#### Usenet Emergency Broadcast ####
All-seeing-I
###################################
Release effective Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
#### ATTENTION LURKERS ####
**** ATTENTION MEMBERS *****
#################################
This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
I repeat
This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
dated Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
##################################
THE FOLLOWING IS A RECOMMENDED
UPDATE FOR YOUR KILL-FILE LIST
It is recommended that you
amend your kill file
Immediately!
___________________________
The Following People are KNOWN
to post spam and unrelated off topic
posts to the newsgroup:
TALK ORIGINS
____________________________
KingOfTheApes <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com>
ComandanteBanana <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com>
Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com>
____________________________
ADDITIONAL NOTES:
1)THIS IS AN ADDENDUM.
2)THIS IS NOT A COMPLETE
KILL FILE LIST
Release effective Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
###################################
We return you to your
regularly scheduled topics
UEBS
Usenet Emergency Broadcast System
EOF
Caranx latus
<snip everything>
I guess you haven't had enough attention lately. Here, have some.
Inez
You're funny, but not in the way you think.
John Wilkins
<f8aa01aa-163f-4c96...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, Inez
<savagem...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2:36�pm, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> > [beep....beeep....beeeeep]
...
>
> You're funny, but not in the way you think.
>
As in "turned while in the fridge"?
spintronic
>
> - Show quoted text -
Could you 2 get a room? (LOL)
Seriously though. I don't get KoTA, Or banamanman either?
Although I beleive they are either the same person, or from a group
they both belong to.
I don't get their hate. I don't get their venom.
Although, I wish they would explain their motives, to see if they are
ulterior.
heekster
<ap...@email.com> wrote:
<snip>
What an attention whore you are.
Sapient Fridge
<jo...@wilkins.id.au> writes
I'd rather you didn't spread such rumours.
--
sapient_...@spamsights.org ICQ #17887309 * Save the net *
Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer *
Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today *
Kill: http://mail-abuse.com http://au.sorbs.net http://spamhaus.org
All-Seeing-I
So says the fish that replys to my posts for weeks seeking attention.
Did you mean like that?
[wink]
All-Seeing-I
You sir, have no sense of humor.
All-Seeing-I
>
> - Show quoted text -
Alt.Atheism must be boring lately.
spintronic
>
> - Show quoted text -
Call me paranoid.
But google highlights users with a colour code per page.
The OP "All seeing I" was green, you are purple.
Either you are;
1) different people,
2) Someone is forging
3) google made a mistake.
I don't believe 3.
spintronic
>
> - Show quoted text -
My mistake. But your headers do show different e-mails.
From: All-Seeing-I <allseei...@usa.com>
From: All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com>
But I use 2 different acounts because google limits post counts, so
I'm not moaning.
Sorry.
All-Seeing-I
>
> - Show quoted text -
I simply have 2 different email addys with the same NYM spinny
Free Lunch
<allse...@usa.com> wrote in talk.origins:
Says a poster with a long history of lying to us.
Caranx latus
What's that? You need more attention, you say? Sure. Here you go.
heekster
There goes another gross of irony meters...
All-Seeing-I
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:05:50 -0700 (PDT), All-Seeing-I
>
> >On Oct 30, 5:04 pm, heekster <heeks...@ifiwxtc.net> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:36:54 -0700 (PDT), Addled-screeeding-Idiot
>
> >> <ap...@email.com> wrote:
>
> >> <snip>
>
> >> What an attention whore you are.
>
> >You sir, have no sense of humor.
>
> Says a poster with a long history of lying to us.
Oh great. Another evolutionist with no sense of humor...
Boikat
> [beep....beeep....beeeeep]
> ###################################
>
> Release effective Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
> This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
>
> #### ATTENTION LURKERS ####
>
> **** ATTENTION MEMBERS *****
>
> #################################
> This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
> I repeat
> This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
> dated Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
> ##################################
>
> THE FOLLOWING IS A RECOMMENDED
> UPDATE FOR YOUR KILL-FILE LIST
>
> It is recommended that you
> amend your kill file
> Immediately!
> ___________________________
>
> The Following People are KNOWN
> to post spam and unrelated off topic
> posts to the newsgroup:
>
> TALK ORIGINS
> ____________________________
>
>
> ____________________________
>
> ADDITIONAL NOTES:
>
> 1)THIS IS AN ADDENDUM.
