Force Texas to leave

[Fred^44]

Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
required to leave?

[Mel Torment]

"Kirby Grant" wrote:

> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic tanks
> and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?

Apparently the world's wealthiest man and a Mexican, Carlos Slim is
looking forward to Austin no longer being the seat of Texan
government, and instead Mexico City.

And as Texans say, "Never argue with a capitalist"

Carlos is wealthier than all Texans, therefor he's smarter and must be
obeyed.

One day his wealth will trickle down to the begging hands of all
Texans.

[Gray Guest]

rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote in news:U6GdndyJR7210y_NnZ2dnUVZ_t-
dn...@posted.sonicnet:

Bye, stupid.

--
Refusenik #1

Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.

Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

[Gray Guest]

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097
@fed07.iad:

> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic
tanks
> and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?

You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.

[duke]

Then you better pack up and leave.

The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************

[Syd M.]

On Nov 25, 5:16 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:58:13 GMT, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
> >Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
> >the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
> >our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
> >required to leave?
>
> Then you better pack up and leave.
>
>

You first, constitution hater.

PDW

[Father Haskell]

On Nov 25, 1:23 pm, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 25-Nov-2012, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:
>

> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic tanks
> and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?

Sacrifices *must* be made.

[Father Haskell]

On Nov 25, 5:55 pm, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 25-Nov-2012, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote at
> alt.atheism:

> Actually, the real trick will be to let Texas seceed and then put them in
> complete isolation until international treaties can be negotiated - which
> would take years. In the meantime they would not be able to transact any
> business with the United States. All Democrats would leave (thus effectively
> causing a "brain drain"). They would have to rely on imports for everything
> they need, but that would mean doing business with all the countries in the
> world that they hate.
>
> The long and the short of it is that after a few months they would be in
> such bad condition that they would surrender and ask to be re-admitted into
> the U.S. on whatever terms Congress imposes.

We could annex them to Cuba for a half billion $ or so.

[Father Haskell]

> Now there's a thought. Sell Texas to Cuba. I don't know if the state is
> worth half a billion since it is populated with hate-filled people who have
> this sense of entitlement, but maybe Cuba won't notice at first. Yeah,
> Texans might get some good cigars out of the deal, but they'd learn what it
> is really like to live under an actual communist government as opposed to
> just thinking that because they hate the United States of America that the
> U.S. is communist.

1/2 bil is just the asking price. I'm willing to negotiate.

[Father Haskell]

> Good thinking. A price that is higher than what it worth, so that when Cuba
> makes a counter-offer they will think they are getting the advantage. Of
> course they'll complain about the deal they get when they find that Texas is
> filled with malcontents who will moan and complain about everything just to
> show their beligerance, but Cuba probably has a way of dealing with people
> like that.

Throw in Florida. Sweeten the deal.

[skye...@yahoo.com]

On Nov 25, 3:55 pm, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 25-Nov-2012, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote at
> alt.atheism:
>

> Actually, the real trick will be to let Texas seceed and then put them in
> complete isolation until international treaties can be negotiated - which
> would take years. In the meantime they would not be able to transact any
> business with the United States. All Democrats would leave (thus effectively
> causing a "brain drain"). They would have to rely on imports for everything
> they need, but that would mean doing business with all the countries in the
> world that they hate.
>
> The long and the short of it is that after a few months they would be in
> such bad condition that they would surrender and ask to be re-admitted into
> the U.S. on whatever terms Congress imposes.

Not only that, the U.S. military would leave - including *all* of Fort
Hood, the biggest military installation in the U.S. (in the world?
don't know). In addition, the U.S. government would require all U.S.
aerospace suppliers to leave, at least until contracts with the new
"foreign country" were worked out (there again, it would be *years*).

Texas would be a dirt-poor pile of nothing but tumbleweeds in nothing
fucking flat.

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com

[SaPeIsMa]

<skye...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:87efb243-18a6-47d3...@6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...

Amazing the nonsense that pinkies fantasize about totally disconnected from
reality

[max headroom]

SaPeIsMa <SaPe...@Hotmail.com> wrote in news:k8vmui$m4k$1...@dont-email.me:

>> don't know)....

The US has military bases in other foreign countries. Relocating Ft Hood would cost the USA far more
than it would cost Texas.

>> ... In addition, the U.S. government would require all U.S.
>> aerospace suppliers to leave,...

Or they'd be free to sell their wares on the international market.

>> ... at least until contracts with the new

>> "foreign country" were worked out (there again, it would be *years*).

>> Texas would be a dirt-poor pile of nothing but tumbleweeds in nothing
>> fucking flat.

Full of oil fields and farms, feed lots and cities, thick steaks and salsa and cold beer. I think
they'd survive.

> Amazing the nonsense that pinkies fantasize about totally disconnected from reality

So what's new?

[SaPeIsMa]

"max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:k907b6$u0l$2...@dont-email.me...

There is also no guarantee that the soldiers of Fort Hood would stay with
the US were Texas pushed out of the Union
There also might be a few other States that could then choose to go with

Texas.


>
>>> ... In addition, the U.S. government would require all U.S.
>>> aerospace suppliers to leave,...
>
> Or they'd be free to sell their wares on the international market.
>

Isn't it funny that the premise is Texas being pushed out, and the the US
government would try to dictate to people in Texas what they should to ??

That's like a woman kicking out her husband, and then trying to tell him who
his friends should be..

>>> ... at least until contracts with the new
>>> "foreign country" were worked out (there again, it would be *years*).
>
>>> Texas would be a dirt-poor pile of nothing but tumbleweeds in nothing
>>> fucking flat.
>
> Full of oil fields and farms, feed lots and cities, thick steaks and salsa
> and cold beer. I think they'd survive.
>
>> Amazing the nonsense that pinkies fantasize about totally disconnected
>> from reality
>
> So what's new?
>

Nothing really, except their usual demonstration of willful ignorance.

[Fred^44]

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:

>This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic tanks
>and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?

