Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Fnord
63 views
Skip to first unread message
David Iain Greig
Oct 21, 2012, 5:14:11 PM10/21/12
to
Fnord bar.
--qux.
--qux.
David Iain Greig
Oct 21, 2012, 5:18:43 PM10/21/12
to
alextangent
Oct 21, 2012, 5:19:39 PM10/21/12
to
*Hemidactylus*
Oct 21, 2012, 6:46:00 PM10/21/12
to
On 10/21/2012 05:14 PM, David Iain Greig wrote:
> Fnord bar.
>
> --qux.
Who buys the first round?
> Fnord bar.
>
> --qux.
Who buys the first round?
Slow Vehicle
Oct 21, 2012, 9:05:41 PM10/21/12
to
Richard Norman
Oct 21, 2012, 9:19:07 PM10/21/12
to
*Hemidactylus*
Oct 21, 2012, 9:26:27 PM10/21/12
to
Paul J Gans
Oct 21, 2012, 9:30:49 PM10/21/12
to
alextangent <bl...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
No. Higher magic. We underlings have no idea as to its
meaning or anything. We just quail in anticipation.
--
--- Paul J. Gans
meaning or anything. We just quail in anticipation.
--
--- Paul J. Gans
Glenn
Oct 21, 2012, 9:30:12 PM10/21/12
to
"*Hemidactylus*" <ecph...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MJ6dnXEq3odePRnN...@giganews.com...
Stephen
Oct 21, 2012, 10:02:28 PM10/21/12
to
David Iain Greig wrote:
> Fnord bar.
>
> --qux.
With nuts and nougat and caramel.
> Fnord bar.
>
> --qux.
--
*Hemidactylus*
Oct 21, 2012, 10:20:11 PM10/21/12
to
Glenn
Oct 21, 2012, 11:05:46 PM10/21/12
to
news:JMKdnV2JDsHGMBnN...@giganews.com...
Sounds like a personal problem.
William Morse
Oct 21, 2012, 11:04:41 PM10/21/12
to
beer for Chris Thompson if I am remembering correctly) but that is for
anyone who wants to travel to Syracuse.
Slow Vehicle
Oct 21, 2012, 11:59:45 PM10/21/12
to
give me six months, and I'll stand a round of homebrew..
Burkhard
Oct 22, 2012, 12:19:40 AM10/22/12
to
J. J. Lodder
Oct 22, 2012, 3:33:50 AM10/22/12
to
Multiply by 2pi to get it right again,
Jan
Jan
Kleuskes & Moos
Oct 22, 2012, 6:17:41 AM10/22/12
to
*Hemidactylus*
Oct 22, 2012, 6:36:52 AM10/22/12
to
On 10/21/2012 11:05 PM, Glenn wrote:
> "*Hemidactylus*" <ecph...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:JMKdnV2JDsHGMBnN...@giganews.com...
>> On 10/21/2012 09:30 PM, Glenn wrote:
>>> "*Hemidactylus*" <ecph...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:MJ6dnXEq3odePRnN...@giganews.com...
>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:19 PM, Richard Norman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:05:41 -0700 (PDT), Slow Vehicle
>>>>> <oneslow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 21, 3:08 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fnord bar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --qux.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> foo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> {{{[{{zombo}}}]}}}
>>>>>
>>>>> Is DIG testing the fnord screening filter to reimplement it?
>>>>
>>>> Was it unimplemented?
>>>>
>>> Maybe it is being lamented.
>>
>> Or fermented. I still await first round beer bongs.
>>
> Sounds like a personal problem.
Or a personnel problem if the bar lacks staff.
> "*Hemidactylus*" <ecph...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:JMKdnV2JDsHGMBnN...@giganews.com...
>> On 10/21/2012 09:30 PM, Glenn wrote:
>>> "*Hemidactylus*" <ecph...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:MJ6dnXEq3odePRnN...@giganews.com...
