10-year-old refuses to stand for Christanic hatred
Catherine de' Medicis With Dripping Snot
Here is a 10-year-old boy who is smarter, braver, and has more courage
than *any* Republican pile of traitorshit.
Bet you the terrorist simps at FOX "News" shit themselves and spew
their hatred of America using this amazing kid as a weapon to keep
rightarded buttfucks seeped in hate.
---
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
None4U
"Catherine de' Medicis With Dripping Snot" <beave...@foxnews.com> wrote
in message news:LradnUeNyOVrw57W...@posted.sonicnet...
I hate when parents use their kids for political , financial or emotional
gain. Its nothing short of sick.
Catherine de' Medicis With Dripping Snot
>"Catherine de' Medicis With Dripping Snot" <beave...@foxnews.com> wrote
>in message news:LradnUeNyOVrw57W...@posted.sonicnet...
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
>> Here is a 10-year-old boy who is smarter, braver, and has more courage
>> than *any* Republican pile of traitorshit.
>> Bet you the terrorist simps at FOX "News" shit themselves and spew
>> their hatred of America using this amazing kid as a weapon to keep
>> rightarded buttfucks seeped in hate.
>I hate when parents use their kids for political , financial or emotional
>gain. Its nothing short of sick.
When ever somebody does that, you'll be sure to post it here, won't you?
Thanks.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Lookout
I refused in 10th grade. Teacher went nuts, sent me to the principal.
The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the
Army.
ne...@millions.com
wrote:
Currently, in regard to the issue, do you stand or refuse?
DCI
lab~rat >:-)
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
>
>Here is a 10-year-old boy who is smarter, braver, and has more courage
>than *any* Republican pile of traitorshit.
>
>Bet you the terrorist simps at FOX "News" shit themselves and spew
>their hatred of America using this amazing kid as a weapon to keep
>rightarded buttfucks seeped in hate.
It's a shame that there are kids out there being used as pawns by
their dumbass liberal parents.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Lookout
It hasn't come up in years. It would depend on the setting. The last
time I was around a flag it was at the funeral for our (me and my
wife's) old First Sergeant. In honor of him I stood at attention as
all prior military are supposed to do.
lab~rat >:-)
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:34:46 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)"
><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>
>>t's a shame that there are kids out there being used as pawns by
>>their dumbass liberal parents.
>
>Didn't you conservatives teach your children racial
>hatred for generation after generation?
>
>So when they grew up they'd stand outside of Little
>Rock school jeering and expressing hatred at Blacks
>being escorted into public schools?
That was the Democrats. Try to keep up.
Lookout
wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:00:55 -0700, fe...@Vester.net puked:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:34:46 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)"
>><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>>
>>>t's a shame that there are kids out there being used as pawns by
>>>their dumbass liberal parents.
>>
>>Didn't you conservatives teach your children racial
>>hatred for generation after generation?
>>
>>So when they grew up they'd stand outside of Little
>>Rock school jeering and expressing hatred at Blacks
>>being escorted into public schools?
>
>That was the Democrats. Try to keep up.
I'd like to see you prove that.
And what about today's white supremacist militia kids? The are all
conservative christians and you know it. I saw a YouTube vid of the
cutest little 12 year old girls singing the most racist songs at a KKK
rally with their parents.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:35:28 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:00:55 -0700, fe...@Vester.net puked:
>>
>>>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:34:46 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)"
>>><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>t's a shame that there are kids out there being used as pawns by
>>>>their dumbass liberal parents.
>>>
>>>Didn't you conservatives teach your children racial
>>>hatred for generation after generation?
>>>
>>>So when they grew up they'd stand outside of Little
>>>Rock school jeering and expressing hatred at Blacks
>>>being escorted into public schools?
>>
>>That was the Democrats. Try to keep up.
>
>I'd like to see you prove that.
Go ask your sheet wearing buddy, Byrd. It was all the rage to string
up those nasty niggers for talking to a white woman back then.
>And what about today's white supremacist militia kids? The are all
>conservative christians and you know it. I saw a YouTube vid of the
>cutest little 12 year old girls singing the most racist songs at a KKK
>rally with their parents.
Why is it that all of you Democrats stopped being in the Klan? Does
it have something to do with the internet and the ability to view the
cutest little 12 year old girls in the privacy of your home? I think
it is.
Lookout
wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:16:36 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com>
>puked:
>
>>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:35:28 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:00:55 -0700, fe...@Vester.net puked:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:34:46 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)"
>>>><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>t's a shame that there are kids out there being used as pawns by
>>>>>their dumbass liberal parents.
>>>>
>>>>Didn't you conservatives teach your children racial
>>>>hatred for generation after generation?
