As for the rest, vote early and vote often.
Jason
======
In the "Love 'Em or Hate 'Em" category:
> >> A real church would not endorse evolution k0ok.
> >
> >Unfortunately for you most of them do.
>
> He said "real" moron. Can't you read?
>
> Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every one of you!
=====
In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
>> your weight around:
>
> Why?
=====
File under: "counting now starts at two":
> The existence of a first replicator molecule is a
> possibility, but not the only one.
Ye, chaos!
=====
In the category, 'Police! YOU! Drop the math! Now step away from the
calculator.'
> Uhh? Let me do the math.
> 100,000,000 dead by 20202 in Africa alone
=====
Granted, nearly every post from this person qualifies, but this one
show
unusual pithiness.
Chez Watt nomination, in the category, "Unclear on the concept":
> Stupid faggot.
>
> Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every one of you!
=====
>> >Barrier: Apes (all animals, really) can never learn to read and
>> >write English - for example writing an essay in response to a
>> >question. Every human being, minus a handicap of some sort, can
>> >learn to read and write English and write essays.
>>
>> That's not a barrier to evolution.
>
>Show a single observation and/or test/verification to show this. A
>barrier was asked for, now that you've been given one, you'll say
>"that's not a barrier". It is a barrier if no observation and/or
>test/verification can EVER show that barrier being crossed. End of story.
=====
File under "as opposed to New York the Texas":
> If you knew anything you would know that New Orleans
> is more like New York the Alabama.
[...] as careless of typing as he is of facts.
=====
For the "Time is Short" Department:
> > In your opinion what happens when time ends?
>
> Thi
=====
Nominated in the "There is a label for everything these days."
>> Ooooo. A mystery :)
>
>Intelligent transubstantiation.
=====
In the category, "Calling a spade a heart."
> Medical Doctors need a very strong background in real human biology. Human
> anatomy and physiology will not get the degree.
=====
In the category of "I didn't say that, and I'll say it again".
>>> It is said the "Shroud of Turin" cannot be dated accuratly because
>>> the church it was located at burned. The fire skewed the carbon
>>> amount in the cloth.
>>
>> actually thats just the excuse the religious use. the dates were
>> accurate.
>>
>>> It is said that a large asteroid strike killed the dino's The strike
>>> caused many world wide fires. But somehow this did NOT skew carbon
>>> dating.
>>
>> you cant carbon date anything from 65 million years ago idiot, and no
>> scientist has ever claimed to do so.
>
>Good, because no one said that jack ass.
>
>The fires from the metor were long ago. The fire at the church was long ago.
>But somehow your science seems to think the fires from the metor strike
>would /not/ have skewed carbon dating today but they did at the church fire.
>
>Double standards shown once again.
=====
File under "measure the story angles with a
try-square or a protractor to see if they're right
angles".
> Aren't demons angles? How do you know you got the
> story from the right ones?
=====
In the Dan Brown Honorary Category:
> _Of course it [the United States] is a pagan country, and advertising it.
> I mean, the great seal with the thirteen step pyramid and the eye, the
> United States Department of Defense in the form of a pentagon, and of
> course the great old tradition for the newly elected president to devour
> the living body of his predecessor in front of the supreme court judges
> all point to pagan origins.
=====
In the category Just Sewer Stories:
> > > There's a well-preserved Roman latrine along Hadrian's wall. The
>> > > Roman soldiers used sponges.
>> >
>> > How did they manufacture sponges?
>> > It's depressing to consider the old romans were more technologically
>> > advanced than I...
>>
>> If you think sponges are manufactured, you must be a creationist.
>> Sponges are animals -- they evolved.
>
> There was selective pressure to become asswipe? I find this dubious.
=====
Thanks for the extra effort. Now let's see what we have here....
>
> As for the rest, vote early and vote often.
>
> Jason
>
Oh, this one, I think.
That one still hurts when I read it, so it's my first choice.
> June was a bad month for Google. Usually they send me daily reports
> on every Chez Watt post, but the system not only broke down, the
> archive may be unreliable now that the system's back up. So if I
> forgot something you nominated, email it to me and I'll include it in
> with July's Watts in August's ballot.
