ACORN workers charged with voter fraud in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania area
edi...@netpath.net
PITTSBURGH (AP) - Authorities in western Pennsylvania have accused
seven people who worked for the community group ACORN of falsifying
voter-registration forms.
The seven have been charged with either forging, illegally soliciting
or illegally filling out voter-registration cards in the lead-up to
the 2008 election.
Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen Zappala Jr. announced the
charges at a news conference Thursday.
ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, has
come under scrutiny for registration irregularities in other states.
Authorities in Nevada filed charges Monday against ACORN and two
former employees on charges they illegally paid canvassers to sign up
voters. ACORN denied those accusations.
edi...@netpath.net
many more states - before it is accepted that:
1) Obama's election was fraudulent.
2) Obama isn't legitimate as president.
3) The regime isn't legitimate as a government for Red Nation after
these fraudulent elections.
4) ACORN qualifies as a "continuing criminal enterprise" under federal
law for RICO prosecution.
http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com - your source for hard-to-find stuff!
Alric Knebel
Oh, oh. Obama's in trouble NOW. Right?
Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
--
____________________________________________________
Alric Knebel
Alric Knebel
> How many more ACORN workers must be charged with voter fraud - in how
> many more states - before it is accepted that:
> 1) Obama's election was fraudulent.
> 2) Obama isn't legitimate as president.
> 3) The regime isn't legitimate as a government for Red Nation after
> these fraudulent elections.
> 4) ACORN qualifies as a "continuing criminal enterprise" under federal
> law for RICO prosecution.
Here's what you're REALLY thinking, you hick bastard:
1) Obama's election is hard to accept.
2) Rednecks don't consider Obama as a white man's president.
3) Red Neck nation is looking for any excuse to make their complaints
legitimate.
4) And there must be something we can do to get rid of ACORN.
--
____________________________________________________
Alric Knebel
edi...@netpath.net
> Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
Alric Knebel
> On May 7, 3:56 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>> Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
>
> Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
> prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
It's like this, Bubba. First, the fake registrants would have to have
voted. They didn't. Second, if they had, they would have had to number
at least as large as the final vote count between the two candidates.
But since the number of false registrants itseld doesn't equal to that
difference, the whole point is meaningless.
Nice try, though. Shows you have spunk, the way you keep looking of
things that you'll hope will stick.
--
____________________________________________________
Alric Knebel
edi...@netpath.net
> edi...@netpath.net wrote:
> > Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
> > prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
>
> It's like this, Bubba. First, the fake registrants would have to have
> voted. They didn't. Second, if they had, they would have had to number
> at least as large as the final vote count between the two candidates.
> But since the number of false registrants itseld doesn't equal to that
> difference, the whole point is meaningless.
>
> Nice try, though. Shows you have spunk, the way you keep looking of
> things that you'll hope will stick.
You don't get it. Sooner or later, the foreign lenders subsidizing
the regime's deficit spending are going to realize that, post-His
Royal Blackness or post-partition, Red Nation's citizens are certain
to abrogate all the regime's debt run up by this illegitimate
presidency. At that point, those foreign lenders are going to cut
their losses - and quit all further lending to the regime, causing its
financial collapse.
joeco...@live.com
What's all that got to do with your OP which was a lie?
There was no voter fraud since none of the fradulently registered
voted.
Alric Knebel
> On May 7, 4:08 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>> edi...@netpath.net wrote:
>>> Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
>>> prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
>> It's like this, Bubba. First, the fake registrants would have to have
>> voted. They didn't. Second, if they had, they would have had to number
>> at least as large as the final vote count between the two candidates.
>> But since the number of false registrants itseld doesn't equal to that
>> difference, the whole point is meaningless.
>>
>> Nice try, though. Shows you have spunk, the way you keep looking of
>> things that you'll hope will stick.
>
> You don't get it.
YOU don't get it. Non of this is going to happen. No partition. No
Red State Revolution. There might be a fight that'll break out at a
barbecue you rednecks are holding, pissing and moaning about the black
president; then you'll run down the street, shouting and waving your
rifles, making yourself a more interesting moving target for the SWAT
teams. But that's it.
--
____________________________________________________
Alric Knebel
*us*
real ballots and auditable counts for overpriced, unreliable,
line-slowing, defective and vulnerable electronic trash aka
electronic 'voting'. It's a huge taxpayer ripoff and the
death knell for any semblance of democracy.