>>>>
>>>>So when they grew up they'd stand outside of Little
>>>>Rock school jeering and expressing hatred at Blacks
>>>>being escorted into public schools?
>>>
>>>That was the Democrats. Try to keep up.
>>
>>I'd like to see you prove that.
>
>Go ask your sheet wearing buddy, Byrd. It was all the rage to string
>up those nasty niggers for talking to a white woman back then.
Who?
>
>>And what about today's white supremacist militia kids? The are all
>>conservative christians and you know it. I saw a YouTube vid of the
>>cutest little 12 year old girls singing the most racist songs at a KKK
>>rally with their parents.
>
>Why is it that all of you Democrats stopped being in the Klan? Does
>it have something to do with the internet and the ability to view the
>cutest little 12 year old girls in the privacy of your home? I think
>it is.
Uhh..I'm not a democrat and never belonged in the Klan. I'm the crazy
social liberal in Alabama, remember?
You're drunk pretty early tonite aren't you?
Siva
Yep we prefer to educate our kids, while rightards "teach" them
Creationism and how to ejaculate to Alaskan bimbos who can't read a
newspaper
Snottless Catherine de' Medicis
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:48:35 GMT, beave...@foxnews.com (Catherine de' Medicis With Dripping Snot) wrote:
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
>>Here is a 10-year-old boy who is smarter, braver, and has more courage
>>than *any* Republican pile of traitorshit.
>The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
>over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
>explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
>The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
>school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the Army.
Good for you, that showed courage and the ability to think for yourself
and *not* cave in to the meaningless blather rituals that the State
wants kids to perform at a young age to get them ready to obey without
thought, without question.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Snottless Catherine de' Medicis
When that happens, you'll let us know, won't you, cunt? Thanks.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
tankfixer
Hiccum Blurpaedius
> In article <1257g5tp5rg3074l7abu92kgp3h5b93...@4ax.com>,
> mrLook...@yahoo.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:48:35 GMT, beaverwa...@foxnews.com (Catherine
> > de' Medicis With Dripping Snot) wrote:
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
>
> > >Here is a 10-year-old boy who is smarter, braver, and has more courage
> > >than *any* Republican pile of traitorshit.
>
> > >Bet you the terrorist simps at FOX "News" shit themselves and spew
> > >their hatred of America using this amazing kid as a weapon to keep
> > >rightarded buttfucks seeped in hate.
>
> > >---
>
> > I refused in 10th grade. Teacher went nuts, sent me to the principal.
> > The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
> > over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
> > explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
>
> > The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
> > school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the
> > Army.
>
> hypocrite...
Well they tortured me when I was a child. Tortured me again when I
grew up.
Children should be allowed to carry weapons to kill conservatives that
resort to torture.
Exterminate the US military
SaPeIsMa
<fe...@Vester.net> wrote in message
news:9f68g5h4ld0c6m035...@4ax.com...
>>their dumbass liberal parents.
>
> hatred for generation after generation?
>
> So when they grew up they'd stand outside of Little
> Rock school jeering and expressing hatred at Blacks
> being escorted into public schools?
>
Nope
The KKK and it's ilk were mostly Democrats
Too bad you're ignorant of the facts and therefore are a follower of
propaganda
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
You act like you're a significant enough internet character to warrant
me remembering that. I don't think I ever knew it, but
congratulations on not being a Democrat.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
Whatever, my point is that there are a lot of these screwballs out
there, like this parent in particular, that should have their kids
taken away from them for child abuse. When I saw that fat ass burr
head sitting there with his kid, all I could think about is balloon
boy and how the dad set him up.
If you want to have a political conscience, great, but don't exploit
your children to do it.
lab~rat >:-)
Catherine de' Medicis) puked:
Ok, you get a 30 day timeout for being generally annoying.
Lookout
wrote:
Not at all. I decided that I wanted to defend my country (not a piece
of colored cloth). When I did that I also gave up some rights. That
was a conscience decision. The flag meant nothing to me while I was in
but I followed orders.
You're a chicken shit for not serving.
Lookout
wrote:
>
><fe...@Vester.net> wrote in message
>news:9f68g5h4ld0c6m035...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:34:46 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)"
>> <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>>
>>>t's a shame that there are kids out there being used as pawns by
>>>their dumbass liberal parents.
>>
>> Didn't you conservatives teach your children racial
>> hatred for generation after generation?
>>
>> So when they grew up they'd stand outside of Little
>> Rock school jeering and expressing hatred at Blacks
>> being escorted into public schools?
>>
>
>Nope
> The KKK and it's ilk were mostly Democrats
Probably true to a certain point. You can't identify them with the
same democratic party we see today.
>Too bad you're ignorant of the facts and therefore are a follower of
>propaganda
To bad you're to stupid to see that the parties have changed in 50
years.