Normal people would do those jobs if they paid more. For that matter,
we could bring in more illegal Mexicans to fill those positions.
Anything would be an improvement over rightards.

[Fred^44]

Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097

>> On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:
>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
>>> you should be required to leave?
>> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic
>> tanks and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?
>You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.

ROFL. The rightards think people would notice if they all packed up
and left. "A day without rightards" -- ROFL. Fucking loons.

[Fred^44]

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Actually, the real trick will be to let Texas seceed and then put them in
>complete isolation until international treaties can be negotiated - which
>would take years. In the meantime they would not be able to transact any
>business with the United States. All Democrats would leave (thus effectively
>causing a "brain drain").

You assume that the Rightarded States of the Rightards would *allow*
their intellectual and moral superiors to leave. That would not be
likely. They would clamp down on Democrats fleeing their new country.

[Fred^44]

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On 25-Nov-2012, Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote at

>> We could annex them to Cuba for a half billion $ or so.

>Now there's a thought. Sell Texas to Cuba. I don't know if the state is
>worth half a billion since it is populated with hate-filled people who have
>this sense of entitlement, but maybe Cuba won't notice at first. Yeah,
>Texans might get some good cigars out of the deal, but they'd learn what it
>is really like to live under an actual communist government as opposed to
>just thinking that because they hate the United States of America that the
>U.S. is communist.

Except that medical coverage and treatment in Cuba is often much
superior than what can be found in the United States, more so when
it comes to optical surgery, Cuban medicine exceeds even that of
what can be had at John Hopkins in some procedures. You would not
want to let rightards have superior medical care, would you?

'Course not.

[RD Sandman]

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in

news:HVOss.44765$ez5....@fed13.iad:

>
> On 26-Nov-2012, "max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote at
> alt.atheism:

> Where do you think that cold beer comes from? Comparatively very
> little beer is produced in Texas. The only one that most people have
> ever heard of is Lone Star - if you can even call that beer. The rest
> are basically micro-brews - aka swill.

Shiner Beer is pretty good. They make both an amber and a pilsner. Here
is their online personna:

http://www.shiner.com/

I know you can't wait to put them down, but never having drank one, how
would you know?



--
Sleep well, tonight.....

RD (The Sandman

If law school is so hard to get through....
how come there are so many lawyers?

[duke]

You're going to lose a HUGE amount of oil supplies, especially when Louisiana
follows them.

[duke]

Who're you?

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Nov 25, 10:58 am, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
> the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
> our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
> required to leave?

LOL...I will be happy to help Gummer pack his one bag...

TMT

[Father Haskell]

On Nov 26, 9:03 am, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 26-Nov-2012, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote at

> > > > > > > Actually, the real trick will be to letTexasseceed and then

> > > > > > We couldannexthem toCubafor a half billion $ or so.
>
> > > > > Now there's a thought. SellTexastoCuba. I don't know if the state

> > > > > is
> > > > > worth half a billion since it is populated with hate-filled people
> > > > > who
> > > > > have

> > > > > this sense of entitlement, but maybeCubawon't notice at first.

> > > > > Yeah,
> > > > > Texans might get some good cigars out of the deal, but they'd learn
> > > > > what
> > > > > it
> > > > > is really like to live under an actual communist government as
> > > > > opposed
> > > > > to
> > > > > just thinking that because they hate the United States of America
> > > > > that
> > > > > the
> > > > > U.S. is communist.
>
> > > > 1/2 bil is just the asking price. I'm willing to negotiate.
>
> > > Good thinking. A price that is higher than what it worth, so that when
> > >Cuba
> > > makes a counter-offer they will think they are getting the advantage. Of
> > > course they'll complain about the deal they get when they find that
> > >Texasis
> > > filled with malcontents who will moan and complain about everything just
> > > to

> > > show their beligerance, butCubaprobably has a way of dealing with

> > > people
> > > like that.
>
> > Throw in Florida.  Sweeten the deal.
>

> Not that I'm not so sure of. Here is Georgia we really don't want to have a
> foreign country at our border.

I don't know, might be kind of neat having Fidel
for your next door neighbor.

[Father Haskell]

On Nov 26, 3:35 pm, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
> "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >On 25-Nov-2012, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote at
> >> We couldannexthem toCubafor a half billion $ or so.
> >Now there's a thought. SellTexastoCuba. I don't know if the state is

> >worth half a billion since it is populated with hate-filled people who have

> >this sense of entitlement, but maybeCubawon't notice at first. Yeah,

> >Texans might get some good cigars out of the deal, but they'd learn what it
> >is really like to live under an actual communist government as opposed to
> >just thinking that because they hate the United States of America that the
> >U.S. is communist.
>

> Except that medical coverage and treatment inCubais often much

> superior than what can be found in the United States, more so when
> it comes to optical surgery, Cuban medicine exceeds even that of
> what can be had at John Hopkins in some procedures. You would not
> want to let rightards have superior medical care, would you?
>
> 'Course not.

Cuban medicine *must* be better; look how many
Presidents Castro outlived.

[Scout]

"max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:k907b6$u0l$2...@dont-email.me...

That's for sure.

>>> ... In addition, the U.S. government would require all U.S.
>>> aerospace suppliers to leave,...
>
> Or they'd be free to sell their wares on the international market.

How true.

>>> ... at least until contracts with the new
>>> "foreign country" were worked out (there again, it would be *years*).
>
>>> Texas would be a dirt-poor pile of nothing but tumbleweeds in nothing
>>> fucking flat.
>
> Full of oil fields and farms, feed lots and cities, thick steaks and salsa
> and cold beer. I think they'd survive.

Given they have an economy almost that of Russia. Seems a lot of countries
have much smaller economies and do just fine.

So let's see, Texas has a GDP of $1.2 Trillion, that would place it between
Australia in 13th place and Mexico in 14th place.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)

Somehow, I bet Texas could handle being independent better than the US could
handle it.

After all, most of the State isn't even on the National electric grid, but
rather runs under the purely Texas state electrical grid.

So what do we have that Texas really needs?

[Scout]

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HVOss.44765$ez5....@fed13.iad...