Dan
> How many more ACORN workers must be charged with voter fraud - in how
> many more states - before it is accepted that:
> 1) Obama's election was fraudulent.
AN infinite number, since they had zero to do with his lawful election
(unlike a certain recent former Resident).
> 2) Obama isn't legitimate as president.
AN infinite number, since they had zero to do with his lawful election
(unlike a certain recent former Resident).
> 3) The regime isn't legitimate as a government for Red Nation after
> these fraudulent elections.
AN infinite number, since they had zero to do with his lawful election
(unlike a certain recent former Resident).
> 4) ACORN qualifies as a "continuing criminal enterprise" under federal
> law for RICO prosecution.
AN infinite number, since they had zero to do with any criminal behavior.
Sad, that you feel the need to lie about your political positions. What
does that say about the quality of those positions?
Dan
Dan
Actually, you give him too much credit. Someone told him what to
believe, and he is just regurgitating it here because they told him to
do that, too.
Such a sad little boy.
Dan
edi...@netpath.net
> YOU don't get it. Non of this is going to happen. No partition.
In 1993, you'd have adamantly told us CZECHOSLOVAKIA never would
partition into two sovereign nations, either - but, a year later, it
did.
Red Nation and Blue Nation now have far less shared than the Czechs
and the Slovaks did a year before they partitioned.
Partition means freedom - for both new countries. Make it happen.
Alric Knebel
> On May 7, 4:31 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>> YOU don't get it. Non of this is going to happen. No partition.
>
> In 1993, you'd have adamantly told us CZECHOSLOVAKIA never would
> partition into two sovereign nations, either - but, a year later, it
> did.
You mean, SOMEONE said it wouldn't while others said it might.
> Red Nation and Blue Nation now have far less shared than the Czechs
> and the Slovaks did a year before they partitioned.
> Partition means freedom - for both new countries. Make it happen.
Right now Red Nation has a lot of Blue Nation sympathizers. It's not
like we're divided that clearly. No state has, like 70% red voters
against 30% blue voters. Check out the stats. The support isn't there
for this sort of nutty thinking. If it were true, all this talk would
have kicked it off already.
--
____________________________________________________
Alric Knebel
edi...@netpath.net
> Right now Red Nation has a lot of Blue Nation sympathizers. It's not
> like we're divided that clearly.
Bullshit. Subtract out the nonwhites who'd vote Democrat no matter
what - and the separation is OVERWHELMING. You have states like
Taxachusetts that every single county in voted Democrat in the 2000
and 2004 presidential elections - and states like North Carolina that,
elementary-school math applied to this state's racial demographics
makes obvious, nearly every singly nonminority voter chose Bush in
both 2000 and 2004 in.
Let the economy worsen more - maybe just a little bit more - and the
willingness of Red Nation and Blue Nation to stay together will end,
fast. This ISN'T 1932 - when a live-and-let-live ethic prevailed on
both sides; instead, it's an era in which both Red Nation and Blue
Nation hate each other.
Alric Knebel
You're crunching your numbers to feed your delusion. Lots of white
people voted for Obama. LOTS.
--
____________________________________________________
Alric Knebel
Gray Ghost
vJnXnZ2dnU...@giganews.com:
Of course once partitioned then we could fairly compare freedom vs socialism.
Afraid of the results?
Besides if we are such benighted people why do you wish to keep us? Rid
yourself of the burden. Unless you want to compel our obediance to your
worldview.
--
Always remember:
Bull Connor was a Democrat!
edi...@netpath.net
IN CORE URBAN BLUE NATION. But - if you assume exit polls were at all
accurate in their claim that whites voted 60-40 against Obama on a
coast-to-coast basis and that almost all blacks voted for Obama - it's
easy to extrapolate just how few whites in heavily-black states where
the overall margin was close must have been.
mc...@pitt.edu
> On May 7, 3:56 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>
> > Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
>
> Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
> prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
Why don't you ask the guys who were on the Supreme Court in 2001?
A few fraudulent registrations, while they are both onerous and
criminal, does not invalidate a national election.
Mick
Gray Ghost
6cdb9c...@t10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com:
Not yet. But one does have to wonder exactly why ACORN consistenly breaks the
law.
SaPeIsMa
<mc...@pitt.edu> wrote in message
news:04fcce3f-33d2-476f...@t10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
On May 7, 4:04 pm, "edi...@netpath.net" <edi...@netpath.net> wrote:
> On May 7, 3:56 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>
> > Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
>
> Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
> prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
# Why don't you ask the guys who were on the Supreme Court in 2001?
#
Why ?
