This is how things really work...

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 27, 2013, 12:41:28 PM1/27/13

to

Who would known?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU

Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-origins@moderators.isc.org

unread,

Jan 27, 2013, 11:12:45 PM1/27/13

to

On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> Who would known?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU

Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!

Harry K

unread,

Jan 27, 2013, 11:29:59 PM1/27/13

to

On Jan 27, 8:12�pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-

Ya got that right. Want me to watch or read something ya better tell
me what its about.

Harry K

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 6:20:57 AM1/28/13

to

What makes you think I want you to watch it? Some preople prefer no
spoiler. YMMV.

Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-origins@moderators.isc.org

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 6:35:41 AM1/28/13

to

This here is a forum of written words. Use words, huh?

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 6:36:55 AM1/28/13

to

On Jan 27, 11:12�pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-

I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 6:50:57 AM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 6:35�am, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-

orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 28 January 2013 11:20:57 UTC, wiki trix �wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 11:29 pm, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 27, 8:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> > > orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
>
> > > > > Who would known?
>
> > > > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>
> > > > Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
> > > > little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
> > > > value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>
> > > Ya got that right. Want me to watch or read something ya better tell
> > > me what its about.
>
> > What makes you think I want you to watch it? Some preople prefer no
> > spoiler. YMMV.
>
> This here is a forum of written words. �Use words, huh?

Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. BTW, the video does
contain words, huh?
Not sure what your problem is. If the post title does not look
interesting to you, then don't watch the video link. Duh.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 6:54:08 AM1/28/13

to

BTW, I really honestly have no words to describe that video. I was
left speechless. If you watch it, you can let me know what words you
could come up with to describe it. I could not.

Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-origins@moderators.isc.org

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 7:15:48 AM1/28/13

to

If it was posted by Stephen Hawking then I'd be interested.
(I know you aren't Stephen Hawking, and, don't change your screen name -
we'll still know that it isn't him.)

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 7:29:50 AM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 7:15�am, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-

orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 28 January 2013 11:50:57 UTC, wiki trix �wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 6:35 am, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> > orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > This here is a forum of written words. �Use words, huh?
>
> > Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. BTW, the video does
> > contain words, huh?
> > Not sure what your problem is. If the post title does not look
> > interesting to you, then don't watch the video link. Duh.
>
> If it was posted by Stephen Hawking then I'd be interested.
> (I know you aren't Stephen Hawking, and, don't change your screen name -
> we'll still know that it isn't him.)

Hey Rocket Scientologist... nobody is forcing you to click on any
link. What Stephen Hawking would have to do with that point is not at
all clear. You seem to have a problem that is far less interesting
than the link I provided.

Harry K

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:04:44 AM1/28/13

to

In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner, I will know at
least somethingabout what link is before I test it.

You are in a formum involved in "information", you don't want us to
know what it is about, you fail at managing to pass on "information"
as noone with any sense will clickon an unknown link.

Harry K

Harry K

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:05:23 AM1/28/13

to

Now we are down to a temper tantrum.

Harry K

Harry K

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:06:01 AM1/28/13

to

So you can't even supply the title of it.

Harry K

chris thompson

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:12:36 AM1/28/13

to

If you're afraid of including spoilers, put "SPOILER TO FOLLOW" in
your message and hit "RETURN" about 20 times. It's not hard, you know.

Chris

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:48:54 AM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 11:04�am, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 4:29 am, wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 28, 7:15 am, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
>
> > orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> > > On Monday, 28 January 2013 11:50:57 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> > > > On Jan 28, 6:35 am, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> > > > orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > This here is a forum of written words. Use words, huh?
>
> > > > Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. BTW, the video does
> > > > contain words, huh?
> > > > Not sure what your problem is. If the post title does not look
> > > > interesting to you, then don't watch the video link. Duh.
>
> > > If it was posted by Stephen Hawking then I'd be interested.
> > > (I know you aren't Stephen Hawking, and, don't change your screen name -
> > > we'll still know that it isn't him.)
>
> > Hey Rocket Scientologist... nobody is forcing you to click on any
> > link. What Stephen Hawking would have to do with that point is not at
> > all clear. You seem to have a problem that is far less interesting
> > than the link I provided.
>
> In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner, I will know at
> least somethingabout what link is before I test it.

It is youtube, you idiot.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:50:41 AM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 11:12�am, chris thompson <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com>

This thread is a lot of chatter about nothing. If you do not want to
click on the link, then bloody well do not click on the link.