>
> On 26-Nov-2012, "max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote at
> alt.atheism:
>

> Where do you think that cold beer comes from? Comparatively very little
> beer
> is produced in Texas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_breweries

And with the explosion of Texas craft breweries I bet they would be enjoying
a tall cold one while the US is still trying to figure out what to do about
the hole in our economy.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <vlu7b8pnl8v65p98t...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:35:16 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>
> >"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On 25-Nov-2012, Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote at
> >>> We could annex them to Cuba for a half billion $ or so.
> >>Now there's a thought. Sell Texas to Cuba. I don't know if the state is
> >>worth half a billion since it is populated with hate-filled people who have
> >>this sense of entitlement, but maybe Cuba won't notice at first. Yeah,
> >>Texans might get some good cigars out of the deal, but they'd learn what it
> >>is really like to live under an actual communist government as opposed to
> >>just thinking that because they hate the United States of America that the
> >>U.S. is communist.
>
> >Except that medical coverage and treatment in Cuba is often much
> >superior than what can be found in the United States, more so when
> >it comes to optical surgery, Cuban medicine exceeds even that of
> >what can be had at John Hopkins in some procedures. You would not
> >want to let rightards have superior medical care, would you?
>
> You're going to lose a HUGE amount of oil supplies, especially when Louisiana
> follows them.

Good.

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Mitchell Holman]

"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:k9187i$3md$1...@dont-email.me:

>
>
> "max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote in message
> news:k907b6$u0l$2...@dont-email.me...

>>>> ... at least until contracts with the new
>>>> "foreign country" were worked out (there again, it would be
>>>> *years*).
>>
>>>> Texas would be a dirt-poor pile of nothing but tumbleweeds in
>>>> nothing fucking flat.
>>
>> Full of oil fields and farms, feed lots and cities, thick steaks and
>> salsa and cold beer. I think they'd survive.
>
> Given they have an economy almost that of Russia. Seems a lot of
> countries have much smaller economies and do just fine.
>
> So let's see, Texas has a GDP of $1.2 Trillion, that would place it
> between Australia in 13th place and Mexico in 14th place.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
>
> Somehow, I bet Texas could handle being independent better than the US
> could handle it.
>
> After all, most of the State isn't even on the National electric grid,
> but rather runs under the purely Texas state electrical grid.
>
> So what do we have that Texas really needs?

Civilization.

[Scout]

"Mitchell Holman" <nomailverizo.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA117D2FE2959...@216.196.121.131...

ROTFLMAO.....

Now that's funny.

[_ G O D _]

"Fred^44" <rep...@scientology.org> wrote
news:SPWdnanbUK0bTy7N...@posted.sonicnet...

>
>
> Except that medical coverage and treatment in Cuba is often much
> superior than what can be found in the United States, more so when
> it comes to optical surgery, Cuban medicine exceeds even that of
> what can be had at John Hopkins in some procedures. You would not
> want to let rightards have superior medical care, would you?

Cuba is both, being geographically situated, and politically
owned by americunts, who are not visiting the island during
vacation, but also holding its residents as their prison labor....
--
_____________________________________________________
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--

[max headroom]

Scout <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:k91bor$htd$1...@dont-email.me:

> "Mitchell Holman" <nomailverizo.net> wrote in message
> news:XnsA117D2FE2959...@216.196.121.131...

>> "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>> news:k9187i$3md$1...@dont-email.me:

>>> So what do we have that Texas really needs?

>> Civilization.

> ROTFLMAO.....

> Now that's funny.

What's REALLY funny is ... he believes it!

[James Meyers]

That would be a blessing!!!

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

You'd be too chickenshit to show up at his place to do it.

[chuckle]


"I will be bringing the local cops with me to visit you so be sure you
have enough doughnuts for all of us. ;<)"
-Too Many Tools, 5/30/09

"Try posting your real address just once and I will
guarantee you a visit."
-Too Many Tools, 6/2/09, right before
he scrambled for excuses not to show up.

"Got a valid address yet winger?
I would like to arraign[sic] a visit for you."
-Too Many Tools, 6/19/09, still hoping
someone actually believes him.

"Give us a valid address and we can arraign a playdate with some
friends."
-Too Many Tools 7-1-2009 STILL trying to get
someone to believe him

"Show a picture of your mailbox then...with you in front of it. ;<)"
-Too Many Tools 7-2-2009 changing the conditions in
another desperate attempt to weasel out of visiting

"Provide the information and you will receive a visit."
-Too Many Tools, 9-16-2009, yet again making promises
he has no intention of keeping.

"Why don't you provide us with a valid name and address ...and we will
arrange a visit for you."
-Too Many Tools, 9-20-2009, yet *again* making promises
he has no intention of keeping.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>"James Meyers" <jmey...@cogeco.ca> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>That would be a blessing!!!
>

Doesn't OUtlook Express have a filter?

[Don Kresch]

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 05:45:26 -0500, "James Meyers"
<jmey...@cogeco.ca> scrawled in blood:

>That would be a blessing!!!
>

It's called a killfile; use it.

Don
aa#51, Knight of BAAWA, Jedi Slackmaster
Praise "Bob" or burn in Slacklessness trying not to.

[John Smith]

"Fred^44" <rep...@scientology.org> wrote in message news:U6GdndyJR7210y_N...@posted.sonicnet...

> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
> the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
> our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
> required to leave?
>
>

*force* Tex-Mexican to leave Why?

Is it because they of Mexican-America you call them rightards?
Do you believe there be a Federal law that says::
State need to leave United States of America,
and go back to United States of Mexico?

You do not like Mexican-America do you?

[John Smith]

"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.2...@fed07.iad...

>
> On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:
>

>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
>> the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
>> our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
>> required to leave?
>

> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic tanks
> and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?

That right you till him,
For in Texas,
White people been doing that for Mexican-America for year.

[RD Sandman]

"John Smith" <som...@microsoft.com> wrote in
news:k92qro$jj5$1...@news.mixmin.net:

There is currently a push to rename Mexico simply Mexico (as it is known
throughout the world) instead of its current name of United States of
Mexico.

