Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

I Have Proved Evolution

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Tiny Bulcher

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 1:11:48 PM12/7/06
to
Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is
irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have
written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a
video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh
no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of
cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell
you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all
my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you
know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about
decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free
behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful,
and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you
fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need
to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert
on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me
contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ...
it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to
know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would
prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's
invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get
merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I
said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I
SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me
round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me.
I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler
liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium
hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of
that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running
about telling hawks from handsaws?

These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these
eels out of here.

--
Tiny
wind NNW, backing Southerly

Bill Hudson

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 1:24:08 PM12/7/06
to

Where can I get some of that?

chris.li...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 1:35:44 PM12/7/06
to

Try

http://www.answersingenesis.org/

If you can stomach it.

Chris

Bill Hudson

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 1:43:55 PM12/7/06
to

Oh, no, not *that*, I meant whatever it is he's smoking.

Ken Rode

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 1:43:03 PM12/7/06
to

Well, that's it then. Absolutely no reason to keep reading
talk.origins...

Kermit

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 2:01:48 PM12/7/06
to

[...]

You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently
disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn
liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")

But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.

Kermit
8P

shipmodeler1

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 2:19:43 PM12/7/06
to
I nominate Tiny as an official "bong":

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bong.htm

chris.li...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 2:23:56 PM12/7/06
to

Oh, I know. Only AiG would sell you a recreational drug *guaranteed* to
give you a really bad trip. But then, I guess only creationists would
want to fork over money for it.

Chris

Tiny Bulcher

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 2:39:48 PM12/7/06
to

Kermit wrote:
> Tiny Bulcher wrote:

<snip>

> > These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these
> > eels out of here.
> >
> > --
> > Tiny
> > wind NNW, backing Southerly
>
> [...]
>
> You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently
> disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn
> liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
>
> But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.

Buggrit. I knew I'd forgotten somebody.

--
Tiny

Tiny Bulcher

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 2:37:48 PM12/7/06
to

shipmodeler1 wrote:
> I nominate Tiny as an official "bong":
>
> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bong.htm

Cheeky bastard. I was going for this:

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/evilclown.htm

--
Tiny

shipmodeler1

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 3:26:35 PM12/7/06
to
hmmm...

cheeky bastard...

Maybe he could add that to his list!

Stile4aly

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 5:25:59 PM12/7/06
to
Probably far too long for a Chez Watt, but I'll nominate it anyway in
the category of "a taste of their own medicine."

Bob Casanova

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 6:28:12 PM12/7/06
to
On 7 Dec 2006 11:39:48 -0800, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by "Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD...@aol.com>:

You forgot Flying Feral Chickens, too.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

Ye Old One

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 7:00:45 PM12/7/06
to
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:28:12 -0500, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>On 7 Dec 2006 11:39:48 -0800, the following appeared in
>talk.origins, posted by "Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD...@aol.com>:
>
>>
>>Kermit wrote:
>>> Tiny Bulcher wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>> > These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these
>>> > eels out of here.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Tiny
>>> > wind NNW, backing Southerly
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently
>>> disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn
>>> liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
>>>
>>> But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
>>
>>Buggrit. I knew I'd forgotten somebody.
>
>You forgot Flying Feral Chickens, too.

And "falling decisions" or "decision points".

--
Bob.

Mark Isaak

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 7:25:56 PM12/7/06
to
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:11:48 -0800, Tiny Bulcher wrote:

> Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is
> irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have
> written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years.

Years!? I have an irrefutable proof of evolution which I will post
in just one week.

It only remains to be determined *which* one week.

--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering

Gerry Murphy

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 9:51:26 PM12/7/06
to

"Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1165515108....@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...

<snip, regretfully>

Marvelous!


Pithecanthropus Erectus

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 10:24:46 PM12/7/06
to

In the category: "The Colonel has finally done it, he's gone round the
bend."

Clever, Tiny.

--
“What concerns me now is that even if you’re as brilliant as Newton, you
reach a point where you start basking in the majesty of God and then
your discovery stops — it just stops,” Dr. Tyson said. “You’re no good
anymore for advancing that frontier, waiting for somebody else to come
behind you who doesn’t have God on the brain and who says: ‘That’s a
really cool problem. I want to solve it.’

