Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Sharper than a 2 edged sword (a 3 edged sword?)

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Great Dayne

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 11:48:27 AM10/24/09
to

Reddfrogg

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 12:21:33 PM10/24/09
to
On Oct 24, 9:48 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA

A three edged sword is a stiletto.

DJT

Tapestry

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 2:58:47 PM10/24/09
to

Reddfrogg

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:03:29 PM10/24/09
to
On Oct 24, 12:58 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 11:21 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 24, 9:48 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
>
> > A three edged sword is a stiletto.
>
> You would know wouldn't ya, jack?

yes, as I know a little about historical weapons.

>
> Got ya now jack.

got me how, exactly?

snip irrelevant links

DJT

Tapestry

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:08:08 PM10/24/09
to
On Oct 24, 2:03 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 12:58 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 24, 11:21 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 24, 9:48 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
>
> > > A three edged sword is a stiletto.
>
> > You would know wouldn't ya, jack?
>
> yes, as I know a little about historical weapons.
>

Yes, using futuristic weaponry in the past.

>
>
> > Got ya now jack.
>
> got me how, exactly?

Your beveled knife, ripperman

The murder weapon.

Ron O

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:08:00 PM10/24/09
to
On Oct 24, 1:58 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 11:21 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 24, 9:48 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
>
> > A three edged sword is a stiletto.
>
> You would know wouldn't ya, jack?
>
> Got ya now jack.
>
> http://www.harvardapparatus.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/haisku3_100...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMHHWfSe4TE

Hey, Tapestry, Great Dayne has been saying that you are as incompetent
as he is.

Ron Okimoto

Reddfrogg

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:16:34 PM10/24/09
to
On Oct 24, 1:08 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2:03 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 24, 12:58 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 24, 11:21 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 24, 9:48 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
>
> > > > A three edged sword is a stiletto.
>
> > > You would know wouldn't ya, jack?
>
> > yes, as I know a little about historical weapons.
>
> Yes, using futuristic weaponry in the past.

The stiletto is a weapon that was used in the late Middle ages. It
was a simple steel dagger with a three cornered cross section. It
was small, easy to conceal and was often used for assassinations. It
has nothing to do with "futuristic weaponry" in the past, whatever
that was.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiletto


>
>
>
> > > Got ya now jack.
>
> > got me how, exactly?
>
> Your beveled knife, ripperman

I don't have any "beveled knife". I have a small collection of
reproduction medieval swords, axes and maces, but I don't even own a
stiletto. What do you mean by "ripperman"?


>
> The murder weapon.

Who was supposedly murdered? You accused me of this before, but
never provided any details.

DJT

Tapestry

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:22:18 PM10/24/09
to
On Oct 24, 2:16 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 1:08 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 24, 2:03 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 24, 12:58 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 24, 11:21 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Oct 24, 9:48 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
>
> > > > > A three edged sword is a stiletto.
>
> > > > You would know wouldn't ya, jack?
>
> > > yes, as I know a little about historical weapons.
>
> > Yes, using futuristic weaponry in the past.
>
> The stiletto is a weapon that was used in the late Middle ages.  It
> was a simple steel dagger with a three cornered cross section.    It
> was small, easy to conceal and was often used for assassinations.   It
> has nothing to do with "futuristic weaponry" in the past, whatever
> that was.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiletto

>
>
>
> > > > Got ya now jack.
>
> > > got me how, exactly?
>
> > Your beveled knife, ripperman
>
> I don't have any "beveled knife".   I have a small collection of
> reproduction medieval swords, axes and maces, but I don't even own a
> stiletto.   What do you mean by "ripperman"?
>
>
>
> > The murder weapon.
>
> Who was supposedly murdered?   You accused me of this before, but
> never provided any details.
>
> DJT- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Scotland yard will love to add this piece of evidence, Jack.

Reddfrogg

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:27:40 PM10/24/09
to


I've never been to Scotland. Why would they care?

DJT

Stephen

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:33:41 PM10/24/09
to
Reddfrogg wrote:

Or an epee ...

