the American Revolution - Nov 13 2010
Dav Mabu
_______________
atheists, we're gonna cut off your heads...
THE HIGH PRICE OF REVOLUTION
*Hemidactylus*
It's a disgrace that you tarnish Depeche Mode like that. Sad. Very Sad.
--
~it ends here~
*Hemidactylus*
raven1
<uuvio...@gmail.com> wrote:
>pz myers does not exist....
He seems to think otherwise.
John S. Wilkins
Who did I buy a drink for then? An ... an imposter!
--
John S. Wilkins, Philosophy, Bond University
http://evolvingthoughts.net
But al be that he was a philosophre,
Yet hadde he but litel gold in cofre
Mitchell Coffey
> pz myers does not exist....
> _______________
>
>
> atheists, we're gonna cut off your heads...
>
> THE HIGH PRICE OF REVOLUTION
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/xviolatex?feature=mhum
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't it been some years now since
Washington was destroyed?
Jeffrey Turner
Washington keeps getting destroyed over and over again.
Or is that Phoenix? Ah, well.
--Jeff
--
Love consists of overestimating
the differences between one woman
and another. --George Bernard Shaw
LT
> pz myers does not exist....
> _______________
>
>
> atheists, we're gonna cut off your heads...
>
> THE HIGH PRICE OF REVOLUTION
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/xviolatex?feature=mhum
Yes, of course, threaten to behead people because they say things you
don't like.
Hey, FBI? Seems to me you should be looking into this nutjob, Dav
Mabu. Seems keen on beheading people, and this ain't Saudi Arabia.
LT
Walter Bushell
<22b783d5-875b-4cd9...@u8g2000vby.googlegroups.com>,
Mitchell Coffey <m.co...@starpower.net> wrote:
It was sacked about 200 years ago.
--
The Chinese pretend their goods are good and we pretend our money
is good, or is it the reverse?
John S. Wilkins
The FBI and the local police already know of this guy - he's been
reported to them several times. He pops up on various blogs (including
mine) with twenty page screeds. Clearly delusional and schizophrenic.
chris thompson
> raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:43:44 -0800 (PST), Dav Mabu
> > <uuviolat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >pz myers does not exist....
>
> > He seems to think otherwise.
>
> Who did I buy a drink for then? An ... an imposter!
> --
(gulp)
IT WASN'T ME!
Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
> LT <LTfl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 13, 4:43 pm, Dav Mabu <uuviolat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > pz myers does not exist....
> > > _______________
> > >
> > > http://richarddawkins.net/discussions/543672-inhertitance-of-acquired...
> > >
> > > atheists, we're gonna cut off your heads...
> > >
> > > THE HIGH PRICE OF REVOLUTION
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/user/xviolatex?feature=mhum
> >
> > Yes, of course, threaten to behead people because they say things you
> > don't like.
> >
> > Hey, FBI? Seems to me you should be looking into this nutjob, Dav
> > Mabu. Seems keen on beheading people, and this ain't Saudi Arabia.
> >
> The FBI and the local police already know of this guy - he's been
> reported to them several times. He pops up on various blogs (including
> mine) with twenty page screeds. Clearly delusional and schizophrenic.
I reported it to Google, but it's still there, so...
We're told that most schizophrenics actually aren't dangerous, much,
except sometimes to themselves. But I'm gonna guess that the ones
that threaten to cut your head off may fall into the other exception.
chris thompson
> On 11/13/2010 03:43 PM, Dav Mabu wrote:> pz myers does not exist....
> > _______________
>
>
> > atheists, we're gonna cut off your heads...
>
> > THE HIGH PRICE OF REVOLUTION
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/user/xviolatex?feature=mhum
>
> If I'm standing next to fellow god-denier PZ...here's my neck. Chop away.
Um. If anyone tries to chop off my head because I am an atheist,
they're gonna have to get past a big honking rifle and a 12 gauge
shotgun.
For that matter, if anyone tries to chop off YOUR head because you're
an atheist, they're gonna have to get past a big honking rifle and a
12 gauge shotgun.