Snottless Catherine de' Medicis
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:34:46 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)"
><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>>their dumbass liberal parents.
>hatred for generation after generation?
The Republican Party *used* to be in favor of equal rights, but that
was before it became the Christanic Treason Party.
This kid refusing to stand for hate and bigotry is what Americans are
all "supposed" to be like given our national Constitution's dictates.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Snottless Catherine de' Medicis
>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:56:57 GMT, beave...@foxnews.com (Snottless Catherine de' Medicis) puked:
>>"lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>>>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:48:35 GMT, beave...@foxnews.com (Catherine de' Medicis With Dripping Snot) puked:
>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
>>>>Here is a 10-year-old boy who is smarter, braver, and has more courage
>>>>than *any* Republican pile of traitorshit.
>>>>Bet you the terrorist simps at FOX "News" shit themselves and spew
>>>>their hatred of America using this amazing kid as a weapon to keep
>>>>rightarded buttfucks seeped in hate.
>>>It's a shame that there are kids out there being used as pawns by
>>>their dumbass liberal parents.
>>When that happens, you'll let us know, won't you, cunt? Thanks.
Translation: The hate filled Christian loon has nothing.
Snottless Catherine de' Medicis
>In article <1257g5tp5rg3074l7...@4ax.com>,
>mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>> The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
>> over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
>> explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
>> The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
>> school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the Army.
>hypocrite...
How so?
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
tankfixer
Not serving ?
That would be news to the various commanders I worked for over the
years..
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
> The KKK and it's ilk were mostly Democrats
>
>Probably true to a certain point. You can't identify them with the
>same democratic party we see today.
Sure you can. The Democratic party today wants to keep them on the
plantation by making them dependent on the government.
Lookout
wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:00:18 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com>
>puked:
>
>> The KKK and it's ilk were mostly Democrats
>>
>>Probably true to a certain point. You can't identify them with the
>>same democratic party we see today.
>
>Sure you can. The Democratic party today wants to keep them on the
>plantation by making them dependent on the government.
I'm sure with your limited intelligence you see it that way
Lookout
wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:58:43 -0600, Siva <soll...@truthpolice.net>
>puked:
>
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:48:35 GMT, beave...@foxnews.com (Catherine
>>> de' Medicis With Dripping Snot) puked:
>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
>>>>
>>>> Here is a 10-year-old boy who is smarter, braver, and has more courage
>>>> than *any* Republican pile of traitorshit.
>>>>
>>>> Bet you the terrorist simps at FOX "News" shit themselves and spew
>>>> their hatred of America using this amazing kid as a weapon to keep
>>>> rightarded buttfucks seeped in hate.
>>>
>>> It's a shame that there are kids out there being used as pawns by
>>> their dumbass liberal parents.
>>
>>Yep we prefer to educate our kids, while rightards "teach" them
>>Creationism and how to ejaculate to Alaskan bimbos who can't read a
>>newspaper
>
>Whatever, my point is that there are a lot of these screwballs out
>there, like this parent in particular, that should have their kids
>taken away from them for child abuse. When I saw that fat ass burr
>head sitting there with his kid, all I could think about is balloon
>boy and how the dad set him up.
>
>If you want to have a political conscience, great, but don't exploit
>your children to do it.
I have to agree with you on this one. The kid is using terminology
that only could have come from his parents. I have no doubt that this
child is saying this only because he's doing as told. My parents were
livid but willing to listen to my side. I simply said I don't believe
in a god, that the god was only thrown in in 1954 and wasn't part of
the original pledge (we learned that in 9th grade Civics) and that I
couldn't see saluting a piece of colored cloth. That was just way my
14 year old mind worked it out. I'm just happy I had parents that
would listen and a school system that respected the rights and
opinions of the students.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
I see how the welfare system has encouraged women not to marry and how
free housing has made people dependent on the government for shelter.
Soon we may see how people rely on the government for their health.
I think that people should pretty much only rely on government for
national security and nationwide infrastructure. Pretty much the rest
should be handled at a local level or by charities.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
I'm an atheist, and I have to say I don't get bothered by the "god"
thing. I guess I just kinda gloss over it and think of the ideals of
America when I salute the flag.
Lookout
wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:51:59 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com>
>puked:
>
>>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:18:12 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:00:18 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com>
>>>puked:
>>>
>>>> The KKK and it's ilk were mostly Democrats
>>>>
>>>>Probably true to a certain point. You can't identify them with the
>>>>same democratic party we see today.
>>>
>>>Sure you can. The Democratic party today wants to keep them on the
>>>plantation by making them dependent on the government.
