Palin does Newsweek...What's next "Dancing with the Stars"?
Too_Many_Tools
I wonder if Playboy is next.
Of course they will have to airbrush the flab off her butt.
TMT
Palin angered by 'sexist' Newsweek cover
Tue Nov 17, 2:41 pm ET
For the second time since Sarah Palin stepped into the national
political spotlight, a photo of the former Republican vice-
presidential candidate featured on the cover of Newsweek magazine is
sparking controversy. Palin herself blasted the "out-of-context" cover
as "sexist" on her Facebook page.
Originally published in the August 2009 issue of Runners World, the
photo features the former Alaska governor in short runner's shorts. It
was part of a multi-photograph slideshow that accompanied an article
about Palin and her love for the sport titled, "I'm A Runner." In her
Facebook post late last night, Palin took issue with Newsweek using a
photo from an article about health and fitness to promote an analysis
piece contemplating her relevance as a political figure:
"The choice of photo for the cover of this week's Newsweek is
unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this "news" magazine has
relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The
Runner's World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was
taken was all about health and fitness -- a subject to which I am
devoted and which is critically important to this nation. The out-of-
context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now. If
anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn't judge a
book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do
anything to draw attention -- even if out of context.
The reaction to the Newsweek cover has predictably sparked outrage
from conservative supporters of Palin and kudos from liberals who
oppose her. CBN commentator David Brady called the cover "a new low"
for the "biased" magazine, adding that Newsweek has a history of
portraying liberal women as "heroes for the next generation," while
portraying conservative women like Palin as "nuts and dopey."
Meanwhile, documentary photographer Nina Berman hailed the cover as
"brilliant" and "shrewd" for using a "propped photo where Palin is an
obvious participant ... to show how far out she is willing to travel
on the road of self promotion" while "shield[ing] themselves from what
would have been the inevitable criticism if they had dolled her up
themselves and posed her the same way."
The current cover flap isn't the first time Newsweek has generated
controversy with a photograph of Palin. The October 13, 2008, issue
featured an extreme close-up of Palin that seemed to be devoid of the
high-tech retouching often employed by magazines. Conservatives
claimed this highlighted some of Palin's supposed "flaws," like
wrinkles around her eyes.
Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham told Yahoo! News that the photo choice was
simply the "most interesting image available":
"We chose the most interesting image available to us to illustrate the
theme of the cover, which is what we always try to do. We apply the
same test to photographs of any public figure, male or female: does
the image convey what we are saying? That is a gender-neutral
standard."
-- Brett Michael Dykes is a contributor to the Yahoo! News Blog
Fred B. Brown
She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
Ramon F Herrera
On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>
> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
than imagined.
-Ramon
HH&C
What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
Too_Many_Tools
People like you.
TMT
Lookout
Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
can't even win her own party AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH
HH&C
I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
SaPeIsMa
"Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>
> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
#
# You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
# Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
# than imagined.
#
# -Ramon
Just because your mom sold herself on the corner does not mean that other
women are like her
Bret Cahill
>
> > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
> > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> > than imagined.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
Neonazis, white supremists, KKK cross burners . . .
Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
>
> > > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
> > > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> > > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> > > > than imagined.
>
> > > > -Ramon
>
> > > What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
>
> > People like you.
>
> > TMT
>
> I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
>
> Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
I have a question: Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
Bret Cahill
HH&C
I see that you've been programmed by Nancy Pelosi.
HH&C
Nancy Pelosi willl probably imagine she saw that, too.
Too_Many_Tools
> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> <snip>
>
> What's next? The White House.
More like a trailer park near you. ;<)
How's that job expansion going Tom?
Got all of those two new employees yet?
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think much of her, but she is going to be at a Costco about
> five miles from my house this weekend. Do you think I should go see
> if I like her better in person?
>
> You do realize the leftist wingers ranting and raving about her at
> least twice daily is calling her to the attention of a lot of people.
> Some will like her.
>
> Perhaps not the best political tactic you guys could come up with.
>
> What's the old adage? I don't care what you say about me as long as
> you spell my name right?
Yeah....I would suggest going and film the event and post it.
Let us decide for ourselves.
