Chez Watt: Mamel, a definition
John Vreeland
In the category:
Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
or: Not running on all cylinders.
Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
All buildings have a roof but not all buildings have or even need
plumbing.
All cars have tires. But not all cars have 8 cylinder motors.
see?
Louann Miller
ada965...@x6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com:
> In the category:
> Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
> or: Not running on all cylinders.
>
> Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
I share my home with four who don't. But they do all have nipples.
rno...@umich.edu
> John Vreeland <vreej...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:e533a29a-e685-4db6-b097-
> ada965cee...@x6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com:
>
> > In the category:
> > Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
> > or: Not running on all cylinders.
>
> > Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
>
> I share my home with four who don't. But they do all have nipples.
They really do -- just very small.
Paul Ciszek
In article <e533a29a-e685-4db6...@x6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>,
I'm not sure if all of the mispellings are deliberate and satirical,
but all mammals, even monotremes, do in fact have mammary glands.
As someone else has remarked, even male mammals have small, less
developed mammary glands. Humans who are taking hormones in order
to transition from male to female can actually lactate.
--
Please reply to: | "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is
pciszek at panix dot com | indistinguishable from malice."
Autoreply is disabled |
![[M]adman's profile photo](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a/default-user=s40-c)
[M]adman
I declair this to be a _cheezy watt_ and not in the best tradition of the
true /chez watt/
.
Kent Paul Dolan
> John Vreeland wrote:
>> Sounds like a loki to me, but still funny.
>> In the category:
>> Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a
>> mammal.
>> or: Not running on all cylinders.
>> Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in
>> common Chris.
You might want to look up in a dictionary what
"mammal" means, Mr. Stupid to the Bone.
>> All buildings have a roof
So the Coleseum in Rome is not a "building", nor is
any uncovered sports arena?
>> but not all buildings have or even need plumbing.
>> All cars have tires.
Oh really?
Car (Page: 216)
Car (?), n. [OF. car, char, F. cahr, fr. L.
carrus, Wagon: a Celtic word; cf. W. car, Armor.
karr, Ir. & Gael. carr. cf. Chariot.]
1. A small vehicle moved on wheels; usually, one
having but two wheels and drawn by one horse; a
cart.
2. A vehicle adapted to the rails of a railroad.
[U. S.] &hand; In England a railroad passenger
car is called a railway carriage; a freight car
a goods wagon; a platform car a goods truck; a
baggage car a van. But styles of car introduced
into England from America are called cars; as,
tram car. Pullman car. See Train.
3. A chariot of war or of triumph; a vehicle of
splendor, dignity, or solemnity. [Poetic].
The gilded car of day. Milton.
The towering car, the sable steeds. Tennyson.
4. (Astron.) The stars also called Charles's
Wain, the Great Bear, or the Dipper.
The Pleiads, Hyads, and the Northern Car. Dryden.
5. The cage of a lift or elevator.
6. The basket, box, or cage suspended from a
ballon to contain passengers, ballast, etc.
7. A floating perforated box for living fish.
[U. S.] Car coupling, or Car coupler, a shackle
or other device for connecting the cars in a
railway train. [U. S.] -- Dummy car (Railroad),
a car containing its own steam power or
locomotive. -- Freight car (Railrood), a car for
the transportation of merchandise or other
goods. [U. S.] -- Hand car (Railroad), a small
car propelled by hand, used by railroad
laborers, etc. [U. S.] -- Horse car, or Street
car, an ommibus car, draw by horses or other
power upon rails laid in the streets. [U. S.] --
Mcol>Palace car, Drawing-room car, Sleeping car,
Parior caretc. , (Railroad), cars especially
designed and furnished for the comfort of
travelers.
http://machaut.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/WEBSTER.sh?WORD=car
Notice that at the time that was written, "car" was
not a term in use to mean "automobile".
>> But not all cars have 8 cylinder motors.
I'd love to see an 8 cylinder fish box, dolt.
>> see?
> I declair this to be a _cheezy watt_ and not in
> the best tradition of the true /chez watt/
Why not? It highlights the offending author's
combined gross ignorance of science or reality,
adherence to rabid bat shit insane theistic
claptrap, immense deeply fundamental personal
illogic, complete incapacity to write correct
English, and incapacity to construct meaningful
analogies.
Looks like a grand slam to me.
This latter posting is yet another in a long string
of examples of you fetching and whinging about being
Chez Watt-ed when you've been correctly pointed out
to everyone to be an immature bumbling buffoon worthy
of no one's respect or attention, but only of
universal ridicule.
If you don't want to be the target of Chez Watts,
and since you're incapable of writing postings not
deserving them, you need simply to stop trolling
talk.origins with your ludicrous inanities.
xanthian.
mammel => mammal
mamory => mammary
declair => declare
*Hemidactylus*
> In article <e533a29a-e685-4db6-b097-ada965cee...@x6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>,
> John Vreeland <vreej...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Sounds like a loki to me, but still funny.
