Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

true fundamentalism?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

David Dalton

unread,
Jul 2, 2012, 11:10:12 PM7/2/12
to
The fundamental is love; however this can not be always
achieved and so one must at least strive for love.
Messages that conflict with that sentence must be discarded
or edited to no longer conflict.

--
David Dalton dal...@nfld.com http://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/nf.html Newfoundland&Labrador Travel & Music
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
"Here I go again...back into the flame" (Sarah McLachlan)

kamerm

unread,
Jul 2, 2012, 11:19:36 PM7/2/12
to
David Dalton wrote:
> The fundamental is love; however this can not be always
> achieved and so one must at least strive for love.

one doesn't strive for what comes naturally
suggesting unconditional subjective love is unnatural
on the other hand, as all that is, is upheld while it is
objective preception of the is'ing may give rise to love
(if one may love house-flies?)

> Messages that conflict with that sentence must be discarded
> or edited to no longer conflict.

one certainly can be free
to choose among the messages
one accepts

-k


David Dalton

unread,
Jul 2, 2012, 11:40:56 PM7/2/12
to
In article <4ff264c6$0$6058$607e...@cv.net>,
all is not love

Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole

unread,
Jul 3, 2012, 12:37:09 AM7/3/12
to


David Dalton wrote:

> The fundamental is love; however this can not be always
> achieved and so one must at least strive for love.

YEP, not be some Anal Retentive "CONSERVATIVE"!
Can't ALTER THE BIBLE TO SUIT MAN, so ya can take away peoples "RIGHTS", and
call it the "ULTIMATE TRUTH!
GOD'S PISSED that they ALTERED the BIBLE!!!!

Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole

unread,
Jul 3, 2012, 12:37:52 AM7/3/12
to


kamerm wrote:

> David Dalton wrote:
> > The fundamental is love; however this can not be always
> > achieved and so one must at least strive for love.
>
> one doesn't strive for what comes naturally

Pauline Bigots, claim to!

Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole

unread,
Jul 3, 2012, 12:39:50 AM7/3/12
to


David Dalton wrote:

> In article <4ff264c6$0$6058$607e...@cv.net>,
> "kamerm" <kam...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > David Dalton wrote:
> > > The fundamental is love; however this can not be always
> > > achieved and so one must at least strive for love.
> >
> > one doesn't strive for what comes naturally
> > suggesting unconditional subjective love is unnatural
> > on the other hand, as all that is, is upheld while it is
> > objective preception of the is'ing may give rise to love
> > (if one may love house-flies?)
> >
> > > Messages that conflict with that sentence must be discarded
> > > or edited to no longer conflict.
> >
> > one certainly can be free
> > to choose among the messages
> > one accepts
> >
> > -k
>
> all is not love

That DAVE?
Thought that was "Mike Turner"!
Showin' me a Sock Show, I Didn't see?

David Dalton

unread,
Jul 3, 2012, 9:38:05 PM7/3/12
to
In article <4q6dnYoA26kL6m_S...@posted.gcicommunications>,
"Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org>
wrote:
Yes, it is me, Dave, not Mike.

David Dalton

unread,
Jul 3, 2012, 9:39:51 PM7/3/12
to
In article <4q6dnYgA26lq62_S...@posted.gcicommunications>,
"Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org>
wrote:

Yes, I wanted to contrast the one fundamental of love
with those so-called fundamentalists who try to
follow all the messages in the bible even when
some of the minor ones they follow conflict with
their major ones.

Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole

unread,
Jul 6, 2012, 3:00:45 AM7/6/12
to
Difference in Tubes from what I "SEE"!
But I am open to being Wrong.
Something Mikey, ISN'T!

Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole

unread,
Jul 6, 2012, 3:01:40 AM7/6/12
to


David Dalton wrote:

> In article <4q6dnYgA26lq62_S...@posted.gcicommunications>,
> "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org>
> wrote:
>
> > David Dalton wrote:
> >
> > > The fundamental is love; however this can not be always
> > > achieved and so one must at least strive for love.
> >
> > YEP, not be some Anal Retentive "CONSERVATIVE"!
> > Can't ALTER THE BIBLE TO SUIT MAN, so ya can take away peoples "RIGHTS", and
> > call it the "ULTIMATE TRUTH!
> > GOD'S PISSED that they ALTERED the BIBLE!!!!
>
> Yes, I wanted to contrast the one fundamental of love
> with those so-called fundamentalists

Which is why Mikey, is not in the same TUBE!


linuxgal

unread,
Aug 14, 2012, 10:32:02 PM8/14/12
to
David Dalton wrote:
> The fundamental is love; however this can not be always
> achieved and so one must at least strive for love.

'Cause when love is gone, there's always justice.
And when justice is gone, there's always force.
And when force is gone, there's always Mom.
Hi Mom!

--
Lots of people try Linux but they can't come to greps with it.

Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole

unread,
Aug 15, 2012, 1:17:41 AM8/15/12
to


linuxgal wrote:

> David Dalton wrote:
> > The fundamental is love; however this can not be always
> > achieved and so one must at least strive for love.
>
> 'Cause when love is gone, there's always justice.

No, JUSTICE, is the LAST THING, you EVER want to PROVOKE!
OFFICERS Violating STATUTE under Color of LAW, Selling People the LAW!
MAKES, "GOD", get Involved!
Attorneys KNOW it for a Fact!
The American Bar Law, is Based on it!
NEMESIS, is NOT a JOKE, rather, appears as a Result of the VIOLATION of
Hubris!

0 new messages