>
> As for the rest, vote early and vote often.
>
> Jason
>
First:
>
> In the category of "I didn't say that, and I'll say it again".
>
> >>> It is said the "Shroud of Turin" cannot be dated accuratly because
> >>> the church it was located at burned. The fire skewed the carbon
> >>> amount in the cloth.
> > >
> >> actually thats just the excuse the religious use. the dates were
> >> accurate.
> > >
> >>> It is said that a large asteroid strike killed the dino's The
> strike >>> caused many world wide fires. But somehow this did NOT
> skew carbon >>> dating.
> > >
> >> you cant carbon date anything from 65 million years ago idiot, and
> no >> scientist has ever claimed to do so.
> >
> > Good, because no one said that jack ass.
> >
> > The fires from the metor were long ago. The fire at the church was
> > long ago. But somehow your science seems to think the fires from
> > the metor strike would not have skewed carbon dating today but they
> > did at the church fire.
> >
> > Double standards shown once again.
>
> =====
Second:
>
> For the "Time is Short" Department:
>
> > > In your opinion what happens when time ends?
> >
> > Thi
>
> =====
Third:
>
> In the category Just Sewer Stories:
>
> > > > There's a well-preserved Roman latrine along Hadrian's wall. The
> >> > > Roman soldiers used sponges.
> >> >
> >> > How did they manufacture sponges?
> >> > It's depressing to consider the old romans were more
> technologically >> > advanced than I...
> > >
> >> If you think sponges are manufactured, you must be a creationist.
> >> Sponges are animals -- they evolved.
> >
> > There was selective pressure to become asswipe? I find this dubious.
>
> =====
Regards,
Stephen
--
...
>
> Granted, nearly every post from this person qualifies, but this
> one
> show
> unusual pithiness.
>
> Chez Watt nomination, in the category, "Unclear on the
> concept":
>
>> Stupid faggot.
>>
>> Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every
>> one of you!
>
> =====
- Second vote.
...
>
> For the "Time is Short" Department:
>
>> > In your opinion what happens when time ends?
>>
>> Thi
>
> =====
- Third vote.
...
- First vote.
That was actually.
"Why, I already know (after reading it) it agrees with me".
I'm gonna do a bit of diggin 2 secs.
> I'm gonna do a bit of diggin 2 secs.-
In the category "hes a great ape"
> I found your simpering 'goldfish tree' post - it is as stupid as I
> thought it would be
> TT ATACCGTCCACCA Hylobates
> TC CCGTCATTCACCG Homo_sapiens
> TC CCATTATCCACCA Pan
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the category of *WHY* phonetics matter.
> I've always wondered if T.O.O really thought anyone ever said "Ye"
> with a Y sound.
---------------------------------------------
In the category of "self defeating behavior"
> You need a life.
> Boikat
-------------------------------------------
In the category of "lost at sea".
> BTW, don't you post from near there?
> Wombat
----------------------------------------
In the category of "how to change 'b -> d', by looking through the
mirror glass".
> Perplexed in Peoria
> "Better yet, your story also gives an example of a typical reason WHY the
> system changes"
Ya, he added an IC printer.
> In this case, the reason was a new function (paper conservation)
Funny. I thought it was because he changed the printer.
--------------------------------------------------
<snip irrelevent quotage>
So, where's the bit you were searching for?
__________________
> > In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
> >>> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
> >>> your weight around:
> >> Why?-
That was actually.
"Why, I already know (after reading it) it agrees with me".
I'm gonna do a bit of diggin 2 secs.
___________________
Were you intending to show you were misquoted, or edited to look
stupid?
Boikat
In the category of;
"i'm throwing this irrelevent junk out. Now where's my keys".
> > > I'm gonna do a bit of diggin 2 secs.-
>
> <snip irrelevent quotage>
>
> So, where's the bit you were searching for?
You just snipped it.
> I'm gonna do a bit of diggin 2 secs.
> ___________________
>
> Were you intending to show you were misquoted, or edited to look
> stupid?
No, but here's the original.
> > > Read this, and then tell me there is a 'nested hierarchy' of "all"
> > > life.
