Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Boy Scouts Introduce GAY BASEBALL Leagues
3 views
Skip to first unread message
BroilJAB
May 25, 2013, 3:31:53 PM5/25/13
to
As millions of decent parents and children leave
the jew polluted Queer Boy Scouts, they now
are forming GAY LEAGUES 'for holocausted
boys who had been rebuffed in their predatory
attacks on non-Homosexual' boys. Article IX
of the New Scout Rules makes it a Hate Crime
to 'resist in any manner' the homosexual
advances of another Scout who is Gay"...
the jew polluted Queer Boy Scouts, they now
are forming GAY LEAGUES 'for holocausted
boys who had been rebuffed in their predatory
attacks on non-Homosexual' boys. Article IX
of the New Scout Rules makes it a Hate Crime
to 'resist in any manner' the homosexual
advances of another Scout who is Gay"...
Zepp
May 25, 2013, 3:50:55 PM5/25/13
to
considered a home run.
deep
May 25, 2013, 5:24:02 PM5/25/13
to
Thay there Boy Thcout, is that your baseball bat or are you glad to
see me?
Dänk 42Ø
May 25, 2013, 11:07:20 PM5/25/13
to
On Sat, 25 May 2013 15:24:02 -0600, deep wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 19:50:55 +0000 (UTC), quack:
But seriously, on the subject of gays in the Boy Scouts, I've long
defended the organization's First Amendment right to freedom of
association, which means they have a right to set standards for
membership and exclude anyone they want, for any reason or no reason at
all.
It's outrageous that gay activists are trying to co-opt a PRIVATE
organization like BSA, forcing it to accept gays (and atheists), in spite
of its long held beliefs. If gays don't like the BSA's rules, they are
free to start their own scouting organization and admit or exclude
whomever they choose.
This is why that even though I am gay myself, I reject the "gay agenda"
because it is FASCIST. Leftist gays do not want mere tolerance, they
want APPROVAL, and they want to outlaw any expression of disapproval,
like they have done in Britain with the "Public Order Act."
My real right to express my opinion freely far outweighs my imaginary
right to not be offended by other people's opinions. Britons decided
that the imaginary right to not be offended was more important, and now
their country is an Orwellian police state.
My usual analogy is to compare this gay scout issue to a Chess club or
the Catholic church. Should the Chess club be forced by law to admit
those who want to play Checkers instead? Should the monotheistic
Catholic church, which believes in Heaven and Hell, be required to admit
polytheistic Hindus who believe in reincarnation? Should Hinduism be
forced to admit monotheists who believe that polytheists are going to
Hell?
This is why we have the First Amendment, and those who would force
acceptance and approval of themselves and their personal beliefs on
others are fascists.
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 19:50:55 +0000 (UTC), quack:
defended the organization's First Amendment right to freedom of
association, which means they have a right to set standards for
membership and exclude anyone they want, for any reason or no reason at
all.
It's outrageous that gay activists are trying to co-opt a PRIVATE
organization like BSA, forcing it to accept gays (and atheists), in spite
of its long held beliefs. If gays don't like the BSA's rules, they are
free to start their own scouting organization and admit or exclude
whomever they choose.
This is why that even though I am gay myself, I reject the "gay agenda"
because it is FASCIST. Leftist gays do not want mere tolerance, they
want APPROVAL, and they want to outlaw any expression of disapproval,
like they have done in Britain with the "Public Order Act."
My real right to express my opinion freely far outweighs my imaginary
right to not be offended by other people's opinions. Britons decided
that the imaginary right to not be offended was more important, and now
their country is an Orwellian police state.
My usual analogy is to compare this gay scout issue to a Chess club or
the Catholic church. Should the Chess club be forced by law to admit
those who want to play Checkers instead? Should the monotheistic
Catholic church, which believes in Heaven and Hell, be required to admit
polytheistic Hindus who believe in reincarnation? Should Hinduism be
forced to admit monotheists who believe that polytheists are going to
Hell?
This is why we have the First Amendment, and those who would force
acceptance and approval of themselves and their personal beliefs on
others are fascists.
0 new messages