> 2)THIS IS NOT A COMPLETE
> KILL FILE LIST
>
> Release effective Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
> This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
> ###################################
>
> We return you to your
> regularly scheduled topics
>
> UEBS
> Usenet Emergency Broadcast System
>
> EOF
I corrected your list.
Boikat
Caranx latus
On the contrary. We *all* found the idea of mammalian trilobites from
the Cambrian hilarious.
All-Seeing-I
drives his computer while drinking
>
> > ____________________________
>
> > ADDITIONAL NOTES:
>
> > 1)THIS IS AN ADDENDUM.
> > 2)THIS IS NOT A COMPLETE
> > KILL FILE LIST
>
> > Release effective Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
> > This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
> > ###################################
>
> > We return you to your
> > regularly scheduled topics
>
> > UEBS
> > Usenet Emergency Broadcast System
>
> > EOF
>
> I corrected your list.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
final update
All-Seeing-I
As James Kirk would say: That's the "trouble with trilobites"
VoiceOfReason
wrote:
> In message <301020091755495646%j...@wilkins.id.au>, John Wilkins
> <j...@wilkins.id.au> writes
>
> >In article
> ><f8aa01aa-163f-4c96-a43a-90fe6d207...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, Inez
> ><savagemouse...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Oct 30, 2:36 pm, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> >> > [beep....beeep....beeeeep]
> >...
>
> >> You're funny, but not in the way you think.
>
> >As in "turned while in the fridge"?
>
> I'd rather you didn't spread such rumours.
The atmosphere here is going sour.
Caranx latus
A sense of humor is always useful. What I don't understand is what
prompted you to make the claim in the first place. Any thoughts?
Boikat
Sorry, Mr. Cambrian Mammal = Triolobite, that would be you, mkay?
Boikat
All-seeing-I
>
> - Show quoted text -
Are you growing a sence of humor?
or is that peach fuzz on your brain
All-seeing-I
>
> - Show quoted text -
can you be more specific?
Ye Old One
No, he seems incapable of thoughts.
--
Bob.
Boikat
He had a thought once, and promptly killed it because it conflicted
with something he read in an ancient text.
Boikat
Caranx latus
I can, but it puzzles me that I should need to. Although I'm aware that
you have since acknowledged the error, why did you originally claim that
trilobites were examples of Cambrian mammals?
All-seeing-I
>
> - Show quoted text -
oh lookie here!
My two favorite k0oks sniffing each others BUTTS!
RAM
I didn't know Nashton was in this thread.
Boikat
Oh look! It's Mr. Cambrian Mammal = Trilobite! And he's trying to be
clever again. Isn't that cute?
So, just to change the subject, the mammal thing was too much for you
to handle, so how abut a more "primitive" form? Care to provide an
example of a Cambrian reptile?
Boikat
Boikat
>
> Are you growing a sence of humor?
With clowns like you, spinny, nashton, and other assorted twits
posting here, it's unavoidable, since you cretinoids are jokes.
>
> or is that peach fuzz on your brain
Sorry, if anyone has any "fuzz" groing on their brain, it would be you
and your mental peer group of slobbering and drooling cretinoid
twits.
Boikat
Kermit
> [beep....beeep....beeeeep]
> ###################################
>
> Release effective Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
> This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
>
> #### ATTENTION LURKERS ####
>
> **** ATTENTION MEMBERS *****
>
> #################################
> This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
> I repeat
> This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
> dated Friday 10.30.09 421p cst
> ##################################
>
> THE FOLLOWING IS A RECOMMENDED
> UPDATE FOR YOUR KILL-FILE LIST
>
> It is recommended that you
> amend your kill file
> Immediately!
> ___________________________
>
> The Following People are KNOWN
> to post spam and unrelated off topic
> posts to the newsgroup:
>
> TALK ORIGINS
> ____________________________
>
>
> ComandanteBanana <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com>
>
> Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com>
>
>
> ADDITIONAL NOTES:
>
> 1)THIS IS AN ADDENDUM.