>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:19 PM, Richard Norman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:05:41 -0700 (PDT), Slow Vehicle
>>>>> <oneslow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 21, 3:08 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fnord bar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --qux.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> foo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> {{{[{{zombo}}}]}}}
>>>>>
>>>>> Is DIG testing the fnord screening filter to reimplement it?
>>>>
>>>> Was it unimplemented?
>>>>
>>> Maybe it is being lamented.
>>
>> Or fermented. I still await first round beer bongs.
>>
> Sounds like a personal problem.
Mike Painter
Oct 22, 2012, 1:43:07 PM10/22/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:14:11 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
Of course there is a bar on the submarine.
"We all live on a YELLOW submarine" was so close to the truth.
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion." ~ Robert Pirsig
Of course there is a bar on the submarine.
"We all live on a YELLOW submarine" was so close to the truth.
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion." ~ Robert Pirsig
Bob Casanova
Oct 22, 2012, 2:02:33 PM10/22/12
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
<gan...@panix.com>:
....but it's pheasant enough, unless we need to duck.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
<gan...@panix.com>:
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Bob Casanova
Oct 22, 2012, 2:02:54 PM10/22/12
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:02:28 +0000 (UTC), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by "Stephen"
<ssa...@austin.rr.com>:
Oh, my!
appeared in talk.origins, posted by "Stephen"
<ssa...@austin.rr.com>:
pnyikos
Oct 22, 2012, 4:19:47 PM10/22/12
to nyi...@bellsouth.net
Whuffo?
He seemed to be far less obnoxious and incorrigible than J. J. O'Shea,
for instance.
Peter Nyikos
He seemed to be far less obnoxious and incorrigible than J. J. O'Shea,
for instance.
Peter Nyikos
alextangent
Oct 22, 2012, 4:24:51 PM10/22/12
to
On Oct 22, 7:03�pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
> <gan...@panix.com>:
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
> <gan...@panix.com>:
>
> >alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
> >>On Oct 21, 10:08?pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
> >>> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
> >>> > Fnord bar.
>
> >>> > --qux.
>
> >>> foo.
>
> >>SNAFU?
>
> >No. �Higher magic. �We underlings have no idea as to its
> >meaning or anything. �We just quail in anticipation.
>
> ....but it's pheasant enough, unless we need to duck.
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>
> - McNameless
I'd grouse after a ducking.
> >>On Oct 21, 10:08?pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
> >>> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
> >>> > Fnord bar.
>
> >>> > --qux.
>
> >>> foo.
>
> >>SNAFU?
>
> >No. �Higher magic. �We underlings have no idea as to its
> >meaning or anything. �We just quail in anticipation.
>
> ....but it's pheasant enough, unless we need to duck.
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>
> - McNameless
pnyikos
Oct 30, 2012, 3:15:28 PM10/30/12
to
OK, DIG, what's this all about? I thought it meant Robert Carnegie :
Fnord was barred from posting to t.o., and yet I've caught him posting
merrily away on a number of threads since then.
Peter Nyikos
Fnord was barred from posting to t.o., and yet I've caught him posting
merrily away on a number of threads since then.
Peter Nyikos
David Iain Greig
Oct 31, 2012, 7:29:12 AM10/31/12
to
pnyikos <nyi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
In this particular instance I needed to test a flag setting in procmail
and so I needed to generate a couple of posts to the group.
The word 'fnord' is a meme, or in-joke, among 'hackers' sensu stricto,
likewise, the 'words' foo, bar, baz, and qux(x..). They are
frequently used as nonsense particles where one cannot be bothered
typing 'this is a test post' or the like, and are in general recognized
as such by Old Farts Of A Certain Ilk.
There was a period where I tried to implement a means to block spam
from gmail/google groups, where any poster from there would be 'whitelisted'
if they included the word 'fnord' in their posts; those who did so were
added to a list that were allowed to post from those sites, and those
who did not were dropped. Implementation issues arose, and it was
stopped. The idea was spammers would never know to use 'fnord' and so
it was a simple mechanism to block post-and-run spam.
--D.
>
> Peter Nyikos
>
and so I needed to generate a couple of posts to the group.