Make sure to ask her if she can see Russia from your Costco.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> You forgot to mention the picture was not for Newsweek but for a
> running magazine. And she is dressed like most runners.
>
> You also forgot to mention that Palin is unhappy about their photo
> swap. Instead you make it sound like she wanted it to come out that
> way.
>
> Then again you are just a little dishonest leftist winger and we
> expect lies and deceit from you.
>
> Newsweek? That's Eleanor Clift's magazine and she/they are as liberal
> as they get. Ever see her on McLaughlin Group? They did a hit piece
> on the opposition? Wow, color me surprised.
Bullshit...she posed for it and it is considered porn in many places.
If she is SO UNHAPPY why did she POSE for it?
Hypocrite.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> Lookout <mrLook...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
> >can't even win her own party
>
LOL...the majority of Republicans consider her unacceptable for
President.
Poll results easily found...if you look for them.
Choke on it. ;<)
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> In article
> <4ced29b5-1ff0-450d-9426-a52bce518...@z35g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, "HH&C"
> Dick Cheney (maybe a point or two more popular in the US than the 9/11
> terrorists).- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
"Programmed" is a polite term describing what Dick Cheney did to
America.
TMT
Gunner Asch
Think there will be one with all those dead Leftists hanging from lamp
posts all across the land?
Gunner
>
"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
Unknown Usnet Poster
Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
Keyton
John R. Carroll
> On Nov 18, 6:00 pm, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote:
>> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> What's next? The White House.
>
> More like a trailer park near you. ;<)
Nawh,
Sarah has decided to write a Trilogy.
"Going Rogue" is out now.
"Going Nowhere" is in the works.
"Going Away" to follow immediately thereafter.
--
John R. Carroll
Gunner Asch
Oh..then you are talking about Democrats!
Thanks for clearing that up.
Gunner Asch
wrote:
>In article
><4ced29b5-1ff0-450d...@z35g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, "HH&C"
>And you and the other Republican party faithful have been programmed by
>Dick Cheney (maybe a point or two more popular in the US than the 9/11
>terrorists).
Dick Cheney? Didnt he go away a couple years ago when the Democrats
assumed control of Congress...2 yrs ago..before they and the Obamassiah
flushed the US down the toilet?
Too_Many_Tools
<snicker>....good one John.
TMT
Fred B. Brown
"Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
-Ramon
Go feed your donkey, Jose
Lookout
wrote:
>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Hey check out this porn that Crazy Sarah did for Newsweek!
>
>You forgot to mention the picture was not for Newsweek but for a
>running magazine. And she is dressed like most runners.
>
>You also forgot to mention that Palin is unhappy about their photo
>swap. Instead you make it sound like she wanted it to come out that
>way.
>
>Then again you are just a little dishonest leftist winger and we
>expect lies and deceit from you.
>
>Newsweek? That's Eleanor Clift's magazine and she/they are as liberal
>as they get. Ever see her on McLaughlin Group? They did a hit piece
>on the opposition? Wow, color me surprised.
NewsWeek, TIME and most major newspapers contract with writers from
all sides to present readers with different views so readers can make
up their own mind. It's not her magazine..she's just one of many
writers there. She has nothing to do with the content of an
issue..just her one article.
I have to believe you were ignorant on this one.
Lookout
Lookout
Proving once again that gummer is as up to date on current events as
Palin. The last magazine he read was a 1954 issue of Boys Life.
Lookout
wrote:
>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
>>can't even win her own party
>
>Your lack of a cite speaks volumes.
I have posted SEVERAL story links in the past few weeks showing her
5th. Do a quick search and look them up. Hell...in Iowa she was 5th
and you can't do anything until you make Iowa happy.
If you read TIME or NewsWeek you would have read the stories.
You really are this ignorant, aren't you?
And no, I'm not going to go back and look them up for you. If you
can't keep up that's not my problem. But it IS a common denominator
with republicans..not being informed of all the facts seem to be a
common thread with them. They only see what they want to see.
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:5ji9g55rc8gdeag3e...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:58:28 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
> <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>> > > > > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>>
>>> > > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>>
>>> > > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
>>> > > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
>>> > > > than imagined.