Fifteen years ago, I could put a .303 round up a flea's ass at 300
meters. My eyesight has gotten worse since then, so they might have to
close to 200 meters.
Chris
John S. Wilkins
Walter Bushell
raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:
According to the philosophy of John Wilkins, which is apparently
accepted by most of the howlers here, "I" is semantic construct required
by the laws of grammar, IIUC. So there is no PZ Myers.
Harvest Dancer
> pz myers does not exist....
> _______________
>
>
> atheists, we're gonna cut off your heads...
>
> THE HIGH PRICE OF REVOLUTION
>
> http://www.youtube.com/user/xviolatex?feature=mhum
Oh gods, he's here too.
Google "David Mabus". He's very well known as a kook in many atheist
circles. He ban him about every 2 - 3 days in one forum I'm in.
Jason Harvestdancer
John S. Wilkins
> In article <hes0e619k50cd4vf9...@4ax.com>,
> raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:43:44 -0800 (PST), Dav Mabu
> > <uuvio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >pz myers does not exist....
> >
> > He seems to think otherwise.
>
>
> According to the philosophy of John Wilkins, which is apparently
> accepted by most of the howlers here, "I" is semantic construct required
> by the laws of grammar, IIUC. So there is no PZ Myers.
No matter what he says to the contrary.
Walter Bushell
jo...@wilkins.id.au (John S. Wilkins) wrote:
> Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <hes0e619k50cd4vf9...@4ax.com>,
> > raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:43:44 -0800 (PST), Dav Mabu
> > > <uuvio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >pz myers does not exist....
> > >
> > > He seems to think otherwise.
> >
> >
> > According to the philosophy of John Wilkins, which is apparently
> > accepted by most of the howlers here, "I" is semantic construct required
> > by the laws of grammar, IIUC. So there is no PZ Myers.
>
> No matter what he says to the contrary.
If he doesn't exist, then clearly he cannot testify. Contrawise, if he
can testify, then he exists.
John S. Wilkins
> In article <1js39gf.wax1qy1sn4umhN%jo...@wilkins.id.au>,
> jo...@wilkins.id.au (John S. Wilkins) wrote:
>
> > Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <hes0e619k50cd4vf9...@4ax.com>,
> > > raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:43:44 -0800 (PST), Dav Mabu
> > > > <uuvio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >pz myers does not exist....
> > > >
> > > > He seems to think otherwise.
> > >
> > >
> > > According to the philosophy of John Wilkins, which is apparently
> > > accepted by most of the howlers here, "I" is semantic construct required
> > > by the laws of grammar, IIUC. So there is no PZ Myers.
> >
> > No matter what he says to the contrary.
>
> If he doesn't exist, then clearly he cannot testify. Contrawise, if he
> can testify, then he exists.
Who said that semantic constructs can't testify? In fact, that's about
*all* they can do.
Walter Bushell
jo...@wilkins.id.au (John S. Wilkins) wrote:
> Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <1js39gf.wax1qy1sn4umhN%jo...@wilkins.id.au>,
> > jo...@wilkins.id.au (John S. Wilkins) wrote:
> >
> > > Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <hes0e619k50cd4vf9...@4ax.com>,
> > > > raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:43:44 -0800 (PST), Dav Mabu
> > > > > <uuvio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >pz myers does not exist....
> > > > >
> > > > > He seems to think otherwise.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > According to the philosophy of John Wilkins, which is apparently
> > > > accepted by most of the howlers here, "I" is semantic construct required
> > > > by the laws of grammar, IIUC. So there is no PZ Myers.
> > >
> > > No matter what he says to the contrary.
> >
> > If he doesn't exist, then clearly he cannot testify. Contrawise, if he
> > can testify, then he exists.
>
> Who said that semantic constructs can't testify? In fact, that's about
> *all* they can do.
Next thing you'll be bringing in the rules of grammar to testify. Seems
they are a lower level of abstraction than semantic constructs.