> You do not like Mexican-America do you?
>

[Fred^44]

Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Ha! It's ironic that these rightards want to live in a theocracy, a
Somalian Utopia where their Republicanism and Jesus run things. If
these rightards were ever to actually go *see* and have to *live*
the consequences of what they advocate, they would shit their pants
and cry, begging to be let back in.

[Fred^44]

"John Smith" <som...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>"Fred^44" <rep...@scientology.org> wrote in message news:U6GdndyJR7210y_N...@posted.sonicnet...
>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
>> the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
>> our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
>> required to leave?
>*force* Tex-Mexican to leave Why?

They want to leave the United States because there's a black man in
the White House. Pay attention.

[Fred^44]

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:31:42 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>>>"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097
>>>> On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:
>>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
>>>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
>>>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
>>>>> you should be required to leave?
>>>> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic
>>>> tanks and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?
>>>You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>>Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.
>>ROFL. The rightards think people would notice if they all packed up
>>and left. "A day without rightards" -- ROFL. Fucking loons.
>Who're you?

I'm the guy laughing at you Republidiot Sarah Palin idiots.

[Fred^44]

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:35:16 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>On 25-Nov-2012, Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote at
>>>> We could annex them to Cuba for a half billion $ or so.
>>>Now there's a thought. Sell Texas to Cuba. I don't know if the state is
>>>worth half a billion since it is populated with hate-filled people who have
>>>this sense of entitlement, but maybe Cuba won't notice at first. Yeah,
>>>Texans might get some good cigars out of the deal, but they'd learn what it
>>>is really like to live under an actual communist government as opposed to
>>>just thinking that because they hate the United States of America that the
>>>U.S. is communist.
>>Except that medical coverage and treatment in Cuba is often much
>>superior than what can be found in the United States, more so when
>>it comes to optical surgery, Cuban medicine exceeds even that of
>>what can be had at John Hopkins in some procedures. You would not
>>want to let rightards have superior medical care, would you?
>You're going to lose a HUGE amount of oil supplies, especially when
>Louisiana follows them.

No, the United States has zero problem taking oil from other countries.
Slaughtering the rightarded rightards in Louisiana and Texas and other
Red State drains on our economy will be easy since these rightards
won't have an Air Force.

[Fred^44]

"James Meyers" <jmey...@cogeco.ca> wrote:

>That would be a blessing!!!

LOL. It's amusing. Rightards can't point to anything I post that's mistaken
or in any way in error, so all they have is to cry about how much the truth
hurts. :) Very amusing.

[duke]

We already know that Jesus is not involved in those type of countries. They're
more your style.

[duke]

On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:37:02 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

Great, then don't complain when you freeze to death in the dark.

[duke]

Since when. We'll have Cape Kennedy, Disney World, and Fort Knox.

[duke]

I'm personally crying because we would have been better off and with more
experience than we got with massa bama.

[Fred^44]

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:33:19 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>On Nov 25, 10:58=A0am, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
>>>> the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
>>>> our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
>>>> required to leave?
>>>LOL...I will be happy to help Gummer pack his one bag...
>>Ha! It's ironic that these rightards want to live in a theocracy, a
>>Somalian Utopia where their Republicanism and Jesus run things. If
>>these rightards were ever to actually go *see* and have to *live*
>>the consequences of what they advocate, they would shit their pants
>>and cry, begging to be let back in.
>We already know that Jesus is not involved in those type of countries.

Jesus is very much part of the vast majority of SOuther American
third world shitholes which Republidiots would love to emulate, so
much so there's no excuse for rightards not packing the fuck up
and moving to any one of them.

[Fred^44]

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:45:34 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>I'm the guy laughing at you Republidiot Sarah Palin idiots.
>I'm personally crying because we would have been better off and with more
>experience than we got with massa bama.

That's because you're a Republican which is indistinguishable from
the Klu Klux Klan.

Still, it would have been *great*& to have Sarah Palin in the White
House. Might as well get this country over with faster so we can
drag the shitting Oligarchs out of their mansions, give 'em trials,
and reboot the country.

[Fred^44]

No you won't, all NASA facilities belong to the United States, they will
be closed and relocated back to the United States when Republicunts
pack up and leave. And don't expect Disney or any other financially
successful corporation to stay open in the theofascist right wing
theocracy.

As for Fort Knox, good luck trying to find any gold in there, the Bush
Christian terrorist regime looted the treasury and stopped allowing the
gold to be audited, there's nothing left.

[Father Haskell]

On Nov 27, 2:31 pm, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>
> As for Fort Knox, good luck trying to find any gold in there, the Bush
> Christian terrorist regime looted the treasury and stopped allowing the
> gold to be audited, there's nothing left.

They're using it to store junior's empty liquor bottles.

[Fred^44]

Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

LOL -- something, yeah. The irony is that only Ron Paul actually
strove to get the contents of our nation's gold vaults audited to
find out if there's anything left. The Bush regime ended the audits
which not only got the usual conspiracy loons howeling again but
also got normal people wondering what the rightarded fuck was
trying to hide.

[Mike Painter]

So, will they go back onto the gold standard or on the liquor bottle
standard?

[Syd M.]

On Nov 27, 2:15 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:45:34 GMT, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
> >duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

> >>On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:31:42 GMT, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
> >>>Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097

> >>>>> On 25-Nov-2012, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:
> >>>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
> >>>>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
> >>>>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
> >>>>>> you should be required to leave?
> >>>>> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic
> >>>>> tanks and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?
> >>>>You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
> >>>>Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.
> >>>ROFL. The rightards think people would notice if they all packed up
> >>>and left. "A day without rightards" -- ROFL. Fucking loons.
> >>Who're you?
>
> >I'm the guy laughing at you Republidiot Sarah Palin idiots.
>
> I'm personally crying because we would have been better off and with more
> experience than we got with massa bama.
>
>

No, your crying because your a bigot and a black man has won the
highest office and has authority over you.