>
> >In the category:
> > Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
> > or: Not running on all cylinders.
>
> >Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
>
> >All buildings have a roof but not all buildings have or even need
> >plumbing.
>
> >All cars have tires. But not all cars have 8 cylinder motors.
>
> I'm not sure if all of the mispellings are deliberate and satirical,
> but all mammals, even monotremes, do in fact have mammary glands.
> As someone else has remarked, even male mammals have small, less
> developed mammary glands. Humans who are taking hormones in order
> to transition from male to female can actually lactate.
>
Cool. |
rno...@umich.edu
But it sure looks funny at a formal dinner when you have to add cream
to your coffee.
Paul Ciszek
In article <aecca662-b131-470d...@t10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>,
*Hemidactylus* <ecph...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>So if I start taking hormones I don't have to buy milk from a store?
If you don't mind the calcium coming out of your own bones, sure.
Bob Casanova
appeared in talk.origins, posted by "*Hemidactylus*"
<ecph...@hotmail.com>:
Remind me to ask for my coffee black if I stop by some
morning...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by "[M]adman" <ad...@hotmaill.et>:
Declare all you want, but some moron claiming that not all
mammals have mammary glands (which *defines* the designation
"mammal") seems entirely appropriate to me as Chez Watt
material. Sort of like claiming that not all water is H2O.
John S. Wilkins
> On Fri, 29 May 2009 13:28:44 -0500, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by "[M]adman" <ad...@hotmaill.et>:
>
> >John Vreeland wrote:
> >> Sounds like a loki to me, but still funny.
> >>
> >> In the category:
> >> Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
> >> or: Not running on all cylinders.
> >>
> >> Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
> >>
> >> All buildings have a roof but not all buildings have or even need
> >> plumbing.
> >>
> >> All cars have tires. But not all cars have 8 cylinder motors.
> >>
> >> see?
> >
> >I declair this to be a _cheezy watt_ and not in the best tradition of the
> >true /chez watt/
>
> Declare all you want, but some moron claiming that not all
> mammals have mammary glands (which *defines* the designation
> "mammal") seems entirely appropriate to me as Chez Watt
> material. Sort of like claiming that not all water is H2O.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_Earth_thought_experiment
I apologise for my profession in advance.
--
John S. Wilkins, Philosophy, University of Sydney
http://evolvethink.wordpress.com/
But al be that he was a philosophre,
Yet hadde he but litel gold in cofre
rno...@umich.edu
> Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 May 2009 13:28:44 -0500, the following appeared
> > in talk.origins, posted by "[M]adman" <ad...@hotmaill.et>:
>
> > >John Vreeland wrote:
> > >> Sounds like a loki to me, but still funny.
>
> > >> In the category:
> > >> Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
> > >> or: Not running on all cylinders.
>
> > >> Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
>
> > >> All buildings have a roof but not all buildings have or even need
> > >> plumbing.
>
> > >> All cars have tires. But not all cars have 8 cylinder motors.
>
> > >> see?
>
> > >I declair this to be a _cheezy watt_ and not in the best tradition of the
> > >true /chez watt/
>
> > Declare all you want, but some moron claiming that not all
> > mammals have mammary glands (which *defines* the designation
> > "mammal") seems entirely appropriate to me as Chez Watt
> > material. Sort of like claiming that not all water is H2O.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_Earth_thought_experiment
>
> I apologise for my profession in advance.
Putnam, of course, neglected to consider the triplet Earth, identical
in all respects to its two siblings except that on triplet Earth, what
they call 'X' and 'Y' are really just H and what they call Z is really
just O. And, of course, what they call H is really either X or Y and
what ....
So the question becomes, what kind of water do they really have on
triplet Earth? H2O or XYZ?
Rich Mathers
Justin Kruger; David Dunning (1999). "Unskilled and Unaware of It:
How
Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated
Self-
Assessments". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6):
1121–
34
John S. Wilkins
[M]adman
Are those your /self help/ books? That's nice.
[M]adman
> On Fri, 29 May 2009 13:28:44 -0500, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by "[M]adman" <ad...@hotmaill.et>:
>
>> John Vreeland wrote:
>>> Sounds like a loki to me, but still funny.
>>>
>>> In the category:
>>> Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
>>> or: Not running on all cylinders.
>>>
>>> Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
>>>
>>> All buildings have a roof but not all buildings have or even need
>>> plumbing.
>>>
>>> All cars have tires. But not all cars have 8 cylinder motors.
>>>
>>> see?
>>
>> I declair this to be a _cheezy watt_ and not in the best tradition
>> of the true /chez watt/
>
> Declare all you want, but some moron claiming that not all
> mammals have mammary glands (which *defines* the designation
> "mammal") seems entirely appropriate to me as Chez Watt
> material. Sort of like claiming that not all water is H2O.