>>
>>I'm sure with your limited intelligence you see it that way
>
>I see how the welfare system has encouraged women not to marry and how
>free housing has made people dependent on the government for shelter.
>Soon we may see how people rely on the government for their health.
>I think that people should pretty much only rely on government for
>national security and nationwide infrastructure. Pretty much the rest
>should be handled at a local level or by charities.
I agree.
It's still not the cause.
tankfixer
beave...@foxnews.com says...
>
> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <1257g5tp5rg3074l7...@4ax.com>,
> >mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
> >> I refused in 10th grade. Teacher went nuts, sent me to the principal.
> >> The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
> >> over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
> >> explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
> >> The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
> >> school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the Army.
> >hypocrite...
>
> How so?
If it has to be expained to you then you wont understand
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
You don't think access to government handouts creates a culture of
freeloaders who are consequently dependent on the government?
Lookout
wrote:
>In article <o5OdnS2-k-71wpjW...@posted.sonicnet>,
>beave...@foxnews.com says...
>>
>> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >In article <1257g5tp5rg3074l7...@4ax.com>,
>> >mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>> >> I refused in 10th grade. Teacher went nuts, sent me to the principal.
>> >> The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
>> >> over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
>> >> explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
>> >> The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
>> >> school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the Army.
>> >hypocrite...
>>
>> How so?
>
>If it has to be expained to you then you wont understand
Of course it has to be explained. He's wrong.
So you explain it then.
Lookout
wrote:
It's not the main cause. One of them? There are MORE whites collecting
then blacks.
Scout
And thus once again we see the real reason why liberals are against
guns.....they are fear they lack the self control that will keep them from
going around and killing people.
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
Go ahead and explain why you think he is wrong..
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
Why do liberals always have to make it about race ?
Snottless Catherine de' Medicis
>In article <o5OdnS2-k-71wpjW...@posted.sonicnet>,
>beave...@foxnews.com says...
>> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>In article <1257g5tp5rg3074l7...@4ax.com>,
>>>mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>>>> I refused in 10th grade. Teacher went nuts, sent me to the principal.
>>>> The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
>>>> over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
>>>> explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
>>>> The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
>>>> school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the Army.
>>>hypocrite...
>> How so?
>If it has to be expained to you then you wont understand
In other words, you're a rightard who spouted occult blather without
thought and now that you've been asked to explain yourself, you don't
have a pedophile priest or Rush Limbaugh to tell you how to respond.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
Republican Christians rape horses, mules: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pUuumRGmzA
Snottless Catherine de' Medicis
The stupid fuck could not -- for obvious reasons.
What remains is that this 10-year-old refusing to stand up for
Republicanism is the very class of citizen that this country needs the
most to climb out of the disaster that Republicans have left America with.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
tankfixer
Say again, over.
You are coming in broken and stupid
Lookout
wrote:
AHAHAHAHAAH Funniest damn thing I've read tonite.
tankfixer
Snottless Catherine de' Medicis
>In article <mvadnc1aG_cuF5XW...@posted.sonicnet>,
>beave...@foxnews.com says...
>> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >In article <o5OdnS2-k-71wpjW...@posted.sonicnet>,
>> >beave...@foxnews.com says...
>> >> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>In article <1257g5tp5rg3074l7...@4ax.com>,
>> >>>mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>> >>>> I refused in 10th grade. Teacher went nuts, sent me to the principal.
>> >>>> The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
>> >>>> over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
>> >>>> explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
>> >>>> The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
>> >>>> school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the Army.
>> >>>hypocrite...
>> >> How so?
>> >If it has to be expained to you then you wont understand
>> In other words, you're a rightard who spouted occult blather without
>> thought and now that you've been asked to explain yourself, you don't
>> have a pedophile priest or Rush Limbaugh to tell you how to respond.
Translation: The rightarded buttfuck has nothing.
tankfixer
>
> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <mvadnc1aG_cuF5XW...@posted.sonicnet>,
> >beave...@foxnews.com says...
> >> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >In article <o5OdnS2-k-71wpjW...@posted.sonicnet>,
> >> >beave...@foxnews.com says...
> >> >> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>In article <1257g5tp5rg3074l7...@4ax.com>,
> >> >>>mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
> >> >>>> I refused in 10th grade. Teacher went nuts, sent me to the principal.
> >> >>>> The called my mom (dad was at work) and I was sent home. I talked it
> >> >>>> over with them that night. They told me I would stand. I refused. I
> >> >>>> explained again I don't believe in saluting a piece of cloth.
> >> >>>> The wrote a note to the principal and explained what I said. The
> >> >>>> school was forced to accept it. I never stood again until I joined the Army.
> >> >>>hypocrite...
> >> >> How so?