> 2)THIS IS NOT A COMPLETE
> KILL FILE LIST
>
> This is a Usenet emergency broadcast
>
> We return you to your
> regularly scheduled topics
>
> UEBS
> Usenet Emergency Broadcast System
>
> EOF
Why Great Dayne?
He says he's the president of the USA, and has a direct line to God's
intentions. He is an enemy to mainstream science, especially
evolutionary science.
Why would you doubt someone who make s claims as important as this,
simply because the has no supporting evidence, and can be more easily
explained by brain pathology?
Kermit
All-seeing-I
Have you been sniffing fertilizer?
It's not good for ya pal.
Boikat
Because Null Thinking I(diot) feels his perch on top of Troll Mountain
is threatened by someone who's just as insane as he is.
>
> Why would you doubt someone who make s claims as important as this,
> simply because the has no supporting evidence, and can be more easily
> explained by brain pathology?
You forget, in his first incarnation as (M)adman, Mr. Cambrian mammal
- trilobite also claimed he had God's Ear, and as everyone know, there
can only be One True(TM) Prophet!
Boikat
Boikat
Evasion noted. Admit it: You feel that your status as "uber troll"
is being threatened, and you can't cope with it. Especially since
your competition also claims to have God's Ear, as you did,
frequently, as (M)adman.
So, how does this sound: Youtwo "prophets", ahve a "Smite Off".
That's right, tell your god thinky to smite the crap out of the
other. That'll settle things once and for all, right, Mr. Cambrian
Mammal = Trilobite?
Boikat
All-Seeing-I
It was an classic case of "open mouth, insert foot" before doing
proper research.
Wasn't that obvious?
It was very funny though. I even laughed at myself.
But after 6 months any joke will get old to those that undersatand
exactly how to have a sense of humor. But, [sigh], as you can see,
some of my favoriets here on T.O. obviously do not understand how
humor works.
Hence ye`ole phrase "He pounds a joke into the ground"
All-Seeing-I
[chuckle]
Obviously YOU do not have a full grasp of how this humor thingy works
Boipussy
Why do you think comedians change up their material?
So it will not get stale of course.
You are one stale cat.
Stale:
1. Having lost freshness, effervescence, or palatability: stale bread;
stale air.
2. Lacking originality or spontaneity: a stale joke.
3. Impaired in efficacy, vigor, or spirit, as from inactivity or
boredom.
4. Law Having lost effectiveness or force through lack of exercise or
action
You are numbers 1 and 2 and 3 while your joke is number 2.
THAT is funny
Boikat
Sorry, projection on your part, again, assboy.
>
> Why do you think comedians change up their material?
Irrelevent to the question, low-brow.
>
> So it will not get stale of course.
But some jokes go on and on, and are still funny, Mr. Cambrian mammal
= trilobite. The reason that one is so funny, and stays funny, is
because you are an arrogant prick.
>
> You are one stale cat.
Better a stale cat than a drooling idiot.
>
> Stale:
> 1. Having lost freshness, effervescence, or palatability: stale bread;
> stale air.
> 2. Lacking originality or spontaneity: a stale joke.
> 3. Impaired in efficacy, vigor, or spirit, as from inactivity or
> boredom.
> 4. Law Having lost effectiveness or force through lack of exercise or
> action
>
> You are numbers 1 and 2 and 3
Actually, they do not apply.
>while your joke is number 2.
Nope. Wrong again. *You* may find getting your nose rubbed into your
stupidity to be tiresome, but you should be used to that by now.
>
> THAT is funny-
And you are still a stupid troll, Mr. Cambrian Mammal = Trilobite.
Now, how about giving an example of a cambrian reptile? Or is there
some magical reason that you cannot?
Boikat
Boikat
The fact that you would have even had to "research" is telling, when
it comes to "trilobites" and "mammals".
>
> Wasn't that obvious?
As obvious as the point on you little pointy head.
>
> It was very funny though. I even laughed at myself.
>
> But after 6 months any joke will get old to those that undersatand
> exactly how to have a sense of humor. But, [sigh], as you can see,
> some of my favoriets here on T.O. obviously do not understand how
> humor works.
No, some jokes never get old.
>
> Hence ye`ole phrase "He pounds a joke into the ground"-
So, how about demonstrating your research powers and citing an example
of a Cambrian *reptile*, Mr. Cambrian Mammal = Trilobite?
