Versions of Origin of Species - link needed

[Friar Broccoli]

Sometime during the spring or summer, someone put up
a program or a link to a tool that graphically showed the various
versions of Darwin's major work.

Did someone keep it?
If so, I would like a link to it.

[Sapient Fridge]

In message
<6fded2a6-ef72-40e3...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Friar Broccoli <eli...@gmail.com> writes

This one?

http://benfry.com/traces/
--
sapient_...@spamsights.org ICQ #17887309 * Save the net *
Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer *
Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today *
Kill: http://mail-abuse.com http://au.sorbs.net http://spamhaus.org

[Friar Broccoli]

On Nov 29, 12:40 pm, Sapient Fridge <use_reply_addr...@spamsights.org>
wrote:
> In message
> <6fded2a6-ef72-40e3-8635-5911505d1...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> Friar Broccoli <elia...@gmail.com> writes

>
> >Sometime during the spring or summer, someone put up
> >a program or a link to a tool that graphically showed the various
> >versions of Darwin's major work.
>
> >Did someone keep it?
> >If so, I would like a link to it.
>
> This one?
>
> http://benfry.com/traces/

Thanks greatly.
That link eventually lead to this:

http://darwin-online.org.uk/Variorum/1866/1866-90-c-1869.html

which is what I was actually looking for to verify the opening
statement in the Tautology FAQ.

[Ye Old One]

Google is playing silly buggers as usual and I'm sorry to say a search
of my own archive has drawn a blank.

--
Bob.

The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the
day they start making vacuum cleaners.

[Friar Broccoli]

On Nov 29, 1:12 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:21:09 -0800 (PST), Friar Broccoli
> <elia...@gmail.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>
> >Sometime during the spring or summer, someone put up
> >a program or a link to a tool that graphically showed the various
> >versions of Darwin's major work.
>
> >Did someone keep it?
> >If so, I would like a link to it.
>
> Google is playing silly buggers as usual and I'm sorry to say a search
> of my own archive has drawn a blank.

Thanks greatly for trying.
If my new computer arrives before the Christmas
holidays I will be switching back to an offline reader,
preferably one that will allow me to create my own
searchable archive.

[Ye Old One]

My problem has always been finding a search that produces 1 or more
hits rather than zero or "bloody hell are there that many!"

For example, I know at one point I posted a link to a video that
showed how a cell could evolve from non cellular life. But can I find
it? Nah!

--
Bob.

[Free Lunch]

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:45:44 GMT, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote in
talk.origins:

Twice I managed to get exactly one hit for a search. Sadly, both times
it happened when I was checking to see if a student had plagiarized
their work. They had.