> > > http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/2004/9/20048298.shtml
> > > Once you get past admitting convergence, I'd love to 're-hear' your
> > > "excuse" as to why man-made hierarchies, are mute.
>
> > Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
> > your weight around:
> > http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v431/n7005/pdf/nature02848.pdf
>
> Why?
> Perhaps I should bash you around the head with the weight of your own
> quotes.
>
> "therefore at the deepest levels linking prokaryotes and eukaryotes,
> the tree of life is actually a ring of life."
Why? as in.
"'Why', will this quote I'm quoting from the article you are telling
me to read, disagree with what I have just said"?
Answer: "NO"!
This one:
>In the Dan Brown Honorary Category:
>
>> _Of course it [the United States] is a pagan country, and advertising it.
>> I mean, the great seal with the thirteen step pyramid and the eye, the
>> United States Department of Defense in the form of a pentagon, and of
>> course the great old tradition for the newly elected president to devour
>> the living body of his predecessor in front of the supreme court judges
>> all point to pagan origins.
--
sapient_...@spamsights.org ICQ #17887309 * Save the net *
Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer *
Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today *
Kill: http://spamsights.org http://spews.org http://spamhaus.org
>In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>
>>> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
>>> your weight around:
>>
>> Why?
This one please.
--
Bob.
> In the Dan Brown Honorary Category:
>
> > _Of course it [the United States] is a pagan country, and advertising it.
> > I mean, the great seal with the thirteen step pyramid and the eye, the
> > United States Department of Defense in the form of a pentagon, and of
> > course the great old tradition for the newly elected president to devour
> > the living body of his predecessor in front of the supreme court judges
> > all point to pagan origins.
--
John S. Wilkins, Philosophy, University of Sydney
http://evolvingthoughts.net
But al be that he was a philosophre,
Yet hadde he but litel gold in cofre
Oh, this guys funny.
He was drowning, so I threw him a rope.
Now, he apparently wants me to hang him with it.
Absolutely no-problemo, you woman beatin retarded, piss-stain.
> June was a bad month for Google. Usually they send me daily reports
> on every Chez Watt post, but the system not only broke down, the
> archive may be unreliable now that the system's back up. So if I
> forgot something you nominated, email it to me and I'll include it in
> with July's Watts in August's ballot.
>
> As for the rest, vote early and vote often.
>
> Jason
>
> ======
>
> In the "Love 'Em or Hate 'Em" category:
>
>>>> A real church would not endorse evolution k0ok.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately for you most of them do.
>>
>> He said "real" moron. Can't you read?
>>
>> Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every one of you!
>
> =====
>
> In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>
>>> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
>>> your weight around:
>>
>> Why?
The above item is #1!
And this one is #2!
And this one is #3!
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
This one please:
> =====
>
> In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>
> >> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
> >> your weight around:
>
> > Why?
>
> =====
>
Chris
> > ======
>
> > In the "Love 'Em or Hate 'Em" category:
>
> >>>> A real church would not endorse evolution k0ok.
>
> >>> Unfortunately for you most of them do.
>
> >> He said "real" moron. Can't you read?
>
> >> Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every one of you!
>
> > =====
>
> > In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>
> >>> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
> >>> your weight around:
>
> >> Why?
>
> The above item is #1!
Sorry, their are 2.
Repeat after me...
1 + 1 = 2.
Yesssss!!! Now we're having fun.
There were 4 then.
Repeat after me.
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4.
Yaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!
What a wonderful day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Noooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!
That's *another* 4.
Repeat after me.
1+1+1+1 = 4.
YYYYaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!
Look kids, an ephalump!!!!!!!!!
Why is it that creationists never learn that the first thing you need
to do when you've dug yourself into a hole, is *put down the shovel*
Chris
Silly boy.
I say the lifes a web.
I quote.
You say read.
I say "Why", it backs me up.
I quote & bash you around the head with quotes backing me up.
And you come out with some antequated shovel analogy that's really /
really ***OLD****
Methinks the potato-head doth protest too much.
Chris
Me thinks that "piss" is another *klingon*.
Spinny's completely lost it.
You really should do something about this excretory fixation you have. Are
your diapers chaffing?
So, your trying to show everyone what it's like to be bat-shit crazy.
