Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running about telling hawks from handsaws?
These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these eels out of here.
Tiny Bulcher wrote: > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > eels out of here.
Bill Hudson wrote: > Tiny Bulcher wrote: > > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> > These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > > eels out of here.
chris.linthomp...@gmail.com wrote: > Bill Hudson wrote: > > Tiny Bulcher wrote: > > > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > > > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > > > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > > > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > > > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > > > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > > > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > > > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > > > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > > > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > > > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > > > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > > > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > > > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > > > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > > > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > > > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > > > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > > > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > > > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > > > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > > > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > > > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > > > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > > > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > > > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > > > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > > > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > > > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> > > These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > > > eels out of here.
Tiny Bulcher wrote: > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > eels out of here.
Well, that's it then. Absolutely no reason to keep reading talk.origins...
Tiny Bulcher wrote: > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > eels out of here.
> -- > Tiny > wind NNW, backing Southerly
[...]
You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
Bill Hudson wrote: > chris.linthomp...@gmail.com wrote: > > Bill Hudson wrote: > > > Tiny Bulcher wrote: > > > > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > > > > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > > > > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > > > > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > > > > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > > > > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > > > > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > > > > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > > > > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > > > > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > > > > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > > > > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > > > > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > > > > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > > > > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > > > > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > > > > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > > > > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > > > > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > > > > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > > > > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > > > > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > > > > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > > > > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > > > > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > > > > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > > > > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > > > > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > > > > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> > > > These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > > > > eels out of here.
> Oh, no, not *that*, I meant whatever it is he's smoking.
Oh, I know. Only AiG would sell you a recreational drug *guaranteed* to give you a really bad trip. But then, I guess only creationists would want to fork over money for it.
> > These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > > eels out of here.
> > -- > > Tiny > > wind NNW, backing Southerly
> [...]
> You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently > disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn > liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
> But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
Tiny Bulcher wrote: > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > eels out of here.
>> You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently >> disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn >> liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
>> But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
>Buggrit. I knew I'd forgotten somebody.
You forgot Flying Feral Chickens, too. --
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless
>>> You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently >>> disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn >>> liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
>>> But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:11:48 -0800, Tiny Bulcher wrote: > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years.
Years!? I have an irrefutable proof of evolution which I will post in just one week.
It only remains to be determined *which* one week.
-- Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net "Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering
Tiny Bulcher wrote: > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > eels out of here.
> -- > Tiny > wind NNW, backing Southerly
Clever, Tiny.
-- “What concerns me now is that even if you’re as brilliant as Newton, you reach a point where you start basking in the majesty of God and then your discovery stops — it just stops,” Dr. Tyson said. “You’re no good anymore for advancing that frontier, waiting for somebody else to come behind you who doesn’t have God on the brain and who says: ‘That’s a really cool problem. I want to solve it.’
>>>>You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently >>>>disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn >>>>liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
>>>>But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
>>>Buggrit. I knew I'd forgotten somebody.
>>You forgot Flying Feral Chickens, too.
> And "falling decisions" or "decision points".
No, he didn't. "It's all about decisions, you see" Klaus
Bill Hudson wrote: > chris.linthomp...@gmail.com wrote:
>>Bill Hudson wrote:
>>>Tiny Bulcher wrote:
>>>>Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is >>>>irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have >>>>written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a >>>>video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh >>>>no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of >>>>cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell >>>>you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all >>>>my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you >>>>know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about >>>>decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free >>>>behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, >>>>and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you >>>>fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need >>>>to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert >>>>on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me >>>>contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... >>>>it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to >>>>know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would >>>>prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's >>>>invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get >>>>merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I >>>>said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I >>>>SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me >>>>round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. >>>>I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler >>>>liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium >>>>hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of >>>>that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running >>>>about telling hawks from handsaws?
>>>>These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these >>>>eels out of here.
> >> You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently > >> disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn > >> liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
> >> But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
> >Buggrit. I knew I'd forgotten somebody.
> You forgot Flying Feral Chickens, too.
*googles* .... ah, the legendary Ted Holden. Before my time, I'm afraid.
Bill Hudson <oldgeek61-...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Oh, no, not *that*, I meant whatever it is he's smoking.
