Science marches on.
Nashton
Science in the service of mankind.
OTOH, the ToE remains at the sidelines, useless as ever, content to
fulfill its role as a world view stop gap between real science and Atheism.
And the brainless mob that doesn't know the first thing about science,
goes on with their hissy-fits, displays of arrogance and nonsense.
Too funny.
R Brown
"Nashton" <na...@na.ca> wrote in message
news:huqfmo$g33$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
It's discovery was inevitable: there is no way it could not have happened.
It looks like you creationists will just have to take the good with the bad.
Go ahead and paint yourselves blue while you scream and dance around the
fire (ie: practice your religion), but don't forget getting a colonoscopy.
Too hypocritical.
Boikat
> New developments in cancer research, environment, health.
> Science in the service of mankind.
>
> OTOH, the ToE remains at the sidelines,
Unless you're interested in reality.
> useless as ever,
Like you?
> content to
> fulfill its role as a world view stop gap between real science and Atheism.
Meaningless blather.
> And the brainless mob that doesn't know the first thing about science,
Like you?
> goes on with their hissy-fits, displays of arrogance and nonsense.
Like you?
>
> Too funny.
Also, like you.
I sense a lot of projetion.
Boikat
g...@risky-biz.com
Every once in a while you trot out this same bit. Each time, after the
briefest search, I find another article that directly contradicts your
claim, as you could, if you cared to educate yourself.
http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Nov07/Siepel.newgenes.ws.html
But even if there were no current applications of the theory, your
position would still be wrong. How many useful technologies would
never have been discovered without seemingly "useless" basic research?
My current favorite is the research into "quorum sensing", the
chemical signals by which bacteria sense that they are in sufficient
numbers to "attack" a host and cause disease. Some of the original
research involved figuring out why fluorescent bacteria only "light
up" when they are in sufficient concentration. Why bacteria light up?
What a waste of grant money. Except, it very well may yield new ways
to fight bacterial disease, possibly with less chance of resistance.
Desertphile
> New developments in cancer research, environment, health.
> Science in the service of mankind.
Much of it based upon evolutionary theory.
> OTOH, the ToE remains at the sidelines, useless as ever, content to
> fulfill its role as a world view stop gap between real science
> and Atheism (sic).
Appears Mental.
> And the brainless mob that doesn't know the first thing about science,
> goes on with their hissy-fits, displays of arrogance and nonsense.
Yeah: stop it, we're embarassed for your sake.
> Too funny.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Friar Broccoli
Odd how you consistently make and remake this same irrelevant tertiary
point.
Why do you run from discussing evidence for or against the tree of
descent and other aspects of evolution like the obvious relationship
between all birds or all mammals; the fossil record and so forth.
If your position is correct, why do you fear such discussions?
johnetho...@yahoo.com
No, the ToE remains solid science. It is you who chooses to sit on the
sidelines proclaiming "Reality is wrong and I won't believe it".
bpuharic
>New developments in cancer research, environment, health.
>Science in the service of mankind.
>
>OTOH, the ToE remains at the sidelines, useless as ever,
so he says. sour grapes from the vinegar making creationist
content to
>fulfill its role as a world view stop gap between real science and Atheism.
>And the brainless mob that doesn't know the first thing about science,
>goes on with their hissy-fits, displays of arrogance and nonsense.
and his exposure to science? his science education?
he has none.
>
>Too funny.
Grandbank
Not so fast there, lad. You're forgetting his pioneering work on the
histology of "tooth bone".
KP
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by Nashton <na...@na.ca>:
Trolling again, I see. Enjoy!
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Frank J
Look. Now he's Michael Egnor's sock puppet.
Eric Root
Social skills training didn't work, I see.
Eric Root