> >> >If it has to be expained to you then you wont understand
> >> In other words, you're a rightard who spouted occult blather without
> >> thought and now that you've been asked to explain yourself, you don't
> >> have a pedophile priest or Rush Limbaugh to tell you how to respond.
> >Say again, over.
>
> Translation: The rightarded buttfuck has nothing.
Of course you don't...
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
Are you going to tell me that there are a higher percentage of whites
on the dole than the percentage of blacks?
Lookout
wrote:
Please define "leftist" for us.
Lookout
wrote:
I didn't say that now, did I?
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
Why, so you can quible and whine that you arn't one ?
Lookout
wrote:
Can you define the word?
Or will you get all flustered and start ignoring me like klaus did?
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
He's not ignoring you.
He's still rolling on the floor laughing at you
Lookout
wrote:
Nah..he's whining like kluas. There is no definition for "leftist"
other than the one HE makes up. And then he knows that I don't fit
that description and it's driving him nuts. So like a pissed off 4th
grader he just keeps calling me a name that means nothing to anyone
but him. I think it's funny and sad all at the same time.
The % of Americans who go to church on a regular basis is dropping
every year. We're finally maturing.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
To your credit, no. So you can see why a majority of blacks vote
Democratic, they're stuck on the government teat.
Gray Ghost
news:aefng5504j5ss72ag...@4ax.com:
You would think you get tired of being wrong all the time.
left?ist
�noun
1. a member of the political Left or a person sympathetic to its views.
�adjective
2. of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or advocated by the political Left.
Also, Leftist.
Origin:
1920�25; left 1 + -ist
Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, � Random House, Inc. 2009.
Related Words for : leftist
collectivist, left-winger, left-of-center, left-wing
View more related words �
left�ism also Left�ism (le(f'ti(z'?m)
n.
1. The ideology of the political left.
2. Belief in or support of the tenets of the political left.
left'ist adj. & n.
The American Heritage� Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright � 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
leftist
One who holds a left-wing viewpoint; someone who seeks radical social and
economic change in the direction of greater equality.
The American Heritage� New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
Copyright � 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
> The % of Americans who go to church on a regular basis is dropping
> every year. We're finally maturing.
>
Don't worry though, after the Muslims establish Shria law in your area YOU
WILL BOW TO MECCA 5 times a day. Or else.
--
�Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel
of envy, its inherent value is the equal sharing of misery.� Winston
Churchill
tankfixer
grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com says...
> 1. a member of the political Left or a person sympathetic to its views.
> 2. of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or advocated by the political Left.
> Also, Leftist.
> Origin:
> Dictionary.com Unabridged
> Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2009.
>
> Related Words for : leftist
> collectivist, left-winger, left-of-center, left-wing
> View more related words »
>
> left·ism also Left·ism (le(f'ti(z'?m)
> n.
>
> 1. The ideology of the political left.
> 2. Belief in or support of the tenets of the political left.
>
> left'ist adj. & n.
> The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
> Copyright © 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
> Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
>
> leftist
> One who holds a left-wing viewpoint; someone who seeks radical social and
> economic change in the direction of greater equality.
> The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
> Copyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
> Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
>
> > The % of Americans who go to church on a regular basis is dropping
> > every year. We're finally maturing.
> >
>
> Don't worry though, after the Muslims establish Shria law in your area YOU
> WILL BOW TO MECCA 5 times a day. Or else.
He keeps up his hate speech and he will get to meet muslims even
sooner..
Lookout
Not me
>2. of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or advocated by the political Left.
>Also, Leftist.
>Origin:
>1920�25; left 1 + -ist
>Dictionary.com Unabridged
>Based on the Random House Dictionary, � Random House, Inc. 2009.
And I believe in many view points held by conservatives.
>
>Related Words for : leftist
>collectivist, left-winger, left-of-center, left-wing
>View more related words �
>
>left�ism also Left�ism (le(f'ti(z'?m)
>n.
>
>1. The ideology of the political left.
>2. Belief in or support of the tenets of the political left.
And I believe in many view points held by conservatives.
>left'ist adj. & n.
>The American Heritage� Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
>Copyright � 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
>Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
>
>leftist
>One who holds a left-wing viewpoint; someone who seeks radical social and
>economic change in the direction of greater equality.
>The American Heritage� New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
>Copyright � 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
>Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
And I believe in many view points held by conservatives.
>> The % of Americans who go to church on a regular basis is dropping
>> every year. We're finally maturing.
>>
>
>Don't worry though, after the Muslims establish Shria law in your area YOU
>WILL BOW TO MECCA 5 times a day. Or else.
Gee...that's not the same definition that klaus posted. Which one is
the correct one? You'll have to answer that question before we can
move on I guess.
BUT......