Good job old man. Carry on.
Boikat
Sorry. It seems the quote was not taken out of context, and nobody
can read you mind (or would want to) to know that what you actually
posted had a further addendum. You're a twit.
Boikat
Boikat
> In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>
>>> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
>>> your weight around:
>>
>> Why?
Gotta go with the sheer perfection of this one. Creationism summed up in
one word.
Post-hoc rationalizations. You gotta love em. As for reading his mind,
I haven't checked out a gum-wrapper cartoon in decades, and I'm not
about to do it now.
Chris
> June was a bad month for Google. Usually they send me daily reports
> on every Chez Watt post, but the system not only broke down, the
> archive may be unreliable now that the system's back up. So if I
> forgot something you nominated, email it to me and I'll include it in
> with July's Watts in August's ballot.
>
> As for the rest, vote early and vote often.
>
> Jason
>
[snip]
> =====
> =====
This one please! Exquisite!
>> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
>> your weight around:
> Why?
My vote splits three ways---
Succinctness special award:
>
> For the "Time is Short" Department:
>
>> > In your opinion what happens when time ends?
>>
>> Thi
For its "hurts my brain" qualities:
>
> In the category of "I didn't say that, and I'll say it again".
>
>>>> It is said the "Shroud of Turin" cannot be dated accuratly because
>>>> the church it was located at burned. The fire skewed the carbon
>>>> amount in the cloth.
>>>
>>> actually thats just the excuse the religious use. the dates were
>>> accurate.
>>>
>>>> It is said that a large asteroid strike killed the dino's The strike
>>>> caused many world wide fires. But somehow this did NOT skew carbon
>>>> dating.
>>>
>>> you cant carbon date anything from 65 million years ago idiot, and no
>>> scientist has ever claimed to do so.
>>
>>Good, because no one said that jack ass.
>>
>>The fires from the metor were long ago. The fire at the church was long
>>ago.
>>But somehow your science seems to think the fires from the metor strike
>>would /not/ have skewed carbon dating today but they did at the church
>>fire.
>>
>>Double standards shown once again.
>
For sheer inanity:
>
> In the category Just Sewer Stories:
>
>> > > There's a well-preserved Roman latrine along Hadrian's wall. The
>>> > > Roman soldiers used sponges.
>>> >
>>> > How did they manufacture sponges?
>>> > It's depressing to consider the old romans were more technologically
>>> > advanced than I...
>>>
>>> If you think sponges are manufactured, you must be a creationist.
>>> Sponges are animals -- they evolved.
>>
>> There was selective pressure to become asswipe? I find this dubious.
--
Mike Dworetsky
(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
> =====
Third:
> In the category, "Calling a spade a heart."
>
> > Medical Doctors need a very strong background in real human biology. Human
> > anatomy and physiology will not get the degree.
>
> =====
Second:
> In the category of "I didn't say that, and I'll say it again".
>
> >>> It is said the "Shroud of Turin" cannot be dated accuratly because
> >>> the church it was located at burned. The fire skewed the carbon
> >>> amount in the cloth.
>
> >> actually thats just the excuse the religious use. the dates were
> >> accurate.
>
> >>> It is said that a large asteroid strike killed the dino's The strike
> >>> caused many world wide fires. But somehow this did NOT skew carbon
> >>> dating.
>
> >> you cant carbon date anything from 65 million years ago idiot, and no
> >> scientist has ever claimed to do so.
>
> >Good, because no one said that jack ass.
>
> >The fires from the metor were long ago. The fire at the church was long ago.
> >But somehow your science seems to think the fires from the metor strike
> >would /not/ have skewed carbon dating today but they did at the church fire.
>
> >Double standards shown once again.
Mitchell Coffey
>> And while you are at it, explain the "principal function" of the anus.
>For you it would seem to primarily be a head receptacle.
> [...] So if I forgot something you nominated, email it to me and I'll
> include it in with July's Watts in August's ballot.
The ones you caught include several that would be hard to improve upon.
173 votes for each of the following five, in no particular order.
> =====
>
> In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>
>>> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
>>> your weight around:
>>
>> Why?