--

Tapestry

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:31:02 PM10/24/09
to
On Oct 24, 2:27 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 1:22 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 24, 2:16 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 24, 1:08 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 24, 2:03 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Oct 24, 12:58 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Oct 24, 11:21 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Oct 24, 9:48 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
>
> > > > > > > A three edged sword is a stiletto.
>
> > > > > > You would know wouldn't ya, jack?
>
> > > > > yes, as I know a little about historical weapons.
>
> > > > Yes, using futuristic weaponry in the past.
>
> > > The stiletto is a weapon that was used in the late Middle ages.  It
> > > was a simple steel dagger with a three cornered cross section.    It
> > > was small, easy to conceal and was often used for assassinations.   It
> > > has nothing to do with "futuristic weaponry" in the past, whatever
> > > that was.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiletto
>
> > > > > > Got ya now jack.
>
> > > > > got me how, exactly?
>
> > > > Your beveled knife, ripperman
>
> > > I don't have any "beveled knife".   I have a small collection of
> > > reproduction medieval swords, axes and maces, but I don't even own a
> > > stiletto.   What do you mean by "ripperman"?
>
> > > > The murder weapon.
>
> > > Who was supposedly murdered?   You accused me of this before, but
> > > never provided any details.
>
> > > DJT- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Scotland yard will love to add this piece of evidence, Jack.
>
> I've never been to Scotland.  Why would they care?

YOU ARE JACK THE RIPPER.

Caranx latus

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:45:04 PM10/24/09
to
Reddfrogg wrote:
> On Oct 24, 1:22 pm, Tapestry <estry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 24, 2:16 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:

<snip>

>>>>>> You would know wouldn't ya, jack?
>>>>> yes, as I know a little about historical weapons.
>>>> Yes, using futuristic weaponry in the past.
>>> The stiletto is a weapon that was used in the late Middle ages. It
>>> was a simple steel dagger with a three cornered cross section. It
>>> was small, easy to conceal and was often used for assassinations. It
>>> has nothing to do with "futuristic weaponry" in the past, whatever
>>> that was.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiletto
>>>>>> Got ya now jack.
>>>>> got me how, exactly?
>>>> Your beveled knife, ripperman
>>> I don't have any "beveled knife". I have a small collection of
>>> reproduction medieval swords, axes and maces, but I don't even own a
>>> stiletto. What do you mean by "ripperman"?
>>>> The murder weapon.
>>> Who was supposedly murdered? You accused me of this before, but
>>> never provided any details.
>>> DJT

>> Scotland yard will love to add this piece of evidence, Jack.
>
>
> I've never been to Scotland. Why would they care?

Apparently your cover has been blown, Dana. Or should I say Jack the
Ripper? The British police (headquarters at Scotland Yard) will be happy
to finally be able to close this case.


--
"We are all connected: to each other, biologically; to the earth,
chemically; to the rest of the universe atomically." - Neil deGrasse Tyson

Reddfrogg

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 3:46:31 PM10/24/09
to

Sorry, but the "Jack the Ripper" murders took place 111 years ago, in
the Whitechapel part of London. It would be impossible for me to be
Jack the Ripper for several reasons.


1. The killer would be long dead
2 I have never been to London
3. I was born in 1962, long after the murders took place
4. I've never killed anyone

DJT

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 4:41:08 PM10/24/09
to

Scotland Yard isn't in Scotland. It's in London. I believe he has become
convinced that you're Jack the Ripper, and perhaps that you committed
your crimes with the aid of a time machine. (I thought Malcom McDowell
did a great job as H. G. Wells, by the way.)

Ron O

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 4:55:31 PM10/24/09
to
> did a great job as H. G. Wells, by the way.)-

It is getting kind of spooky. Odin just asked what a rollock is.
Tapestry tends to fixate on people. He has some kind of list of
people that he believes did him wrong in the past. His behaviour is
sort of like the mad slasher in a hack horror film that puts the
picture of the mother that he hates over the faces of his victims. I
don't know what it is called in psychological terms, but he seems to
do it quite often.

Ron Okimoto

Bob Casanova

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 8:11:08 PM10/24/09
to
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:31:02 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Tapestry
<estr...@gmail.com>:

<snip>

>YOU ARE JACK THE RIPPER.

And you apparently actually believe this.

Oy...
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

VoiceOfReason

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 8:34:16 PM10/24/09
to

I believe the technical term is "fucking goofy."

Kermit

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 9:19:42 PM10/24/09
to

They will also be astonished to discover that the murder weapon was a
stiletto. The victims were cut up, not stabbed with a stiletto.

Kermit

Kermit

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 9:28:21 PM10/24/09
to

Yes - "Time After Time".

I don't remember the author, but I remember a science fiction short
story in which Jack is brought to the future and nearly killed by a
little girl who is more of a sociopath than he is, My memory is fuzzy
now, but I remember their encounter. The author was someone else who
extrapolated certain trends and suggested Jack was simply born before
his time.