Mark Isaak

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:53:42 AM1/28/13

to

Consider the ethics of making posts that you don't want anyone to read.
No different from littering, it seems to me.

As for spoilers, they have been found to enhance people's enjoyment of
the story.

--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) curioustaxonomy (dot) net
"It is certain, from experience, that the smallest grain of natural
honesty and benevolence has more effect on men's conduct, than the most
pompous views suggested by theological theories and systems." - D. Hume

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 12:41:30 PM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 11:53�am, Mark Isaak <eci...@curioustax.onomy.net> wrote:
> On 1/28/13 3:20 AM, wiki trix wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 27, 11:29 pm, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 27, 8:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
>
> >> orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> >>>> Who would known?
>
> >>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>
> >>> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
> >>> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
> >>> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>
> >> Ya got that right. �Want me to watch or read something ya better tell
> >> me what its about.
>
> > What makes you think I want you to watch it? Some preople prefer no
> > spoiler. YMMV.
>
> Consider the ethics of making posts that you don't want anyone to read.

I never made a post that I don't want anyone to read. I made a post
that some adventurous people may want to read, and I want those people
to read it.

> � No different from littering, it seems to me.

What seems to you will not be clear unless you think more clearly.

Bob Casanova

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 1:35:12 PM1/28/13

to

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:48:54 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix
<wiki...@gmail.com>:

>On Jan 28, 11:04�am, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:

<snip>

>> In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner, I will know at
>> least somethingabout what link is before I test it.

>It is youtube, you idiot.

Apparently. So? YouTube, including faked pages, has been a
favored venue for malware delivery in the past...

http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/a-new-youtube-malware-tool/
http://www.techradar.com/us/news/mobile-computing/laptops/internet/web/youtube-poses-major-malware-threat-132894
http://www.pcworld.com/article/133232/article.html
http://www.scmagazine.com/scores-of-spoofed-youtube-pages-lead-to-malware/article/172043/

....and I suspect that hasn't changed. But since we've had
this discussion in the past I also suspect you'll again
discount any potential problem.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."

- McNameless

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 2:36:35 PM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 1:35�pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:48:54 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

> <wikit...@gmail.com>:

>
> >On Jan 28, 11:04�am, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >> In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner, I will know at
> >> least somethingabout what link is before I test it.
> >It is youtube, you idiot.
>
> Apparently. So? YouTube, including faked pages, has been a
> favored venue for malware delivery in the past...

Then don't use the internet. Look... any link could be a threat. I
provided a link. If you do not want to click on a link, that is your
choice. What do you want me to do about it? Should nobody provide a
link to anything?

Catpain 'Merca

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 3:48:25 PM1/28/13

to

wiki trix <wiki...@gmail.com> wrote in news:a6bc7803-cf5b-4947-9f8d-
a4f157...@qi8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:

> Who would known?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>

I refuse to follow this link because I refuse to be the odd man out in this
thread.

So I copied the string "EYsH9BXcflU" into my clipboard, checked it for
viruses and trojans and bad programming and then pasted the string into
Google's search textbox. Google came up with 4 results in 0.17 seconds, but
fortunately the first entry in the results from Google appeared to be a
reference to youtube. This happy result saved me hours of delving into the
remaining 3 Google results.

As luck would have it, only last week had I completed my concrete URL Test
Bunker for a similar project. (It's taken a fair bit of sharp sand and
cement, steel rods and most of my backyard, but I think for safe surfing, it
will prove its worth) I placed an old Intel box running a new installation
(no personal information on the system)of Windnose XP with 3 subshells of
virtual XP machines at the heart of the bunker and positioned the screen
behind repeated laminations of hardened glass and plexiglass. Then I
positioned the manipulating robots ready to operate the wireless mouse and
keyboard. I then started up the following virus checking programs:
AhnLab-V3
AntiVir
Antiy-AVL
Avast
Avast5
AVG
BitDefender
CAT-QuickHeal
ClamAV
Commtouch
Comodo
DrWeb
Emsisoft
eSafe
eTrust-Vet
F-Prot
F-Secure
Fortinet
GData
Ikarus
Jiangmin
K7AntiVirus
Kaspersky
McAfee
McAfee-GW-Edition
Microsoft
NOD32
Norman
nProtect
Panda
PCTools
Prevx
Rising
Sophos
SUPERAntiSpyware
Symantec
TheHacker
TrendMicro
TrendMicro-HouseCall
VBA32
VIPRE
ViRobot
VirusBuster

Using the manipulating robots, I bravely fired up my browser, repeated the
Google search and clicked on the youtube link.