>
> =====
>
> Granted, nearly every post from this person qualifies, but this one
> show unusual pithiness.
>
> Chez Watt nomination, in the category, "Unclear on the concept":
>
>> Stupid faggot.
>>
>> Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every one of
>> you!
>
> =====
>
> For the "Time is Short" Department:
>
>> > In your opinion what happens when time ends?
>>
>> Thi
>
> =====
>
> In the Dan Brown Honorary Category:
>
>> _Of course it [the United States] is a pagan country, and advertising
>> it. I mean, the great seal with the thirteen step pyramid and the eye,
>> the United States Department of Defense in the form of a pentagon, and
>> of course the great old tradition for the newly elected president to
>> devour the living body of his predecessor in front of the supreme court
>> judges all point to pagan origins.
>
> =====
>
> In the category Just Sewer Stories:
>
>> > > There's a well-preserved Roman latrine along Hadrian's wall. The
>>> > > Roman soldiers used sponges.
>>> >
>>> > How did they manufacture sponges?
>>> > It's depressing to consider the old romans were more technologically
>>> > advanced than I...
>>>
>>> If you think sponges are manufactured, you must be a creationist.
>>> Sponges are animals -- they evolved.
>>
>> There was selective pressure to become asswipe? I find this dubious.
>
> =====
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"It is certain, from experience, that the smallest grain of natural
honesty and benevolence has more effect on men's conduct, than the most
pompous views suggested by theological theories and systems." - D. Hume
If rhyming "Chris" with "piss" is the limit of your poetical aptitude,
it seems we need not warn Carol Ann Duffy about her impending
unemployment.
You, on the other hand, had better not quit your day job, if you've
got one.
Chris
>June was a bad month for Google. Usually they send me daily reports
>on every Chez Watt post, but the system not only broke down, the
>archive may be unreliable now that the system's back up. So if I
>forgot something you nominated, email it to me and I'll include it in
>with July's Watts in August's ballot.
>
>As for the rest, vote early and vote often.
Nah, just once; I'm not from Chicago...
This one:
>In the Dan Brown Honorary Category:
>
>> _Of course it [the United States] is a pagan country, and advertising it.
>> I mean, the great seal with the thirteen step pyramid and the eye, the
>> United States Department of Defense in the form of a pentagon, and of
>> course the great old tradition for the newly elected president to devour
>> the living body of his predecessor in front of the supreme court judges
>> all point to pagan origins.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Would you employ him? I certainly wouldn't.
>
>Chris
--
Bob.
Rhymes better than "potato ~ spintronic".
Guess you missed the "klingon" part, eh?
No matter, I see your still doin it. Clinging that is.
P.O.O-Head has a fourth nipple if that's any comfort.
> You, on the other hand, had better not quit your day job, if you've
> got one.
I could always go on the dole like P.O.O-Head & R2D2.
The Dole don't pay you enough to employ people.
I here theres a womans boxing club who need sparring partners in your
area.
You could actually *work* & *be good at what you do*, all in one go.
Sort of like 2 new fuzzy feelings for the price of one.
No contest
> =====
David
> vote early and vote often.
Okay. I think I'm keeping more than I'm discarding,
a clue that I may be feeling indecisive, but
replicate my vote among this lot of eight Watts.
xanthian.
> =====
> In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>>> Perhaps you should read the original article
>>> before you go throwing your weight around:
>> Why?
> =====
> File under: "counting now starts at two":
>> The existence of a first replicator molecule is a
>> possibility, but not the only one.
> Ye, chaos!
> =====
> File under "as opposed to New York the Texas":
>> If you knew anything you would know that New
>> Orleans is more like New York the Alabama.
> [...] as careless of typing as he is of facts.
> =====
> In the category, "Calling a spade a heart."
>> Medical Doctors need a very strong background in
>> real human biology. Human anatomy and physiology
>> will not get the degree.
> =====
> In the category of "I didn't say that, and I'll say it again".
> =====
> File under "measure the story angles with a
> try-square or a protractor to see if they're right
> angles".
>> Aren't demons angles? How do you know you got the
>> story from the right ones?