Kermit

Kermit

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 9:29:14 PM10/24/09
to

Of course, I you *were Jack, that's exactly what you would say...

Kermit

Kermit

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 9:30:52 PM10/24/09
to

Dayne - your brain doesn't work right. Seriously, call the doctor.

Kermit

Ron O

unread,
Oct 24, 2009, 10:06:46 PM10/24/09
to

That would make it even more similar to the psychological projection
that Ray, adman, and NashT always engage in.

Ron Okimoto

Ernest Major

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 7:47:06 AM10/25/09
to
In message <hbvlf5$r4n$1...@aioe.org>, Caranx latus <kar...@sympatico.ca>
writes

>Apparently your cover has been blown, Dana. Or should I say Jack the
>Ripper? The British police (headquarters at Scotland Yard) will be
>happy to finally be able to close this case.

It's the Metropolitan Police who are headquartered at *New* Scotland
Yard.
--
alias Ernest Major

chris thompson

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 7:57:12 AM10/25/09
to
On Oct 24, 4:55 pm, Ron O <rokim...@cox.net> wrote:

"In technical terms, he's a loon."
--Dr. Silberman, _Terminator_

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 9:08:37 AM10/25/09
to

You may be thinking of "A toy for Juliette" by Robert Bloch.

Ron O

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 9:38:19 AM10/25/09
to
On Oct 25, 6:57 am, chris thompson <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com>
wrote:

This isn't an applicable quote because it was a misdiagnosis. When
Tap starts claiming that he is from another dimension and the Gobbly
Gobs from an alternate Orange County are controling his brain then it
might be applicable.

Ron Okimoto

Ron O

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 9:43:22 AM10/25/09
to
> You may be thinking of "A toy for Juliette" by Robert Bloch.-

Time After Time was a Ripper time travel movie :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_After_Time_(1979_film)

They had lunch at that Scottish place, McDonalds.

Ron Okimoto

RAM

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 10:58:19 AM10/25/09
to
OOOOOUUU!!! That hurts! You are not going to get away with this.
Well at least not until the start serving haggis!

> Ron Okimoto

Great Dayne

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 2:35:54 PM10/25/09
to
> did a great job as H. G. Wells, by the way.)- Hide quoted text -

Now they have you purchasing the murder weapon. Funny how you never
mentioned
before you do surgery on squirrels. Where are the records of your
notes of the surgery?
You aren't trying to claim the dog ate your evidence? Why did you wait
so long to mention
you perform surgery on little animals, rollock? Are you obstructing
and withholding key evidence
in an ongoing investigation, jack?

chris thompson

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 2:50:21 PM10/25/09
to
On Oct 25, 7:57 am, chris thompson <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com>
wrote:

It was a misdiagnosis in the film, but seem appropriate here.

Chris

Great Dayne

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 2:58:59 PM10/25/09
to
On Oct 25, 1:50 pm, chris thompson <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It was a misdiagnosis in the film, but seem appropriate here.

In this version of the film, dr strangelove, jack the ripper gets
caught.

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 3:32:04 PM10/25/09
to

You have me confused with several other people. And where did the
"squirrels" thing come from? Has anyone mentioned squirrels?

Please seek help. You have began repeating the request for psychiatric
treatment, but there's a major difference between our requests and
yours: we actually mean it, while you intend it merely as a insult of
the form "I know you are but what am I?"

You need to get help. Really.

Tapestry

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 3:36:33 PM10/25/09
to
> You need to get help. Really.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

You will be allowed to be extradicted to the UK to be held accountable
for
your crimes.
No US citizen can commit crimes abroad and use citizenship here as a
safe haven.

Dana Tweedy

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 6:31:32 PM10/25/09
to

What "film" do you think you are in?

DJT

Dana Tweedy

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 6:34:14 PM10/25/09
to
Great Dayne wrote:
> On Oct 24, 3:41 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
snip

?
>>
>> Scotland Yard isn't in Scotland. It's in London. I believe he has
>> become convinced that you're Jack the Ripper, and perhaps that you
>> committed your crimes with the aid of a time machine. (I thought
>> Malcom McDowell did a great job as H. G. Wells, by the way.)- Hide
>> quoted text -
>
> Now they have you purchasing the murder weapon.

Who is the "they" and what "murder weapon"? What purchase evidence do you
have?


>Funny how you never
> mentioned
> before you do surgery on squirrels.

Perhaps because John doesn't do surgery on squirrels. Neither do I.