The word 'fnord' is a meme, or in-joke, among 'hackers' sensu stricto,
likewise, the 'words' foo, bar, baz, and qux(x..). They are
frequently used as nonsense particles where one cannot be bothered
typing 'this is a test post' or the like, and are in general recognized
as such by Old Farts Of A Certain Ilk.
There was a period where I tried to implement a means to block spam
from gmail/google groups, where any poster from there would be 'whitelisted'
if they included the word 'fnord' in their posts; those who did so were
added to a list that were allowed to post from those sites, and those
who did not were dropped. Implementation issues arose, and it was
stopped. The idea was spammers would never know to use 'fnord' and so
it was a simple mechanism to block post-and-run spam.
--D.
>
> Peter Nyikos
>
Mike Painter
Oct 31, 2012, 10:42:32 PM10/31/12
to
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:29:12 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
<dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
>The word 'fnord' is a meme, or in-joke, among 'hackers'
Only an enlightened few.
<dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
>The word 'fnord' is a meme, or in-joke, among 'hackers'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion." ~ Robert Pirsig
J.J. O'Shea
Oct 31, 2012, 11:49:20 PM10/31/12
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:19:47 -0400, pnyikos wrote
(in article
<cda3f536-729d-49d0...@b15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>):
And there he is again. Why, who was it who was complaining about people
'poisoning' threads? Hmm. Maybe if I think a little it'll come to me...
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
(in article
<cda3f536-729d-49d0...@b15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>):
'poisoning' threads? Hmm. Maybe if I think a little it'll come to me...
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
Glenn
Oct 31, 2012, 11:57:26 PM10/31/12
to
"J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig> wrote in message news:k6srg...@news1.newsguy.com...
J.J. O'Shea
Nov 1, 2012, 12:33:30 AM11/1/12
to
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:57:26 -0400, Glenn wrote
(in article <glennsheldon-k6ss7o$sfv$1...@dont-email.me>):
Just commenting; if you think differently, please point out where I
complained. I _know_ that Peter is Peter and will never, ever, change.
And, oh, I also know that you won't, either.
(in article <glennsheldon-k6ss7o$sfv$1...@dont-email.me>):
complained. I _know_ that Peter is Peter and will never, ever, change.
And, oh, I also know that you won't, either.
Glenn
Nov 1, 2012, 12:53:53 AM11/1/12
to
"J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig> wrote in message news:k6su2...@news1.newsguy.com...
J.J. O'Shea
Nov 1, 2012, 7:54:42 AM11/1/12
to
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 00:53:53 -0400, Glenn wrote
(in article <glennsheldon-k6svhk$9vs$1...@dont-email.me>):
>
> "J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig> wrote in message
> news:k6su2...@news1.newsguy.com...
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:57:26 -0400, Glenn wrote
>> (in article <glennsheldon-k6ss7o$sfv$1...@dont-email.me>):
>>
>>>
>>> "J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig> wrote in message
>>> news:k6srg...@news1.newsguy.com...
>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:19:47 -0400, pnyikos wrote
>>>> (in article
>>>> <cda3f536-729d-49d0...@b15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>):
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 21, 5:03 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Fnord bar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --qux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whuffo?
>>>>>
>>>>> He seemed to be far less obnoxious and incorrigible than J. J. O'Shea,
>>>>> for instance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter Nyikos
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And there he is again. Why, who was it who was complaining about people
>>>> 'poisoning' threads? Hmm. Maybe if I think a little it'll come to me...
>>>>
>>> So he started it and you aren't complaining?
>>>
>>
>> Just commenting; if you think differently, please point out where I
>> complained. I _know_ that Peter is Peter and will never, ever, change.
>>
>> And, oh, I also know that you won't, either.
>>
> There you are.
>
I do notice that you failed to point out any 'complaints'.
(in article <glennsheldon-k6svhk$9vs$1...@dont-email.me>):
>
> "J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig> wrote in message
> news:k6su2...@news1.newsguy.com...
