John says why it can't happen.
spintronic
happening.
So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
seconds on my watch.
Guess what???????????????????????
John Harshman
> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> happening.
No, he doesn't.
> So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
> seconds on my watch.
>
>
> Guess what???????????????????????
I can't guess. Tell us.
spintronic
> spintronic wrote:
.
.
> > John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> > happening.
>
> No, he doesn't.
So John has 3 options
1) Agree with this thread
2) Retract his claim.
3) Agree with the probability in the other thread.
> > So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
> > seconds on my watch.
>
> > Guess what???????????????????????
>
> I can't guess. Tell us.
I doubt that, you are talking to me don't forget.
If you expect an answers, why don't you take a calculated guess.
You may get lucky.
Could I have my £4million per third turnover now, BTW?
John Harshman
> On 19 Nov, 22:20, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> spintronic wrote:
> .
> .
>
>>> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
>>> happening.
>> No, he doesn't.
>
> So John has 3 options
>
> 1) Agree with this thread
> 2) Retract his claim.
> 3) Agree with the probability in the other thread.
4) Point out that he never made any such claim.
>>> So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
>>> seconds on my watch.
>>> Guess what???????????????????????
>> I can't guess. Tell us.
>
> I doubt that, you are talking to me don't forget.
Yes, but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
spintronic
> spintronic wrote:
> > On 19 Nov, 22:20, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> spintronic wrote:
> > .
> > .
>
> >>> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> >>> happening.
> >> No, he doesn't.
>
> > So John has 3 options
>
> > 1) Agree with this thread
> > 2) Retract his claim.
> > 3) Agree with the probability in the other thread.
>
> 4) Point out that he never made any such claim.
>
> >>> So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
> >>> seconds on my watch.
> >>> Guess what???????????????????????
> >> I can't guess. Tell us.
.
> > I doubt that, you are talking to me don't forget.
>
> Yes,
(Was that a subconscience agreement to give me £4million U.Kpounds)?
> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third rollover.
UC
There are so many contingencies....it's very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very very very very very very very very very
very very very very very
unlikely.
Dana Tweedy
snipping nonsense
>
>> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
>> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
>> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>
> Now I know you believe me. You owe me Ł4 million, every third
> rollover.
May I suggest you stop posting while drunk?
DJT
spintronic
.
.
> spintronic wrote:
>
> snipping nonsense
>
>
>
> >> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
> >> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
> >> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>
> > Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third
> > rollover.
>
> May I suggest you stop posting while drunk?
>
> DJT
Why? To catch up with you? (so many innuendos so little time)
Damn, all of you. Plz listen.
I could prove My (and a host of other) IQ's in a heart beat.
What more evidence do you need?
Go win your (meaningless) lottery.
Go win your nobel, at my research.
Go win your (lonely) pot.
Go ignore spin, (Do what you want)
I really dont give a shit.
But PLZ.
Listen to the hebrew GOD tonight. Jehovah.
Some will see purple monkeys, some will have 217.13 neutrinos, some
will have an IQ og 0.000005, some willl see A young Y.O.O.
All of you will see the truth. And the truth will set you free.
Dick C.
a80d-19c...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:
> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> happening.
Really? Where? How about showing the quote.
I really suspect that you made that up.
>
>
> So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
> seconds on my watch.
>
>
> Guess what???????????????????????
>
--
Dick #1349
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
~Benjamin Franklin
Home Page: dickcr.iwarp.com
email: dic...@gmail.com
spintronic
.
.
> > John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> > happening.
>
> Really? Where? How about showing the quote.
> I really suspect that you made that up.
I suspect we could argue a while, and then I say green.
I also suspect you could do your own hardwork, and find the colour
grey.
> > So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
> > seconds on my watch.
>
> > Guess what???????????????????????
You picked brown.
Inez
> On 19 Nov, 23:56, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> .
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> > spintronic wrote:
>
> > snipping nonsense
>
> > >> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
> > >> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
> > >> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>
> > > Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third
> > > rollover.
>
> > May I suggest you stop posting while drunk?
>
> > DJT
>
> Why? To catch up with you? (so many innuendos so little time)
>
> Damn, all of you. Plz listen.