> Where are the records of your
> notes of the surgery?

What surgery?


> You aren't trying to claim the dog ate your evidence?

What evidence?

> Why did you wait
> so long to mention
> you perform surgery on little animals, rollock?

No one said anything about surgery on animals. Where do you get that idea?

> Are you obstructing
> and withholding key evidence
> in an ongoing investigation, jack?

Again, medical attention. Call your doctor ASAP.


DJT

Dana Tweedy

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 6:36:28 PM10/25/09
to
Tapestry wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2:32 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
snip

>> Please seek help. You have began repeating the request for
>> psychiatric treatment, but there's a major difference between our
>> requests and yours: we actually mean it, while you intend it merely
>> as a insult of the form "I know you are but what am I?"
>>
>> You need to get help. Really.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> You will be allowed to be extradicted to the UK to be held accountable
> for
> your crimes.

What crimes do you think John has done? Why would the UK want to
extridite a biologist who hasn't done anything?

> No US citizen can commit crimes abroad and use citizenship here as a
> safe haven.

You don't have any evidence or reason to assume John has done any crimes.

Seek medical attention. You need it.

DJT

chris thompson

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 7:35:38 PM10/25/09
to

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest?

Chris

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 9:37:13 PM10/25/09
to

> You will be allowed to be extradicted to the UK to be held


> accountable for your crimes. No US citizen can commit crimes abroad
> and use citizenship here as a safe haven.

What crimes? Be specific. If you're talking about Jack the Ripper, I
hadn't been born yet, so you really can't pin it on me.

Cory Albrecht

unread,
Oct 25, 2009, 10:44:15 PM10/25/09
to
VoiceOfReason wrote, on 09-10-24 08:34 PM:

I think Goofy would rather get it on with Mickey than with
Tapestry/Great Dayne.

:-)

Great Dayne

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 11:09:35 AM10/26/09
to


Times crimes golaszewski.
Murder.
You also murdered a girl named .... Kim, here in the good old
US of A.

Dana Tweedy

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 11:57:30 AM10/26/09
to
Great Dayne wrote:
> On Oct 25, 8:37 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
snip

>>
>> What crimes? Be specific. If you're talking about Jack the Ripper, I
>> hadn't been born yet, so you really can't pin it on me.
>
>
> Times crimes golaszewski.

What 'time crimes"? Also, John Harshman is not "golaszewski". You are
aware, are you not that time travel is not possible?

> Murder.

Who do you suppose John has killed?


> You also murdered a girl named .... Kim, here in the good old
> US of A.

What evidence do you have for this claim. You accused me of this crime
before, without any evidence either.

DJT

Kermit

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 12:31:27 PM10/26/09
to

I've eaten there. They have tables of the most peculiar wood, and
their tea is atrocious.

Kerrrmit

Kermit

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 12:29:40 PM10/26/09
to

That was it!

They don't do perversity like Bloch anymore.

Kermit

Kermit

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 12:37:33 PM10/26/09
to

You are no longer merely making making claims not supported by
evidence. You have begun to spin off into serious incoherence. Please,
call your doctor.

I'm guessing that you are posting on several newsgroups and threads,
and you are getting everyone confused. There is no "Rollock", except
in your mind. And Jack has been dead for a century and more.

Kermit

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 12:40:42 PM10/26/09
to
I don't understand that answer. Times crimes?

And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?

Tapestry

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 12:53:11 PM10/26/09
to

It is against the law to open up gates without authorization.

>
> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?

Her family sure blames you for her death.

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 4:37:52 PM10/26/09
to

It's been said he had the heart of a little boy...preserved in alcohol
on his desk.

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 4:39:53 PM10/26/09
to

Is this some kind of time travel you're talking about? Can you quote the
relevant law for me?

>> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
>> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?
>
> Her family sure blames you for her death.

Do you have any evidence for this claim?
>

Klaus Hellnick

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 8:14:59 AM10/27/09
to

Why can't you answer simple questions? You keep ascribing your insane
statements to others, then claim they need help. I note you still have
not answered my simple questions as to how you became president or
exactly what happened to Washington, D.C., or how a crippled policeman
could use the federal government to harass you (very unsuccessfully, I
might add).
If you have a lucid moment, please consider how insane your claims have
been and get yourself professional help. Even a priest would probably
give beneficial advice.
Klaus

Great Dayne

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 11:23:02 AM10/27/09
to

Ignorance of universal laws is no excuse. I have just informed you of
your violation. You are guilty.

