If you had 100 chips.
spintronic
n1 = Spirituality.
n2 = Intelligence.
n3 = Social skills.
n4 = Happiness.
Dana Tweedy
That depends on what casino. Most of the casinos on the Strip have farily
crappy odds, but some of the Downtown places are pretty good. I'd
probably put some on the pass line, and hope for a good shooter.
DJT
Greg G.
This reminds me of the guy who found a genie in a bottle. The genie
could either make him the richest man who ever lived or the wisest man
who ever lived. The man chose wisdom. His first thought was the
realization that he made the wrong choice.
Boikat
spintronic
> spintronic wrote:
.
.
This is your choice. So your odds are looking good.
What do you choose?
spintronic
> On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
.
> > What would you spend them on?
>
> > n1 = Spirituality.
> > n2 = Intelligence.
> > n3 = Social skills.
> > n4 = Happiness.
>
> Sure. You first.
Age before beauty.
spintronic
There was no genie, his name was Solomon, & riches came with wisdom.
Boikat
Lady's first.
Boikat
John Wilkins
<ffa1e972-b4c9-4b3d...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Greg G. <ggw...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well I'd bet it 50:50 on Intelligence and Social Skills, on the
understanding that Spirituality is a sucker's buy (you get nothing for
your outlay) and that Happiness will come as the result of being well
endowed in the other two.
HighQ
> In article
> <ffa1e972-b4c9-4b3d-a6f3-e0fd94224...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
You believe that happiness comes from >50% intelligence?
And believe that spiritually is a wart that wont happen?
HighQ
> On Nov 26, 5:56 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Nov, 23:20, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > .
> > .
>
> > > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > > n4 = Happiness.
.
> > > Sure. You first.
>
> > Age before beauty.
>
> Lady's first.
Here's my coat, now answer do you want to walk on it?
Boikat
Being well endowed can be it's own happyness.
(Wanders off, whistling an inocent tune....)
Boikat
Burkhard
Funny, I thought just the other way round. I go 100% for happiness,
under the assumption that to be happy, you need at least lots and lots
of 2 and 3 anyway, so you get hem in a "buy one get two free package"
and you get lots of other goodies into the bargain, such as ""good
birth, good children, and beauty".
HighQ
> On Nov 26, 6:26 pm, John Wilkins <j...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
.
> Being well endowed can be it's own happyness.
>
> (Wanders off, whistling an inocent tune....)
Why do you bring this group to a new low?
John Wilkins
<deb08e1f-43e1-4327...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
HighQ <einst...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
I think if you are roughly equally smart and sociable, you can make a
happy life. I did not say spirituality is a wart; I said that I think
there's no payoff. For a start it's ill-defined (it seems to mean
little more than a feeling of unity with something, which can be as
easily satisfied by supporting your local football team, or studying
the biological world, or just going to the beach, as anything
religious), and for another according to most religious traditions you
don't attain it, you have it as a gift, so if I have it, I have it, and
if not, not (NB: Buddhist notions of enlightenment are different to
western "spirituality"). And finally I think it's a myth. There is no
such thing.
HighQ
>
> - Show quoted text -
That just shows your insecurities, about being ugly, having ugly kids,
and being a bad parent.
Tell your wife, I think her belly looks nice & (whatever).
I hope you have a boy & name him Paul.
John Wilkins
<b.sc...@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
On the principle of commutativity, I think we agree.
John Wilkins
<a933755d-f29d-46a3...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
How would you know that?
HighQ
>
> - Show quoted text -
And from experience.
The most ugly father can produce the most beautiful children.
Will in New Haven
Since, despite the wishful thinking of the envious, intelligence is
how you _attain_ social skills and you use both of those to attain
happiness, I will take intelligence. Intelligent people without social
skills have no social skills because they choose not to have them.
Stupid people can, some of them, be charming in some situations but
they never attain any real social skills. I don't think you use the
same kind of chips to purchase spirituality, so it isn't on this
menu.