>
> I could prove My (and a host of other) IQ's in a heart beat.
>
There probably is something more pathetic than a person trying to brag
about their IQ on the internet, but I can't think of it off the top of
my head.
> What more evidence do you need?
Nothing more, thank you.
> Go win your (meaningless) lottery.
>
> Go win your nobel, at my research.
>
> Go win your (lonely) pot.
>
> Go ignore spin, (Do what you want)
>
> I really dont give a shit.
>
> But PLZ.
>
> Listen to the hebrew GOD tonight. Jehovah.
>
> Some will see purple monkeys, some will have 217.13 neutrinos, some
> will have an IQ og 0.000005, some willl see A young Y.O.O.
>
> All of you will see the truth. And the truth will set you free.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
John Harshman
> spintronic wrote:
> snipping nonsense
>
>>> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
>>> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
>>> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>> rollover.
>
> May I suggest you stop posting while drunk?
Last two words: superfluous.
John Harshman
John Harshman
> On 19 Nov, 22:47, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> spintronic wrote:
>>> On 19 Nov, 22:20, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>> spintronic wrote:
>>> .
>>> .
>>>>> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
>>>>> happening.
>>>> No, he doesn't.
>>> So John has 3 options
>>> 1) Agree with this thread
>>> 2) Retract his claim.
>>> 3) Agree with the probability in the other thread.
>> 4) Point out that he never made any such claim.
>>
>>>>> So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
>>>>> seconds on my watch.
>>>>> Guess what???????????????????????
>>>> I can't guess. Tell us.
Can I suppose that you are never going to reveal your brilliant conclusion?
>>> I doubt that, you are talking to me don't forget.
>> Yes,
>
> (Was that a subconscience agreement to give me £4million U.Kpounds)?
If it was, send a bill to my subconscious, not me.
>> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
>> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
>> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>
> Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third rollover.
Granting for the sake of argument that I believed you, why would I owe
you money?
Dick C.
a2a9-4fe...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
Just as I thought, you are lying about Harshman saying that.
Which is no surprise, seeing how you are a typically dishonest
creationist, and now appear to be huffing something. Probably
spray paint.
Dick C.
023d5f...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
> I could prove My (and a host of other) IQ's in a heart beat.
You do, everytime you post. And it appears to be well below average.
>
> What more evidence do you need?
None, stop posting.
Dana Tweedy
> On 19 Nov, 23:56, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> .
> .
>
>> spintronic wrote:
>>
>> snipping nonsense
>>
>>
>>
>>>> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
>>>> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
>>>> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>>
>>> Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third
>>> rollover.
>>
>> May I suggest you stop posting while drunk?
>>
>> DJT
>
> Why? To catch up with you? (so many innuendos so little time)
I don't drink, which is why my posts are mostly rational.
>
> Damn, all of you. Plz listen.
>
> I could prove My (and a host of other) IQ's in a heart beat.
IQ is irrelevant.
>
> What more evidence do you need?
Again, IQ is not what's relevant, it's about logical thinking.
>
> Go win your (meaningless) lottery.
>
> Go win your nobel, at my research.
>
> Go win your (lonely) pot.
>
> Go ignore spin, (Do what you want)
>
> I really dont give a shit.
>
> But PLZ.
>
> Listen to the hebrew GOD tonight. Jehovah.
>
> Some will see purple monkeys, some will have 217.13 neutrinos, some
> will have an IQ og 0.000005, some willl see A young Y.O.O.
>
> All of you will see the truth. And the truth will set you free.
Again, don't post while drunk. That's all I ask.
DJT
spintronic
> spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:997acb31-7245-471f-
> a2a9-4fe5db0fe...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 20 Nov, 00:44, "Dick C." <foo.dic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > .
> > .
>
> >> > John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> >> > happening.
>
> >> Really? Where? How about showing the quote.
> >> I really suspect that you made that up.
>
> > I suspect we could argue a while, and then I say green.
>
> > I also suspect you could do your own hardwork, and find the colour
> > grey.
>
> >> > So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
> >> > seconds on my watch.
>
> >> > Guess what???????????????????????
>
> > You picked brown.
.
> Just as I thought, you are lying about Harshman saying that.