>
> >> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
> >> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?
>
> > Her family sure blames you for her death.
>
> Do you have any evidence for this claim?

The next sign of your paranoia is that I will post a url of a band
playing
a song and you will go to the judge and ask him to place them
under surveillance, since they are so obviously involved in the plot
conspiracy
against you ...

DJT

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 12:25:58 PM10/27/09
to


Sorry for digging up this old account, but I hit the sending limit on
my regular one

You are accusing John of paranoia, when it's your own mental issues
that are being shown. There is no judge, and no surveillance.
There's just your own mental problems

Seek qualified mental help ASAP

DJT

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 1:07:25 PM10/27/09
to

I'm pretty sure that ignorance of universal law doesn't allow you to
violate it. Contrary to Road Runner cartoons, a coyote who runs off a
cliff will not stay in place until he looks down. Similarly, being
unaware that I'm not allowed to travel in time won't let my time machine
work.

What makes you think I was able to "open up gates"? And how do you get
authorization, by the way? I would really love to visit the Middle Jurassic.

>>>> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
>>>> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?
>>> Her family sure blames you for her death.
>> Do you have any evidence for this claim?
>
> The next sign of your paranoia is that I will post a url of a band
> playing a song and you will go to the judge and ask him to place them
> under surveillance, since they are so obviously involved in the plot
> conspiracy against you ...

OK, that would seem to be your paranoia. I don't think there is any
conspiracy against me. You're the one who thinks that. And I ignore all
your youtube urls.

If you don't believe me about your paranoia, try consulting a doctor.
Help is available. You don't have to suffer alone.

Picasso Renoir Hilton

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 1:34:17 PM10/27/09
to

Of course it works. God the "entity" gave you the technology.
You used it and it is against universal law to do so without
authorization.
It was an undercover sting to bust you.
And you are guilty.
King dunce of the universe.

>
> What makes you think I was able to "open up gates"? And how do you get
> authorization, by the way? I would really love to visit the Middle Jurassic.
>
> >>>> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
> >>>> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?
> >>> Her family sure blames you for her death.
> >> Do you have any evidence for this claim?
>
> > The next sign of your paranoia is that I will post a url of a band
> > playing a song and you will go to the judge and ask him to place them
> >  under surveillance, since they are so obviously involved in the plot
> >  conspiracy against you ...
>
> OK, that would seem to be your paranoia. I don't think there is any
> conspiracy against me.

Watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn3ewOtZ2yU

DJT

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 2:29:58 PM10/27/09
to
On Oct 27, 11:34 am, Picasso Renoir Hilton <ihavethecode...@gmx.com>
wrote:

> On Oct 27, 12:07 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
snip


> > I'm pretty sure that ignorance of universal law doesn't allow you to
> > violate it. Contrary to Road Runner cartoons, a coyote who runs off a
> > cliff will not stay in place until he looks down. Similarly, being
> > unaware that I'm not allowed to travel in time won't let my time machine
> > work.
>
> Of course it works.

What do you base this assertion on?


>God the "entity" gave you the technology.

John does not have any technology that permits him to travel through
time.


> You used it and it is against universal law to do so without
> authorization.
> It was an undercover sting to bust you.

What was an 'undercover sting"?

> And you are guilty.
> King dunce of the universe.

Mental help. Seek it soon.

>
>
>
>
>
> > What makes you think I was able to "open up gates"? And how do you get
> > authorization, by the way? I would really love to visit the Middle Jurassic.
>
> > >>>> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
> > >>>> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?
> > >>> Her family sure blames you for her death.
> > >> Do you have any evidence for this claim?
>
> > > The next sign of your paranoia is that I will post a url of a band
> > > playing a song and you will go to the judge and ask him to place them
> > >  under surveillance, since they are so obviously involved in the plot
> > >  conspiracy against you ...
>
> > OK, that would seem to be your paranoia. I don't think there is any
> > conspiracy against me.
>
> Watch:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn3ewOtZ2yU

John already told you he doesn't click on those links. Is there any
point you wish to make?


DJT

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 2:49:49 PM10/27/09
to

When did he do that? And why, if I wasn't supposed to use it?

> You used it and it is against universal law to do so without
> authorization.
> It was an undercover sting to bust you.
> And you are guilty.
> King dunce of the universe.
>
>> What makes you think I was able to "open up gates"? And how do you get
>> authorization, by the way? I would really love to visit the Middle Jurassic.

No answer?

