Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: It Never Happened

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Albert Tatlock

unread,
May 19, 2011, 6:01:56 PM5/19/11
to

"Jack McKinney" <jak...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:26133-4DD...@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net...
> THE ONLY THING EVOLVING, IS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION ITSELF...
>
> TIME IS AN ILLUSION !!!
>
> This whole argument about how evolution could have occurred is
> nonsensical. By evolution I mean a gradual change that resulted from
> natural selection and random mutations. The final arbiter of that
> argument should have been the fossil records; and there is no evidence
> that a gradual change ever occurred... THE FOSSIL RECORDS SAY NO WAY
> JOSE... And since that was more or less clearly established some 50
> years ago, a new theory had to be evolved... That being the theory of
> "Punctuated Equilibrium" had to be evolved so as to reflect the evidence
> supplied by the fossil records... Essentially the theory of evolution
> has become non-falsifiable because all evidence is interpreted in a
> manner as to support the theory...Any theory that is non-falsifiable is
> no theory at all...it is a belief system, or a religion, if you will...
>
> There was no evolution, and arguing about the details on how evolution
> occurred is an excise in madness...It's akin to arguing about the
> particulars of what Santa Claus eats for breakfast every morning...IT'S
> CRAZY !!!
>
> ANY EVIDENCE THAT EXPLAINS HOW SOMETHING COULD HAVE OCCURRED, THAT IN
> FACT NEVER DID OCCUR, IS A REFLECTION OF STUPIDITY... any such evidence
> would be like evidence presented to support the morning meals of Santa
> Claus...
>
>


Boikat

unread,
May 19, 2011, 6:16:45 PM5/19/11
to
On May 19, 5:01 pm, "Albert Tatlock" <tatl...@rovers.com> wrote:
> "Jack McKinney" <jak1...@webtv.net> wrote in message

What do you expect from webTV (with very few exceptions)? That, and
as a rule of thumb, anyone who quotes some webby twit as some sort of
authority isn't too bright either.

Boikat

Rolf

unread,
May 20, 2011, 4:56:24 PM5/20/11
to


All right, now please tell WHAT HAPPENED instead of what never happened!
There are such an immense number of things that never happened; you'd never
even scratch the surface with things that didn't happen. Do you understand
that? So you know of anything, anyuthing at all that has happened that you
would like to tell us about? We would be very much obliget to you if you
did.

We are sooooo tired of all the time being told about things that didn't
happen, we already have Ray Martinez and Tony Pagano dedicated to that
purpose; surely you could find something more useful to do with your time?
Like polishing your toenails. Just a friendly suggestion.


Nathan Levesque

unread,
May 22, 2011, 1:14:51 AM5/22/11
to
On May 19, 5:01 pm, "Albert Tatlock" <tatl...@rovers.com> wrote:
> "Jack McKinney" <jak1...@webtv.net> wrote in message

>
> news:26133-4DD...@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > THE ONLY THING EVOLVING, IS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION ITSELF...

What would constitute evolving then if not speciation, adaptive
radiation, the accumulation of beneficial mutations, etc...?

> > TIME IS AN ILLUSION !!!

lol wut?

> > This whole argument about how evolution could have occurred is
> > nonsensical. By evolution I mean a gradual change that resulted from
> > natural selection and random mutations. The final arbiter of that
> > argument should have been the fossil records; and there is no evidence
> > that a gradual change ever occurred...

Other then the gradual change recapitulating phylogeny as observed via
fossils throughout the geologic column?


>> THE FOSSIL RECORDS SAY NO WAY
> > JOSE... And since that was more or less clearly established some 50
> > years ago, a new theory had to be evolved... That being the theory of
> > "Punctuated Equilibrium" had to be evolved so as to reflect the evidence
> > supplied by the fossil records...

Eh, it wasn't really that new.

>> Essentially the theory of evolution
> > has become non-falsifiable because all evidence is interpreted in a
> > manner as to support the theory...

Aside from the mass of genetic tests, the potential for anachronistic
fossils, ERV's that don't fit common ancestry, etc...?

>>Any theory that  is non-falsifiable is
> > no theory at all...it is a belief system, or a religion, if you will...

I won't. Just because you're ignorant of the facts doesn't mean they
don't exist.

> > There was no evolution, and arguing about the details on how evolution
> > occurred is an excise in madness...It's akin to arguing about the
> > particulars of what Santa Claus eats for breakfast every morning...IT'S
> > CRAZY !!!

It's not crazy, it's a demonstrable fact. One that we have continued
to observe occurring in the present.

> > ANY EVIDENCE THAT EXPLAINS HOW SOMETHING COULD HAVE OCCURRED, THAT IN
> > FACT NEVER DID OCCUR, IS A REFLECTION OF STUPIDITY... any such evidence
> > would be like evidence presented to support the morning meals of Santa
> > Claus...

Keep shouting, that always helps your case rather then presenting
factual arguments in a sound reasonable manner.

Frank J

unread,
May 22, 2011, 10:44:03 AM5/22/11
to

Ron O

unread,
May 22, 2011, 11:45:40 AM5/22/11
to
On May 19, 5:01 pm, "Albert Tatlock" <tatl...@rovers.com> wrote:
> "Jack McKinney" <jak1...@webtv.net> wrote in message
>

I thought that this was something about May 21st.

Ron Okimoto

John S. Wilkins

unread,
May 22, 2011, 12:10:08 PM5/22/11
to
Albert Tatlock <tat...@rovers.com> wrote:

So that would make evolution a kind of Zenobiology?
--
John S. Wilkins, Associate, Philosophy, University of Sydney
http://evolvingthoughts.net
But al be that he was a philosophre,
Yet hadde he but litel gold in cofre

James Beck

unread,
May 22, 2011, 1:00:47 PM5/22/11
to

Man, are the volcano people going to be steamed at you.

0 new messages