The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: "Dana Tweedy" <twee...@cvn.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 03:46:41 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Mar 22 2003 10:46 pm
Subject: Re: Piltdown Fraud: Evolution evangelists.
news:3f355ee.0303221833.3dce89ff@posting.google.com...
<news:b5gj0o$27olig$1@ID-35161.news.dfncis.de>... snipping Again, you ignore what I wrote, why is that? What do you fear? > Actually, what you've done is sidestep the rea questions. You think by already been well established that the quotes you stole from the other site were taken out of context, and do not mean what you want them to. My point is to show that by stealing the quotes in the first place, lying about where they came from, and then trying to excuse your stealing and lying by claiming "the ends justify the means" , you are behaving in a dishonest and unChristian manner. That the quotes are themsevles lies is another matter entirely. > You're trying to choke off the pipeline of quotations, as thus every quotations are falsehoods. Lies of omission. I leave it to others to demostrate how those quotes are dishonest. I am content to show that you are dishonest in how you use them. > If a quotation is used, you: > 1. Accuse of taking out of context out of context. > 2. Plagiarizing Stealing another person's words without attribution is plagurizing. You quoted from "Anointed one"'s site without making proper attribution. Futhermore you implied that you made photocopies of the original sources. That is another falsehood. > But you don't answer the real questions. misquotes and lies of omission. You didn't present any real questions that required an answer. > You never: > 1. prove these to be out of context. wheel? > 2. deal with the fact that a evolutionist has admitted a portion of Those quotations were carefully taken out of context, to change the meaning. > evolution to be fraudulent, hence the quotation. The "evolutionist(s)" in those quotations was NOT admitting that "a portion of evolution" was "fraudulent". That is the whole point of a "lie of omission", to omit the part of the person's words that explains and clarifies the person's position. Those quotes you stole are classic lies of omission. They are false, and using them is perpetrating a falsehood. This is beside the point that your use of them was at best dishonest, and at worst despicable. DJT You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||