--
Will in New Haven
Desertphile
n5=a hand gun. Then I'd have a fucking hell of a lot more than 100
chips, partner.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Desertphile
> spintronic wrote:
Bet with the house, when playing craps.
Notice that spinhead only offers four options? Here in a world
where tens of millions of people are starving to death, and many
more live in cardbord boxes, and he listed "Spirituality" as one
of the options.... the goddamned immoral shit.
Boikat
After you. As I said, ladies first.
Boikat
Boikat
Sorry. Did I touch on a sensative issue? You have my sympathies.
Boikat
HighQ
The guy with 2, buys 1. That gains him 3&4.
HighQ
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:07:18 -0800 (PST), spintronic
>
> > What would you spend them on?
>
> > n1 = Spirituality.
> > n2 = Intelligence.
> > n3 = Social skills.
> > n4 = Happiness.
>
> n5=a hand gun. Then I'd have a fucking hell of a lot more than 100
> chips, partner.
>
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
You can borrow my chips.
What do you pick? (More guns,'r' more 1 to 4?)
Boikat
Stuart
> What would you spend them on?
>
> n1 = Spirituality.
> n2 = Intelligence.
> n3 = Social skills.
> n4 = Happiness.
I'd invest.
Stuart
HighQ
> On Nov 26, 7:18 pm, John Wilkins <j...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
.
If we are forced to fight on a new low....
.
.
> > > Being well endowed can be it's own happyness.
>
> > > (Wanders off, whistling an inocent tune....)
>
> > How would you know that?
>
> Rumors.
Certainly none your wife is spreading.
(Now Boyprat, I hate this sort of filth, But obviously you persist.)
And you won't win. If you keep going I will castrate you like a Jewish
Raisen.
So either back on topic, or back on the topic of boyslacks balls?
You tell me?
HighQ
Nice of you to join us, but ("IN WHAT"?)
Will in New Haven
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:15:39 -0700, "Dana Tweedy"
>
> > spintronic wrote:
> > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > n4 = Happiness.
> > That depends on what casino. Most of the casinos on the Strip have farily
> > crappy odds, but some of the Downtown places are pretty good. I'd
> > probably put some on the pass line, and hope for a good shooter.
>
> Bet with the house, when playing craps.
<nitpic> You _can't_ bet with the house. You can bet against the
shooter but you still don't get the house's end of the action. I
forget why but I think one of the rolls that loses for the shooter
loses for you also. So you only have a somewhat smaller Negative
Expected Value than the shooter or those who bet with the shooter.
Guys who play craps always say it has the best odds for the player and
then they make "hard way" bets and "field" bets that are as bad as
roulette.
--
Will in New Haven
> Notice that spinhead only offers four options? Here in a world
> where tens of millions of people are starving to death, and many
> more live in cardbord boxes, and he listed "Spirituality" as one
> of the options.... the goddamned immoral shit.
>
HighQ
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
Well he's pissed.
macaddicted
> On 26 Nov, 23:20, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> .
> .
>
> > > What would you spend them on?
> >
> > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > n4 = Happiness.
> >
> > Sure. You first.
>
>
> Age before beauty.
Pearls before swine (which is the classic comeback).
--
macaddicted
Wisdom is radiant and unfading and she is easily discerned
by those who love her and is found by those who seek her.
Wisdom 6:12 (NRSV)
HighQ
> spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On 26 Nov, 23:20, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > .
> > .
>
> > > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > > n4 = Happiness.
.
> > > Sure. You first.
> > Age before beauty.
>
> Pearls before swine (which is the classic comeback).
Why do people feel a need to group up against me ?
Are these pigs even sniffing my pearls?
If I cast more, will they smell more?
Boikat
> On 27 Nov, 02:26, macaddic...@REMOVETHISca.rr.com (macaddicted) wrote:> spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 26 Nov, 23:20, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > .
> > > .
>
> > > > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > > > n4 = Happiness.
