OUR GOD IS GOD

John...@peoplepc.com

unread,

Apr 4, 2012, 10:43:47 AM4/4/12

to

Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.

Report not abuse

OUR GOD IS GOD

http://www.amazon.com/OUR-GOD-IS-ebook/dp/B007QO8QQI/ref=cm_cmu_up_thanks_hdr

Kleuskes & Moos

unread,

Apr 4, 2012, 11:09:34 AM4/4/12

to

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700, John1117 wrote:

> OUR GOD IS GOD

Dear, oh, dear... Another electric monk on the blink.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
< Yow! I want my nose in lights! >
--------------------------------
\
\
___
{~._.~}
( Y )
()~*~()
(_)-(_)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bob Casanova

unread,

Apr 4, 2012, 2:09:44 PM4/4/12

to

On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by John...@peoplepc.com:

>OUR GOD IS GOD

So is everyone else's, from Zeus to Cadillac.

>http://www.amazon.com/OUR-GOD-IS-ebook/dp/B007QO8QQI/ref=cm_cmu_up_thanks_hdr
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

John...@peoplepc.com

unread,

Apr 4, 2012, 3:58:43 PM4/4/12

to

THERE IS A SCRIPTURE ABOUT ANSWERING BEFORE UNDERSTANDING.

*

Inez

unread,

Apr 4, 2012, 4:44:34 PM4/4/12

to

There's also scripture about a woman turning into a pillar of salt
for looking in the wrong direction, so one's confidence is not
necessarily high.

Arkalen

unread,

Apr 4, 2012, 4:58:57 PM4/4/12

to

(2012/04/05 4:58), John...@peoplepc.com wrote:

Is there scripture about the (lack of) credibility of all-caps posts ?
Google it.

chris thompson

unread,

Apr 4, 2012, 5:16:43 PM4/4/12

to

On Apr 4, 2:09 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700 (PDT), the following

> appeared in talk.origins, posted by John1...@peoplepc.com:

>
> >OUR GOD IS GOD
>
> So is everyone else's, from Zeus to Cadillac.
>

> >http://www.amazon.com/OUR-GOD-IS-ebook/dp/B007QO8QQI/ref=cm_cmu_up_th...

>
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless

Only if it's the right color, you know

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD5Vythvxig

Chris

Walter Bushell

unread,

Apr 5, 2012, 11:54:44 AM4/5/12

to

In article <t-C*i2...@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>,

What is verifiable by reason and experience does not need or even
benefit from scripture.

--
This space unintentionally left blank.

Boikat

unread,

Apr 5, 2012, 1:46:25 PM4/5/12

to

On Apr 4, 2:58 pm, John1...@peoplepc.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 12:09:34 PM UTC-3, Kleuskes & Moos wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700, John1117 wrote:
>
> > > OUR GOD IS GOD
>
> > Dear, oh, dear... Another electric monk on the blink.
>

> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> > ________________________________
> > < Yow! I want my nose in lights! >
> > --------------------------------
> > \
> > \
> > ___
> > {~._.~}
> > ( Y )
> > ()~*~()
> > (_)-(_)

> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> THERE IS A SCRIPTURE ABOUT ANSWERING BEFORE UNDERSTANDING.

I think there's one about posting to news groups whithout knowing the
purpose of the news group posted to, too.

Boikat

Nathan Hood

unread,

Apr 5, 2012, 3:29:30 PM4/5/12

to

Quote it, and explain how it relates to you getting a slightly non-
encouraging response to commercially advertising a book in a non-
commercial newsgroup.

Nathan

John...@peoplepc.com

unread,

Apr 30, 2012, 10:00:38 AM4/30/12

to

On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 3:09:44 PM UTC-3, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by John...@peoplepc.com:
>
> >OUR GOD IS GOD
>
> So is everyone else's, from Zeus to Cadillac.

I found proof.

Kermit

unread,

Apr 30, 2012, 11:47:14 AM4/30/12

to

On Apr 30, 7:00 am, John1...@peoplepc.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 3:09:44 PM UTC-3, Bob Casanova wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700 (PDT), the following

> > appeared in talk.origins, posted by John1...@peoplepc.com:

>
> > >OUR GOD IS GOD
>
> > So is everyone else's, from Zeus to Cadillac.
>
> I found proof.