That decision was NOT about illegal or fraudulent votes
It was about the State of Florida changing the rules of the election AFTER
THE FACT to justify questionnable recounts.
(Just like the present situation in Minnesota)
# A few fraudulent registrations, while they are both onerous and
# criminal, does not invalidate a national election.
It does, if it had an effect of putting one person into office who has NO
RIGHT to be there.
Lars Eighner
<001ef1c3-d29c-4341...@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, the
lovely and talented edi...@netpath.net broadcast on alt.true-crime:
> On May 7, 3:56�pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>> Ooops. �No. �The election is still legitimate.
> Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
> prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
Nothing in this case calls the legitimacy of the election into question.
Sure, it is a crime to register Donald Duck to vote, but it does no harm to
the election unless Donald Duck shows up at the polls and votes.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> use...@larseighner.com
INCREDIBLE new art blog:
http://inflagrantedilettante.blogspot.com/
Dan
>
> <mc...@pitt.edu> wrote in message
> news:04fcce3f-33d2-476f...@t10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
> On May 7, 4:04 pm, "edi...@netpath.net" <edi...@netpath.net> wrote:
>> On May 7, 3:56 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
>>
>> Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
>> prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
> #
> # Why don't you ask the guys who were on the Supreme Court in 2001?
> #
>
> Why ?
> That decision was NOT about illegal or fraudulent votes
> It was about the State of Florida changing the rules of the election
> AFTER THE FACT to justify questionnable recounts.
Um, no, it was about Gore only recounting some districts (among some
other issues), none of which were Constitutional issues (as stated by
the SCOTUS in their decision). Of course, the real issue was a
Republican Court installing one of their own.
> (Just like the present situation in Minnesota)
Not even close.
> # A few fraudulent registrations, while they are both onerous and
> # criminal, does not invalidate a national election.
>
> It does, if it had an effect of putting one person into office who has
> NO RIGHT to be there.
Since that is not the case (i.e., no one was shown to vote fraudulently
based on the ACORN actions), I assume you will let the issue drop...
Yeah, right!
Dan
Kris Baker
news:slrnh095co....@debranded.larseighner.com...
> In our last episode,
> <001ef1c3-d29c-4341...@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, the
> lovely and talented edi...@netpath.net broadcast on alt.true-crime:
>
>> On May 7, 3:56 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>>> Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
>
>> Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
>> prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
>
> Nothing in this case calls the legitimacy of the election into question.
> Sure, it is a crime to register Donald Duck to vote, but it does no harm
> to
> the election unless Donald Duck shows up at the polls and votes.
Actually....only the forms were filled out.
I've done voter registration, and the forms are numbered.
You have to submit back the exactly number (correct,
incorrect, blank) of forms.
The person doing the voting registration (ie, me) could NOT
challenge the information I was given by the person wishing
to register. Of course, I could NOT lie and fill out a bunch
of forms myself. But some people who were hired by ACORN,
sat at their kitchen table and filled out junk.
Then, the registrars get to work validating them.
What ACORN has said from the start, at least in two areas, is that
they recognized that Jimmy Johns and a Disney character were
among a bunch of forms submitted by a worker.
Since they had to return the forms, one ACORN person said
they even paperclipped them together and noted them as
"likely invalid" (paraphrasing).
When the forms got to the registrar, all hell broke loose.
Crap happens, and you're right that no Disney character
voted.
In Utah, we couldn't even tell people that if they wanted to
be "independent", they had to check "No affiliation" - because
there was an Independent Party. There was also a Personal
Choice party, which got lots of people registered.
We even had Republicans come in and register - just to
see if we were changing them to Democrats. They didn't
realize we had the enter county voting rosters in front of
us, and knew the game they were playing.
Voter registration can get ugly.
Donald Duck didn't vote.
End of story.
Strabo
> In our last episode,
> <001ef1c3-d29c-4341...@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>, the
> lovely and talented edi...@netpath.net broadcast on alt.true-crime:
>
>> On May 7, 3:56 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
>>> Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
>
>> Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
>> prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
>
> Nothing in this case calls the legitimacy of the election into question.
> Sure, it is a crime to register Donald Duck to vote, but it does no harm to
> the election unless Donald Duck shows up at the polls and votes.