Can't you read?
I said "In common"
When men grow the same types of mammory glands that women have, get back to
me. They will have the same kind of mammory glands in common then
Chris
1. It's not a book.
2. It's a single article, so the plural form is incorrect.
3. You overestimate your competence when it comes to simple text.
You _desperately_ need to assimilate the message in that article.
Chris
[M]adman
Oh? Care to Qualify that remark?
Boikat
You just did. QED.
Boikat
Chris
Read number 3 again. Slowly, with a dictionary handy.
Chris
John Harshman
and was concerned lest other prisoners find out.
rno...@umich.edu
wrote:
It is not that rare or obscure a thing. I had a palpable lump in my
breast, or at least under the skin near one nipple. My primary care
physician sent me off to the mammography clinic who had a special
afternoon once a week for men. They could see it but not identify it
with a standard mammogram but the ultrasound scan clearly showed it to
be a routine cyst so I didn't have to do the biopsy. I was fully
expecting to go through the whole mastectomy/chemotherapy business.
It then just disappeared on its own.
Bob Casanova
They are the "same type", just as Dolly Parton and Cher have
the "same type". The difference is size and level of
development, which is modifiable using hormone therapy. And
once again, you reveal yourself to be functionally
illiterate regarding anything to do with science in general,
and with biology in particular.
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by jo...@wilkins.id.au (John S.
Wilkins):
>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 29 May 2009 13:28:44 -0500, the following appeared
>> in talk.origins, posted by "[M]adman" <ad...@hotmaill.et>:
>>
>> >John Vreeland wrote:
>> >> Sounds like a loki to me, but still funny.
>> >>
>> >> In the category:
>> >> Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
>> >> or: Not running on all cylinders.
>> >>
>> >> Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
>> >>
>> >> All buildings have a roof but not all buildings have or even need
>> >> plumbing.
>> >>
>> >> All cars have tires. But not all cars have 8 cylinder motors.
>> >>
>> >> see?
>> >
>> >I declair this to be a _cheezy watt_ and not in the best tradition of the
>> >true /chez watt/
>>
>> Declare all you want, but some moron claiming that not all
>> mammals have mammary glands (which *defines* the designation
>> "mammal") seems entirely appropriate to me as Chez Watt
>> material. Sort of like claiming that not all water is H2O.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_Earth_thought_experiment
OK, perhaps I should have qualified my statement with the
addition "...in actual reality."
>I apologise for my profession in advance.
;-)
Walter Bushell
John Harshman <jharshman....@pacbell.net> wrote:
I remember a TV show, where one of the guys commits suicide because he
is mocked for having breasts, it turn out that one of the lo cal plants
is releasing chemicals with feminizing effects.
Oh, yes, do you know that the water supply in most places contains all
sorts of interesting medicines and their metabolites? Some places its so
bad it is a threat to the manhood of the women.
Matt Silberstein
<pr...@panix.com> in <proto-E517FE....@news.panix.com>
wrote:
>In article <mCiVl.8528$Lr6....@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com>,
> John Harshman <jharshman....@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>> rno...@umich.edu wrote:
>> > On May 29, 10:07 am, Louann Miller <louan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> John Vreeland <vreej...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:e533a29a-e685-4db6-b097-
>> >> ada965cee...@x6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com:
>> >>
>> >>> In the category:
>> >>> Mamel: a non-trilobite that may or may not be a mammal.
>> >>> or: Not running on all cylinders.
>> >>> Not all mammels have to have mamory glands in common Chris.
>> >> I share my home with four who don't. But they do all have nipples.
>> >
>> > They really do -- just very small.
>> >
>> This was a plotline on "Oz" once -- one of the inmates got breast cancer
>> and was concerned lest other prisoners find out.
>
>I remember a TV show,
CSI
>where one of the guys commits suicide because he
>is mocked for having breasts, it turn out that one of the lo cal plants
>is releasing chemicals with feminizing effects.
Season 8, Episode 4: The Case of the Cross-Dressing Carp
Original Air Date—18 October 2007
>Oh, yes, do you know that the water supply in most places contains all
>sorts of interesting medicines and their metabolites? Some places its so
>bad it is a threat to the manhood of the women.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Walter Bushell
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPref...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Thanks.
> >Oh, yes, do you know that the water supply in most places contains all
> >sorts of interesting medicines and their metabolites? Some places its so
> >bad it is a threat to the manhood of the women.
Yesterday, I read in one of the current Men's magazines the story of a
man who apparently grew breast from eating soy foods. The went away when
he cut the soy foods and came back when he started eating Ensure -- he
didn't think to read the label. Probably his body was more sensitive to
the soy xenoestrogens, butt.