>>>
>>> > > > -Ramon
>>>
>>> > > What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
>>>
>>> > People like you.
>>>
>>> > TMT
>>>
>>> I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
>>>
>>> Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
>>
>>I have a question: Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
>>the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
>>
>>
>>Bret Cahill
>
> Think there will be one with all those dead Leftists hanging from lamp
> posts all across the land?
A persons fantasies tell a lot about them.
ArmyOfDorkness
"Fred B. Brown" <fredb...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:4b053537$0$321$bb4e...@newscene.com...
We need to do our own version of Operation Chaos. She has my vote getting
her as the republican candidate.
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
>news:5ji9g55rc8gdeag3e...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:58:28 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
>> <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> > > > > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>>>
>>>> > > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>>>
>>>> > > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
>>>> > > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
>>>> > > > than imagined.
>>>>
>>>> > > > -Ramon
>>>>
>>>> > > What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
>>>>
>>>> > People like you.
>>>>
>>>> > TMT
>>>>
>>>> I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
>>>>
>>>> Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
>>>
>>>I have a question: Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
>>>the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
>>>
>>>
>>>Bret Cahill
>>
>> Think there will be one with all those dead Leftists hanging from lamp
>> posts all across the land?
>
>A persons fantasies tell a lot about them.
Indeed. I love the ones who think they elected a president that would
give them home and change..and has given them noting but pending death.
Gunner
ArmyOfDorkness
"Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8ihag5595huchrpnl...@4ax.com...
And you know that ditzy Palin, and behind the scenes the republicans know
she is a ditz, getting all the attention has to really be burning republican
ass Just like Glenn Beck stealing all the thunder from O'Reilly and Coulter.
You hardly ever hear their crazy sound bites anymore. It's hard to out-crazy
someone who is truly insane.
Palin/Beck 2012 I'll do anything I can to help this dream ticket. Where do
I sign up to volunteer and get the word out?
Gunner Asch
I rather suspect you will be dead before that election. Dont fret about
it.
Lookout
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
heheheh...it's a cluster fuck circus and Palin and Beck are the head
clowns. I'm loving it.
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:uedbg5len52l05lc3...@4ax.com...
I never expected a home Gummer
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Mine is paid for. Unfortunately the homeless shelters are filled with
families these days..that lost theirs.
Ill bet each and everyone of them simply loves the Obamassiah ....eh?
Laugh laugh laugh
Michael A. Terrell
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:58:28 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
> <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
> >>
> >> > > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
> >>
> >> > > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> >> > > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> >> > > > than imagined.
> >>
> >> > > > -Ramon
> >>
> >> > > What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
> >>
> >> > People like you.
> >>
> >> > TMT
> >>
> >> I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
> >>
> >> Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
> >
> >I have a question: Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
> >the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
> >
> >
> >Bret Cahill
>
> Think there will be one with all those dead Leftists hanging from lamp
> posts all across the land?
Don't forget the trolls!!! Of course it'll take some 1.5" rope for
them, so it doesn't break. :)
--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
Harold Burton
<52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 3:54�pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
> >
> > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
> >
>
> You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> Republican Party has to offer.
No, you inferred that. . . and she still frightens the shit out of
leftards.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
<ddb85bc8-6bee-4f01...@y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Bret Cahill <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
> Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
> the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
Robert Byrd.
snicker.
Gunner Asch
Nah..for them one simply doubles up on strands of barbed wire before
hanging them.
Curly Surmudgeon
Re-register Republican so you can vote for their nominee in the primaries.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lib Loo
"Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>
>> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>
>
> You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> than imagined.
>
> -Ramon
>
Dude, you elected Obama. Pot kettle black.
Lib Loo
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:pstbg5pqjde9ee43u...@4ax.com...
You misspelled Obamashugana.
Too_Many_Tools
> "Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in messagenews:52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>
> >> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
> > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> > than imagined.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> Dude, you elected Obama. Pot kettle black.
LOL....no Dude...you ELECTED Obama.
Without the support he got from Republicans, Obama would not be there.
All of America thanks you for doing something right...for once.
TMT
Lookout
I have done just that several times.