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:57:26 -0400, Glenn wrote
>> (in article <glennsheldon-k6ss7o$sfv$1...@dont-email.me>):
>>
>>>
>>> "J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig> wrote in message
>>> news:k6srg...@news1.newsguy.com...
>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:19:47 -0400, pnyikos wrote
>>>> (in article
>>>> <cda3f536-729d-49d0...@b15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>):
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 21, 5:03 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Fnord bar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --qux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whuffo?
>>>>>
>>>>> He seemed to be far less obnoxious and incorrigible than J. J. O'Shea,
>>>>> for instance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter Nyikos
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And there he is again. Why, who was it who was complaining about people
>>>> 'poisoning' threads? Hmm. Maybe if I think a little it'll come to me...
>>>>
>>> So he started it and you aren't complaining?
>>>
>>
>> Just commenting; if you think differently, please point out where I
>> complained. I _know_ that Peter is Peter and will never, ever, change.
>>
>> And, oh, I also know that you won't, either.
>>
> There you are.
>
Mitchell Coffey
Nov 1, 2012, 12:38:06 PM11/1/12
to
On 10/31/2012 10:42 PM, Mike Painter wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:29:12 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
> <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> The word 'fnord' is a meme, or in-joke, among 'hackers'
>
> Only an enlightened few.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord
For a certain definition of "enlightenment."
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:29:12 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
> <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> The word 'fnord' is a meme, or in-joke, among 'hackers'
>
> Only an enlightened few.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord
Mitchell Coffey
Mitchell Coffey
Nov 1, 2012, 12:43:12 PM11/1/12
to
to do with you?
Mitchell Coffey
J.J. O'Shea
Nov 1, 2012, 12:55:07 PM11/1/12
to
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:43:12 -0400, Mitchell Coffey wrote
(in article <k6u8qq$nve$8...@dont-email.me>):
Well, of course. It must have something to do with Peter. He is, after all,
The Single Most Important Person In The Universe.
(in article <k6u8qq$nve$8...@dont-email.me>):
The Single Most Important Person In The Universe.
*Hemidactylus*
Nov 1, 2012, 10:33:42 PM11/1/12
to
over with or there will be repercussions.
pnyikos
Nov 2, 2012, 4:32:06 PM11/2/12
to nyi...@bellsouth.net
yet he has been posting merrily away..."?
Why does my adding the fact that I witnessed it with my own eyes (as
opposed to e.g., relying on hearsay, like a lot of people do where
Behe is concerned) elicit this strange reply from you?
Did you REALLY think that I assumed that "Fnord bar" had something to
do with me???
Peter Nyikos
pnyikos
Nov 2, 2012, 4:36:42 PM11/2/12
to nyi...@bellsouth.net
which I replied a few minutes ago]. What reasoning, if any, is behind
it?
Peter Nyikos
pnyikos
Nov 2, 2012, 4:44:44 PM11/2/12
to nyi...@bellsouth.net
On Nov 1, 12:58�pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:43:12 -0400, Mitchell Coffey wrote
> (in article <k6u8qq$nv...@dont-email.me>):
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:43:12 -0400, Mitchell Coffey wrote
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 10/30/2012 3:15 PM, pnyikos wrote:
> >> On Oct 21, 5:03 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
> >>> Fnord bar.
>
> >>> --qux.
>
> >> OK, DIG, what's this all about? �I thought it meant Robert Carnegie :
> >> Fnord was barred from posting to t.o., and yet I've caught him posting
> >> merrily away on a number of threads since then.
>
> >> Peter Nyikos
>
> > Jeez, Peter, if a tree falls in the woods do you assume it has something
> > to do with you?
>
> > Mitchell Coffey
>
> Well, of course. It must have something to do with Peter. He is, after all,
> The Single Most Important Person In The Universe.
Unlike with Mitchell and Hemidactylus, I'm not going to ask what is
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 10/30/2012 3:15 PM, pnyikos wrote:
> >> On Oct 21, 5:03 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
> >>> Fnord bar.