PDW

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <g64ab8dhia8d8f7jp...@4ax.com>,

So what?

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <b54ab8dj8p8r1t9e7...@4ax.com>,

Are you kidding? We'll take over the world with our alternative energy
sources and you'll fall even further into the 3rd world.

It may be the only way to prevent China from owning the alternate energy
field. Get rid of the science haters and we can beat China.

[Father Haskell]

He's crying because a black man is smarter than he is.

[GOD LLC]

On Sunday, November 25, 2012 5:16:47 PM UTC-5, duke wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:58:13 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>
>
>
> >Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
>
> >the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
>
> >our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
>
> >required to leave?
>
>
>

> Then you better pack up and leave.

>
>
>
> The dukester, American - American
>
> ********************************************
>
> You can't fix stupid.
>

> ************************************d********

I would like to see you make him you cowardly piece of shit.

[Scout]

"max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:k91quj$g0v$1...@dont-email.me...
> Scout <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
> news:k91bor$htd$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>> "Mitchell Holman" <nomailverizo.net> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA117D2FE2959...@216.196.121.131...
>
>>> "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>> news:k9187i$3md$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>>>> So what do we have that Texas really needs?
>
>>> Civilization.
>
>> ROTFLMAO.....
>
>> Now that's funny.
>
> What's REALLY funny is ... he believes it!

Which is why I thought it was so funny....

[John Smith]

"Fred^44" <rep...@scientology.org> wrote in message news:586dnWpgmLEHmijN...@posted.sonicnet...

The Tex-Mexican that Vote for,
Brown Man name Obama,
For they is not Black or White.

If you can not see that,
You may be the Rightward One,
Required to leave United States of All above ..

[John Smith]

"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote in message news:XnsA1185F096...@216.196.121.131...

> "John Smith" <som...@microsoft.com> wrote in
> news:k92qro$jj5$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>
>> "Fred^44" <rep...@scientology.org> wrote in message
>> news:U6GdndyJR7210y_N...@posted.sonicnet...
>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
>>> you should be required to leave?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> *force* Tex-Mexican to leave Why?
>>
>> Is it because they of Mexican-America you call them rightards?
>> Do you believe there be a Federal law that says::
>> State need to leave United States of America,
>> and go back to United States of Mexico?
>
> There is currently a push to rename Mexico simply Mexico (as it is known
> throughout the world) instead of its current name of United States of
> Mexico.
>

I like to see a push to rename,
United States of America,
to United States of Ferrell.

After Will Ferrell LOOL......

But just like Mexico the People have to Vote on it..

That way we all from Ferrell to Mexico can be America..

[Gray Guest]

rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote in
news:FYqdnexsHPstTC7N...@posted.sonicnet:

> Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097

>>> On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:

>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
>>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
>>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
>>>> you should be required to leave?

>>> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic
>>> tanks and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such
people?
>>You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.
>
> ROFL. The rightards think people would notice if they all packed up
> and left. "A day without rightards" -- ROFL. Fucking loons.
>
>

Don't you claim that they do all the menial jobs? Who's gonna do it for
you?

--
Refusenik #1

Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.

Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

[Gray Guest]

"James Meyers" <jmey...@cogeco.ca> wrote in news:9R0ts.64096$WP2.50591
@newsfe20.iad:

> That would be a blessing!!!
>
>

Soon enough.

[Fred^44]

Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>In article <b54ab8dj8p8r1t9e7...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>> Great, then don't complain when you freeze to death in the dark.

LOL. A Christian warning others about being in the dark. <smile>

>Are you kidding? We'll take over the world with our alternative energy
>sources and you'll fall even further into the 3rd world.
>It may be the only way to prevent China from owning the alternate energy
>field. Get rid of the science haters and we can beat China.

The United States already continues to make significant achievements in
the realm of science despite the abject opposition and shitting-up of
our nation's academia. Remove these right wing extremists and we could
once again show the world what our nation's best and brightest are
capable of.

[Fred^44]

Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote in
>news:FYqdnexsHPstTC7N...@posted.sonicnet:
>> Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>>>"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097
>>>> On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:
>>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
>>>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
>>>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
>>>>> you should be required to leave?
>>>> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic
>>>> tanks and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?
>>>You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>>Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.
>> ROFL. The rightards think people would notice if they all packed up
>> and left. "A day without rightards" -- ROFL. Fucking loons.
>Don't you claim that they do all the menial jobs? Who's gonna do it for you?

I'm claiming that rightards have lower income averages than normal people
because they are doing jobs that are pay less than high technology and
other high-end jobs.

Rightards are on average 6 IQ points less than normal people, and that fact
is expressed in the economics of Red States when compared against Blue.

[Zacharias Mulletstein]

"James Meyers" <jmey...@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
news:9R0ts.64096$WP2....@newsfe20.iad...

> That would be a blessing!!!

Every day is a day without "Fred" since he resides in my killfile.

[Zacharias Mulletstein]

"Gray Guest" <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA118D8AB6DFA4We...@88.198.244.100...

> "James Meyers" <jmey...@cogeco.ca> wrote in news:9R0ts.64096$WP2.50591
> @newsfe20.iad:
>
>> That would be a blessing!!!
>>
>>
>
> Soon enough.

Death threat noted. You're just like "Gunner." a sickly coward who sits
behind his computer dreaming of a "Final Solution" of "liberals" and
everyone else who is smarter than you.

[Besque]

On 11/26/2012 3:31 PM, Fred^44 wrote:
> Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097
>>> On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:
>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
>>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
>>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
>>>> you should be required to leave?
>>> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic
>>> tanks and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?
>> You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>> Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.
>
> ROFL. The rightards think people would notice if they all packed up
> and left. "A day without rightards" -- ROFL. Fucking loons.
>

You think that's bad, try living a day with social (Marxist)democrats.
>

[Besque]

On 11/27/2012 1:45 PM, Fred^44 wrote:
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:31:42 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>> Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097
>>>>> On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at alt.atheism:
>>>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
>>>>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
>>>>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
>>>>>> you should be required to leave?
>>>>> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty septic
>>>>> tanks and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such people?
>>>> You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>>> Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.
>>> ROFL. The rightards think people would notice if they all packed up
>>> and left. "A day without rightards" -- ROFL. Fucking loons.