RD (The Sandman)
news:joqdg51o6vkbhgghq...@4ax.com:
Ol' Honest Lookout......
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?
Hawke
> On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>
>> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>
>
> You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> than imagined.
>
> -Ramon
>
That's right, Palin is the best they have. Deep down they know she
hasn't a chance in Hell of being elected president. But compared to the
other bums in that party she's way ahead. They just had her at a book
signing event and like fifteen hundred people showed up and some waited
over night to see her. Not far away Mike Huckaby had a get together and
a couple hundred people showed up. As far as a legitimate presidential
candidate and a qualified one, Huckaby blows Palin away. But he's not
nearly as popular as she is. So that shows the unbelievably bad
situation the republicans are in. All their legitimate candidates are so
boring no one gives a crap about them and the one person they care about
, Palin, hasn't an icecube's chance in Hell of getting elected. Yep, it
looks like another season in the basement for the republican party.
Ain't it grand?
Hawke
Lookout
Why is it dishonest? I can vote for whomever I want.
Lookout
Going Rogue coloring book
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
Michael A. Terrell
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >
> > Don't forget the trolls!!! Of course it'll take some 1.5" rope for
> >them, so it doesn't break. :)
>
> Nah..for them one simply doubles up on strands of barbed wire before
> hanging them.
Out of Concertina wire, again? ;-)
Gunner Asch
<mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>Gunner Asch wrote:
>>
>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>> >
>> > Don't forget the trolls!!! Of course it'll take some 1.5" rope for
>> >them, so it doesn't break. :)
>>
>> Nah..for them one simply doubles up on strands of barbed wire before
>> hanging them.
>
>
> Out of Concertina wire, again? ;-)
Razor ribbon really doesnt form a decent noose and it tends to not slide
across itself very well. While you can form a loop and even tie it..it
wont slide and cho......hummm...you know..thats not a bad idea..for
Libtards you really really find contemptious...like making a rope out of
dull razor blades and hanging them with it.
And it seperates their heads neatly..abliet over some time...slowly
slicing deeper and deeper into their necks as their body spasms work the
blades deeper and deeper....
Ya may have a winner here!! Ill forward it to the group writting the
manual.
Want credit or should I simply credit it to Radio Man?
Hawke
There is that, but then they also only know what Fox News tells them. If
it isn't on Fox they don't know about it. Unless they read it on a right
wing blog.
Hawke
Michael A. Terrell
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:55:24 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Gunner Asch wrote:
> >>
> >> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Don't forget the trolls!!! Of course it'll take some 1.5" rope for
> >> >them, so it doesn't break. :)
> >>
> >> Nah..for them one simply doubles up on strands of barbed wire before
> >> hanging them.
> >
> >
> > Out of Concertina wire, again? ;-)
>
> Razor ribbon really doesnt form a decent noose and it tends to not slide
> across itself very well. While you can form a loop and even tie it..it
> wont slide and cho......hummm...you know..thats not a bad idea..for
> Libtards you really really find contemptious...like making a rope out of
> dull razor blades and hanging them with it.
>
> And it seperates their heads neatly..abliet over some time...slowly
> slicing deeper and deeper into their necks as their body spasms work the
> blades deeper and deeper....
>
> Ya may have a winner here!! Ill forward it to the group writting the
> manual.
>
> Want credit or should I simply credit it to Radio Man?
Credit it to Cliffie, and let him explain it to the other losers! ;-)
Of course, there is always 'Die knife' that can be heated and formed
into lots of useful shapes. The corrugated container industry uses tons
of it.
Beam Me Up Scotty
We know.... I'm going to register Democrat and get all your
Progressives out that I can. Fight fire with fire.
Now you see why the progressive Republicans are being shown the door.
Specter and that woman in NY 23 were handed their hats.
Harold Burton
Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
Unlike the leftards who only know what MSNBC tells them.
Snicker.
Gray Ghost
You keep telling yourself thise lies if they keep you warm at night. The
disinformation campaign is working.