>
> .
> .
>
> > > > Sure. You first.
> > > Age before beauty.
>
> > Pearls before swine (which is the classic comeback).
>
> Why do people feel a need to group up against me ?
Take it as a subtle hint that *maybe* your'e full of crap.
Just a thought.
>
> Are these pigs even sniffing my pearls?
"Pearls" are not made of brown squishy matter, and they also do not
come from the South end of a North bound horse.
>
> If I cast more, will they smell more?
They smell enough the way it is.
Boikat
spintronic
> On Nov 26, 8:32 pm, HighQ <einstein...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 27 Nov, 02:26, macaddic...@REMOVETHISca.rr.com (macaddicted) wrote:> spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 26 Nov, 23:20, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > .
> > > > .
>
> > > > > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > > > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > > > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > > > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > > > > n4 = Happiness.
>
> > .
> > .
.
.
> > > > > Sure. You first.
> > > > Age before beauty.
>
> > > Pearls before swine (which is the classic comeback).
>
> > Why do people feel a need to group up against me ?
>
> Take it as a subtle hint that *maybe* your'e full of crap.
Sure, thank your wife.
> Just a thought.
When is she Due?
> > Are these pigs even sniffing my pearls?
>
> "Pearls" are not made of brown squishy matter, and they also do not
> come from the South end of a North bound horse.
Anyway, that reminds me. What topic waswe on?
> > If I cast more, will they smell more?
>
> They smell enough the way it is.
Guess you miissed yet *ANOTHER* life lesson/analogy there.
But thanks for the conformation, nonethe less.
Dana Tweedy
>>
>> Bet with the house, when playing craps.
>
> <nitpic> You _can't_ bet with the house. You can bet against the
> shooter but you still don't get the house's end of the action. I
> forget why but I think one of the rolls that loses for the shooter
> loses for you also. So you only have a somewhat smaller Negative
> Expected Value than the shooter or those who bet with the shooter.
> Guys who play craps always say it has the best odds for the player and
> then they make "hard way" bets and "field" bets that are as bad as
> roulette.
I've played craps on line where I didn't risk any real money, and I've
played real games in casinos in Vegas.
When I've played craps for real money in Vegas, I played lowest bet limits I
could find. ($3 per bet) I don't try the hardway or field bets, as they are
pretty much sucker bets. I play the pass line, and the odds, where the
chances of winning are best. I usually don't make much, but I usually come
out ahead.
I've played roulette a few times, but I only bet on the outside thirds, and
bet two of the three, so the odds of winning something are 2/3. If I win, I
get out when I'm ahead, before the laws of chance catch up.
In Vegas terms I'm a piker.
DJT
bpuharic
<spint...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 26 Nov, 23:20, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>.
>.
>
>> > What would you spend them on?
>>
>> > n1 = Spirituality.
>> > n2 = Intelligence.
>> > n3 = Social skills.
>> > n4 = Happiness.
>>
>> Sure. You first.
>
>
>Age before beauty.
pearls before swine
Burkhard
It mainly shows that I have read Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, where
he names these three as goods that can give you Eudamonia or
happiness, (279a-c), provided you also have intelligence, and whose
absence can destroy it. Someone here must uphold standards, after
all.
John Wilkins
<c703e1a1-78d7-4977...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
Burkhard <b.sc...@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
I read eudaimonia as having a good spirit or soul, not as modern
notions of happiness. Perhaps "contentment" or "fulfilment". Almost
stoic virtue...
Nick Keighley
> On 27 Nov, 00:26, John Wilkins <j...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <ffa1e972-b4c9-4b3d-a6f3-e0fd94224...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > Greg G. <ggw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > > n4 = Happiness.
>
> > > This reminds me of the guy who found a genie in a bottle. The genie
> > > could either make him the richest man who ever lived or the wisest man
> > > who ever lived. The man chose wisdom. His first thought was the
> > > realization that he made the wrong choice.