And according to that definition I'm not a leftist because I ALSO hold
some conservative views on many subjects. Or..in your world can one be
a Leftist AND a conservative all at the same time?
That's gonna baffle you for a while, isn't it?
Gray Ghost
news:87hqg5hsup9f0l14e...@4ax.com:
The fact that 2 people came up independently with identical defintions would
suggest that the established meanings are fairly universal.
You don't hold any conservative views about anything. At least I can't
beleive it. You are so quick to deride Republicans as subhumans, and frankly
that is the kind of bigotry that conservative reject.
You can call yourself anything you want. Actions and statements to the
contrary simply prove your dishonesty.
tankfixer
grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com says...
> >>1. a member of the political Left or a person sympathetic to its
> >
> > Not me
> >
> >>2. of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or advocated by the
> >>political Left. Also, Leftist.
> >>Origin:
Before he claimed his liberal views caused death threats to the radio
station he alegedly worked at..
That his ideals are too liberal and to the left for Alabama, where he
claims to live.
Now he says he holds conservative views...
Which time was he lying ?
Lookout
wrote:
Uh..we have several muslims as friends and two of my physicians are
muslims.
You live in a very small world.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
So I'm not a leftist then.
>You don't hold any conservative views about anything. At least I can't
>beleive it. You are so quick to deride Republicans as subhumans, and frankly
>that is the kind of bigotry that conservative reject.
I didn't call all republicans subhumans. You're lying again. Why do
you lie so much?
So thinking that English (or American) should be the official language
is a liberal view? And I think that the borders should be sealed is a
liberal view? And I think that all illegals should be sent back to
where they came is a liberal view? I think that anyone on public
assistance should get 6 months tops and then get nothing unless they
earn it doing public works is a liberal view? I opined all those here
so how have you missed it when you've gone back months just to find
one thing I said. Or are you lying again?
>You can call yourself anything you want. Actions and statements to the
>contrary simply prove your dishonesty.
Yes I can call myself anything I want. But it's immature little punks
like you who like to lump other into broad categories so you can focus
your hate. You really need some help.
And you lie constantly. Why is that?
Gray Ghost
Wayne
"Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:82grg5tlusbougvks...@4ax.com...
Lookout
wrote:
One more time dumbass. I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative.
>Which time was he lying ?
Neither. The problems is that conservatives can't think along
different lines for different problems. You're a myopic dunce who
hates anyone who holds any view other than your own.
Lookout
wrote:
What is a psyciatrist?
Perhaps you need a brain or at least a spell checker?
X-Complaints-To: ab...@eternal-september.org
Nah..you're just a run-of-the-mill nym shifting troll.
Gray Ghost
news:3envg5tsn2sq15vkm...@4ax.com:
Social liberalism is a moral rot and cannot coexist with fiscal conservatism
since it needs the power of the state to enforce it's will.
DamOTclese
>> different lines for different problems. You're a myopic dunce who
>> hates anyone who holds any view other than your own.
>Social liberalism is a moral rot and cannot coexist with fiscal conservatism
>since it needs the power of the state to enforce it's will.
You stupid fuck, the United States was *founded* as a liberal
Conservative state. Your Jesus mythos deity construct was created
as a liberal Conservative, ya fucking stupid rightard.
---
The Virgin Mary was raped.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
You're wrong again. It can and does exist. You might know us the
moderates who swing every election.
Lookout
wrote:
>grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>> Neither. The problems is that conservatives can't think along
>>> different lines for different problems. You're a myopic dunce who
>>> hates anyone who holds any view other than your own.
>>Social liberalism is a moral rot and cannot coexist with fiscal conservatism
>>since it needs the power of the state to enforce it's will.
>
>You stupid fuck, the United States was *founded* as a liberal
>Conservative state. Your Jesus mythos deity construct was created
>as a liberal Conservative, ya fucking stupid rightard.
You certainly can't say that "All men are created equal" was a
conservative thought in the 1700's, can you?
Even when I was in high school we were taught that we started as the
most liberal country in the world.
DamOTclese
>On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:43 GMT, fr...@skeptictank.org (DamOTclese) wrote:
>>grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>> Neither. The problems is that conservatives can't think along
>>>> different lines for different problems. You're a myopic dunce who
>>>> hates anyone who holds any view other than your own.
>>>Social liberalism is a moral rot and cannot coexist with fiscal conservatism
>>>since it needs the power of the state to enforce it's will.
>>You stupid fuck, the United States was *founded* as a liberal
>>Conservative state. Your Jesus mythos deity construct was created
>>as a liberal Conservative, ya fucking stupid rightard.
>You certainly can't say that "All men are created equal" was a
>conservative thought in the 1700's, can you?