If you cannot, why not?
Boikat
Ye Old One
So how do you explain your stupidity?
Madman (aka Mudbrain) is on record as claiming:-
That 3.5% actually means 25%...
That the actor Paul Newman was a creationist...
That "Dr." Kent Hovind has made lots of *scientific* discoveries...
That wars have been fought because some scientific finding discredited
some facet of some religion...
To have a "higher education" than most posters to this news group...
To understand how geologists determine the age of any given sample of
rock...
That trilobites were Cambrian mammals... [that one still makes me
laugh]
And that he has "created genes" and not evolved ape genes...
That linguists have traced all the world's languages to the Middle
East region and back to around the same time as the bible claims Noah
and his sons rebuilt mankind.
Claimed that talk.origin's moderator was a troll.
Claimed cigarettes do not cause cancer.
Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
Certainly I don't.
--
Bob.
Ye Old One
Talking of butts, still looking for the evidence that Kent 'I bought
my degree' Hovind made many scientific discoveries.
You will have a very hard job finding one Mudbrain. Tell you what
Muddy, you stop posting until you can document one of his discoveries,
and when you provide a cite to a peer reviewed publication on it the I
will stop posting my list of stupid claims you made.
Go on, go for it.
Ye Old One
We see it from you all the time Mudbrain.
>
>Wasn't that obvious?
>
>It was very funny though. I even laughed at myself.
>
>But after 6 months any joke will get old to those that undersatand
>exactly how to have a sense of humor. But, [sigh], as you can see,
>some of my favoriets here on T.O. obviously do not understand how
>humor works.
>
>Hence ye`ole phrase "He pounds a joke into the ground"
You are the joke.
--
Bob.
You are depriving a village somewhere of an idiot.
Reddfrogg
Is that how you get your special "perception"?
>
> It's not good for ya pal.
You don't seem to grasp Kermit's point. Dayne claims to have a
special perception about the world, in which he's president. How is
that any different from your own perception that you know what those
"ancient texts" really mean?
DJT
heekster
There, you did it again. The fact that you would need to research
this, shows your fundamental ignorance about what you are talking
about.
This is no joke.
>Wasn't that obvious?
>
Only your post hoc back-pedaling, and mealy-mouthed rationalization is
obvious.
>It was very funny though. I even laughed at myself.
>
No shortage of things to be laughed at there.
Sapient Fridge
<5ccf5051-69fc-4b39...@15g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>,
All-Seeing-I <allse...@usa.com> writes
Adman, you don't research *anything* regarding science or evolution
theory before you post. That's why you end up your feet permanently in
your gob, most of the time you don't realise it though.
--
sapient_...@spamsights.org ICQ #17887309 * Save the net *
Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer *
Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today *
Kill: http://mail-abuse.com http://au.sorbs.net http://spamhaus.org
Ye Old One
He is funny ha-ha. You are just funny peculiar.
Caranx latus
> On Oct 30, 8:06 pm, Caranx latus <kar...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
<snip>
>>>>>> On the contrary. We *all* found the idea of mammalian trilobites from
>>>>>> the Cambrian hilarious.
>>>>> As James Kirk would say: That's the "trouble with trilobites"
>>>> A sense of humor is always useful. What I don't understand is what
>>>> prompted you to make the claim in the first place. Any thoughts?
>>> can you be more specific?
>> I can, but it puzzles me that I should need to. Although I'm aware that
>> you have since acknowledged the error, why did you originally claim that
>> trilobites were examples of Cambrian mammals?
>
> It was an classic case of "open mouth, insert foot" before doing
> proper research.
Don't you think that the majority of the posts that you make here
deserve that consideration? If you did even a small amount of research
before posting a URL as a 'proof against evolution', you'd be able to
spot the errors of fact that those web pages always seem to have.
> Wasn't that obvious?
>
> It was very funny though. I even laughed at myself.
>
> But after 6 months any joke will get old to those that undersatand
> exactly how to have a sense of humor. But, [sigh], as you can see,
> some of my favoriets here on T.O. obviously do not understand how
> humor works.
Old jokes survive precisely because they are funny. For example:
Take my trilobite... please.
Well, I'm not much of a joke teller. Perhaps I shouldn't ad lib.