>
> > Well I'd bet it 50:50 on Intelligence and Social Skills, on the
> > understanding that Spirituality is a sucker's buy (you get nothing for
> > your outlay) and that Happiness will come as the result of being well
> > endowed in the other two.
>
I think he's saying if you're smart and have social skills you'll be
happy. I think you could construct scenarios where this wouldn't be
true. So I'd split the happiness/social skills bet. But then I'm a
geek.
> And believe that spiritually is a wart that wont happen?
spiritually is an imaginary property
alextangent
Strange, since you claim loads of 2, great steaming piles of 1, and
yet seem to have no 3 and a debatable amount of 4. In the casino of
life, seems like you blew 100 getting shit faced at the bar, and now
you're annoying all the other patrons by pontificating on the meaning
of liff from your bar stool.
Desertphile
<spint...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 Nov, 23:15, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> > spintronic wrote:
>
> .
> .
>
> > > What would you spend them on?
> >
> > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > n4 = Happiness.
> >
> > That depends on what casino. Most of the casinos on the Strip have farily
> > crappy odds, but some of the Downtown places are pretty good. I'd
> > probably put some on the pass line, and hope for a good shooter.
> This is your choice. So your odds are looking good.
> What do you choose?
None of the above, idiot. Drinking water, food, shelter, fuel, and
transportation come first.
--
spintronic
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:52:33 -0800 (PST), spintronic
>
>
>
>
>
> <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On 26 Nov, 23:15, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> > > spintronic wrote:
>
> > .
> > .
>
> > > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > > n4 = Happiness.
>
> > > That depends on what casino. Most of the casinos on the Strip have farily
> > > crappy odds, but some of the Downtown places are pretty good. I'd
> > > probably put some on the pass line, and hope for a good shooter.
> > This is your choice. So your odds are looking good.
> > What do you choose?
>
> None of the above, idiot. Drinking water, food, shelter, fuel, and
> transportation come first.
>
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
>
> - Show quoted text -
Only a moron could walk into ferrari dealership & ask for some dog
food.
Will in New Haven
I never go to a casino except to the poker room. However, I used to
ride a bus to Foxwoods and they gave you free play tickets and long
before that I made some decent money counting cards at Blackjack. When
I got those free play tickets I played craps because I wasn't going to
sit at the Blackjack table for any length of time. So I looked up the
numbers for playing "with the house" and it is clear that you can't
really do that. Nick the Greek said that betting against the shooter
got you a tiny fraction of one percent less disadvantage and advised
doing it if you didn't mind everyone at the table hating you. It never
bothered me.
Walter Bushell
<2bf3f46b-0b49-4e5d...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
Will in New Haven <bill....@taylorandfrancis.com> wrote:
> <nitpic> You _can't_ bet with the house. You can bet against the
> shooter but you still don't get the house's end of the action. I
> forget why but I think one of the rolls that loses for the shooter
> loses for you also. So you only have a somewhat smaller Negative
> Expected Value than the shooter or those who bet with the shooter.
> Guys who play craps always say it has the best odds for the player and
> then they make "hard way" bets and "field" bets that are as bad as
> roulette.
Hey, if they wanted to get rich or even keep their money, they wouldn't
be gambling at a casino, now would they. There are some games that have
winning stratgies for the player, but the house always wants to stamp
them out, even though the house would make even more money by allowing
them. "Jane Roe won a million dollars at blackjack", would bring the
suckers in, they'd scarf up a few free drinks and lose their shirts.
--
A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard.
Will in New Haven
> In article
> <2bf3f46b-0b49-4e5d-941e-e2b273ea0...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
> Will in New Haven <bill.re...@taylorandfrancis.com> wrote:
>
> > <nitpic> You _can't_ bet with the house. You can bet against the
> > shooter but you still don't get the house's end of the action. I
> > forget why but I think one of the rolls that loses for the shooter
> > loses for you also. So you only have a somewhat smaller Negative
> > Expected Value than the shooter or those who bet with the shooter.
