Hello Mike Dunford,

Thanks for clearing that up.

It seems to me that this tactic of not drawing the inference knowingly
leads them to a conclusion of nothing new to say (about the designer).
Did they make a disclaimer about this? If not, I think it's trickery
too.

Their motives aside, is their intent then only to demonstrate
intelligent design?

And then would you say that they are correct or incorrect in their
demonstration of that design being intelligent?

Thanks in advance for you responses. I hope to read more when I get back
from an out of town trip.

Jillar