Turns out it was a video of a lady who seems more than a little confused
about nuclear physics and cosmology. But then again, who isn't :-)

Catpain Merca
--
.

David Canzi

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 3:48:40 PM1/28/13

to

You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
attention?

--
David Canzi | "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation
| of strength." -- Eric Hoffer

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 4:01:02 PM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 3:48�pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

> wiki trix �<wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Jan 27, 11:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> >orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> >> > Who would known?
>
> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>
> >> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
> >> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
> >> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>
> >I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>
> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
> attention?

Far from it.

Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-origins@moderators.isc.org

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 4:53:44 PM1/28/13

to

That belief arguably is true, but also is the reason that this conversation
has turned as it has.

I'm familiar with a Usenet poster whose game appears to be to provoke
his opponents - which apparently is everybody - into doing more typing,
and thinking, than he does, which seems to count as winning. The content
matters only as a means to this end. So I ignore him, mostly, as a
reader, but sometimes I make replies that will be of interest to
other people - partly to avoid having them get sucked into the game.
I don't use his scoring system as a measure of success; why would I?

And now there comes to mind a science-fiction fable about a young man
who experienced a spontaneous alteration of his mental processes and
became non-verbal and devoted to instantaneous responses to normal
natural urges; gratification of appetites, fighting apparent
opponents, or fleeing from stronger opponents and other dangers.
And his family went to court to say that if the institution where he
was kept couldn't cure him then he should be placed in their,
the family's care. And in the court he suddenly spoke eloquently,
saying that actually his new state of mind is fine and he just
doesn't need to think or speak in order to be comfortable with
his wants, until right now where he finds he has to take time to
explain this so that things can stay as they are. Which happens.

In turn I think of the fable of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde - whose
obsession with no one's needs other than his own led to his
unfortunate outcome.

And also of the kid that never speaks until age four and suddenly
says "This soup is too hot", and, when asked why he has not spoken
before, he says, "Everything was okay till now."

David Canzi

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 6:06:45 PM1/28/13

to

Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:19:44 PM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 6:06ï¿½pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

> wiki trix ï¿½<wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 28, 3:48 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> >> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >On Jan 27, 11:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> >> >orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> >> >> > Who would known?
>
> >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>
> >> >> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
> >> >> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
> >> >> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>
> >> >I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>
> >> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
> >> attention?
>
> >Far from it.
>
> Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.

Oh pleaseï¿½ the link I provided is entirely voluntary. An analogy to
telemarketing is entirely ludicrous.

Harry K

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:45:01 PM1/28/13

to

What do we want you to do!! Should be obvious to anyone but an idiot
(to use your term)

Harry K

Harry K

unread,

Jan 28, 2013, 11:50:30 PM1/28/13

to

On Jan 28, 12:48�pm, "Catpain 'Merca" <catpainme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote in news:a6bc7803-cf5b-4947-9f8d-
> a4f157180...@qi8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:

LOL. And the bottom line seems to be a subject of little interest to
anyone except wiki trix.

Harry K

Glenn

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 12:42:29 AM1/29/13

to

"wiki trix" <wiki...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:c39504a8-5be5-41fb...@zw6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

> On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> > wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >On Jan 28, 3:48 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> > >> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> >On Jan 27, 11:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> > >> >orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> > >> >> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> > >> >> > Who would known?
> >
> > >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
> >
> > >> >> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
> > >> >> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
> > >> >> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
> >
> > >> >I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
> >
> > >> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
> > >> attention?
> >
> > >Far from it.
> >
> > Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.
>

> Oh please� the link I provided is entirely voluntary. An analogy to
> telemarketing is entirely ludicrous.
>
Meaningless, this is how things really work. Would that you known.

Nashton

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 8:07:37 AM1/29/13

to

This whole ng is a lot of chatter about nothing. The ToE is useless and
the elephant in the room (how life actually started) is never addressed
and if it is, you get the usual "I can't hear you as my fingers are in
my ears."