> > Guys who play craps always say it has the best odds for the player and
> > then they make "hard way" bets and "field" bets that are as bad as
> > roulette.
>
> Hey, if they wanted to get rich or even keep their money, they wouldn't
> be gambling at a casino, now would they. There are some games that have
> winning stratgies for the player, but the house always wants to stamp
> them out, even though the house would make even more money by allowing
> them. "Jane Roe won a million dollars at blackjack", would bring the
> suckers in, they'd scarf up a few free drinks and lose their shirts.
I know middle-level casino executives who say they make _exactly_ that
argument about dealing with Blackjack counters. But the old guard just
can't _stand_ being the marks, even if it brings them in many more
victims, I mean customers. But none of them mind winning poker players
because the winners make their money from the losers and the house
gets its rake every time.
spintronic
> On Nov 27, 2:01 am, HighQ <einstein...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Nov, 23:07, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > n4 = Happiness.
.
> > The guy with 2, buys 1. That gains him 3&4.
>
> Strange, since you claim loads of 2, great steaming piles of 1, and
> yet seem to have no 3 and a debatable amount of 4. In the casino of
> life, seems like you blew 100 getting shit faced at the bar, and now
> you're annoying all the other patrons by pontificating on the meaning
> of liff from your bar stool.
I honestly believe this retort is the only one I have ever read, on
the same level as mine.
See, he even got the "liff" down to a tee.
I suggest you cellebrate.
spintronic
wrote:.
.
> and long before that I made some decent money counting cards at Blackjack.
Did I already mention he was pissed?
Why I believe I did.
Kleuskes & Moos
Unless, of course, you are the owner of a hungry dog. Besides,
Ferrari's and simular cars are nothing but toys.
I'd prefer a more practical vehicle, like a 2CV. More fun, too.
Desertphile
<spint...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 Nov, 15:58, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:52:33 -0800 (PST), spintronic
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 26 Nov, 23:15, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> > > > spintronic wrote:
> >
> > > .
> > > .
> >
> > > > > What would you spend them on?
> >
> > > > > n1 = Spirituality.
> > > > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > > > n4 = Happiness.
> >
> > > > That depends on what casino. Most of the casinos on the Strip have farily
> > > > crappy odds, but some of the Downtown places are pretty good. I'd
> > > > probably put some on the pass line, and hope for a good shooter.
> > > This is your choice. So your odds are looking good.
> > > What do you choose?
> > None of the above, idiot. Drinking water, food, shelter, fuel, and
> > transportation come first.
> Only a moron could walk into ferrari dealership & ask for some dog
> food.
They would if they had nothing to eat, moron.
--
Boikat
My. That was profoundly meaningless.
> > > Are these pigs even sniffing my pearls?
>
> > "Pearls" are not made of brown squishy matter, and they also do not
> > come from the South end of a North bound horse.
>
> Anyway, that reminds me. What topic waswe on?
Your stupid games.
>
> > > If I cast more, will they smell more?
>
> > They smell enough the way it is.
>
> Guess you miissed yet *ANOTHER* life lesson/analogy there.
>
> But thanks for the conformation, nonethe less.-
What ever. Maybe you should not post and sniff glue at the same
time. Just a suggestion, you dishonest iece of shit.
Boikat
spintronic
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:56:39 -0800 (PST), spintronic
.
> > > > > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > None of the above, idiot. Drinking water, food, shelter, fuel, and
> > > transportation come first.
>
> > Only a moron could walk into ferrari dealership & ask for some dog
> > food.
>
> They would if they had nothing to eat, moron.
The ferrari guy has 2 hands behind his back.
He says "in one hand the can you seek isn't there, in the other a can
you don't want is".
You choose his right, (And Win).
He gives you his can of 10W40.