>> Who're you?
>
> I'm the guy laughing at you Republidiot Sarah Palin idiots.
>

She was govener, so she's smarter than you are.
>

[Gray Guest]

"Zacharias Mulletstein" <zachariasm...@isright.com> wrote in
news:k944bs$7cd$1...@dont-email.me:

Whatnthe fuck is wrong with you? Where do you see a death threat you
paranoid little shit?

Maybe you should report me. To somebody. For something.

[Gray Guest]

Besque <Bes...@gmail.com> wrote in news:kFgts.152994$kt5.1...@fx08.am4:

Now THAT would be a Utopia.

[SaPeIsMa]

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd2-6561A3...@news.giganews.com...

Well maybe if you can keep those oh so successfull companies from going
bankrupt one after the other

>
> It may be the only way to prevent China from owning the alternate energy
> field. Get rid of the science haters and we can beat China.
>

That approach was tried in Germany, the Soviet, China, Cuba, Cambodia, and a
few other countries where stupid pinkies used the same mantra
"Let's get rid of the XXX, and we can beat YYY"
It was done to the tune of over 140,000,000 lives in the last century, and
stupid gits like you still haven't learned the lesson..

[Zacharias Mulletstein]

"Gray Guest" <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA118D8AB6DFA4We...@88.198.244.100...

> "James Meyers" <jmey...@cogeco.ca> wrote in news:9R0ts.64096$WP2.50591
> @newsfe20.iad:
>
>> That would be a blessing!!!
>>
>>
>
> Soon enough.

[Derek Smalls]

"Zacharias Mulletstein" wrote in message news:k95gl0$cd1$1...@dont-email.me...

>^^^^

Then you're safe, as you are one incredibly stump stupid person.

[Fred^44]

Woops! Rightarded buttfuck employed the fatal logic fallacy known as
"Begging the Question."

Care to try again, rightard?

[Fred^44]

ROFL! This buttfuck thinks that getting elected by a bunch of right wing
buttfucks some how means the elected buttfuck is smarter. :) Amusing. You
must be a Christian.

[duke]

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:22:54 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:

>duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>>On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:33:19 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>>On Nov 25, 10:58=A0am, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to leave
>>>>> the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says if you hate
>>>>> our country and everything our Constitution stands for, you should be
>>>>> required to leave?

>>>>LOL...I will be happy to help Gummer pack his one bag...
>>>Ha! It's ironic that these rightards want to live in a theocracy, a
>>>Somalian Utopia where their Republicanism and Jesus run things. If
>>>these rightards were ever to actually go *see* and have to *live*
>>>the consequences of what they advocate, they would shit their pants
>>>and cry, begging to be let back in.
>>We already know that Jesus is not involved in those type of countries.
>
>Jesus is very much part of the vast majority of SOuther American
>third world shitholes which Republidiots would love to emulate, so
>much so there's no excuse for rightards not packing the fuck up
>and moving to any one of them.

What makes you think we'd do the moving?

The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.

********************************************

[duke]

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:21:02 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

They keep going bankrupt, and thanks to massa bama, we're eating the costs.

>It may be the only way to prevent China from owning the alternate energy
>field. Get rid of the science haters and we can beat China.

[duke]

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:31:22 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:

>duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>>On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:50:16 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>>duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:35:16 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>>>>"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On 25-Nov-2012, Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote at
>>>>>>> We could annex them to Cuba for a half billion $ or so.
>>>>>>Now there's a thought. Sell Texas to Cuba. I don't know if the state is
>>>>>>worth half a billion since it is populated with hate-filled people who have
>>>>>>this sense of entitlement, but maybe Cuba won't notice at first. Yeah,
>>>>>>Texans might get some good cigars out of the deal, but they'd learn what it
>>>>>>is really like to live under an actual communist government as opposed to
>>>>>>just thinking that because they hate the United States of America that the
>>>>>>U.S. is communist.
>>>>>Except that medical coverage and treatment in Cuba is often much
>>>>>superior than what can be found in the United States, more so when
>>>>>it comes to optical surgery, Cuban medicine exceeds even that of
>>>>>what can be had at John Hopkins in some procedures. You would not
>>>>>want to let rightards have superior medical care, would you?
>>>>You're going to lose a HUGE amount of oil supplies, especially when
>>>>Louisiana follows them.

>>>No, the United States has zero problem taking oil from other countries.
>>>Slaughtering the rightarded rightards in Louisiana and Texas and other
>>>Red State drains on our economy will be easy since these rightards
>>>won't have an Air Force.
>>Since when. We'll have Cape Kennedy, Disney World, and Fort Knox.

>No you won't, all NASA facilities belong to the United States, they will
>be closed and relocated back to the United States when Republicunts
>pack up and leave.

No, no, no. You can't have them. They stay with us, who are not moving
anywhere. If you want to go, then go.

> And don't expect Disney or any other financially
>successful corporation to stay open in the theofascist right wing
>theocracy.

>As for Fort Knox, good luck trying to find any gold in there, the Bush
>Christian terrorist regime looted the treasury and stopped allowing the
>gold to be audited, there's nothing left.

[duke]

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:55:25 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:

>Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>On Nov 27, 2:31=A0pm, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>> As for Fort Knox, good luck trying to find any gold in there, the Bush
>>> Christian terrorist regime looted the treasury and stopped allowing the
>>> gold to be audited, there's nothing left.

>>They're using it to store junior's empty liquor bottles.
>
>LOL -- something, yeah. The irony is that only Ron Paul actually
>strove to get the contents of our nation's gold vaults audited to
>find out if there's anything left. The Bush regime ended the audits
>which not only got the usual conspiracy loons howeling again but
>also got normal people wondering what the rightarded fuck was
>trying to hide.

Has massa buckwheat been going along with the joke?

