Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The mathematically rational theory of evolution
40 views
Skip to first unread message
Richard Norman
Apr 26, 2012, 1:24:45 AM4/26/12
to
The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria, cured virus
diseases not to mention cancer, and eliminated pesticide resistant
insects. Now the medical profession, hitherto brainwashed into
innocently harming millions of people, can return to healing. I have
already made reservations in Oslo for the December ceremony to pick up
my award.
Oops, I just noticed that some Austrian monk did that calculation
already some 150 years ago. I guess it must have escaped peoples'
notice until now.
allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria, cured virus
diseases not to mention cancer, and eliminated pesticide resistant
insects. Now the medical profession, hitherto brainwashed into
innocently harming millions of people, can return to healing. I have
already made reservations in Oslo for the December ceremony to pick up
my award.
Oops, I just noticed that some Austrian monk did that calculation
already some 150 years ago. I guess it must have escaped peoples'
notice until now.
Rolf
Apr 26, 2012, 7:43:41 AM4/26/12
to
Richard Norman wrote:
> The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
> allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
> father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
> that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
> is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
> genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
>
> I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria, cured virus
> diseases not to mention cancer, and eliminated pesticide resistant
> insects. Now the medical profession, hitherto brainwashed into
> innocently harming millions of people, can return to healing. I have
> already made reservations in Oslo for the December ceremony to pick up
> my award.
>
Oh, the Nobel Peace price for what?
> The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
> allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
> father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
> that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
> is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
> genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
>
> I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria, cured virus
> diseases not to mention cancer, and eliminated pesticide resistant
> insects. Now the medical profession, hitherto brainwashed into
> innocently harming millions of people, can return to healing. I have
> already made reservations in Oslo for the December ceremony to pick up
> my award.
>
Richard Norman
Apr 26, 2012, 11:49:28 AM4/26/12
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:43:41 +0200, "Rolf" <rolf.a...@tele2.no>
wrote:
Perhaps I meant Stockholm. But I have now also made reservations in
Oslo for restoring sense and order to talk.origins, a task far more
odiferous than clearing the Augean stables.
wrote:
Oslo for restoring sense and order to talk.origins, a task far more
odiferous than clearing the Augean stables.
*Hemidactylus*
Apr 26, 2012, 6:35:12 PM4/26/12
to
selection phenomenon thus we have we have multidrug resistant microbes,
multiherbicide resistant weeds, multipesticide resistant insects and
less than durable cancer treatments. Good job!
--
*Hemidactylus*
Richard Norman
Apr 26, 2012, 6:48:34 PM4/26/12
to
There, I have now covered the entire subject far more thoroughly and
far more rigorously than the good double doctor ever has done.
Friar Broccoli
Apr 26, 2012, 9:32:12 PM4/26/12
to
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:24:45 -0700, Richard Norman
<r_s_n...@comcast.net> wrote:
>The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
>allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
>father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
>that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
>is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
>genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
>
>I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria, cured virus
>diseases not to mention cancer, and eliminated pesticide resistant
>insects.
I presume you have realized that if we just leave the bugs alone, then
<r_s_n...@comcast.net> wrote:
>The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
>allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
>father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
>that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
>is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
>genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
>
>I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria, cured virus
>diseases not to mention cancer, and eliminated pesticide resistant
>insects.
each generation the unwanted characteristics will drop by 3/4's, and
then quickly disappear.
I have the following questions:
1) How do you propose to convince bacteria and viruses to reproduce
sexually?
2) If "p" be the probability of a beneficial mutation where should I
place my "q"?
--
Friar Broccoli (Robert Keith Elias), Quebec Canada
I consider ALL arguments in support of my views
wiki trix
Apr 26, 2012, 9:49:36 PM4/26/12
to
On Apr 26, 9:32 pm, Friar Broccoli <elia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:24:45 -0700, Richard Norman
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:24:45 -0700, Richard Norman
>
> <r_s_nor...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
> >allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
> >father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
> >that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
> >is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
> >genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
>
> >I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria, cured virus
> >diseases not to mention cancer, and eliminated pesticide resistant
> >insects.
>
> I presume you have realized that if we just leave the bugs alone, then
> each generation the unwanted characteristics will drop by 3/4's, and
> then quickly disappear.
>
> I have the following questions:
>
> 1) How do you propose to convince bacteria and viruses to reproduce
> sexually?
