Description:
Evolution versus creationism (sometimes hot!). (Moderated)
|
|
|
Google + debate
|
| |
I love intelligent conversation and I hope to one day have one. In
the mean time, if any of you guys that have a big difference of
opinion would like to air them in public, I would love to see it.
|
|
|
OT: Puzzler
|
| |
I have no idea where to turn on the internet for this, and i have
googled it.
I occasionally drive around Ohio for work, and in many smaller
communities I see enormous-size late Victorian-era houses, but very
few large houses that were built in the later years. It seems as
though after about WWI there was either little home-building (existing... more »
|
|
|
Is the distinction between science and metaphysics fuzzy?
|
| |
“I will call metaphysical all those propositions which claim to
represent knowledge about something which is over or beyond all
experience, e.g. about the real Essence of things, about Things in
themselves, the Absolute, and such like” (Carnap 1935).
Rudolf Carnap, in his book Philosophy and Logical Syntax, used the... more »
|
|
|
wresting with dualism
|
| |
well I have put aside theology for the most part, I'm not trying to make an argument for beneficial creation here
I don't believe in an All-Powerful benefactor, since suffering exists, and suffering is not beneficial, and suffering is not a beneficial creation, so no prayer, worship, or hope resides here... more »
|
|
|
Are religious fundamentalists trying to Christianize the government?
|
| |
My one-hour documentary, “In God We Teach” has just been posted online
for viewing by all. The film tells the story of a high school student
who secretly recorded his history teacher in class and accused him of
proselytizing for Jesus. The teacher, in danger of losing his job
strenuously denied it. The specifics of this controversy speak... more »
|
|
|
New talk origins forum
|
| |
I created talk origins on google groups, because it was easy.
[link]
Rules of the forum are as follows:
Rule 1: Every poster acknowledges their own human spirit, as well as
those of the other posters, as a matter of subjective opinion.
Those are all the rules.... more »
|
|
|
Ancient walking mystery deepens
|
| |
One of the first creatures to step on land could not have walked on
four legs, 3D computer models show.
Textbook pictures of the 360-million-year-old animal moving like a
salamander are incorrect, say scientists.
Instead, it would have hauled itself from the water using its front
limbs as crutches, research in Nature suggests.... more »
|
|
|