--
�Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel
of envy, its inherent value is the equal sharing of misery.� Winston
Churchill
Hawke
Well, you got that wrong, Snicker. The difference between the left and
the right is the left has many sources of news and information. You guys
only have one place to get right wing slanted news and that is Fox. As
you often point out, the main stream media is biased liberal. But there
are plenty of places and many degrees of liberalism for liberals to
choose from. Not so with you. I mean, where else can you get your
slanted information? It's Fox or nothing. I'm talking TV here, not
radio. We all know you right wingers have a monopoly of AM radio
stations. As for TV you watch Fox or you're out of luck. That means if
you don't see it on Fox you don't see it. Which is what I said to begin
with.
Hawke
Too_Many_Tools
> Buerste wrote:
> > "rangerssuck" <rangerss...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:11593915-c469-48db...@o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> > On Nov 18, 7:00 pm, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote:
> >> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> <snip>
>
> >> What's next? The White House.
>
> > That would make you happy? Seriously?
> > *************************************
>
> > I'd love to see the libtards all have conniption fits! And, she would be
> > infinitely better than Obammy.
>
> That's what you said when Bush got the White House. He'd be better. No,
> he was the absolute worst. Now we know how good you are at predictions.
> Here's your next beauty. Palin infinitely better than Obama. Sure. Name
> one thing she can do better? I mean besides lie. Or suck dick.
>
> Hawke- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ahhhh....<TMT holding hand up>....Sarah can see Russia from
ANYWHERE....and sometimes she even opens her eyes.
TMT
Gray Ghost
The reason for this is simple.
Truth only has one version.
RD (The Sandman)
news:9a5eg5d40am8iue1s...@4ax.com:
In most states, the only way you can vote in a primary (either Democratic
or Republican) is if you are registered as an Independent. Then you can
choose one. You are "re-registering" in order to do that. IOW, you are
intionally bypassing the system and trying to have a voice in a party you
are not a member of. You call that honest?
Ed Huntress
"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9CCA73E51...@216.196.97.130...
'Not following you here, RD. Roughly half the states have closed
primaries -- you can only vote for candidates of the party for which you are
registered. The rest of the states have various versions of open or
semi-closed primaries. These work in a variety of ways but, in general, you
can vote for someone in either party, or even both parties, in the case of
Wisconsin and maybe one or two other states.
What do you mean that you must be registered as an Independent to vote in a
primary?
--
Ed Huntress
Lookout
Very true. Like 5th graders who get all their information for a book
report from one source.
Lookout
"your" If you mean mine then you're wasting your time..I'm not a
progressive.
I change to the republican side to vote AGAINST some who are running
for governor. I'm trying to help a dem get elected here. >
>
>Now you see why the progressive Republicans are being shown the door.
>
>Specter and that woman in NY 23 were handed their hats.
I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
Lookout
Actually your wrong. As someone posted earlier the liberals DO watch
Faux Commentary so they can hear both sides. It's the conservatives
who are narrow minded and don't care about the facts from both sides.
Hey..it was a conservative who posted that poll..blame him
Curly Surmudgeon
> I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
It's an oxymoron.
Beam Me Up Scotty
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:40:08 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
>
> It's an oxymoron.
>
Look up Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party.
Beam Me Up Scotty
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:40:08 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
>
> It's an oxymoron.
>
r wiley
"Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ldggg5l15uh38iji7...@4ax.com...
> I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
Nixon going to China.
rw
r wiley
And yet Newsweek chose not to run this on their cover.
rw
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
Now what are you babbling about?
Hawke
And you go to Fox for that? The unbiased station? Fair, middle of the
road, non partisan news and information? Is that what Fox gives people?
Or does it give it's right wing audience just what it wants, right wing
slanted news given by commentators who are all right wingers? Come on.
Cut the crap. You know Fox is the most biased network in the U.S. You
only like it because it is slanted to the right and that is why you
watch it. I don't expect you to fess up though. You wouldn't be a right
winger if you did.
Hawke
Hawke
Everything I said is true. You can check it out if you like. Or you can
keep your illusions. Either way it means nothing to me. But check out
what Huckabee says about her and her popularity. Wait a minute, if you
did that you would see what I said was true. You don't want to do that.
It'll conflict with your preconceived ideas.
Hawke
Klaus Schadenfreude
>And you go to Fox for that? The unbiased station? Fair, middle of the
>road, non partisan news and information? Is that what Fox gives people?