> =====
> In the Dan Brown Honorary Category:
>> _Of course it [the United States] is a pagan
>> country, and advertising it. I mean, the great
>> seal with the thirteen step pyramid and the eye,
>> the United States Department of Defense in the
>> form of a pentagon, and of course the great old
>> tradition for the newly elected president to
>> devour the living body of his predecessor in
>> front of the supreme court judges all point to
>> pagan origins.
> =====
> =====
>
> In the category of "I didn't say that, and I'll say it again".
>
>>>> It is said the "Shroud of Turin" cannot be dated accuratly because
>>>> the church it was located at burned. The fire skewed the carbon
>>>> amount in the cloth.
>>>
>>> actually thats just the excuse the religious use. the dates were
>>> accurate.
>>>
>>>> It is said that a large asteroid strike killed the dino's The strike
>>>> caused many world wide fires. But somehow this did NOT skew carbon
>>>> dating.
>>>
>>> you cant carbon date anything from 65 million years ago idiot, and no
>>> scientist has ever claimed to do so.
>>
>>Good, because no one said that jack ass.
>>
>>The fires from the metor were long ago. The fire at the church was long
>>ago.
>>But somehow your science seems to think the fires from the metor strike
>>would /not/ have skewed carbon dating today but they did at the church
>>fire.
>>
>>Double standards shown once again.
>
....and this one:
I don't know if you think I am as stupid as you are, but I did double
check all of those just in case they were missed Chez Watt entries.
I can do that you know, look for those posts. I found them. They
weren't missed nominations, they're just you being stupid.
Did you hope to fool me?
Jason
This one came out with a very strong lead and wound up in first place.
> In the category of "I didn't say that, and I'll say it again".
>
> >>> It is said the "Shroud of Turin" cannot be dated accuratly because
> >>> the church it was located at burned. The fire skewed the carbon
> >>> amount in the cloth.
>
> >> actually thats just the excuse the religious use. the dates were
> >> accurate.
>
> >>> It is said that a large asteroid strike killed the dino's The strike
> >>> caused many world wide fires. But somehow this did NOT skew carbon
> >>> dating.
>
> >> you cant carbon date anything from 65 million years ago idiot, and no
> >> scientist has ever claimed to do so.
>
> >Good, because no one said that jack ass.
>
> >The fires from the metor were long ago. The fire at the church was long ago.
> >But somehow your science seems to think the fires from the metor strike
> >would /not/ have skewed carbon dating today but they did at the church fire.
>
> >Double standards shown once again.
This one came in a very strong and respectable second.
> In the category, How Creationism is Different from Science:
>
> >> Perhaps you should read the original article before you go throwing
> >> your weight around:
>
> > Why?
A moderately distant third.
> In the Dan Brown Honorary Category:
>
> > _Of course it [the United States] is a pagan country, and advertising it.
> > I mean, the great seal with the thirteen step pyramid and the eye, the
> > United States Department of Defense in the form of a pentagon, and of
> > course the great old tradition for the newly elected president to devour
> > the living body of his predecessor in front of the supreme court judges
> > all point to pagan origins.
Honorable mentions.
> In the category Just Sewer Stories:
>
> > > > There's a well-preserved Roman latrine along Hadrian's wall. The
> >> > > Roman soldiers used sponges.
>
> >> > How did they manufacture sponges?
> >> > It's depressing to consider the old romans were more technologically
> >> > advanced than I...
>
> >> If you think sponges are manufactured, you must be a creationist.
> >> Sponges are animals -- they evolved.
>
> > There was selective pressure to become asswipe? I find this dubious.
> For the "Time is Short" Department:
>
> > > In your opinion what happens when time ends?
>
> > Thi
On Jul 19, 8:16 pm, Harvest Dancer <harvestdan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> June was a bad month for Google. Usually they send me daily reports
> on every Chez Watt post, but the system not only broke down, the
> archive may be unreliable now that the system's back up. So if I
> forgot something you nominated, email it to me and I'll include it in
> with July's Watts in August's ballot.
>
> As for the rest, vote early and vote often.
>
> Jason
>
> ======
>
> In the "Love 'Em or Hate 'Em" category:
>
> > >> A real church would not endorse evolution k0ok.