>
Or someone on the inside votes for them!
Just think, ACORN furnishes no-show registrations and registrars
happily complete the fraud.
Alric Knebel
Like I said, you crunch those numbers all you want. Liberals voted for
him, and there are lots of white liberals. True, hick whites are still
a bit racist, but they're in the minority.
--
____________________________________________________
Alric Knebel
Gray Ghost
So any white that voted against Obama was plain and simple a racist?
Hell Toupee
>
> edi...@netpath.net wrote:
> > On May 7, 3:56 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@cableone.net> wrote:
> >> Ooops. No. The election is still legitimate.
> >
> > Bullshit. How much fraud in it can be documented in criminal
> > prosecutions before its "legitimacy" becomes a joke?
>
> It's like this, Bubba. First, the fake registrants would have to have
> voted. They didn't. Second, if they had, they would have had to number
> at least as large as the final vote count between the two candidates.
> But since the number of false registrants itseld doesn't equal to that
> difference, the whole point is meaningless.
Right. The wingnuts should be laughing and applauding these fraud
reports, because it was ACORN was being defrauded. ACORN paid their
solicitors a bounty per registstration, so a few industrious con
artists filled up their registration sheets with phony names and
collected the money from ACORN.
No one showed up to fraudulently vote because those persons didn't
exist. They were made solely to collect extra money from ACORN.
Got it now, 'tards? Instead of being outraged, you should be feeling
gleeful. Because ACORN got swindled. The way they set it up, they
screwed themselves.
HellT
Starkiller�
wrote:
ACORN got what they wanted. Obama.
Why should they feel swindled when they accomplished exactly what they
set out to do.
In the words of the fat Hispanic chic that appeared at one of the big
ACORN shindigs "We gonn get Obama for presidente, hee hee hee".
And they did.
IN the liberal mind it is not the method that matters, It is the end
result.
And BTW:
NNTP-Posting-Host: tlS9SHP6sVYmVP+DFGjrUA.user.aioe.org
Followup-To: misc.survivalism
Dumbfuck Troll.
Curly Surmudgeon
<edi...@netpath.net> wrote:
> FROM ASSOCIATED PRESS, TODAY:
> PITTSBURGH (AP) - Authorities in western Pennsylvania have accused seven
> people who worked for the community group ACORN of falsifying
> voter-registration forms.
> The seven have been charged with either forging, illegally soliciting or
> illegally filling out voter-registration cards in the lead-up to the
> 2008 election.
>
> Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen Zappala Jr. announced the
> charges at a news conference Thursday.
>
>
> ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, has
> come under scrutiny for registration irregularities in other states.
>
> Authorities in Nevada filed charges Monday against ACORN and two former
> employees on charges they illegally paid canvassers to sign up voters.
> ACORN denied those accusations.
http://www.foxsmallbusinesscenter.com/politics/2009/12/22/acorn-properly-
spent-federal-funds-congressional-study-says/
Updated December 22, 2009
ACORN Properly Spent Federal Funds, Congressional Study Says
By Chad Pergram
- FOXNews.com
The beleaguered community organizing group ACORN properly spent all
federal dollars it received in the past five years, according to a study
by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS).
The beleaguered community organizing group ACORN properly spent all
federal dollars it received in the past five years, according to a study
by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS).
The report, requested by House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers,
D-Mich., also found that no voters who were allegedly registered to vote
improperly cast any ballots.
The report comes as the federal government and the California law
enforcement officials are probing the Association of Community
Organizations for Reform Now -- a group that President Obama worked with
in the early 1990s.
The CRS said officials have probed ACORN 46 times.
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, has asked Conyers to hold hearings to scrutinize
ACORN's activities but Conyers has declined.
ACORN came under fire in September when a series of undercover videos
showed a couple posing as a pimp and prostitute receiving advice from
ACORN employees on how to evade tax laws. offices.
The CRS report indicated that the filming may have violated laws in
Maryland and California, where some of the taping was done. The CRS study
says both states "appear to ban private recording of face to face
conversations absent the consent of all the participants."
Congress has voted to strip ACORN of federal funding. But a federal judge
ruled this month that the move was unconstitutional -- a decision that
the Justice Department is appealing.
The CRS indicated that courts "may have sufficient basis" to rule that
unconstitutional. The Constitution bans "bills of attainder," laws that
specifically target one group or person.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote Republican, Suffering Builds Character
------------------------------------------------------------------------------