>> On Jun 18, 11:34?am, rnorman <
r_s_nor...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:34:11 +0100, alias Ernest Major
>> > <{$t...@meden.demon.co.ukl> wrote:
>> > > On 18/06/2013 06:49, Paul Ciszek wrote:
>> > > > Cyanobacteria, and by extension green plants, make use of the
>red
>> > and blue
>> > > > ends of the spectrum while discarding the middle. ?(Hence the
>> > popularity
>> > > > of garish red & blue LED lighting in the latest, most
>high-tech
>> > forms of
>> > > > hydroponics.) ?Now, some algae contain other pigments, such as
>> > rhodophyta.
>> > > > Do they use these pigments to capture and make use of green or
>> > yellow light
>> > > > from the middle of the spectrum?
>> > > Wikipedia says so ...
>> > > ? ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_pigment
>> > > .... but this article isn't well referenced (but Wikipedia
>tends to
>> > be
>> > > down on primary sources, and I guess most of the literature on
>the
>> > acual
>> > > chemistry is to be found in primary sources).
>> > Sorry about the formatting but I am responding from a smart phone
>> > rather than a real computer.
>> > My impression is that the accessory pigments somehow channel the
>> > electron excitation from the captured photons into the same
>> > photosystem but I don't know just how it is done and it is too
>> > tedious for me to look it up on my phone. ?I also don't know why
>> > chlorophyll should ignore the most energetic part of the solar
>> > radiation.
>> > However I happen now to be floating down the Volga River in the
>> > company of a plant physiologist so I will try to find out.
>> I found the following assertion:
>> "Photosynthetic cyanobacteria have chlorophyll a and carotenoids in
>> addition to some unusual accessory pigments named phycobilins. The
>> blue pigment, phycocyanin and the red one, phycoerythrin, absorb
>> wavelengths of light for photosynthesis that are missed by
>chlorophyll
>> and the carotenoids" from Kenneth Todar at the following link:
>>
>
http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad
>=rja&ved=0CDQQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftextbookofbacteriology.net%2Fprocar
>yotes_3.html&ei=SVvAUbicEcOIhQexvYHACw&usg=AFQjCNEpomO6YDY_EMYfUNjBP_pO
>7EdxPQ&sig2=SISUBK-cBMXvtMmvGhNa3A
>Sorry, I assumed it was obvious that the accessory pigments absorb
>wavelengths of light missed by chlorophyll a. The question is the
>mechanism by which electron excitation can be passed to photosystems
>I and II in order to produce the reducing power needed to fix
>(reduce) carbon to carbohydrate. My colleague would be happy to
>explain the actions of all sorts of plant hormones and phytochromes
>but the biophysics of electron excitation is somewhat specialized.
I have, in my time, attended more than one seminar on
electron excitation and transfer in photosynthesis.
Sadly, I recall none of the details except that the process
involves compounds easily excited by a photon that leaves
an electron excited. Then this electron is transferred
either down the chain to an appropriate site, or transferred
to another molecule entirely. Eventually the electron,
energy degraded but not to zero, ends up at a site where the
"action" takes place.
I know that's a tremendously uninformative paragraph, but
I can't do any better. The takeaway for me which I still
remember is that I now understood why photosynthesis is
so inefficient.
>Note: accessory pigments have other functions. They also protect
>plants from photorespiration that interferes with photosynthesis. Of
>course horticulturists use artificial selection to produce plants
>with unusually colored and patterned foliage because of these
>pigments.