>
> >>> --qux.
>
> >> OK, DIG, what's this all about? �I thought it meant Robert Carnegie :
> >> Fnord was barred from posting to t.o., and yet I've caught him posting
> >> merrily away on a number of threads since then.
>
> >> Peter Nyikos
>
> > Jeez, Peter, if a tree falls in the woods do you assume it has something
> > to do with you?
>
> > Mitchell Coffey
>
> Well, of course. It must have something to do with Peter. He is, after all,
> The Single Most Important Person In The Universe.
behind this "Well, of course..." comment.
The answer is obvious. It is the ventriloquist-analogue who actually
types the things that appear under the byline of the dummy-analogue,
"J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig>."
Peter Nyikos
*Hemidactylus*
Nov 2, 2012, 7:45:46 PM11/2/12
to
activate an asset.
Mitchell Coffey
Nov 3, 2012, 3:32:31 AM11/3/12
to
you were making a rather cleaver joke. I wrote what I did because I
didn't read what you'd written at all closely. You do have a tendency to
introduce your own issues into unrelated threads, but I completely
misread you here.
Mitchell Coffey
J.J. O'Shea
Nov 3, 2012, 7:24:04 AM11/3/12
to
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:44:44 -0400, pnyikos wrote
(in article
<f5166165-ad15-4462...@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>):
> On Nov 1, 12:58 pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:43:12 -0400, Mitchell Coffey wrote
>> (in article <k6u8qq$nv...@dont-email.me>):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10/30/2012 3:15 PM, pnyikos wrote:
>>>> On Oct 21, 5:03 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>> Fnord bar.
>>
>>>>> --qux.
>>
>>>> OK, DIG, what's this all about? I thought it meant Robert Carnegie :
>>>> Fnord was barred from posting to t.o., and yet I've caught him posting
>>>> merrily away on a number of threads since then.
>>
>>>> Peter Nyikos
>>
>>> Jeez, Peter, if a tree falls in the woods do you assume it has something
>>> to do with you?
>>
>>> Mitchell Coffey
>>
>> Well, of course. It must have something to do with Peter. He is, after all,
>> The Single Most Important Person In The Universe.
>
> Unlike with Mitchell and Hemidactylus, I'm not going to ask what is
> behind this "Well, of course..." comment.
That would be because you already know, Peter.
>
> The answer is obvious. It is the ventriloquist-analogue who actually
> types the things that appear under the byline of the dummy-analogue,
> "J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig>."
Most interesting.
>
> Peter Nyikos
Who is still the single most dishonest creationist currently posting on t.o.
(in article
<f5166165-ad15-4462...@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>):
> On Nov 1, 12:58 pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:43:12 -0400, Mitchell Coffey wrote
>> (in article <k6u8qq$nv...@dont-email.me>):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10/30/2012 3:15 PM, pnyikos wrote:
>>>> On Oct 21, 5:03 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>> Fnord bar.
>>
>>>>> --qux.
>>
>>>> OK, DIG, what's this all about? I thought it meant Robert Carnegie :
>>>> Fnord was barred from posting to t.o., and yet I've caught him posting
>>>> merrily away on a number of threads since then.
>>
>>>> Peter Nyikos
>>
>>> Jeez, Peter, if a tree falls in the woods do you assume it has something
>>> to do with you?
>>
>>> Mitchell Coffey
>>
>> Well, of course. It must have something to do with Peter. He is, after all,
>> The Single Most Important Person In The Universe.
>
> Unlike with Mitchell and Hemidactylus, I'm not going to ask what is
> behind this "Well, of course..." comment.
>
> The answer is obvious. It is the ventriloquist-analogue who actually
> types the things that appear under the byline of the dummy-analogue,
> "J.J. O'Shea" <try.n...@but.see.sig>."
>
> Peter Nyikos
Who is still the single most dishonest creationist currently posting on t.o.