>Or does it give it's right wing audience just what it wants, right wing
>slanted news given by commentators who are all right wingers? Come on.
>Cut the crap. You know Fox is the most biased network in the U.S.
Cite.
Harold Burton
Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:19:41 -0500, Harold Burton
> <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <he791c$cp1$2...@aioe.org>,
> > Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Lookout wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:08:27 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
> >> >>> can't even win her own party
> >> >> Your lack of a cite speaks volumes.
> >> >
> >> > I have posted SEVERAL story links in the past few weeks showing her
> >> > 5th. Do a quick search and look them up. Hell...in Iowa she was 5th
> >> > and you can't do anything until you make Iowa happy.
> >> >
> >> > If you read TIME or NewsWeek you would have read the stories.
> >> >
> >> > You really are this ignorant, aren't you?
> >> >
> >> > And no, I'm not going to go back and look them up for you. If you
> >> > can't keep up that's not my problem. But it IS a common denominator
> >> > with republicans..not being informed of all the facts seem to be a
> >> > common thread with them. They only see what they want to see.
> >>
> >>
> >> There is that, but then they also only know what Fox News tells them.
> >
> >Unlike the leftards who only know what MSNBC tells them.
> >
> >
> >
> >Snicker.
>
> Actually your (sic) wrong.
You just were.
> As someone posted earlier the liberals DO watch
> Faux Commentary so they can hear both sides....
And conservatives research both sides too.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
Right away you've proved your only source of information is other idiot
leftards in these newsgroups, the ones parroting their lies about "us
guys" depending only on Rush or Fox News for info. They're wrong,
you're wrong, but feel free to provide any proof of "us guys" getting
our information from a single source.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
Just like you go to MoveON?
Snicker.
Harold Burton
Harold Burton
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
There ya go askin' lefturds to put up or shut up. Watch them slink away
with their tails between their legs.
Fact Attack
about their pathetic, damned souls. If they can't laugh, they'll cry,
because they're so pathetic.
Curly Surmudgeon
Pot, may I introduce Kettle...
Gray Ghost
No stupid, what you spewed is your opinion. Wrong headed and bigoted, byt
still just YOUR opinion.
r wiley
According to to Chelsea Handler, "Hillary Clinton ould
give her left nut to take a picture as sexy as that."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoPRLeRI4pQ
rw
RD (The Sandman)
news:4b083353$0$5019$607e...@cv.net:
Poor choice of words. I was using them as applicable to Lookout's case
only. He re-registers to vote in a party he is not a member of. Many
states only allow registered party members to vote in the Democratic or
Republican Parties. Some states allow Independents to vote in one
primary or the other, but not both. My state is that way and that was
what I was intending to say.
However, that said, I don't do it. I feel that if you wish to promote a
party's primary, then join that party....become an actual member of it
for the purposes of expressing that party. Don't change registration
simply to vote on a member you feel that your actual party can bear.
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
RD (The Sandman)
@news.eternal-september.org:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:40:08 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
>
> It's an oxymoron.
>
That's true. ;)
Ed Huntress
I agree. The whole idea got started with Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos," which
he started a year ago last February. He was trying to keep Obama from
winning the primary by asking Republicans to cross over and vote for Hilary
in certain states. In the process, he committed a felony in Ohio, which the
state attorney's office refused to prosecute, because of the political
nightmare that would ensue. <g>
In any case, it's another little assault on the democratic process, which
seems to be under attack from a variety of directions these days.
--
Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
> Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in news:he9hnl$iou$17
> @news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:40:08 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
>>
>> It's an oxymoron.
>>
>
> That's true. ;)
I resent that remark. <g>
--
Ed Huntress, the last (George) Romney/Rockefeller/Ev Dirksen Republican
May Ev Dirksen, the blessed bullfrog, rest in peace...
Hawke
>>>>> And no, I'm not going to go back and look them up for you. If you
>>>>> can't keep up that's not my problem. But it IS a common denominator
>>>>> with republicans..not being informed of all the facts seem to be a
>>>>> common thread with them. They only see what they want to see.
>>>> There is that, but then they also only know what Fox News tells them.