No I'm not.
John Harshman
> spintronic wrote:
>> On 19 Nov, 23:56, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>> .
>> .
>>
>>> spintronic wrote:
>>>
>>> snipping nonsense
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
>>>>> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
>>>>> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>>>> Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third
>>>> rollover.
>>> May I suggest you stop posting while drunk?
>>>
>>> DJT
>> Why? To catch up with you? (so many innuendos so little time)
>
> I don't drink, which is why my posts are mostly rational.
Another non sequitur. It's possible for a person who drinks to be
rational, even after drinking. And I doubt simple drunkenness explains
spinny.
spintronic
And telling you how to win the lottery in that condition is equally
bad, In my moral opinion.
spintronic
Like your consciousness, I'd doubt it would pay.
> >> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
> >> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
> >> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>
> > Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third rollover.
>
> Granting for the sake of argument that I believed you, why would I owe
> you money?- Hide quoted text -
J.J. O'Shea
(in article
<3646b776-7637-48fc...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>):
Cool. So post the cite showing where he did.
And you might want to try to make that DOS attack while you're at it.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
spintronic
> spintronic wrote:
> > On 19 Nov, 22:47, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> spintronic wrote:
> >>> On 19 Nov, 22:20, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >>>> spintronic wrote:
> >>> .
> >>> .
> >>>>> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> >>>>> happening.
> >>>> No, he doesn't.
> >>> So John has 3 options
> >>> 1) Agree with this thread
> >>> 2) Retract his claim.
> >>> 3) Agree with the probability in the other thread.
> >> 4) Point out that he never made any such claim.
>
> >>>>> So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
> >>>>> seconds on my watch.
> >>>>> Guess what???????????????????????
> >>>> I can't guess. Tell us.
>
> Can I suppose that you are never going to reveal your brilliant conclusion?
First I must suppose you conclude that the chances of life are
1/1.32539089*10^28
Is that correct?
> >>> I doubt that, you are talking to me don't forget.
> >> Yes,
>
> > (Was that a subconscience agreement to give me £4million U.Kpounds)?
>
> If it was, send a bill to my subconscious, not me.
You invited me. I didn't gatecrash
> >> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
> >> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
> >> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>
> > Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third rollover.
>
> Granting for the sake of argument that I believed you, why would I owe
> you money?
For the knowledge I gave you earlier.
bpuharic
>Listen to the hebrew GOD tonight. Jehovah.
he doesn't exist. how can you listen to silence?
>
John Harshman
whether your nan is sick at all, or whether you even have a nan.
John Harshman
No. Wherever did you get that idea?
>>>>> I doubt that, you are talking to me don't forget.
>>>> Yes,
>>> (Was that a subconscience agreement to give me £4million U.Kpounds)?
>> If it was, send a bill to my subconscious, not me.
>
>
> You invited me. I didn't gatecrash
I invited you? When? To what?
>>>> but hope springs eternal. Don't worry. Nobody will think less of
>>>> you if you explain what you're trying to say, even if it's really
>>>> stupid. And just think: what if it's really clever?
>>> Now I know you believe me. You owe me £4 million, every third rollover.
>> Granting for the sake of argument that I believed you, why would I owe
>> you money?
>
> For the knowledge I gave you earlier.
You didn't give me any knowledge, and I don't recall there being a
specified charge for anything.
spintronic
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:16:40 -0500, spintronic wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 20 Nov, 01:33, "Dick C." <foo.dic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:997acb31-7245-471f-
> >> a2a9-4fe5db0fe...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>> On 20 Nov, 00:44, "Dick C." <foo.dic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> .
> >>> .
>
> >>>>> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> >>>>> happening.
>
> >>>> Really? Where? How about showing the quote.
> >>>> I really suspect that you made that up.
>
> >>> I suspect we could argue a while, and then I say green.
>
> >>> I also suspect you could do your own hardwork, and find the colour
> >>> grey.
>
> >>>>> So I started my stopwatch, and calculated his probability, vs the
> >>>>> seconds on my watch.
>
> >>>>> Guess what???????????????????????
>
> >>> You picked brown.
> > .
> > .
.
.
> >> Just as I thought, you are lying about Harshman saying that.