Does Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (constant allele frequencies) apply to
> >The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
> >allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
> >father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
> >that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
> >is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
> >genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
>
> >I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria, cured virus
> >diseases not to mention cancer, and eliminated pesticide resistant
> >insects.
>
> I presume you have realized that if we just leave the bugs alone, then
> each generation the unwanted characteristics will drop by 3/4's, and
> then quickly disappear.
>
> I have the following questions:
>
> 1) How do you propose to convince bacteria and viruses to reproduce
> sexually?
conjugation?
> 2) If "p" be the probability of a beneficial mutation where should I
> place my "q"?
it.
jillery
Apr 27, 2012, 12:37:45 AM4/27/12
to
Richard Norman
Apr 27, 2012, 12:45:51 AM4/27/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:37:45 -0400, jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
The rational numbers don't form a continuum. And if you allow
irrationality into the theory of evolution we are right back in that
4000+ post quagmire.
wrote:
irrationality into the theory of evolution we are right back in that
4000+ post quagmire.
jillery
Apr 27, 2012, 1:08:13 AM4/27/12
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:45:51 -0700, Richard Norman
Not "a" continuum. THE Continuum, specifically the Q Continuum, from
Star Trek.
Star Trek.
Friar Broccoli
Apr 27, 2012, 7:13:37 AM4/27/12
to
made up. So now I discover that it was some of them who started life
here on earth. So Dr. Dr. was right all along!
All I had to do was ask, and it was revealed unto me !!
jillery
Apr 27, 2012, 12:01:27 PM4/27/12
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:13:37 -0400, Friar Broccoli <eli...@gmail.com>
invitation.
>>Not "a" continuum. THE Continuum, specifically the Q Continuum, from
>>Star Trek.
>
>I always thought the characters on Star Trek were too real to have been
>made up. So now I discover that it was some of them who started life
>here on earth. So Dr. Dr. was right all along!
>
>All I had to do was ask, and it was revealed unto me !!
That was the polite answer. Asking where to put things is an open
>>Star Trek.
>
>I always thought the characters on Star Trek were too real to have been
>made up. So now I discover that it was some of them who started life
>here on earth. So Dr. Dr. was right all along!
>
>All I had to do was ask, and it was revealed unto me !!
invitation.
hersheyh
Apr 28, 2012, 12:34:03 PM4/28/12
to
"mutant-of-interest" and "not-mutant-of-interest". We are dealing with
the more complex problem where we have mutation to any of 4 possible
bases, only one of which produces the "mutant-of-interest". That is not
a binary distinction because there are 4 possible alleles to consider. ;-)
hersheyh
Apr 28, 2012, 12:30:43 PM4/28/12
to
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:24:45 AM UTC-4, Richard Norman wrote:
> The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
> allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
> father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
> that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
> is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
> genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
>
> I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria,
Except for the minor nitpick that bacterial genetics is called
> The probability of a heterozygote mother contributing a recessive
> allele to her child is 1/2. The probability of her heterozygote
> father also contributing a recessive allele is 1/2. The probability
> that the child will be homozygous recessive is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4. That
> is the application of the law of multiplication of probabilities to
> genetics and hence explains evolution properly.
>
> I have now solved the problem of drug resistant bacteria,
non-Mendelian for a reason.
> cured virus
> diseases not to mention cancer,
> and eliminated pesticide resistant
> insects. Now the medical profession, hitherto brainwashed into
> innocently harming millions of people, can return to healing. I have
> already made reservations in Oslo for the December ceremony to pick up
> my award.
>
> Oops, I just noticed that some Austrian monk did that calculation
> already some 150 years ago. I guess it must have escaped peoples'
> notice until now.
Friar Broccoli
Apr 28, 2012, 12:48:52 PM4/28/12
to
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:34:03 -0700 (PDT), hersheyh <hers...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
So now Dr. Dr. can accuse evolutionists of believing that 1=0.25. Will
our humiliation at the hands of this master wordsmith ever end?
wrote:
our humiliation at the hands of this master wordsmith ever end?
Richard Norman
Apr 28, 2012, 1:27:23 PM4/28/12
to
than has yet been demonstrated by the double degreed party in
question. I have also demonstrated the application of the law of
multiplication of probabilities which, by a simple extension,
demonstrates that reptiles can turn into birds through mutation and
selection, not to mention a few other little processes. The
application to bacterial genetics is left as an exercise for the
student. An alert student will no doubt have already noticed an
abundance of such applications and derivations in this news group.
0 new messages