>>>>>> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
>>>>>> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?
>>>>> Her family sure blames you for her death.
>>>> Do you have any evidence for this claim?
>>> The next sign of your paranoia is that I will post a url of a band
>>> playing a song and you will go to the judge and ask him to place them
>>> under surveillance, since they are so obviously involved in the plot
>>> conspiracy against you ...
>> OK, that would seem to be your paranoia. I don't think there is any
>> conspiracy against me.
>
> Watch:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn3ewOtZ2yU
>

As I've mentioned before, I don't bother watching your pointless videos.

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 2:50:47 PM10/27/09
to
DJT wrote:

> John does not have any technology that permits him to travel through
> time.

Well, not except forward at a rate of one second per second.


Picasso Renoir Hilton

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 6:42:33 PM10/27/09
to

So he could capitalize on your stupidity to troll you along and take
the
planet.

>
> > You used it and it is against universal law to do so without
> > authorization.
> > It was an undercover sting to bust you.
> > And you are guilty.
> > King dunce of the universe.
>
> >> What makes you think I was able to "open up gates"? And how do you get
> >> authorization, by the way? I would really love to visit the Middle Jurassic.
>
> No answer?
>
> >>>>>> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
> >>>>>> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?
> >>>>> Her family sure blames you for her death.
> >>>> Do you have any evidence for this claim?
> >>> The next sign of your paranoia is that I will post a url of a band
> >>> playing a song and you will go to the judge and ask him to place them
> >>>  under surveillance, since they are so obviously involved in the plot
> >>>  conspiracy against you ...
> >> OK, that would seem to be your paranoia. I don't think there is any
> >> conspiracy against me.
>
> > Watch:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn3ewOtZ2yU
>

> As I've mentioned before, I don't bother watching your pointless videos.- Hide quoted text -

Reddfrogg

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 9:00:46 PM10/27/09
to
On Oct 27, 4:42 pm, Picasso Renoir Hilton <ihavethecode...@gmx.com>
wrote:
snip

>
> > > Of course it works. God the "entity" gave you the technology.
>
> > When did he do that? And why, if I wasn't supposed to use it?
>
> So he could capitalize on your stupidity to troll you along and take
> the
> planet.

If this being had time travel technology, why would he need John?

DJT
>

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 27, 2009, 9:50:26 PM10/27/09
to

Please elaborate. You're saying that god is trying to conquer the world,
and my stupidity is helping him?

>>> You used it and it is against universal law to do so without
>>> authorization.
>>> It was an undercover sting to bust you.
>>> And you are guilty.
>>> King dunce of the universe.
>>>> What makes you think I was able to "open up gates"? And how do you get
>>>> authorization, by the way? I would really love to visit the Middle Jurassic.
>> No answer?
>>
>>>>>>>> And I'm not golasewski. Who is this...Kim? Do you have evidence that she
>>>>>>>> existed, much less was murdered, much less who might have done it?
>>>>>>> Her family sure blames you for her death.
>>>>>> Do you have any evidence for this claim?
>>>>> The next sign of your paranoia is that I will post a url of a band
>>>>> playing a song and you will go to the judge and ask him to place them
>>>>> under surveillance, since they are so obviously involved in the plot
>>>>> conspiracy against you ...
>>>> OK, that would seem to be your paranoia. I don't think there is any
>>>> conspiracy against me.
>>> Watch:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn3ewOtZ2yU
>> As I've mentioned before, I don't bother watching your pointless videos.

That was an invitation to tell me what you meant.

Great Dayne

unread,
Oct 28, 2009, 11:59:30 AM10/28/09
to

He already has, speaking of things to come as if they already were,
and
obviously your stupidity is what made it possible.

gregwrld

unread,
Oct 28, 2009, 2:09:34 PM10/28/09
to

You've really become so pathetic. John is
right - you need serious help...

gregwrld

Dana Tweedy

unread,
Oct 28, 2009, 3:08:53 PM10/28/09
to
Great Dayne wrote:
> On Oct 27, 8:50 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
snip

>>> So he could capitalize on your stupidity to troll you along and take
>>> the
>>> planet.
>>
>> Please elaborate. You're saying that god is trying to conquer the
>> world, and my stupidity is helping him?
>
> He already has, speaking of things to come as if they already were,
> and
> obviously your stupidity is what made it possible.

You seem to be very confused about what has, and has not happened.

DJT

John Harshman

unread,
Oct 28, 2009, 3:56:29 PM10/28/09
to
Not so obviously to me, probably because I'm stupid. Could you explain
at length? Strive for clarity.

0 new messages