Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:55:16 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Dec 2 2009 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: A new post for evolution vs creation
On Dec 2, 8:02 am, George <gburk...@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
> Due to many responsibilities of the ministry I can only post as I get Oh, indeed they have. It appears that you are using the creationist's > free time so I apologize if I can only post on various days. It > appears to me that no one has answered my post with specific facts as > to how life sustained itself after the moment of existence. primary weapon, willful ignorance. Please go back and read our responses. Then do the gentlemanly thing, and respond to us. > I only see 1. That's because you haven't read our responses for comprehension. > conjecture which is fine where a person looks to speculate his > imagination or his faith. 2. Faith has *nothing* to do with it. > Lu 1:51 He hath shewed strength with his No you're not, George, or you would have replied to at least *one* of > arm; he hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. > However, I am seeking the truth our posts in the other threads you started. What you are doing - and we *all* know it - is Lying For Jesus. I'm > and it will not do to speculate the You would be well advised to be less interested in "truth" and more > imagination and say it is the truth until a better speculation arises > when we are looking for the truth! interested in "fact." "Truth" is information with a psychological component. Everybody is *Fact*, on the other hand, is straightforward: it a unit of knowledge Facts are your friends. > Joh 8:32 And ye shall know the Funny you should mention it, but it was the *utter* lack of moral > truth, and the truth shall make you free. The biggest problem that I > have with evolution and most evolutionists is the great lack of moral > integrity regarding fact and opinion. integrity that first drove me away from (in order): the Baptist church --> Fundamentalism --> Christianity in general --> all organized religion. And once I got to that point, it was simple to ask the question, "What So what is it you think "evolutionists" (a pejorative term, by the > De 5:20 Neither shalt thou bear And yet you are bearing false witness against us right now, by not > false witness against thy neighbour. reading and responding to the answers we gave you, point-by-point, in the first couple of posts. You, sir, are a hypocrite of the First Water. > But, then if evolutionists have It's like this, George: to you have *any* objective, verifiable > reject the holiness and integrity of God who must be required to be > moral or ethical? evidence - and bible verses do *not* count - that any god exists? If so, please post it here: Humans are not moral and ethical because they think a God is watching > It is not ethical to give a theory, opinion, or Evolution *is* a fact. It has been observed in the wild and in the > imagination and to present it as a fact, or imply it as a fact. laboratory. It is going on around you every single day. > Ro Well George, those words were written in a simpler time. Now we have > 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of > God. a better way of knowing: it's called *science*. I do not believe something someone tells me unless s/he has evidence to back up her/his claim. During bible times, everyone believed in magic and the supernatural, so if someone claimed that he talked to a god, folks tended to believe him. We know better today. > As a Christian I admit that I live by faith because I do not have No, the bible was written by goat herders during the Bronze and Iron > all the facts! Ro 1:17 For therein is the righteousness of God > revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by > faith. Did you know that it is the Bible revelation that is honest and > ethical about this truth of origins! Ages, when all humans (pretty much) believed in magic and the supernatural. Genesis is *metaphor*. It is not factual, however much you think that >Ec 3:11 He hath made everything You need to be schooled on what these words mean, George. > beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so > that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning > to the end. The truth is that we do not know factually how creation > occurred nor is how it sustained itself, all we have is our > revelations and the faith we place in them. For the evolutionist it is > the conjecture or theory or opinion "Conjecture" in science is called an "hypothesis." When a scientist A "theory" does NOT mean "a wild guess" in science. It means "a And opinions? Opinions are like belly buttons, George: everybody has And we have *data* to back up evolution, George. *Mountains* of it. > of a part of the scientific Well, that's very Bronze Age of you, George. But here in the 21st > community, for me as a Christian it is the revelation of scriptures. Century, we tend not to put too much stock into revealed knowledge if it contradicts the data. Have you ever thought about the problem that revealed knowledge That's why science trumps revelation, George: every single time, > What we a left with at this time is a preponderance of the evidence And the preponderance of evidence supports evolution, George. Sorry > and not a conviction do to fact beyond a reasonable doubt. about that. Why don't you read the talk.origins archive and find out what our evidence really is? By the way: I've read the bible, cover-to-cover, several times, lest > Lu 11:9 EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!! > And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall > find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you. Yes often both sides > are disingenuous when they claim to have the complete truth unless > they honestly state that they have it by faith! Heb 11:1 Now faith > is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Thank you: I was about to quote Hebrews 11:1 to *you*. Here's Faith is *not* a virtue, George. Faith is a character flaw. > Much criticism has been placed on the scriptures for light being in If the Genesis myth resonates for you, George, that's fine. For you, > existence before the sun can you as educated scientist explain this > scriptural dilemma for me as I suppose this is one of the many reasons > men reject the revelation of scripture when I believe that the > scriptures are the revelation of true science! Ge 1:3 And God said, > Let there be light: and there was light. What does this reveal about > the physics of light? Ge 1:16 And God made two great lights; the > greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: > he made the stars also. Ge 1:17 And God set them in the firmament of > the heaven to give light upon the earth, Ge 1:18 And to rule over the > day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and > God saw that it was good. Ge 1:19 And the evening and the morning were > the fourth day. thebibilicalview.com it's true - although it is *NOT FACTUAL*. What you need to realize is that what resonates for *us* is the You know that song I quoted, George? That sums it up for me. People Been there, done that, George. Not interested. Now kindly start replying to people who post answers to your messages, Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