I doubt that.

Anyway, what does your post have to do with origins?

> > >http://www.amazon.com/OUR-GOD-IS-ebook/dp/B007QO8QQI/ref=cm_cmu_up_th...

> > --
>
> > Bob C.
>
> > "Evidence confirming an observation is
> > evidence that the observation is wrong."
> > - McNameless

Kermit

Bob Casanova

unread,

Apr 30, 2012, 3:20:23 PM4/30/12

to

On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:00:38 -0700 (PDT), the following

appeared in talk.origins, posted by John...@peoplepc.com:

>On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 3:09:44 PM UTC-3, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700 (PDT), the following
>> appeared in talk.origins, posted by John...@peoplepc.com:
>>
>> >OUR GOD IS GOD
>>
>> So is everyone else's, from Zeus to Cadillac.
>
>I found proof.

Congratulations! Care to share that "proof", including how
you tested it? A delay of less than almost 4 weeks would be
nice...

Bob Casanova

unread,

May 3, 2012, 2:21:37 PM5/3/12

to

On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:20:23 -0700, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>:

>On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:00:38 -0700 (PDT), the following
>appeared in talk.origins, posted by John...@peoplepc.com:
>
>>On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 3:09:44 PM UTC-3, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700 (PDT), the following
>>> appeared in talk.origins, posted by John...@peoplepc.com:
>>>
>>> >OUR GOD IS GOD
>>>
>>> So is everyone else's, from Zeus to Cadillac.
>>
>>I found proof.
>
>Congratulations! Care to share that "proof", including how
>you tested it? A delay of less than almost 4 weeks would be
>nice...

[Crickets...]

Guess not...
>
>>> >http://www.amazon.com/OUR-GOD-IS-ebook/dp/B007QO8QQI/ref=cm_cmu_up_thanks_hdr

If this is the "proof" you found, care to summarize?

If you're the author (so hard to tell with those who cower
behind "handles") and you're just hawking your book, please
ESAD.

Harry K

unread,

May 3, 2012, 2:39:04 PM5/3/12

to

On Apr 4, 12:58 pm, John1...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 12:09:34 PM UTC-3, Kleuskes & Moos wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700, John1117 wrote:
>
> > > OUR GOD IS GOD
>
> > Dear, oh, dear... Another electric monk on the blink.
>

> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> > ________________________________
> > < Yow! I want my nose in lights! >
> > --------------------------------
> > \
> > \
> > ___
> > {~._.~}
> > ( Y )
> > ()~*~()
> > (_)-(_)

> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> THERE IS A SCRIPTURE ABOUT ANSWERING BEFORE UNDERSTANDING.
>
> *

I'm sure there is also one about using the talents god gave you. How
about engaginbg your brain, if you still have one, and posting your
proof.

Harry K

Dale

unread,

May 20, 2012, 1:14:44 AM5/20/12

to

On 04/04/2012 10:43 AM, John...@peoplepc.com wrote:
> OUR GOD IS GOD
>
> http://www.amazon.com/OUR-GOD-IS-ebook/dp/B007QO8QQI/ref=cm_cmu_up_thanks_hdr
>

every civilization thinks their God(s) is God(s), some have just
happened to be more troublesome

--
Dale

RAM

unread,

May 20, 2012, 11:30:30 AM5/20/12

to

On Apr 4, 2:58�pm, John1...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 12:09:34 PM UTC-3, Kleuskes & Moos wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:43:47 -0700, John1117 wrote:
>
> > > OUR GOD IS GOD
>
> > Dear, oh, dear... Another electric monk on the blink.
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----

> > �________________________________

> > < Yow! I want my nose in lights! >
> > �--------------------------------
> > � \
> > � �\
> > � � � �___
> > � � �{~._.~}
> > � � � ( Y )
> > � � �()~*~()
> > � � �(_)-(_)
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
>
> THERE IS A SCRIPTURE ABOUT ANSWERING BEFORE UNDERSTANDING.
>
> *

There is also a scientific understanding of cyclical mood disorders.
DSM IV 301.13