I am siding with you on this one. The self importance and gassbaggery
oozes from many posters in here, Robert Carnegie included, whom can't
help himself but attempt to appear superior to everyone else by making
it clear that he is a moderator of this ng, as if anyone gives a shit.

>

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 8:13:56 AM1/29/13

to

What would that be?

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 8:15:20 AM1/29/13

to

On Jan 29, 12:42ï¿½am, "Glenn" <glennshel...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "wiki trix" <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:c39504a8-5be5-41fb...@zw6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

> > On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> > > wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >On Jan 28, 3:48 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> > > >> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> >On Jan 27, 11:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> > > >> >orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> > > >> >> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> > > >> >> > Who would known?
>
> > > >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>
> > > >> >> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
> > > >> >> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
> > > >> >> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>
> > > >> >I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>
> > > >> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
> > > >> attention?
>
> > > >Far from it.
>
> > > Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.
>

> > Oh pleaseï¿½ the link I provided is entirely voluntary. An analogy to

> > telemarketing is entirely ludicrous.
>
> Meaningless, this is how things really work. Would that you known.

Was that supposed to mean something?

Nashton

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 8:14:24 AM1/29/13

to

On 13-01-29 12:19 AM, wiki trix wrote:

> On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 28, 3:48 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Jan 27, 11:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
>>>>> orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
>>>>>>> Who would known?
>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>>
>>>>>> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
>>>>>> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
>>>>>> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>>
>>>>> I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>>
>>>> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
>>>> attention?
>>
>>> Far from it.
>>
>> Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.
>
> Oh pleaseï¿½ the link I provided is entirely voluntary. An analogy to
> telemarketing is entirely ludicrous.
>

What is really hilarious is the fact that many of these posters
literally live on the Usenet, posting thousands upon thousands of posts
every year only to lash out on you because you provided a link to a
Youtube video and then claim that you have wasted their "precious" time.

Nashton

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 8:20:55 AM1/29/13

to

On 13-01-29 12:50 AM, Harry K wrote:
> On Jan 28, 12:48 pm, "Catpain 'Merca" <catpainme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote in news:a6bc7803-cf5b-4947-9f8d-
>> a4f157180...@qi8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:
>>

<snip>

>>
>> Using the manipulating robots, I bravely fired up my browser, repeated the
>> Google search and clicked on the youtube link.
>>
>> Turns out it was a video of a lady who seems more than a little confused
>> about nuclear physics and cosmology. But then again, who isn't :-)
>>
>> Catpain Merca
>> --
>> .
>
> LOL. And the bottom line seems to be a subject of little interest to
> anyone except wiki trix.
>
> Harry K
>

The bottom line is the idiocy in the statement that you somehow imagine
that you can speak for every poster that followed the link.

Legend in your own mind....

Nashton

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 8:22:13 AM1/29/13

to

On 13-01-29 1:42 AM, Glenn wrote:
>
> "wiki trix" <wiki...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:c39504a8-5be5-41fb...@zw6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>>>>> I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>>>
>>>>> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
>>>>> attention?
>>>
>>>> Far from it.
>>>
>>> Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.
>>

>> Oh pleaseï¿½ the link I provided is entirely voluntary. An analogy to

>> telemarketing is entirely ludicrous.
>>
> Meaningless, this is how things really work. Would that you known.
>

I just lost 2 seconds of my time trying to figure out your gibberish.
I want them back!

jillery

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 9:05:49 AM1/29/13

to

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:22:13 -0400, Nashton <na...@na.ca> wrote:

>On 13-01-29 1:42 AM, Glenn wrote:
>>
>> "wiki trix" <wiki...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:c39504a8-5be5-41fb...@zw6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>>>>>>> I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>>>>
>>>>>> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
>>>>>> attention?
>>>>
>>>>> Far from it.
>>>>
>>>> Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.
>>>

>>> Oh please� the link I provided is entirely voluntary. An analogy to

>>> telemarketing is entirely ludicrous.
>>>
>> Meaningless, this is how things really work. Would that you known.
>>
>
>I just lost 2 seconds of my time trying to figure out your gibberish.
>I want them back!

Go back to the village from whence you came.

Harry K

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 10:30:31 AM1/29/13

to

Thanks for proving my point. What we want anyone to do who posts a
link has been posted..repeatedly. Go look for it and maybe this time
you won't miss it.