[duke]

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:26:55 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:

>duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>>On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:45:34 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>>I'm the guy laughing at you Republidiot Sarah Palin idiots.

>>I'm personally crying because we would have been better off and with more
>>experience than we got with massa bama.
>

>That's because you're a Republican which is indistinguishable from
>the Klu Klux Klan.

Didn't you get the memo? The kkk was born out of the 'rat party when old
Lincoln was a Republican.

>Still, it would have been *great*& to have Sarah Palin in the White
>House. Might as well get this country over with faster so we can
>drag the shitting Oligarchs out of their mansions, give 'em trials,
>and reboot the country.

Yeah, I know someone that we'd like to put the boot to right now.

[Zacharias Mulletstein]

"Gray Guest" <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote in message

news:XnsA1196B895EA0We...@88.198.244.100...

> "Zacharias Mulletstein" <zachariasm...@isright.com> wrote in
> news:k944bs$7cd$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> "Gray Guest" <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA118D8AB6DFA4We...@88.198.244.100...
>>> "James Meyers" <jmey...@cogeco.ca> wrote in news:9R0ts.64096$WP2.50591
>>> @newsfe20.iad:
>>>
>>>> That would be a blessing!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Soon enough.
>>
>> Death threat noted. You're just like "Gunner." a sickly coward who sits
>> behind his computer dreaming of a "Final Solution" of "liberals" and
>> everyone else who is smarter than you.
>>
>>
>
> Whatnthe fuck is wrong with you? Where do you see a death threat you
> paranoid little shit?
>
> Maybe you should report me. To somebody. For something.

It's already been done. You should expect a knock on your door very soon.

[Syd M.]

On Nov 28, 3:11 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:55:25 GMT, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
> >Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>On Nov 27, 2:31=A0pm, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
> >>> As for Fort Knox, good luck trying to find any gold in there, the Bush
> >>> Christian terrorist regime looted the treasury and stopped allowing the
> >>> gold to be audited, there's nothing left.
> >>They're using it to store junior's empty liquor bottles.
>
> >LOL -- something, yeah. The irony is that only Ron Paul actually
> >strove to get the contents of our nation's gold vaults audited to
> >find out if there's anything left. The Bush regime ended the audits
> >which not only got the usual conspiracy loons howeling again but
> >also got normal people wondering what the rightarded fuck was
> >trying to hide.
>
> Has massa buckwheat been going along with the joke?
>
>

Why should he, when you ARE the joke?

PDW

[Gray Guest]

"Zacharias Mulletstein" <zachariasm...@isright.com> wrote in

news:k95uih$879$1...@dont-email.me:

There was one today. Packages for the Holidays.

BTW. I've reported real actual death threats and had nothing happen. Good
luck with vague statements about anonymous people.

[Gray Guest]

"Zacharias Mulletstein" <zachariasm...@isright.com> wrote in

news:k95gl0$cd1$1...@dont-email.me:

It's not a dream. It is a fervent hope.
There will never be a "Final Solution" to liberals.
Liberals in particular are not smarter than me. They clearly don't
understand math. They clearly don't understand the differences between
income and outgo. They clearly don't understand the crisis they are
fomenting. I mean yeah they know they are trying to crash the country they
think the source of evil in the world. What they don't know is the extent
of the backlash.

When the bottom falls out and there is nothing but anarchy, I'll be hunting
you with dogs.

[duke]

On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:32:06 GMT, "Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>On 27-Nov-2012, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote at alt.atheism:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:45:34 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
>>

>> >duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >>On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:31:42 GMT, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44)
>> >>wrote:
>> >>>Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>>>"Kirby Grant" <KGr...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xmtss.63107$HJ.24097
>> >>>>> On 25-Nov-2012, rep...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote at
>> >>>>> alt.atheism:

>> >>>>>> Is there any way that we can *force* the rightards down in Texas to
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> leave the United States? Shouldn't there be a Federal law that says
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> if you hate our country and everything our Constitution stands for,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> you should be required to leave?

>> >>>>> This is ridiculous. Who would flip burgers, dig ditches, empty
>> >>>>> septic
>> >>>>> tanks and all of the other menial labor that is now done by such
>> >>>>> people?
>> >>>>You fuckwits would have to do it. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>> >>>>Society would be at a complete standstill inside 3 weeks.
>> >>>ROFL. The rightards think people would notice if they all packed up
>> >>>and left. "A day without rightards" -- ROFL. Fucking loons.
>> >>Who're you?
>> >

>> >I'm the guy laughing at you Republidiot Sarah Palin idiots.
>>
>> I'm personally crying because we would have been better off and with more
>> experience than we got with massa bama.

>You are living proof that stupidity is the number 1 priority for
>Republicans.

As your idiot president buckwheat goes on a 3 week Hawaii Christmas vacation
while the country falls of the edge of the cliff. Remember, you voted for him,
not me.

How about that, numb nuts.

[Gray Guest]

"Ken" <kts...@yoohoo.com> wrote in news:SBuws.155674$dN6.1...@fed11.iad:

> For a person who is president, "vacation" is a relative term. He'll
> still get intelligence briefings, he'll still be in contact with his
> staff quite a few hours every day and he'll still sign off on documents.
> You Republicans begrudge Democrats everything. Yet Republicans are far
> worse about spending money on vacation. Dubya was constantly running off
> to Texas so that he could give papparatzi a chance to see him life a
> branch at his so-called ranch and then claim that he was actually doing
> real work - Dubya never worked a day in his whole life.
>

Stupid and a liar. No further usefulness. Terminate.

[Jason]

In article <XnsA122C2CFF7C39We...@88.198.244.100>, Gray

A Year without Rightards would mean that liberals would establish a
communist governement. We are already headed in that direction. America is
slowly but surely becoming an entitlement society. What happens when
America becomes a total establishment society? America will go belly
up--because they will totally run out of money.

http://www.conservativeredpolitics.com/2012/11/why-gop-lost.html

Before looking at how the GOP can win again, I think we need to really
assess why we lost in the first place. My colleague Josh wrote an
excellent piece on the path forward for the GOP just the other day. I also
have some perspectives on this topic, but I would really like to dig deep
into what we did wrong first.

