Homo Sapien?

[Debra]

HOMO SAPIEN? ~

O! IPSO HE MAN! /
IS HE MAN, POO! /
--
O! SO! HM APE IN! /
O! MOSH APE IN! /
O! SH! APE, M.O., IN! /

O! IS ON HM APE! /
SO! ON HIM APE! /
ON APE, HIS M.O.! /

According to The Edgar Cayce Readings
God directly created the homo sapien body,
or Adam, via a combination of usage of
1.Mental projection; 2. Introgression, or gene
splicing, utilizing the great ape; 3. Local soil
elements. Thus these correct anagrams in
the word itself!

Debra Dee Freeman
A DR DEBEE FREEMAN ~
ERE BE A FREEMAN, DD!

[John Harshman]

On 2/25/13 5:49 PM, Debra wrote:
>
> HOMO SAPIEN? ~

No such word. It's Homo sapiens. The "s" is not a plural.

[Paul J Gans]

Of course it is. There are two of them in sapiens.

--
--- Paul J. Gans

[jillery]

Cute.

[Kermit]

On 25 Feb, 17:49, Debra <dfreem...@live.com> wrote:
> HOMO SAPIEN? ~
>
> O! IPSO HE MAN! /
> IS HE MAN, POO! /
> --
> O! SO! HM APE IN! /
> O! MOSH APE IN! /
> O! SH! APE, M.O., IN! /
>
> O! IS ON HM APE! /
> SO! ON HIM APE! /
> ON APE, HIS M.O.! /
>
> According to The Edgar Cayce Readings
> God directly created the homo sapien body,
> or Adam, via a combination of usage of
> 1.Mental projection; 2. Introgression, or gene
> splicing, utilizing the great ape; 3. Local soil
> elements. Thus these correct anagrams in
> the word itself!

Anagrams are not claims of fact, to be correct or incorrect.

They are trivial and random word play. Like rhyming or alphabetical
order, they have nothing to do with either word meaning nor any truth
to claims of fact.

>
> Debra Dee Freeman
> A DR DEBEE FREEMAN ~
> ERE BE A FREEMAN, DD!

Also, you fail the Turing test.

kermit

[Paul J Gans]

Thank you. <bows>

[Bob Casanova]

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:08:22 +0000 (UTC), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
<gan...@panix.com>:

But it only has to take a "p" once...
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."

- McNameless

[Alan]

"Debra" <dfre...@live.com> wrote in message
news:3b6c4331-a0f8-475e...@k8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

It appears this person(?) also flames the alt.anagrams newsgroup.

DIG - can you chop them out before t.o gets flooded?

Alan

[Mitchell Coffey]

DIG doesn't read most posts, and he likes requests like yours to be made
by email. He does act on emailed requests, if he considers it appropriate.

Mitchell

[Paul J Gans]

Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:08:22 +0000 (UTC), the following
>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
><gan...@panix.com>:

>>John Harshman <jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>On 2/25/13 5:49 PM, Debra wrote:
>>>>
>>>> HOMO SAPIEN? ~
>>
>>>No such word. It's Homo sapiens. The "s" is not a plural.
>>
>>Of course it is. There are two of them in sapiens.

>But it only has to take a "p" once...

Clearly more highly evolved than other species....

[David Iain Greig]

Your idiocy is on seriously limited time.

Just fyi.

--D.

--
david iain greig gr...@ediacara.org
moderator, talk.origins sp4 kox
http://www.ediacara.org/~greig arbor plena alouattarum

[Glenn]

"David Iain Greig" <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote in message news:cabal-kgjjro$jrd$1...@darwin.ediacara.org...

> Debra <dfre...@live.com> wrote:
> >
> > HOMO SAPIEN? ~
> >
> > O! IPSO HE MAN! /
> > IS HE MAN, POO! /
> > --
> > O! SO! HM APE IN! /
> > O! MOSH APE IN! /
> > O! SH! APE, M.O., IN! /
> >
> > O! IS ON HM APE! /
> > SO! ON HIM APE! /
> > ON APE, HIS M.O.! /
> >
> > According to The Edgar Cayce Readings
> > God directly created the homo sapien body,
> > or Adam, via a combination of usage of
> > 1.Mental projection; 2. Introgression, or gene
> > splicing, utilizing the great ape; 3. Local soil
> > elements. Thus these correct anagrams in
> > the word itself!
> >
> > Debra Dee Freeman
> > A DR DEBEE FREEMAN ~
> > ERE BE A FREEMAN, DD!
>
> Your idiocy is on seriously limited time.
>
> Just fyi.
>

You're spoiling for a severe anagramming.