Harry K

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 11:44:38 AM1/29/13

to

On Jan 29, 8:14 am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
> On 13-01-29 12:19 AM, wiki trix wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> >> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Jan 28, 3:48 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> >>>> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Jan 27, 11:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> >>>>> orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> >>>>>>> Who would known?
>
> >>>>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>
> >>>>>> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
> >>>>>> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
> >>>>>> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>
> >>>>> I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>
> >>>> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
> >>>> attention?
>
> >>> Far from it.
>
> >> Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.
>

> > Oh please the link I provided is entirely voluntary. An analogy to

> > telemarketing is entirely ludicrous.
>
> What is really hilarious is the fact that many of these posters
> literally live on the Usenet, posting thousands upon thousands of posts
> every year only to lash out on you because you provided a link to a
> Youtube video and then claim that you have wasted their "precious" time.

Nashton.... I guess I must agree with you here. But I hope it is not
habit forming.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 11:47:27 AM1/29/13

to

That does not make sense. What does "repeatedly" refer to? ANd Lokk
for what exactly?

Bob Casanova

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 12:22:41 PM1/29/13

to

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:36:35 -0800 (PST), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

<wiki...@gmail.com>:

Perhaps following his suggestion would be appropriate,
rather than posting a link with zero info?

My comment wasn't about the problem per se, but about your
condescending dismissal of the concerns expressed by Harry
K, a dismissal which implied that his comments were paranoid
and completely without merit, and that he was an idiot to be
concerned in the slightest.

>> ....and I suspect that hasn't changed. But since we've had
>> this discussion in the past I also suspect you'll again
>> discount any potential problem.

....as you did.

Bob Casanova

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 12:26:03 PM1/29/13

to

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:19:44 -0800 (PST), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix
<wiki...@gmail.com>:

>On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jan 28, 3:48 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> >> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On Jan 27, 11:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
>> >> >orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
>> >> >> > Who would known?
>>
>> >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>>
>> >> >> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
>> >> >> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
>> >> >> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>>
>> >> >I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>>
>> >> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
>> >> attention?
>>
>> >Far from it.
>>
>> Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.
>

>Oh please… the link I provided is entirely voluntary.

....as is answering the phone with zero information regarding
the caller.

> An analogy to
>telemarketing is...

....therefore appropriate.

Bob Casanova

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 12:27:27 PM1/29/13

to

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:05:49 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:

But does the village *deserve* the return of their idiot?

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 12:33:32 PM1/29/13

to

On Jan 29, 12:22 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:36:35 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

> <wikit...@gmail.com>:

A link into youtube is about as safe as a link can get. The risk is so
low that you may as well not access the internet if it worries you.
Nobody forced anyone to click on the youtube link. As for me providing
more information about the link, which seems to be the issue we are
addressing here... well that would provide no extra assurance that the
link was any safer than if I had not. What is your point here?

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 12:36:24 PM1/29/13

to

On Jan 29, 12:26 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:19:44 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

> <wikit...@gmail.com>:

>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> >> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >On Jan 28, 3:48 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> >> >> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On Jan 27, 11:12 pm, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
> >> >> >orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sunday, 27 January 2013 17:41:28 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> >> >> >> > Who would known?
>
> >> >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU
>
> >> >> >> Not people who aren't inclined to view Internet videos posted with
> >> >> >> little explanation by folks who aren't reliably respectful of the
> >> >> >> value of other folk's time and attention - that's for sure!
>
> >> >> >I owe you nothing of the sort. Go jump in a lake.
>
> >> >> You don't owe others respect for the value of their time and
> >> >> attention?
>
> >> >Far from it.
>
> >> Great opportunities await you in the telemarketing industry.
>
> >Oh please the link I provided is entirely voluntary.
>
> ....as is answering the phone with zero information regarding
> the caller.
>
> > An analogy to
> >telemarketing is...
>
> ....therefore appropriate.

Nope. More like TV stations. You only watch shows that you actully
choose to watch.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 1:32:51 PM1/29/13

to

On Jan 28, 11:04 am, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:

> On Jan 28, 4:29 am, wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 28, 7:15 am, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-
>
> > orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> > > On Monday, 28 January 2013 11:50:57 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> > > > On Jan 28, 6:35 am, "Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-

> > > > orig...@moderators.isc.org" <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > This here is a forum of written words. Use words, huh?
>
> > > > Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. BTW, the video does
> > > > contain words, huh?
> > > > Not sure what your problem is. If the post title does not look
> > > > interesting to you, then don't watch the video link. Duh.
>

> > > If it was posted by Stephen Hawking then I'd be interested.
> > > (I know you aren't Stephen Hawking, and, don't change your screen name -
> > > we'll still know that it isn't him.)
>
> > Hey Rocket Scientologist... nobody is forcing you to click on any
> > link. What Stephen Hawking would have to do with that point is not at
> > all clear. You seem to have a problem that is far less interesting
> > than the link I provided.