First, let's take ourselves back to election night. Hopefully enough time
has passed that we can look back on it without having to relive the
emotions of that dreadful night. I've heard some good spinning from Fox
News and Karl Rove that may dispute with my assessment, but let's forget
that and call a spade a spade - the GOP got their butts handed to them.
There are a few reasons, in my opinion, why that is.

America is Becoming an Entitlement Society
Let's face it - winning an election in America (or any country composed
primarily of human beings) is, at least to an extent, about who can
promise the voters more free stuff. And of course, the President was able
to convince undecided voters that he would give them more free stuff than
Romney was. This hasn't always been the case. Why do you think Bush won
re-election in spite of unpopular wars? He promised more free stuff! The
Bush-era GOP promised us all big entitlements, big government programs,
and huge tax cuts. Well that's just too good to resist! Especially because
stingy old John Kerry and the Democrats were only willing to give us the
first two. In 2012, Republicans were promising the tax cuts (though the
perception is that they only help the rich, which is not true), but they
wanted to reduce the other things. Democrats want to let you keep
everything (except for those at the very top, but hey - they're not a big
share of the electorate). There's a reason entitlements are the third rail
of American politics. We should be somewhat optimistic though. it's hard
to imagine any ticket so deeply connected to the Ryan budget proposal
could have ever done so well electorally in years past. Perhaps Americans
are waking up. But entitlement reform, while the single most important
issue facing this nation by far, is still not a popular platform item.

Our Candidates were Not the Best
Republicans have a greater burden on them to find good candidates than
Democrats do. Why? See above. If we're going to sell this whole
entitlement reform thing, we need the right salesman. So let's take a
memorable look back at the candidates of 2012, starting with none other
than Mitt Romney. First let me be clear: I love Mitt Romney. I have
supported him enthusiastically since the very start. I was excited when he
announced his candidacy and couldn't wait to work to get him elected. His
record as governor is not the purest, but you can tell from his policy
positions even in 1994 up through today that the man has a truly
conservative mindset wrapped in a pragmatic exterior. He understands
business and economics like so few candidates before him. He is one of the
most charitable people to ever run for president and, by all accounts
(except the media), a truly loving man. I'm a proud Romney super-fan,
maybe the only one there is. But let's face it - he's a great candidate,
but terrible at being a candidate. I mean absolutely awful. He came off as
a man from another time. It's almost like he and his devout Mormon family
came right out of the 1950's to run in this election and didn't have time
to learn how the world has changed. I kind of like that personally, but
most people just can't relate to it. Then, of course, the man's loaded and
tried too hard to relate. It's okay to be rich, but it's not okay to be
rich and pretend you're just an average joe. In spite of all this, he
still came within 3 points of winning the popular vote in this country.
Imagine if we had a candidate that could actually inspire people other
than me and convince them that all these huge reforms would lead us to a
new tomorrow with a brighter future? It could've been a landslide. If we
can find the right candidates, my first point about an entitlement society
can be overcome. That's my view on Romney. Josh has already discussed the
problems with some of our other candidates, as have all the pundits on
both sides, and I think the problems with many of our Senate candidates go
without saying. So I won't beat a dead horse there.

We Lost on Social Issues
This election should have never been about social issues. And who on earth
would have thought it would be the Democrats that would be the ones that
made it about social issues? Certainly the country has moved to the left
on gay marriage. But that was an issue that was barely even discussed on a
national level. The Democrats know they can't usually win on these issues,
especially considering America is more pro-life than ever. So they decided
to take a step back. What's one social issue that's behind us? Something
that everyone pretty much agrees on? Contraception! And they got the
perfect opening the minute the Republicans opposed the HHS mandate.
Obviously the Republican opposition was to protect religious liberty, but
it's easy to make it look like Republicans hate contraception. And women.
And you know what - it worked.

The Conservative Media Bubble
Why were so many Republicans so shocked last Tuesday night when Romney
lost the election? All the polls were predicting it. It wasn't much of a
shock to anyone following the RCP average. I knew it was coming. I still
held out hopes that somehow Gallup and Rasmussen had better voter turnout
models, but I wasn't expecting it. It's one thing to be disappointed that
Romney lost. It's quite another to actually be surprised. The problem is
conservatives are increasingly living in a media bubble with a
self-confirming bias. This is what has lead to so may Republican voters
thinking far-right candidates are electable. We hear it on Limbaugh or
Fox. We become convinced that everyone thinks like us. Then we see
pollsters like Gallup show these turnout models that reflect 2004
demographics and we assume that's what's going to happen. Perhaps the
average person doesn't watch any cable news station - just their local
network affiliate or local newspaper, etc. But Republican primary voters
are constantly surrounded by the perspectives of Glenn Beck, Rush
Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc. I like Fox, I think it offers a much needed
perspective that is absent from the mainstream media, but it can't be the
sole universe I live in. We need to go back to reality and promote
responsible conservative principles and stop thinking that everyone else
in America thinks like we do. The truth is, most Americans are naturally
somewhat conservative, but we drive them away from our party by allowing
the Conservative Media Complex t drive us to the rhetorical extreme.

These are some of my initial thoughts on the matter. I still haven't quite
decided how to go about fixing the problem yet. Notice, I didn't once
mention Latinos. If we had more broad appeal in general, we still could've
won this election. But the Latino issue is one we need to address to be
relevant in future elections.

[Father Haskell]

On Dec 7, 7:28 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> Before looking at how the GOP can win again, I think we need to really
> assess why we lost in the first place.

Romney.

[Gray Guest]

Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote in news:Jason-0712121628160001@66-53-220-
229.stkn.mdsg-pacwest.com:

> In article <XnsA122C2CFF7C39We...@88.198.244.100>, Gray
> Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>

>> "Ken" <kts...@yoohoo.com> wrote in news:SBuws.155674$dN6.120651

The GOP is useless. A different methodolgy is required.

Something with a lot of punishment for my enemies.