[Earle Jones]

In article <cabal-kgjjro$jrd$1...@darwin.ediacara.org>,

*
DIG:

I don't think that Debbie understands the idea of a monitored newsgroup.
She will not understand your posting. Just fyi.

She drifted to t.o. from alt.anagrams, following me, I suspect.

earle
*

[Bob Casanova]

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:24:49 +0000 (UTC), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
<gan...@panix.com>:

>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:08:22 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>><gan...@panix.com>:
>
>>>John Harshman <jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>>On 2/25/13 5:49 PM, Debra wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> HOMO SAPIEN? ~
>>>
>>>>No such word. It's Homo sapiens. The "s" is not a plural.
>>>
>>>Of course it is. There are two of them in sapiens.
>
>>But it only has to take a "p" once...
>
>Clearly more highly evolved than other species....

But Homo erectus didn't take a "p" at all...

[Paul J Gans]

Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:24:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
><gan...@panix.com>:

>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:08:22 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>>><gan...@panix.com>:
>>
>>>>John Harshman <jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>>>On 2/25/13 5:49 PM, Debra wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HOMO SAPIEN? ~
>>>>
>>>>>No such word. It's Homo sapiens. The "s" is not a plural.
>>>>
>>>>Of course it is. There are two of them in sapiens.
>>
>>>But it only has to take a "p" once...
>>
>>Clearly more highly evolved than other species....

>But Homo erectus didn't take a "p" at all...

And you were wondering why they went extinct?

[Debra]

On Feb 26, 7:26�pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:

> moderator, talk.origins � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � sp4 koxhttp://www.ediacara.org/~greig� � � � � � � �arbor plena alouattarum- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Only a genius can recognize a genius, so I am used to
being misunderstood since most of the population only
have an average intelligence.

But even if you were to take an action against me which
you should not, at least I have already accomplished
what evil stupid lying stalker JEERS GOD? ANAL LOUSE ~
EARLE DOUGLAS JONES has been trying to do here
for who knows how long which is to get someone at
talk.origins interested in anagrams and alt.anagrams.
Witness dav...@agent.com, who has made posts
their recently. Hooray!

Debra Dee Freeman
DEAF E-MAN ERR? E-DEB
E-BADE DEAF MEN ERR
E-BANE DEFAMED, ERR
E-FRAMER E-DEED? BAN
BEEN DARED FRAMEE
BEEN ADDER FRAMEE

[Boikat]

<snip>

You do realize that claim is a common characteristic of a NET.LOON.

Boikat

[Kermit]

> > > moderator, talk.origins sp4 koxhttp://www.ediacara.org/~greigarbor plena alouattarum- Hide quoted text -

>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Only a genius can recognize a genius, so I am used to
> > being misunderstood since most of the population only
> > have an average intelligence.
>
> <snip>
>
> You do realize that claim is a common characteristic of a NET.LOON.
>
> Boikat

I note with amusement that she gives no understanding of what David
said, nor Glenn's comment about it.

It is also a common characteristic of net loons to not understand the
conversations going on around them, much like children at a family
gathering.

kermit

[Earle Jones]

In article
<e1834fa9-7fcc-44e0...@l9g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,

*
Actually, that's the best anagram Debbie has ever come up with!

JEERS GOD? ANAL LOUSE ~ EARLE DOUGLAS JONES

That's pretty good!

I prefer: Earle Douglas Jones = Jealous Songleader
= No red jello sausage

earle
*
DIG: I would probably let her ride it out. She'll drift away
eventually.

ej
*

[Mark Isaak]

On 2/27/13 12:38 PM, Debra wrote:
> [...]