>
> In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner, I will know at
> least somethingabout what link is before I test it.

This is just too stupid. If I was to provide a link that was of some
risk, do you think that telling you something about it would improve
your safety? Like if I was being malicious, I would warn you? Are you
that stupid?

Mitchell Coffey

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 3:38:49 PM1/29/13

to

I assume it's stop posting in T.O., or some equivalent scatological
metaphor. People seem to be irritated by your off-topic posts. I
personally am not, and don't understand why others think it's so bad -
particularly what they aren't irritated by.

Mitchell

unread,

Jan 29, 2013, 10:29:42 PM1/29/13

to

On Jan 29, 8:28 pm, Robert Carnegie <rja.carne...@excite.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 January 2013 18:32:51 UTC, wiki trix wrote:
> > This is just too stupid. If I was to provide a link that was of some
> > risk, do you think that telling you something about it would improve
> > your safety? Like if I was being malicious, I would warn you? Are you
> > that stupid?
>
> Malicious links usually come with a vague, somewhat tempting description.

I would think that a promise of easy money or perhaps porno would be
more on target. Or in this crowd, perhaps a description about how the
video shows Richard Dawkins agreeing with Ted Haggard on some issue. I
would hardly think that my post was tempting enough to spread
malicious code.

> Or alternatively with the appearance of very important news, such as that
> Michael Jackson is dead or that someone has /already/ broken into your
> bank account. Whereas, instead, it means that someone /wants/ to break
> into your bank account.

Now you are getting the hang of it. Now, does that resemble my post in
any way?

> There's also a category of "spear phishing" where you aim an attack
> at a particular group of victims. If I announced here that there's
> free beer all February at the Museum of Creationism, that would be
> spear phishing. (There isn't free beer!)

OK. That also does not resemble my post. So not sure what your point
is on that. But the issue originally raised was about my lack of
description of the video link. I could cook up anything I wanted, true
or untrue. That narrative would not change anything in terms of your
ability to trust that link, or affect the actual level of risk
associated with clicking on that link. I have a hard time accepting
that you are still so stupid on that point. But, again, if you feel
that you cannot trust a link in any post, then do not click on it.
Duh.

> If you post a video link with a detailed description of why it may be
> of interest to other people, it's more credible that it's valid,

The you are an idiot. If I was trying to do harm, I would have provide
a detailed but untrue description of why it may be of interest to
people here. That would not make it more credible or valid. Christ you
are dumb.

> because the vague one is probably /more/ effective, is less effort,
> and the carefully crafted one will usually be treated with equal
> harshness - I say "usually" because you might be able to persuade
> people that it was an unfortunate accident, or even that you
> don't know how it happened. Indeed, you probably could keep that
> going for quite a while.

Holy shit you are an idiot. Holy holy shit.

Nashton

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 6:25:23 AM1/30/13

to

What makes you think I care that you agree with me?
Moreover, I know that your biases and prejudices make it difficult for
you (and the majority of the hoi polloi, scientist wannabees in this ng)
to agree with individuals whom are on the creation side of the fence but
next time, try to put that aside for the sake of objectivity as you did
in this instance.

Burkhard

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 7:01:37 AM1/30/13

to

That should be "the majority of hoi polloi", as "hoi" is already
Greek for "the". If one has to be pretentious, one should at least do
it properly.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 8:18:54 AM1/30/13

to

Nothing makes me think that you care that I agree with you. What makes
you think that I think that you care that I agree with you?

> Moreover, I know that your biases and prejudices make it difficult for
> you (and the majority of the hoi polloi, scientist wannabees in this ng)
> to agree with individuals whom are on the creation side of the fence but
> next time, try to put that aside for the sake of objectivity as you did
> in this instance.

Yes, of course, I will, as always, endeavor to put aside my biases and
prejudices for the sake of objectivity. That is very good advice for
us all.