>
> > No I'm not.
>
> Cool. So post the cite showing where he did.
No. He knows what & why he did it.
I know why what & where he did.
The question is do you fools comprehend why he did what he did?
If you can't keep up,Go away.
J.J. O'Shea
(in article <FeidnRkKLux...@giganews.com>):
I simply don't believe anything he posts.
John Harshman
Actually, I know that I didn't do it. But because you won't provide the
post, here it is (direct quote of the relevant bit):
"If we assume that you mean there is a 1 in 13 million chance of winning
per trial, that number will be roughly correct. But where did that
assumption come from? What if the chance of winning was 1 in 10^50? Now
how many winners are there likely to be, given that Bob won once?"
Note the important phrase "what if", i.e. it's a hypothetical. Note that
the sentence refers to winning the lottery, not to the origin of life.
Note that spinny just can't read.
> I know why what & where he did.
>
>
> The question is do you fools comprehend why he did what he did?
>
>
> If you can't keep up,Go away.
I thought you weren't going to post any more because your nan was sick.
J.J. O'Shea
(in article
<44df2ae8-d50f-44b4...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>):
He says he didn't. Everyone else believes him. If you know where he did, you
can cite it and prove your position. If you fail to cite it, well, as you
have no credibility...
>
> I know why what & where he did.
Prove it.
>
>
> The question is do you fools comprehend why he did what he did?
It doesn't seem that he did what you said he did. I _know_ that you often say
things which you cannot possibly prove. For example, you have stated that I
am a serial killer. You can't support that assertion, either.
You're delusional. That's quite clear.
>
>
> If you can't keep up,Go away.
>
Oh, I think I'll stay, unless someone can mount a DOS attack on my system and
shut me up. I find your delusions amusing.
Dick C.
news:3646b776-7637-48fc...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
Since further down in the thread he explains what happened, it
seems that you are lying again.
Devils Advocaat
> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> happening.
Did he?
Can you offer an exact quote?
Can you offer up the thread's title?
Or maybe even post a link to it?
J.J. O'Shea
(in article <rbSdndmyjp7...@giganews.com>):
>
>
> I thought you weren't going to post any more because your nan was sick.
He's simply the most arrant liar and nothing he posts is to be believed.
Inez
The way to win the lottery is to be the one selling the tickets. I
figured that out when I was 7.
RAM
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:56:59 -0500, John Harshman wrote
>
>
>
> > I thought you weren't going to post any more because your nan was sick.
>
> He's simply the most arrant liar and nothing he posts is to be believed.
>
> --
> email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
That includes the story about his ill nan.
John Wilkins
<fd302aaf-a352-42a5...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
RAM <ramat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 6:43 am, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:56:59 -0500, John Harshman wrote
> > (in article <rbSdndmyjp7hmJvWRVn_...@giganews.com>):
> >
> >
> >
> > > I thought you weren't going to post any more because your nan was sick.
> >
> > He's simply the most arrant liar and nothing he posts is to be believed.
>
> That includes the story about his ill nan.
>
I think that charity requires we take that at face value unless we have
good solid reason to think it is false. I don't know if he used that
excuse at school or not, but we have to take it seriously.
chris thompson
You are one seriously mind-fooked dude.
Get some help.
You are not as fragmented as Tapestry/Great Dayne but you are headed
that way.
Please seek help before you are irretrieveably lost.
Chris
Mike Painter
> John harshman says life has a 10^50 chance per habbitable planet of
> happening.
>
>
> seconds on my watch.
>
>
> Guess what???????????????????????
John is out of touch.
Idiots unable to understand what is going on have raised the 50 to well over
150 in the last few years.
If their idea had any validity there would be no chemistry.
John Harshman
doesn't stop posting? Are we allowed to infer anything?
John Wilkins
<jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
Maybe that he doesn't love his nan as much as he says he does? :-)
J.J. O'Shea
(in article <tPednc0OhZA...@giganews.com>):
I infer that either:
1 he lied about someone being sick
2 someone may be sick, but he really doesn't care if that someone lives or
dies
3 he's got a severe mental problem
4 some combination of the above.
Right now I'm leaning heavily towards (4).