Received: by 10.68.227.230 with SMTP id sd6mr7913676pbc.8.1335500086203;
        Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni103060pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!darwin.ediacara.org!there.is.no.cabal
From: wiki trix <wikit...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: The Theory of Everything!
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 27
Sender: n...@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robo...@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <3645c62e-6f4e-46db-a740-968371b298d0@g6g2000pbq.googlegroups.com>
References: <6jf8p7hk18cngfd4o31m9lm2o50v7ef48a@4ax.com> <20025801.12.1335119517844.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcuu8> <a83bp7hn0t00co4qv7b8ca0ahpgr7pp4rc@4ax.com> <23833245.1628.1335208697474.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbps5> <kfqdp7hv6h8rt3v1cs9gd9p11721ufcbbc@4ax.com> <10065417.316.1335296482400.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbpg8> <ftdgp7tqaqfgt5rj13skc4vlktrcptm00n@4ax.com> <ea9e2186-499d-4680-b32a-8618da2ab8fb@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> <kgvip7dfbhhpq81gjtvn8i2e7t13el2uu6@4ax.com> <df2e403f-1daa-49e9-ab5c-ea0b97897e3b@9g2000yqp.googlegroups.com> <21924011.1746.1335476335398.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbow2> <a5bef2a4-841b-4e5a-a283-72ef7644a631@f27g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <15591859.114.1335494392584.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbpg8>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1335500780 40928 128.100.83.246 (27 Apr 2012 04:26:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Authentication-Warning: yws13.prod.google.com: news set sender to n...@google.com using -f
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.160.96.83
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g6g2000pbq.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.160.96.83; posting-account=ARREswoAAADgWu4wXPSJCCN8bG5VegGr
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Trident/5.0),gzip(gfe)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm1RTeEVOL6SPDHF+YKCKf2rMhqidV4+CqHcqqkqnqfkFr7+TLSbyShDnyXSsGMuCLSaB5FenVNfaoDE10IBjlR6347batQeNw+sFt1BuGPCE6zeO0fmQdNbMvIRhLqml2wjE5glzAeSirkzZW+9iRcmdPLsg==
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by darwin.ediacara.org id q3R4QKBp040917
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Apr 26, 10:39 pm, "Mr.Dunsapy" <duns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >.What some have a problem with, is who designed what?
>
> > No.  Just no.
>
> >  What *scientists* have a problem with is:
> > How do you detect design?
> > How do you distinguish design from development?
> > How do you test for design?
>
> What you said supports what I have been saying. The scientists do not even look for ID.
> For life here is an easy way to do this.
>
> 1-look for life just happening someplace.  If you don't find any, then you go by the evidence you have . Which is, there is no, life just happening.
> That is the scientific answer. Anything else is speculation.

Some processes that are too slow to sit and watch happen. Tectonic
plate movements result in continental drift and mountain chain
formation. Galaxy formation, Universal heat death are also ongoing.
None of these things can be seen by casual direct observation.

> 2-record all the knowledge and experience and work you do to set up this experiment and build life in a lab. This is ID. If you notice that the Miller experiment was set up as what the scientists thought the early earth would be like.   This experiment was designed to try to exclude ID. So they only tried to find the what they wanted the answer to be, that was life could happen on it's own. So this experiment was not open to ID. They were totally blind to ID, in their method of research.

What experiment would you describe as one designed to try to include
ID?