Reddfrogg
Which is even a more lame excuse when you brag about your "research
skills"
DJT
All-seeing-I
All-seeing-I
wrote:
> In message
> <5ccf5051-69fc-4b39-89be-059cd633e...@15g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>,
> All-Seeing-I <allseei...@usa.com> writes
Incorrect kook.
Your problem is that I do check up on what is being said here. Guess
what. There is not a single shred of real hard evidence for the silly
notion of molecules to man using a chain of events as outlined by the
modern theory of evolution.
The ToE is inconclusive, it is incomplete and it does not reconcile
with the other processes on this planet. Beyond variation within the
same kind of life you got nothing but a fanciful pipe dream that takes
a suspension of disbelief that is second to none. The funny part is,
variation was observed 3500 years ago and written it about in books
such as the bible. No science needed.
Now, I had a somewhat favorable opinion of evolution before I began
reading Talk Origins. Not anymore. Now it has become clear that real
science has been influenced by an atheistic agenda to the point that
it has become unrecognizable in the media from the science of a mere
30 years ago.
Fact truth. Your ToE is nothing more then a "fad belief". Just like it
was originally a fad belief in France when the rich elite made
Darwin's book popular because they were bored with the Catholic Church
and all of it's oppressive rules. Which is basically the same reason
it is a fad belief today.
wf3h
> On Nov 1, 3:06 pm, Sapient Fridge <use_reply_addr...@spamsights.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Adman, you don't research *anything* regarding science or evolution
> > theory before you post. That's why you end up your feet permanently in
> > your gob, most of the time you don't realise it though.
>
> Incorrect kook.
>
> Your problem is that I do check up on what is being said here. Guess
> what. There is not a single shred of real hard evidence for the silly
> notion of molecules to man using a chain of events as outlined by the
> modern theory of evolution.
are you a chemist? i am. and you're wrong. the evidence is in genetics
which is TESTABLE in a lab.
you createionists, locked into your 2000 year old worldview, can't
understand modern science so you ignore it. it's a reason your ideas
are a failure.
>
> The ToE is inconclusive, it is incomplete and it does not reconcile
> with the other processes on this planet.
we chemists don't think so. the physicists don't think so. who are YOU
to tell us what's wrong when YOUR view of nature is CLEARLY a failure?
Beyond variation within the
> same kind of life you got nothing but a fanciful pipe dream that takes
> a suspension of disbelief that is second to none. The funny part is,
> variation was observed 3500 years ago and written it about in books
> such as the bible. No science needed.
that kind of says it all: 'no science needed'. so you toss out
science.
which is why creationsits cant even tell us why a rock falls from a
cliff let alone the development of life
>
> Now, I had a somewhat favorable opinion of evolution before I began
> reading Talk Origins. Not anymore. Now it has become clear that real
> science has been influenced by an atheistic agenda to the point that
> it has become unrecognizable in the media from the science of a mere
> 30 years ago.
except, of course, most scientists are believers in god. seems
creationists are so paranoid about science that they consider OTHER
christians to be atheists.
ANOTHER failure of creationism
>
> Fact truth. Your ToE is nothing more then a "fad belief".
fact: no scientist agrees with this. fact: you have to invent a
paranoid view of science to make your view work. fact: you have to be
paranoid about religion to make your view work
fact: your view is a failure
Just like it
> was originally a fad belief in France when the rich elite made
> Darwin's book popular because they were bored with the Catholic Church
> and all of it's oppressive rules. Which is basically the same reason
> it is a fad belief today.-
then why does the pope accept it?
oh. ANOTHER failure for your explanation
Sapient Fridge
<c991f6eb-2b76-40ab...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> writes
Actually there is rather a lot of evidence and thousands upon thousands
of science papers discussing it. You only think there isn't any
evidence because you refuse to read about it.
A couple of books on the evidence that you assert does not exist:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Genesis-Scientific-Quest-Lifes-Origins/dp/0309094321
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Your-Inner-Fish-Discovery-375-Million-Year-Old/dp/0141027584
I could go on but I know that it's pointless as you won't read them.
>The ToE is inconclusive, it is incomplete and it does not reconcile
>with the other processes on this planet.
