Received: by 10.204.157.134 with SMTP id b6mr1578272bkx.5.1337367287260;
        Fri, 18 May 2012 11:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e27ni11294bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!uio.no!fnord.no!news0.firedrake.org!news.xcski.com!darwin.ediacara.org!there.is.no.cabal
From: jillery <69jpi...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Neanderthals & Adam & Eve
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:57:22 -0400
Organization: EddieAcreRan.Org
Lines: 53
Sender: n...@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robo...@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <8p6dr7dsb8berq44qpnimbl1435h2lqqjt@4ax.com>
References: <og39r7hopv98mpqhe8h9t0pqvit8olllbg@4ax.com> <a02983b1-70d3-4c0a-9c65-ca5275806e2b@5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <237ar7poiokqs5fkuqrui8ke08j9nae2ie@4ax.com> <51d41115-1952-4d9e-9385-f44d1d582d81@v10g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <e6aa54ef-dc93-4ba0-a31f-cc41df635337@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com> <07e807b6-4275-4de7-8b0f-a5618c6a4e23@hq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <78ocr75npjluhqc21ig3rvt2vv7vbjm8ro@4ax.com> <bf0dd2f6-4d60-46db-b90f-5a470047a5fa@z19g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1337367988 88070 128.100.83.246 (18 May 2012 19:06:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+vBFmSdfEKeUyI1GgBce/HfJVY6c7eOoA=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1KowZV+bTekmeCExgbWH2Gp8mm4=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Fri, 18 May 2012 09:46:54 -0700 (PDT), Herman <Dusty55...@aol.com>
wrote:

>On May 18, 10:24�am, jillery <69jpi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> >What about it being impossible for life to evolve by chance?
>>
>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html
>>
>> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.htm
>>
>> >To evolve
>> >by chance is impossible so what does that leave? It leaves Creation
>> >that's what.
>>
>> No. �Arguments against evolution are not arguments for Creationism.
>> Even if it could be shown that evolution was impossible, you are still
>> obliged to show that your version of creation is correct.
>>
>> >Sorry to bust your bubble oh brilliant one but the
>> >creation of the universe was from the perfect mind of God. The Bible
>> >was composed by him and written by men that he created to write it.
>> >So,... all this above garbage is proved to be garbage from all you
>> >that post here. By proving that evolution of life by chance is
>> >impossible, that is proof of God.
>>
>> First, try proving that evolution is impossible. �Then try proving
>> that God exists. �You can rightfully claim victory only after you
>> succeed with both.
>
>The man who did the math did just that.


And who was that man, Herman?  You don't say.


> By proving that it was
>impossible for life to evolve by chance, he proved that God was the
>designer and creator. ...


No he didn't, for the reasons I already specified.


> Keep on dwelling on this and it will sink in
>one day. Then you will say, "That's what Dusty thought and I tried to
>tell him he was wrong.. How stupid of me to make a fool out of myself
>on the Internet.


In your wet dreams.