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 11:30:42 AM1/30/13

to

Like Jed Clampett, one should use a fancy eatin' table for fancy
events:

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1xT2grZpCI>

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 12:18:11 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 11:12 am, "Glenn" <glennshel...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "Burkhard" <b.scha...@ed.ac.uk> wrote in messagenews:a161a886-c70f-42b2...@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...

I think you missed the obvious. Greek is intrinsically pretentious, at
least if you are not Greek.

Bob Casanova

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 12:21:13 PM1/30/13

to

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:33:32 -0800 (PST), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

<wiki...@gmail.com>:

>A link into youtube is about as safe as a link can get.

Thanks you for that reassurance, which I will discount.

Bob Casanova

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 12:24:40 PM1/30/13

to

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:36:24 -0800 (PST), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

<wiki...@gmail.com>:

Yep; analyze the logic. Until you click the link or answer
the phone you have zero information regarding the content.

> More like TV stations. You only watch shows that you actully
>choose to watch.

You watch shows without any idea what they're about? You're
an advertiser's dream.

Bob Casanova

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 12:26:18 PM1/30/13

to

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:53:45 -0500, the following appeared

Ummm...

Point.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 12:32:21 PM1/30/13

to

Yikes. That looks like another scary youtube link. Watch out Harry K.
and Bob Casanova, we are all out to infect your computer today.

"In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner..." - Idiot Harry
K.

"YouTube, including faked pages, has been a favored venue for malware

delivery in the past..." - Moron Bob Casanova

Bob Casanova

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 12:33:50 PM1/30/13

to

On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:45:59 -0800 (PST), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

<wiki...@gmail.com>:

>On Jan 28, 1:35 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:48:54 -0800 (PST), the following
>> appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix
>> <wikit...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >On Jan 28, 11:04 am, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> >> In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner, I will know at
>> >> least somethingabout what link is before I test it.
>> >It is youtube, you idiot.
>>
>> Apparently. So? YouTube, including faked pages, has been a
>> favored venue for malware delivery in the past...
>>
>> http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/a-new-yout...http://www.techradar.com/us/news/mobile-computing/laptops/internet/we...http://www.pcworld.com/article/133232/article.htmlhttp://www.scmagazine.com/scores-of-spoofed-youtube-pages-lead-to-mal...
>
>Idiot. You do not understand any of the links you provided here.

Wrong. But no matter.

> They
>are related to fake URLs that look like YouTube pages that trick users
>into downloading a tojan horse that pretends to be a required video
>codec for viewing YouTube videos. First of all, my link was an actual
>YouTube link. Note how its starts off with https://www.youtube.com.

So you're unaware of spoofed URLs, the sort which show up
frequently in email links? I don't know if they're easy (or
even possible) in Usenet newsreaders, but I'm happy for you
to test that for me. Enjoy!

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 12:37:40 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 12:24 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:36:24 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

> <wikit...@gmail.com>:

I said nothing that implied anything of the sort. Look. You have to
some extent explore things you do not know much about to determine if
it may be of interest. Watch what you want to watch. Click on what you
want to click. Anything other than continue your idiotic posts in this
thread. BTW, I have not watched any TV in almost 15 years.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 12:42:58 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 12:21 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:33:32 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

> <wikit...@gmail.com>:

Let me get this straight. You are actually saying that you consider a
YouTube URL to be a high security risk? So you never view any YouTube
link? What about a link to Google? Or Wikipedia? What in your mind
constitutes a safe link? Is any internet activity safe? Do you have
any idea how stupid you are on this issue? And a hypocrite as well,
since you are on the Internet now as you are reading this. Only Dale
comes close to you in the stupidity department here on this news
group.

alextangent

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 1:30:30 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 3:45 pm, wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 1:35 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:48:54 -0800 (PST), the following
> > appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix
> > <wikit...@gmail.com>:
>
> > >On Jan 28, 11:04 am, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:
>
> > <snip>
>
> > >> In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner, I will know at
> > >> least somethingabout what link is before I test it.
> > >It is youtube, you idiot.
>
> > Apparently. So? YouTube, including faked pages, has been a
> > favored venue for malware delivery in the past...
>

> >http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/a-new-yout......

>
> Idiot. You do not understand any of the links you provided here. They
> are related to fake URLs that look like YouTube pages that trick users
> into downloading a tojan horse that pretends to be a required video
> codec for viewing YouTube videos. First of all, my link was an actual
> YouTube link. Note how its starts off withhttps://www.youtube.com.

