--
"Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:h33qc4$vad$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
I weeded out the noise for you. Now, why don't you go buy yourself some
"Sid9" <si...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:h33qe8$vgk$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
I think it's fine. Usually it's things that cost less that are perceived as
having little value. Besides, you get what you pay for. No free lunches.
Hate is no fun if you keep it to yourself.
My health care is just fine. I don't need a solution that dilutes it.
Poor results for who?
My health care is just fine. Leave me out of your scheme.
Biden is another trail lawyer turned politician.