>>> Unlike the leftards who only know what MSNBC tells them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Snicker
>> Well, you got that wrong, Snicker. The difference between the left and
>> the right is the left has many sources of news and information. You guys
>> only have one place to get right wing slanted news and that is Fox.
>
>
>
> Right away you've proved your only source of information is other idiot
> leftards in these newsgroups, the ones parroting their lies about "us
> guys" depending only on Rush or Fox News for info. They're wrong,
> you're wrong, but feel free to provide any proof of "us guys" getting
> our information from a single source.
>
>
> Snicker.
There aren't any other right wing cable news stations other than Fox
News. So what other right wing sources do you get your biased
information from? Does all of it come from Hannity?
Hawke
Hawke
How stupid are you? I just told you that Mike Huckabee was the one who
was talking about Palin. But you probably want a "cite" so you can
pretend he didn't say anything critical of her, you love her so much.
Hawke
Klaus Schadenfreude
>
>There aren't any other right wing cable news stations other than Fox
>News.
So then what's the big fucking problem, ace?
Gunner Asch
The Parakeet wants no other refutation of his leftwing mantra. Fox is a
danger to the leftist Newspeak because it has a growing number of
viewers/listeners and the Big 4 are losing audience at a record pace.
Hence the Leftwingers threat of using the Fairness Doctrine..and their
sudden backing off when they understood what it would mean to
Them...<VBG>
It would have been interesting to having Limbaugh on NBC...wouldnt it?
<VBG>
Gunner
"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
Unknown Usnet Poster
Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
Keyton
Hawke
You mean besides the fact they pretend they are not? Like I said, I
don't care if there are right wing stations on radio or TV. I just don't
like it when they won't own up to it. If you have a right wing point of
view, man up and admit it. What I don't like is that Fox won't do that.
They play this little game like they aren't right wing, which is
bullshit because everyone knows they are.
Hawke
HH&C
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:36:44 -0800, Gunner Asch
>
>
>
>
>
> <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
> >On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:30:39 -0600, denni...@dennism3.invalid (Dennis M)
> >wrote:
>
> >>In article
> >><4ced29b5-1ff0-450d-9426-a52bce518...@z35g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, "HH&C"
> >><hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>On Nov 18, 9:56 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>
> >>>> > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
> >>>> > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> >>>> > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> >>>> > > than imagined.
>
> >>>> > > -Ramon
>
>
> >>>> Neonazis, white supremists, KKK cross burners . . .
>
> >>>> Bret Cahill
>
> >>>I see that you've been programmed by Nancy Pelosi.
>
> >>And you and the other Republican party faithful have been programmed by
> >>Dick Cheney (maybe a point or two more popular in the US than the 9/11
> >>terrorists).
>
> >Dick Cheney? Didnt he go away a couple years ago when the Democrats
> >assumed control of Congress...2 yrs ago..before they and the Obamassiah
> >flushed the US down the toilet?
>
> >Gunner
>
> Proving once again that gummer is as up to date on current events as
> Palin. The last magazine he read was a 1954 issue of Boys Life.
You are saying that Dick Cheney is still Vice President?
Klaus Schadenfreude
>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> In talk.politics.guns Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
>>
>>> There aren't any other right wing cable news stations other than Fox
>>> News.
>>
>> So then what's the big fucking problem, ace?
>
>
>You mean besides the fact they pretend they are not?
If YOU can tell- and you don't seem to be exactly a rocket scientist-
than anyone else can tell, too. If it's the ONLY "right wing news
station" as you claim, then what *is* the problem?
> Like I said, I
>don't care if there are right wing stations on radio or TV.
Obviously, you're lying.
>I just don't like it when they won't own up to it.
You poor fucking baby. [chuckle] Is Fox ignoring you?
>If you have a right wing point of
>view, man up and admit it. What I don't like is that Fox won't do that.
You mean like the other own up be being tools of the "progressives,"
you mean?
>They play this little game like they aren't right wing, which is
>bullshit because everyone knows they are.
Again for the dim-witted Hawke, if everyone knows they are, what's the
problem?
Gunner Asch
In Loopouts little fantasy world...I believe he still is.