Desertphile
The Stardust casino in Las Vegas, Nevada, used to have two
Blackjack machines that made card counting easy--- they had one
"deck" in them. I used the Zen system, using my fingers as an
abacus, to fill a gallon pickle jar with quarters. One could let
the wager "ride" up to $20, after which the machine would spit out
$40 on a win. Along the way I explained to my brother what I was
doing and why, until three very violent-looking men got standing
behind me and examined every twitch I made. My brother and I went
for lunch (taking turns carrying the jar of quarters), and when we
came back the machines were gone.
Casinos are no fun these days.
--
spintronic
> On Nov 26, 9:14 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
.
> > When is she Due?
>
> My. That was profoundly meaningless.
You said she was pregnant, Is she?
> > > > Are these pigs even sniffing my pearls?
>
> > > "Pearls" are not made of brown squishy matter, and they also do not
> > > come from the South end of a North bound horse.
>
> > Anyway, that reminds me. What topic waswe on?
>
> Your stupid games.
Oh ya. Back on topic.
> > > > If I cast more, will they smell more?
>
> > > They smell enough the way it is.
>
> > Guess you miissed yet *ANOTHER* life lesson/analogy there.
>
> > But thanks for the conformation, nonethe less.-
>
> What ever.
Am I getting to you?
> Maybe you should not post and sniff glue at the same
> time. Just a suggestion, you dishonest iece of shit.
Is that with 2 p's or 0?
Paul J Gans
And then there are all the dudes who'd crowd round to watch
Jane lose her shirt.
--
--- Paul J. Gans
Boikat
> On 27 Nov, 20:16, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> On Nov 26, 9:14 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> .
> .
>
> > > When is she Due?
>
> > My. That was profoundly meaningless.
>
> You said she was pregnant, Is she?
Again, whatever you're snorting, you should quit while you still have
enough neurons to breath without assistance.
>
> > > > > Are these pigs even sniffing my pearls?
>
> > > > "Pearls" are not made of brown squishy matter, and they also do not
> > > > come from the South end of a North bound horse.
>
> > > Anyway, that reminds me. What topic waswe on?
>
> > Your stupid games.
>
> Oh ya. Back on topic.
Not playing untill you place your bets.
>
> > > > > If I cast more, will they smell more?
>
> > > > They smell enough the way it is.
>
> > > Guess you miissed yet *ANOTHER* life lesson/analogy there.
>
> > > But thanks for the conformation, nonethe less.-
>
> > What ever.
>
> Am I getting to you?
No, Just not bothering with your inane bullshit.
>
> > Maybe you should not post and sniff glue at the same
> > time. Just a suggestion, you dishonest iece of shit.
>
> Is that with 2 p's or 0?
Do you really want to go there, asshole? Who was it that whined about
being teased because he was dyslexic? For instance, above you worte a
word, "nonethe" Is that a new word? What was it that guy said a
couple of thousand years ago, something about "he who is without sin
may cast the first stone"?. Then there was that other guy who said
"people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks".
You want to play that game, I'm up to it. We can waste a lot of band-
width on spelling mistakes. All it will prove is that neither one of
us can spell worth shit. Of course, the difference is, I usually
don't bother with spelling mistakes made by others, since I know I
misspell words, frequently. You, on the other hand, are an arrogant
ass, and feel the need to point out other's spelling mistakes in order
to compensate for the battering your ego takes when your other
bullshit blows up in your face..
Boikat
Stuart
> On 27 Nov, 02:11, Stuart <bigdak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 26, 1:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > What would you spend them on?
>
> > > n2 = Intelligence.
> > > n3 = Social skills.
> > > n4 = Happiness.
>
>
> > Stuart
>
> Nice of you to join us, but ("IN WHAT"?)
No-load mutual funds.
Stuart
Bob Casanova
appeared in talk.origins, posted by spintronic
<spint...@hotmail.com>:
>On 26 Nov, 23:20, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>.
>.
>
>> > What would you spend them on?
>>
>> > n1 = Spirituality.
>> > n2 = Intelligence.