"No no, that's too strong, Man." - Champion Jack Dupree
-- H. Brent Howatt | The deluded are always filled with absolutes hey...@die.spammers.rootshell.be| The rest of us have to live with ambiguity PGP keys by email or keyserver | _Aristoi_ Walter Jon Williams
Tiny Bulcher <RSGD9...@aol.com> wrote: > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is [mass snippage] > These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > eels out of here.
I've been gone for a while, changing jobs, houses, counties, etc., and I retuirn to find this. Clearly with the passing of time, the creationists minds have moved to a far more disordered state.
-- H. Brent Howatt | The deluded are always filled with absolutes hey...@die.spammers.rootshell.be| The rest of us have to live with ambiguity PGP keys by email or keyserver | _Aristoi_ Walter Jon Williams
Klaus wrote: > Bill Hudson wrote: >> chris.linthomp...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Bill Hudson wrote:
>>>> Tiny Bulcher wrote:
>>>>> Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is >>>>> irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have >>>>> written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a >>>>> video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh >>>>> no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of >>>>> cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I >>>>> tell >>>>> you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to >>>>> all >>>>> my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you >>>>> know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about >>>>> decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free >>>>> behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, >>>>> and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you >>>>> fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need >>>>> to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert >>>>> on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me >>>>> contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... >>>>> it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely >>>>> happy to >>>>> know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would >>>>> prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's >>>>> invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get >>>>> merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I >>>>> said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I >>>>> SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me >>>>> round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. >>>>> I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler >>>>> liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium >>>>> hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of >>>>> that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running >>>>> about telling hawks from handsaws?
>>>>> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these >>>>> eels out of here.
>> Oh, no, not *that*, I meant whatever it is he's smoking.
> I thought it was a nice parody that covered everything except for stone > penis-snakes in coal mines.
And lurkers supporting him in email. -- [The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.] Richard Clayton "Remember, always be yourself. Unless you suck." — Joss Whedon
>> >> You have succeeded in reconciling nearly all of the apparently >> >> disparate geniuses who see past the sham which is evolutionism. (Damn >> >> liberal spellchecker can't recognize "evolutionism")
>> >> But... where's the 20 billion year-old ax handle? Preferably in coal.
>> >Buggrit. I knew I'd forgotten somebody.
>> You forgot Flying Feral Chickens, too.
>*googles* .... ah, the legendary Ted Holden. Before my time, I'm >afraid.
Pity. Here's another: "Woodpecker Karl".
Enjoy! ;-) --
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless
Tiny Bulcher wrote: > Absolutely, definitively, and without question. My proof is > irrefutable. But I'm not going to tell you what it is until I have > written it all up in a paper, which could take, oooh, years. I have a > video, too, that proves it all conclusively, but you can't see it, oh > no, because you're not worthy. Cites? You want cites? I've got lots of > cites, to literally millions of textbooks, ... and they're mine, I tell > you, all mine. But if you like, I will post a post full of links to all > my old posts, and I'm sure that will convince you. By the way, did you > know Dembski is a heterosexual-adherent? Oh, yes. It's all about > decisions, you see, and if any of you decide to indulge in free > behaviour and argue with me I will be forced to be extremely merciful, > and ignore you completely. Or I might swear at you a lot, and call you > fascist cheerleaders. Science, you say? I know all the science I need > to know, because I was in a hospital once, and that makes me an expert > on Everything. Next thing you know you'll be trying to tell me > contraception can prevent pregnancy. I know what you are all up to ... > it's a conspiracy, but that's all right. It makes me extremely happy to > know that you all think I'm wrong, because if you agreed me that would > prove me wrong, but you don't, so that proves I'm right. That's > invulnerable logic, that is. I've told you, don't argue, or I'll get > merciful again. You wouldn't like me when I'm merciful. Why? Because I > said so. Isn't that good enough for you? WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME IF I > SHOUTED? I'm going to have my own stalker, you know, who follows me > round accusing me of being nice to Greeks. Yeah, but you can't get me. > I know what God equals, guv. (George ... don't do that). And Hitler > liked dogs, you know. Significant, eh? I told 'em, I did, millennium > hand and shrimp. Stalin's wife committed suicide, what do you think of > that, then? Do you think I can't tell what you're all up to, running > about telling hawks from handsaws?
> These fragments I have shored against my ruins. And somebody get these > eels out of here.
Wizard. Is this Chez Wattable or is it too long? -- [The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.] Richard Clayton "Remember, always be yourself. Unless you suck." — Joss Whedon
|