Provide evidence for that statement. You can't can you? Even though
you have spent two years desperately searching.
<further unsupported assertions snipped>
Ye Old One
Why do you feel the need to lie so much?
[snip more lies.]
--
Bob.
People may not always remember exactly what you said, but they will
always remember just how bright you made them feel.
All-seeing-I
You are not a "chemist" but you are a freak of nature.
All-seeing-I
wrote:
>
> <further unsupported assertions snipped>
Evasion noted by removing what you cannot address
RAM
I see that in this thread you are in a pissing contest and urine all
wet. Gets some towels and dry yourself off and get that Bible out and
read it for some more "just so" quotes to make yourself feel better.
HTH
Dan Listermann
"All-seeing-I" <ap...@email.com> wrote in message
news:c991f6eb-2b76-40ab...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 1, 3:06 pm, Sapient Fridge <use_reply_addr...@spamsights.org>
"The ToE is inconclusive,"
And your "Theory of Creation" is? You can't even describe what happened
beyond "it did!"
.
Boikat
> Hence ye`ole phrase "He pounds a joke into the ground
Where as you simpley pound your pud.
Boikat
Boikat
Even lamer, when you consider he ctually strte a thread in an attempt
to defend "Cambrian mammal = Trilobite". I still snicker when I think
about his post where he said "With all those species of trilobites,
surely one of them evolved into a mammal" or something to that
effect.
Boikat
wf3h
according to creationists, 'nature' doesn't exist. only magic.
Sapient Fridge
<defd0b08-b063-4453...@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> writes
Saying that your assertions are unsupported is enough.
If you want me to comment on your evidence then you will have to produce
some.
Ye Old One
<ap...@email.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
Cries Mudbrain looking in the mirror again.
--
Bob.
If brains were taxed, you would get a rebate.
johnetho...@yahoo.com
Translation: Someone has provided evidence that goes against what I
claim. I could to the following:
Respond with evidence of my own. I can't do that because I don't have
any.
Admit that I was incorrect. I won't do that because I'm too dishonest.
Hurl stupid insults while saying nothing about the subject. That
sounds good to me.
Free Lunch
All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote in
<c991f6eb-2b76-40ab...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>:
Your lie is noted.
Your ignorance is noted.
Your pride in your ignorance is noted.
Your pride in your ignorance of science is amazing.
>The ToE is inconclusive, it is incomplete and it does not reconcile
>with the other processes on this planet. Beyond variation within the
>same kind of life you got nothing but a fanciful pipe dream that takes
>a suspension of disbelief that is second to none. The funny part is,
>variation was observed 3500 years ago and written it about in books
>such as the bible. No science needed.
>
>Now, I had a somewhat favorable opinion of evolution before I began
>reading Talk Origins. Not anymore. Now it has become clear that real
>science has been influenced by an atheistic agenda to the point that
>it has become unrecognizable in the media from the science of a mere
>30 years ago.
>
>Fact truth. Your ToE is nothing more then a "fad belief". Just like it
>was originally a fad belief in France when the rich elite made
>Darwin's book popular because they were bored with the Catholic Church
>and all of it's oppressive rules. Which is basically the same reason
>it is a fad belief today.
Thank you for providing yet more evidence that your religion is false.
Boikat
You are a liar.
>
> The ToE is inconclusive, it is incomplete and it does not reconcile
> with the other processes on this planet. Beyond variation within the
> same kind of life you got nothing but a fanciful pipe dream that takes
> a suspension of disbelief that is second to none. The funny part is,
> variation was observed 3500 years ago and written it about in books
> such as the bible. No science needed.
Your ignorance, noted.
>
> Now, I had a somewhat favorable opinion of evolution before I began
> reading Talk Origins. Not anymore. Now it has become clear that real
> science has been influenced by an atheistic agenda to the point that
> it has become unrecognizable in the media from the science of a mere
> 30 years ago.
Liar.
>
> Fact truth. Your ToE is nothing more then a "fad belief". Just like it
> was originally a fad belief in France when the rich elite made
> Darwin's book popular because they were bored with the Catholic Church
> and all of it's oppressive rules. Which is basically the same reason
> it is a fad belief today.- Hide quoted text -
Your ignorance is once again noted.
Grow up, fool.
Boikat