> Only a genius can recognize a genius,

Out of curiosity, what anagramists other than yourself do you regard as
geniuses?

> so I am used to
> being misunderstood since most of the population only
> have an average intelligence.

You are wrong, incidentally, about the ability to recognize genius.
Most people with average intelligence can recognize it. It takes no
intelligence at all, however, to see in oneself genius that is not there.

--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) curioustaxonomy (dot) net
"It is certain, from experience, that the smallest grain of natural
honesty and benevolence has more effect on men's conduct, than the most
pompous views suggested by theological theories and systems." - D. Hume

[Bob Casanova]

On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:55:24 +0000 (UTC), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
<gan...@panix.com>:

>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:24:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>><gan...@panix.com>:
>
>>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:08:22 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>>>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>>>><gan...@panix.com>:
>>>
>>>>>John Harshman <jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>>>>On 2/25/13 5:49 PM, Debra wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HOMO SAPIEN? ~
>>>>>
>>>>>>No such word. It's Homo sapiens. The "s" is not a plural.
>>>>>
>>>>>Of course it is. There are two of them in sapiens.
>>>
>>>>But it only has to take a "p" once...
>>>
>>>Clearly more highly evolved than other species....
>
>>But Homo erectus didn't take a "p" at all...
>
>And you were wondering why they went extinct?

Point; crocogators are no longer around for much the same
reason.

[Bob Casanova]

On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:34:34 -0800, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Mark Isaak
<eci...@curioustax.onomy.net>:

>On 2/27/13 12:38 PM, Debra wrote:
>> [...]
>> Only a genius can recognize a genius,
>
>Out of curiosity, what anagramists other than yourself do you regard as
>geniuses?
>
>> so I am used to
>> being misunderstood since most of the population only
>> have an average intelligence.
>
>You are wrong, incidentally, about the ability to recognize genius.
>Most people with average intelligence can recognize it. It takes no
>intelligence at all, however, to see in oneself genius that is not there.

The opposite, in fact.

[Paul J Gans]

Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:55:24 +0000 (UTC), the following
>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
><gan...@panix.com>:

>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:24:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>>><gan...@panix.com>:
>>
>>>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:08:22 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>>>>appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>>>>><gan...@panix.com>:
>>>>
>>>>>>John Harshman <jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>On 2/25/13 5:49 PM, Debra wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HOMO SAPIEN? ~
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No such word. It's Homo sapiens. The "s" is not a plural.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Of course it is. There are two of them in sapiens.
>>>>
>>>>>But it only has to take a "p" once...
>>>>
>>>>Clearly more highly evolved than other species....
>>
>>>But Homo erectus didn't take a "p" at all...
>>
>>And you were wondering why they went extinct?

>Point; crocogators are no longer around for much the same
>reason.

Old crocogators? Is that a geezer joke? ;-)

[Bob Casanova]

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:05:07 +0000 (UTC), the following

Not exactly. A crocogator has "a big snappin' mouth with
teeth at one end, and a big snappin' mouth with teeth at the
other end". I leave to your imagination what body part this
precludes the existence of... ;-)

[Paul J Gans]

I'll need evidence for that, evidence that is notarized,
published in what I say are reputable journals, by
people I consider worthy of offering opinions.

[Walter Bushell]

In article <ins1j8t2n1k22vi0l...@4ax.com>,

Don't worry the balance is maintained by an opposite animal with tails
at both ends.

--
This space unintentionally left blank.

[Bob Casanova]

On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC), the following

I think I got it from Peter (who exhibits startling similar
characteristics); doesn't that make it beyond reproach?

[Bob Casanova]

On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:53:59 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com>:

....with a concept of "balance" similar to that of "comfort",
when you have one foot in a fire and the other in liquid
nitrogen?

[Paul J Gans]

You had to bring politics into this, didn't you... ;-)

[Paul J Gans]

In that case it certainly is beyond reproach.

[Paul J Gans]

Well, that would make some people hoppy.

[Walter Bushell]

In article <kgtqmv$r72$2...@reader1.panix.com>,

Everytihngs political these days, especially the facts.

[Paul J Gans]

That's because too many people have their own facts.