J.J. O'Shea
Nov 3, 2012, 7:24:59 AM11/3/12
to
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 03:32:31 -0400, Mitchell Coffey wrote
(in article <k72ha8$lnj$3...@dont-email.me>):
Peter was making a _joke_?! Be still my heart.
(in article <k72ha8$lnj$3...@dont-email.me>):
Walter Bushell
Nov 3, 2012, 10:08:59 PM11/3/12
to
In article <k6u9h...@news4.newsguy.com>,
No, that's me. But I am crazy, it is well known.
--
This space unintentionally left blank.
--
This space unintentionally left blank.
pnyikos
Nov 8, 2012, 9:35:38 AM11/8/12
to nyi...@bellsouth.net
You are still too deeply encoded for me to fathom your comment about
Carnegie being our kingpin now.
Peter Nyikos
SkyEyes
Nov 9, 2012, 3:47:58 AM11/9/12
to
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Bob Casanova
Nov 9, 2012, 1:11:26 PM11/9/12
to
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 00:47:58 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by SkyEyes
<skye...@yahoo.com>:
>On Oct 22, 1:28 pm, alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 22, 7:03 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
>> > appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>> > <gan...@panix.com>:
>>
>> > >alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
>> > >>On Oct 21, 10:08?pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>> > >>> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>
>> > >>> > Fnord bar.
>>
>> > >>> > --qux.
>>
>> > >>> foo.
>>
>> > >>SNAFU?
>>
>> > >No. Higher magic. We underlings have no idea as to its
>> > >meaning or anything. We just quail in anticipation.
>> > ....but it's pheasant enough, unless we need to duck.
appeared in talk.origins, posted by SkyEyes
<skye...@yahoo.com>:
>On Oct 22, 1:28 pm, alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 22, 7:03 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
>> > appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>> > <gan...@panix.com>:
>>
>> > >alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
>> > >>On Oct 21, 10:08?pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>> > >>> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>
>> > >>> > Fnord bar.
>>
>> > >>> > --qux.
>>
>> > >>> foo.
>>
>> > >>SNAFU?
>>
>> > >No. Higher magic. We underlings have no idea as to its
>> > >meaning or anything. We just quail in anticipation.
>> > ....but it's pheasant enough, unless we need to duck.
>> I'd grouse after a ducking.
>I'm afraid I'd chicken out.
Wait; let me eggsplain...
>I'm afraid I'd chicken out.
Mitchell Coffey
Nov 10, 2012, 11:22:30 PM11/10/12
to
On 11/9/2012 1:11 PM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 00:47:58 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by SkyEyes
> <skye...@yahoo.com>:
>
>> On Oct 22, 1:28 pm, alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 7:03 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>>> appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>>>> <gan...@panix.com>:
>>>
>>>>> alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 21, 10:08?pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Fnord bar.
>>>
>>>>>>>> --qux.
>>>
>>>>>>> foo.
>>>
>>>>>> SNAFU?
>>>
>>>>> No. Higher magic. We underlings have no idea as to its
>>>>> meaning or anything. We just quail in anticipation.
>
>>>> ....but it's pheasant enough, unless we need to duck.
>
>>> I'd grouse after a ducking.
>
>> I'm afraid I'd chicken out.
>
> Wait; let me eggsplain...
Turkey.
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 00:47:58 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by SkyEyes
> <skye...@yahoo.com>:
>
>> On Oct 22, 1:28 pm, alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 7:03 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:30:49 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>>> appeared in talk.origins, posted by Paul J Gans
>>>> <gan...@panix.com>:
>>>
>>>>> alextangent <b...@rivadpm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 21, 10:08?pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Fnord bar.
>>>
>>>>>>>> --qux.
>>>
>>>>>>> foo.
>>>
>>>>>> SNAFU?
>>>
>>>>> No. Higher magic. We underlings have no idea as to its
>>>>> meaning or anything. We just quail in anticipation.
>
>>>> ....but it's pheasant enough, unless we need to duck.
>
>>> I'd grouse after a ducking.
>
>> I'm afraid I'd chicken out.
>
> Wait; let me eggsplain...
Mitchell
0 new messages