Klaus

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 2:04:48 AM12/8/06
to

No, he didn't. "It's all about decisions, you see"
Klaus

Klaus

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 2:01:27 AM12/8/06
to

I thought it was a nice parody that covered everything except for stone
penis-snakes in coal mines.
Klaus

Tiny Bulcher

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 3:49:42 AM12/8/06
to

Bob Casanova wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2006 11:39:48 -0800, the following appeared in
> talk.origins, posted by "Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD...@aol.com>:
>
> >
> >Kermit wrote:
> >> Tiny Bulcher wrote:
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >> > These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these
> >> > eels out of here.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Tiny
> >> > wind NNW, backing Southerly
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently
> >> disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn
> >> liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
> >>
> >> But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
> >
> >Buggrit. I knew I'd forgotten somebody.
>
> You forgot Flying Feral Chickens, too.

*googles* .... ah, the legendary Ted Holden. Before my time, I'm
afraid.

--
Tiny

heyref

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 1:02:06 PM12/8/06
to
Bill Hudson <oldgee...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Oh, no, not *that*, I meant whatever it is he's smoking.

"No no, that's too strong, Man." - Champion Jack Dupree

--
H. Brent Howatt | The deluded are always filled with absolutes
hey...@die.spammers.rootshell.be| The rest of us have to live with ambiguity
PGP keys by email or keyserver | _Aristoi_ Walter Jon Williams

heyref

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 1:08:35 PM12/8/06
to
Tiny Bulcher <RSGD...@aol.com> wrote:
> Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is
[mass snippage]

> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these
> eels out of here.

I've been gone for a while, changing jobs, houses, counties, etc., and I
retuirn to find this. Clearly with the passing of time, the creationists
minds have moved to a far more disordered state.

Richard Clayton

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 3:47:00 PM12/8/06
to

And lurkers supporting him in email.
--
[The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]
Richard Clayton
"Remember, always be yourself. Unless you suck." — Joss Whedon

Bob Casanova

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 3:49:50 PM12/8/06
to
On 8 Dec 2006 00:49:42 -0800, the following appeared in

Pity. Here's another: "Woodpecker Karl".

Enjoy! ;-)

Richard Clayton

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 3:45:59 PM12/8/06
to

Wizard. Is this Chez Wattable or is it too long?

Bob Casanova

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 3:51:24 PM12/8/06
to
On 8 Dec 2006 18:08:35 GMT, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by heyref <hey...@phenix.rootshell.be>:

>Tiny Bulcher <RSGD...@aol.com> wrote:
>> Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is
>[mass snippage]
>> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these
>> eels out of here.
>
>I've been gone for a while, changing jobs, houses, counties, etc., and I
>retuirn to find this. Clearly with the passing of time, the creationists
>minds have moved to a far more disordered state.

Yep. And Tiny does a *beautiful* job of parodying (is that a
word?) them.

Robert Grumbine

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 4:13:06 PM12/8/06
to
In article <bakeh.21$LL4.4@trnddc04>,

Are you implying that there are rules to Chez Watt?

I wonder what the longest winning chez watt has been. At least 100 lines,
I expect, and possibly more like 300. Some of the song lyrics and
epic poem renditions really get up there.

--
Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links.
Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much
evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they
would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences

Jim Lovejoy

unread,
Dec 12, 2006, 12:52:26 AM12/12/06
to
"Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD...@aol.com> wrote in
news:1165515108....@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com:

> Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is
> irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have
> written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a
> video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh
> no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of
> cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell
> you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all
> my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you
> know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about
> decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free
> behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful,
> and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you
> fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need
> to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert
> on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me
> contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ...
> it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to
> know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would
> prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right.

After thinking over what you've said, I agree with you.

> That's
> invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get
> merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I
> said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I
> SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me
> round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me.
> I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler
> liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium
> hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of
> that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running
> about telling hawks from handsaws?
>
> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these
> eels out of here.
>

0 new messages