Well, one problem was that Christianity didn't consider blacks to
be men, not in the way the U. S. Constitution was meant. The U. S.
Constitution applied to land-owning white men but fortunately the
document is a living document which evolved to encompass everyone
-- except for fags, of course, which are also considered subhuman.
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
Sure you do...
> You live in a very small world.
Stay with that delusion..
tankfixer
grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com says...
More than likely
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
Sure you are..
>
> >Which time was he lying ?
>
> Neither. The problems is that conservatives can't think along
> different lines for different problems. You're a myopic dunce who
> hates anyone who holds any view other than your own.
Except you are the one flinging names about with your endless hate
speech...
Governor Swill
>Well, one problem was that Christianity didn't consider blacks to
>be men, not in the way the U. S. Constitution was meant. The U. S.
>Constitution applied to land-owning white men but fortunately the
>document is a living document which evolved to encompass everyone
>-- except for fags, of course, which are also considered subhuman.
Blacks are thought by many Jews and Christians to be the cursed
descendents of Canaan.
20 Noah, a man of the soil, proceeded [a] to plant a vineyard. 21
When he drank some of its wine, he became drunk and lay uncovered
inside his tent. 22 Ham, the father of Canaan, saw his father's
nakedness and told his two brothers outside. 23 But Shem and Japheth
took a garment and laid it across their shoulders; then they walked in
backward and covered their father's nakedness. Their faces were turned
the other way so that they would not see their father's nakedness.
24 When Noah awoke from his wine and found out what his youngest son
had done to him, 25 he said,
"Cursed be Canaan!
The lowest of slaves
will he be to his brothers."
26 He also said,
"Blessed be the LORD, the God of Shem!
May Canaan be the slave of Shem. [b]
27 May God extend the territory of Japheth [c] ;
may Japheth live in the tents of Shem,
and may Canaan be his [d] slave."
So during the slave trade did slavery receive the blessing of the
Church.
Swill
--
In the exam room . . .
Doctor: "Public Opt . . ."
Elephant: "SOCIALISM!"
Doctor: "Reflexes good."
Governor Swill
>> One more time dumbass. I'm a social liberal and fiscal conservative.
>
>Sure you are..
Well, there is such a thing.
>> Neither. The problems is that conservatives can't think along
>> different lines for different problems. You're a myopic dunce who
>> hates anyone who holds any view other than your own.
>
>Except you are the one flinging names about with your endless hate
>speech...
Now y'all both sound like dunces flinging names about.
Lookout
wrote:
>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:43 GMT, fr...@skeptictank.org (DamOTclese) wrote:
>>>grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>> Neither. The problems is that conservatives can't think along
>>>>> different lines for different problems. You're a myopic dunce who
>>>>> hates anyone who holds any view other than your own.
>>>>Social liberalism is a moral rot and cannot coexist with fiscal conservatism
>>>>since it needs the power of the state to enforce it's will.
>>>You stupid fuck, the United States was *founded* as a liberal
>>>Conservative state. Your Jesus mythos deity construct was created
>>>as a liberal Conservative, ya fucking stupid rightard.
>>You certainly can't say that "All men are created equal" was a
>>conservative thought in the 1700's, can you?
>
>Well, one problem was that Christianity didn't consider blacks to
>be men, not in the way the U. S. Constitution was meant. The U. S.
>Constitution applied to land-owning white men but fortunately the
>document is a living document which evolved to encompass everyone
You were doing so well..you should have quit while you were ahead.
Lookout
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>fr...@skeptictank.org (DamOTclese) wrote:
>
>>Well, one problem was that Christianity didn't consider blacks to
>>be men, not in the way the U. S. Constitution was meant. The U. S.
>>Constitution applied to land-owning white men but fortunately the
>>document is a living document which evolved to encompass everyone
>>-- except for fags, of course, which are also considered subhuman.
>
>Blacks are thought by many Jews and Christians to be the cursed
>descendents of Canaan.
Yes..religion makes you stupid. Now are you getting it?
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:55:43 -0600, Governor Swill
> <governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >fr...@skeptictank.org (DamOTclese) wrote:
> >
> >>Well, one problem was that Christianity didn't consider blacks to
> >>be men, not in the way the U. S. Constitution was meant. The U. S.
> >>Constitution applied to land-owning white men but fortunately the
> >>document is a living document which evolved to encompass everyone
> >>-- except for fags, of course, which are also considered subhuman.
> >
> >Blacks are thought by many Jews and Christians to be the cursed
> >descendents of Canaan.
>
> Yes..religion makes you stupid. Now are you getting it?
>
He doesn't need religion to make him look stupid
Gray Ghost
@news.bytemine.net:
I always find it amazing how much nonbeleivers think they know about
believers and the Bible. I think all that Lookout knows about is his monkey
and how to spank it.