>
> > >Unfortunately for you most of them do.
>
> > He said "real" moron. Can't you read?
>
> > Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every one of you!
>
> =====
>
>
> =====
>
> File under: "counting now starts at two":
>
> > The existence of a first replicator molecule is a
> > possibility, but not the only one.
>
> Ye, chaos!
>
> =====
>
> In the category, 'Police! YOU! Drop the math! Now step away from the
> calculator.'
>
> > Uhh? Let me do the math.
> > 100,000,000 dead by 20202 in Africa alone
>
> =====
>
> Granted, nearly every post from this person qualifies, but this one
> show
> unusual pithiness.
>
> Chez Watt nomination, in the category, "Unclear on the concept":
>
> > Stupid faggot.
>
> > Always remember, Jesus loves you and so do I! Each and every one of you!
>
> =====
>
> >> >Barrier: Apes (all animals, really) can never learn to read and
> >> >write English - for example writing an essay in response to a
> >> >question. Every human being, minus a handicap of some sort, can
> >> >learn to read and write English and write essays.
>
> >> That's not a barrier to evolution.
>
> >Show a single observation and/or test/verification to show this. A
> >barrier was asked for, now that you've been given one, you'll say
> >"that's not a barrier". It is a barrier if no observation and/or
> >test/verification can EVER show that barrier being crossed. End of story.
>
> =====
>
> File under "as opposed to New York the Texas":
>
> > If you knew anything you would know that New Orleans
> > is more like New York the Alabama.
>
> [...] as careless of typing as he is of facts.
>
> =====
>
>
> =====
>
> Nominated in the "There is a label for everything these days."
>
> >> Ooooo. A mystery :)
>
> >Intelligent transubstantiation.
>
> =====
>
> In the category, "Calling a spade a heart."
>
> > Medical Doctors need a very strong background in real human biology. Human
> > anatomy and physiology will not get the degree.
>
> =====
>
>
> =====
>
> File under "measure the story angles with a
> try-square or a protractor to see if they're right
> angles".
>
> > Aren't demons angles? How do you know you got the
> > story from the right ones?
>
> =====
>
>
> =====
>
>
> =====
> Here are theChezWattwinners. Winning authors and nominators are
> invited to come forward for credit or blame where appropriate.
>
<snip>
>
> A moderately distant third.
>
> > In the Dan Brown Honorary Category:
>
> > > _Of course it [the United States] is a pagan country, and advertising it.
> > > I mean, the great seal with the thirteen step pyramid and the eye, the
> > > United States Department of Defense in the form of a pentagon, and of
> > > course the great old tradition for the newly elected president to devour
> > > the living body of his predecessor in front of the supreme court judges
> > > all point to pagan origins.
>
Well, what can I say? I want to thank everybody and anybody who ever
had anything at all to do with the making of this post. My aim is to
dream without boundaries. Tonight, with you, I see boundaries being
crossed. As a post composer, I am thrilled to be honored here. I don't
have a sense of entitlement or that I deserve this.<sniff>. There are
a lot of great posts that have won the Chez Watt award and a lot of
great posts that haven't. You just do the best you can.<sniff sniff>
Right now I don't know if I have dreamt about this or not. But when
you are in the ocean you must swim. Being on the race for the Chez
Watt , logically I want to win.<bleurrrrrp> I just want to thank
everybody I've ever met in my entire life.<sniff> I don't know what I
did in this life to deserve all of this. I'm just a boy from a trailer
park who had a dream. <wobble>. I get sad, especially for the people
who surround me and the public who might stop me on the streets. It is
a virtual responsibility. I feel like Adam when he said to Eve, 'Back
up, I don't know how big this gets.' I got third place, and I get to
scream and jump a little. But I got to go back to work tomorrow. So I
want to thank my parents, my grandmother <bleurrrp> my colleagues, my
hairdresser and makeup artist, <sniff> the sscript writers, the guy
who brings the coffee around <sniff>, the pet handler, and of
course all you guys out there who voted for me <waiiiiiil>. You guys
are just the greatest, love you all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(leaves to the left, waving trophy)
<changes channel to a Star Trek: TOS rerun>
LOLOL
Tim