>> > n3 = Social skills.
>> > n4 = Happiness.
>>
>> Sure. You first.
>
>
>Age before beauty.
....and pearls before swine.
Dorothy Parker's riposte seems remarkably appropriate for
t.o, given the many attempts to educate creationists, and
their reactions.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Walter Bushell
<353953ce-5065-4089...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
That argument is simple psychology combined with mathematics. Art
Linkletter had a long running show called "People Are Funny" about Money
was perhaps a part of the show.
Ah, the marks are not victims, they go to casinos to lose and get rid of
excess money, which would otherwise make them change their life. A
casino is perhaps the only place where if you act like an idiot you will
be treated with the upmost of respect, but thrown out if it looks like
you know what you are doing. Then there are those that come for
entertainment, having decided how much they are going to lose and stop
when they reach the limit.
Will in New Haven
I assure you that casino management, at least the old-school types,
regard them as marks and victims. This attitude is what sparked the
overreaction to card counting in blackjack. The roles were reversed
and the casino guys couldn't stand it. They were very casual about
someone getting lucky and winning a huge score, for reasons you
mentioned in an earlier post. However, people actually getting a _plus
position_ against them made them the suckers and it infuriated them.
--
Will in New Haven
they go to casinos to lose and get rid of
Boikat
> On 27 Nov, 01:59, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> On Nov 26, 7:18 pm, John Wilkins <j...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
>
> .
> .
> If we are forced to fight on a new low....
<snip>
>
> You tell me?
In addition:
I noticed you replied to this post, yet did not respond to the other
two posts that *are* related to you little mind game. Why was that?
Boikat
Boikat
> On 27 Nov, 01:59, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> On Nov 26, 7:18 pm, John Wilkins <j...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
>
> .
> .
> If we are forced to fight on a new low....
That's the level you take it to, fucktard.
> .
> .
>
> > > > Being well endowed can be it's own happyness.
>
> > > > (Wanders off, whistling an inocent tune....)
>
> > > How would you know that?
>
> > Rumors.
>
> Certainly none your wife is spreading.
>
> (Now Boyprat, I hate this sort of filth, But obviously you persist.)
Then why respond to it?
>
> And you won't win. If you keep going I will castrate you like a Jewish
> Raisen.
Will you now?
>
> So either back on topic, or back on the topic of boyslacks balls?
>
> You tell me?
As before, after you, butt-wipe.
Boikat
Walter Bushell
John Wilkins <jo...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
> In article <hen8io$f8c$1...@news.albasani.net>, Burkhard
> <b.sc...@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > John Wilkins wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <ffa1e972-b4c9-4b3d...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> > > Greg G. <ggw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Nov 26, 5:07 pm, spintronic <spintro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> What would you spend them on?
> > >>>
> > >>> n1 = Spirituality.
> > >>> n2 = Intelligence.
> > >>> n3 = Social skills.
> > >>> n4 = Happiness.
> > >> This reminds me of the guy who found a genie in a bottle. The genie
> > >> could either make him the richest man who ever lived or the wisest man
> > >> who ever lived. The man chose wisdom. His first thought was the
> > >> realization that he made the wrong choice.
> > >>
> > > Well I'd bet it 50:50 on Intelligence and Social Skills, on the
> > > understanding that Spirituality is a sucker's buy (you get nothing for
> > > your outlay) and that Happiness will come as the result of being well
> > > endowed in the other two.
> > >
> >
> > Funny, I thought just the other way round. I go 100% for happiness,
> > under the assumption that to be happy, you need at least lots and lots
> > of 2 and 3 anyway, so you get hem in a "buy one get two free package"
> > and you get lots of other goodies into the bargain, such as ""good
> > birth, good children, and beauty".
> >
> On the principle of commutativity, I think we agree.
Diogenes of Sinope was apparently very happy living in a barrel. He's
the man who order the great Alex to get out of his sun.
Burkhard
They were big business in ol' Sinope and controlled the media.