--
Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent Global Warming.
"Hide the Decline"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk
31,486 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, don't agree the
science is settled.
http://www.petitionproject.org/
What it appears to be all about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEZszGJHbK4&feature=video_response
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
>tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.25846dfb43d61d8ca85
>@news.bytemine.net:
>
>> In article <lja7h55ort2sprkg7...@4ax.com>,
>> mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:55:43 -0600, Governor Swill
>>> <governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >fr...@skeptictank.org (DamOTclese) wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>Well, one problem was that Christianity didn't consider blacks to
>>> >>be men, not in the way the U. S. Constitution was meant. The U. S.
>>> >>Constitution applied to land-owning white men but fortunately the
>>> >>document is a living document which evolved to encompass everyone
>>> >>-- except for fags, of course, which are also considered subhuman.
>>> >
>>> >Blacks are thought by many Jews and Christians to be the cursed
>>> >descendents of Canaan.
>>>
>>> Yes..religion makes you stupid. Now are you getting it?
>>>
>>
>> He doesn't need religion to make him look stupid
>
>I always find it amazing how much nonbeleivers think they know about
>believers and the Bible. I think all that Lookout knows about is his monkey
>and how to spank it.
That's the best you can do today? A masturbation joke? You're nothing
but a pissed off little 3rd grader.
Bruno Muscarelli
What a fucking buffoon non-answer. You are so indoctrinated, you don't even
realize that a lot of non-believers used to be believers who see through the
bullshit and hypocrisy. I was raised Lutheran and was later baptized Baptist
before it all came to a screeching halt. You want to be superstitious and
believe a bunch of crap rammed down your throat, sheep? Fine, just keep it
to yourself. What a dumbass.
Gray Ghost
news:o6CdnW9Q5J6JHIHW...@earthlink.com:
Another intelligent response from the tolerant party.
DamOTclese
Religion starts with stupid then makes the stupid even dumber.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
"They love them some god-fearin' dipshits, don't they?" -- SittingDuck
DamOTclese
> I always find it amazing how much nonbeleivers
> think they know about believers and the Bible.
That's because you're a fucking religious cultist. Your intellectual
and moral superiors know more about your own Christanic mythologies
and their origins than any of you god-fucking cultists do.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
DamOTclese
What else has the typical Christian Republidiot got?
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
Governor Swill
>tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>In article <lja7h55ort2sprkg7...@4ax.com>,
>>mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:55:43 -0600, Governor Swill
>>> <governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>fr...@skeptictank.org (DamOTclese) wrote:
>>>>Well, one problem was that Christianity didn't consider blacks to
>>>>>be men, not in the way the U. S. Constitution was meant. The U. S.
>>>>>Constitution applied to land-owning white men but fortunately the
>>>>>document is a living document which evolved to encompass everyone
>>>>>-- except for fags, of course, which are also considered subhuman.
>>>>Blacks are thought by many Jews and Christians to be the cursed
>>>>descendents of Canaan.
>>> Yes..religion makes you stupid. Now are you getting it?
>> He doesn't need religion to make him look stupid
>
>Religion starts with stupid then makes the stupid even dumber.
Wow, man, I think I just like, saw God or something.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Which party are you talking about and who proclaimed them tolerant?
Lookout
wrote:
Agreed. I was raised catholic and saw through the bullshit when I was
12. I've debated religion many times on air..in fact when I was on
WDJC in Birmingham, AL for 3 days they received their highest ratings
ever. At the time (88 I think) the show was broadcast live to 127
stations. By day 3 one in three calls were on my side that all
religions are bullshit.
And yes I was able to debate them verse for verse. For everyone one
they quoted I could come up with one that was 100% in disagreement
with them. IE "and eye for an eye" and "turn the other cheek". And
callers were coming up with more than I could. It was hilarious.
The common sense side has been building for decades. 1/3 of the world
is christian..1/6 are non-believers. Think about those numbers...ONLY
twice as many christians as non-believers in the world. Christians act
like EVERYONE believes and as a matter of fact most of the local
idiots call me a liar when I quote those numbers. When I tell them
look it up they tell me whatever site I use is lying.
So it's no wonder that so many conservatives are christian...is it?
Dumbasses.
Bruno Muscarelli
That's interesting. Your other fucktard brothers keep saying the left are
the racist and intolerant. At least you admit the left are the tolerant
party. It is very hard to be tolerant of sheep who think they know something
when all they do is repeat what they have been TOLD by the liars in our
media. Don't assume that I am on the left, either, jerkoff, go here
www.politicalcompass.org and find out where YOU stand. I am in the middle,
just left of center, down on the Libertarian scale.