The link on Google groups is
http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=https://www.youtube.com&usg=AFQjCNHz1jHS6L7z2fS3tDr6FBuDo1VXrA,
not what you typed.

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 1:34:39 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 12:33 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:45:59 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix

> <wikit...@gmail.com>:

>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 28, 1:35 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:48:54 -0800 (PST), the following
> >> appeared in talk.origins, posted by wiki trix
> >> <wikit...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >On Jan 28, 11:04 am, Harry K <turn...@q.com> wrote:
>
> >> <snip>
>
> >> >> In this cyberworld where viruses lurk in any corner, I will know at
> >> >> least somethingabout what link is before I test it.
> >> >It is youtube, you idiot.
>
> >> Apparently. So? YouTube, including faked pages, has been a
> >> favored venue for malware delivery in the past...
>

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 2:01:39 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 1:43 pm, "Glenn" <glennshel...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "wiki trix" <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:38bd2cdc-9511-42cd...@pp8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

Perhaps sllightly. But I like pretentious. Especially if it comes with
good info.

alextangent

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 2:07:07 PM1/30/13

to

They are all the same. Google groups adds in a redirector to the
website, regardless of what you type.

You typed and Google groups shows as text this: (I've modified the
https:\\ so it appears as a literal string)

https:??www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU

Google links it as

http:??www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv
%3DEYsH9BXcflU&usg=AFQjCNFgD4pzqIib0_233zRIZ0JAKarjlQ

The link is a redirect, and the string watch?v=EYsH9BXcflU has been
escaped.

alextangent

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 2:09:26 PM1/30/13

to

And Google groups is too smart; it still managed to spot the link and
imbed a redirect...

Nashton

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 2:10:22 PM1/30/13

to

Whatever that means.
Plato differentiates between the "aristoi" and "hoi polloi."

(ἆριστοι---οί πολλοί)

There is no such thing as the majority of the hoi polloi.

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 4:39:03 PM1/30/13

to

On 01-30-13 1:26 PM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:53:45 -0500, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:27:27 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>

>>>>>
>>>>> I just lost 2 seconds of my time trying to figure out your gibberish.
>>>>> I want them back!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Go back to the village from whence you came.
>>>
>>> But does the village *deserve* the return of their idiot?
>>
>>
>> If they let him out, yes.
>> If they pushed him out, hell yes.
>
> Ummm...
>
> Point.
>

I am honored that you think of me in those terms.

Nashton

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 4:40:59 PM1/30/13

to

On 01-29-13 1:27 PM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:05:49 -0500, the following appeared

> in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>

>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:22:13 -0400, Nashton <na...@na.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> On 13-01-29 1:42 AM, Glenn wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "wiki trix" <wiki...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:c39504a8-5be5-41fb...@zw6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

>>>>> On Jan 28, 6:06 pm, "David Canzi" <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>

>>>> Meaningless, this is how things really work. Would that you known.

>>>>
>>>
>>> I just lost 2 seconds of my time trying to figure out your gibberish.
>>> I want them back!
>>
>>
>> Go back to the village from whence you came.
>
> But does the village *deserve* the return of their idiot?
>

"Jillery" proving that he (she?) is only capable of hit and run insults
as if I care.

jillery

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 4:59:56 PM1/30/13

to

It's kinda like sneering at other people for mixing checks and stripes
when you have toilet paper stuck on your shoes.

Glenn

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 5:11:32 PM1/30/13

to

"wiki trix" <wiki...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:25115f86-8593-4d4e...@d8g2000pbm.googlegroups.com...

But I'm not sleepy.

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 6:58:52 PM1/30/13

to

You could pretend to sleep.

Mitchell

Glenn

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 7:24:24 PM1/30/13

to

"Mitchell Coffey" <mitchell...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:kecc3c$jbn$2...@dont-email.me...

Are you trying to be pretentious too?

wiki trix

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 8:51:17 PM1/30/13

to

On Jan 30, 6:13�pm, "Glenn" <glennshel...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "wiki trix" <wikit...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:da927c75-d61c-4db4...@i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com...

No more internet for you young man,

Glenn

unread,

Jan 30, 2013, 9:05:02 PM1/30/13

to

"wiki trix" <wiki...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:89415c5b-7d11-49a3...@d8g2000pbm.googlegroups.com...

You're delusional.