Message from discussion
WHY Re: Age of the Earth
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!zib-berlin.de!netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!netcomsv!alc!alc-ohio!stassen
From: stas...@alc-ohio.alc.com (Chris Stassen)
Subject: Re: WHY Re: Age of the Earth
Message-ID: <1994Jan24.142249.21276@alc-ohio.alc.com>
Reply-To: stas...@alc.com
Organization: The Lion's Den - Newark, Ohio
References: <mI-cu*v80@alturia.abq.nm.us>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 1994 14:22:49 GMT
Lines: 32
Allen Newton asks (regarding the mid-Atlantic magnetic record):
> isn't it possible (perhaps even more reasonable) that magnetic chunks
> of material [could have] ended up in any of various configurations?
> Wouldn't this explain the different directions as well?
No, this isn't a good explanation. It does not account for the
"mirror-image" pattern of the data. It cannot account for the fact
that the orientation of magnetic particles in fine sediments
*matches* the pattern observed in the rocks. e.g.:
Sediments
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
___/ .
+ ___/ .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ___/ .
- ___/. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ___/ . .
___/. . .
+ ___/ . . .
___/ . . .
. . . . . . . . ___/ . . .
- ___/. . . + . Rocks
. . . . ___/ . . . .
+ ___/. . . - . .
___/ . . . . .
. . + . . .
. - . . . .
+ . . . . .
--
Chris Stassen [stas...@alc.com] (614) 366-9628 Caltech '84 <><