Robot rollock big plan (quite insane no?)
Great Dayne
I won my case yesterday morning. His plan is to pretend that I haven't
and keep going.
This is the equivelent of a court case where one side about to win
presents its arguments
on the last issue, and wins, and the other side pretends that they
didn't.
Dana Tweedy
> I won my case yesterday morning.
Congratulations. Where was the hearing held?
> His plan is to pretend that I haven't
> and keep going.
Well, if you won a court case, then there should be records. All you have
to do is show "him" those records.
>
> This is the equivelent of a court case where one side about to win
> presents its arguments
> on the last issue, and wins, and the other side pretends that they
> didn't.
What do you think you've won?
DJT
Desertphile
<ihaveth...@aol.com> wrote:
> I won my case yesterday morning. His plan is to pretend
> that I haven't and keep going. This is the equivelent of
> a court case where one side about to win presents its
> arguments on the last issue, and wins, and the other
> side pretends that they didn't.
What did the doctor say?
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Great Dayne
> Well, if you won a court case, then there should be records.
Yep.
> All you have
> to do is show "him" those records.
Negative, my attorney will bring me the execution of summary judgement
order now.
Dana Tweedy
> On Nov 4, 10:46 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
>> Well, if you won a court case, then there should be records.
>
> Yep.
Where are the records?
>
>> All you have
>> to do is show "him" those records.
>
> Negative, my attorney will bring me the execution of summary judgement
> order now.
What law firm does your attorney work for?
DJT
Tapestry
> >> All you have
> >> to do is show "him" those records.
>
> > Negative, my attorney will bring me the execution of summary judgement
> > order now.
>
> What law firm does your attorney work for?
Ask Vend he is the one who got them for me.
Dana Tweedy
Vend isn't here right now. If you have attorneys, you'd know what law firm
you hired.
DJT
Skinny Cartman
What part of this fell out of your brain?
That is for you to know and me to find out.
Are you claiming you don't know which law firm the attorneys opposing
you belong to?
The way they are running the case, I don't meet my attorneys until it
is over.
Dana Tweedy
> On Nov 4, 2:04 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>> Tapestry wrote:
>>> On Nov 4, 1:30 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> All you have
>>>>>> to do is show "him" those records.
>>
>>>>> Negative, my attorney will bring me the execution of summary
>>>>> judgement order now.
>>
>>>> What law firm does your attorney work for?
>>
>>> Ask Vend he is the one who got them for me.
>>
>> Vend isn't here right now. If you have attorneys, you'd know what
>> law firm you hired.
>
> What part of this fell out of your brain?
What part of what? You are being rather vauge here.
> That is for you to know and me to find out.
Odd, if you hired a law firm, you would know the names of the lawyers, and I
would not.
> Are you claiming you don't know which law firm the attorneys opposing
> you belong to?
I'm saying I have no contact with any law firm, or any attorney "opposing"
me at all. I'm not involved in any court case, and I don't have any
contact with attorneys. All of this is your own delusion.
> The way they are running the case, I don't meet my attorneys until it
> is over.
That's a very odd practice, as attorneys always meet with their clients
before proceeding. How do your attorneys expect to get paid? What is
the case docket number, and what jurisdiction is the case being ajudicated
under?
DJT
Great Dayne
> > The way they are running the case, I don't meet my attorneys until it
> > is over.
>
> That's a very odd practice, as attorneys always meet with their clients
> before proceeding.
So you agree with me that the way they are running the case is
totally and complete insane.
Dana Tweedy
No, I'm pointing out that you don't have any attorneys, and it's a figment
of your mental disease. Seek medical attention, you need help.
DJT
Boikat
Oh, I'm sure there's a fair amount of insanity involved here.
Boikat
Boikat
wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:55:32 -0800 (PST), Great Dayne
>
> > I won my case yesterday morning. His plan is to pretend
> > that I haven't and keep going. This is the equivelent of
> > a court case where one side about to win presents its
> > arguments on the last issue, and wins, and the other
> > side pretends that they didn't.
>
> What did the doctor say?
In technical terms? "Crazy as a liquoured up 'possum on an electric
fence."
Boikat
Great Dayne
You keep harping on the same issue. Intellectual monomania.
Why don't you vary and spice it up a bit.
Like do it in another languange.
El loco grinco!
Good going mrs gozlowski
Dana Tweedy
> On Nov 5, 11:08 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>> Great Dayne wrote:
>>> On Nov 5, 10:52 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>> The way they are running the case, I don't meet my attorneys until
>>>>> it is over.
>>
>>>> That's a very odd practice, as attorneys always meet with their
>>>> clients before proceeding.
>>
>>> So you agree with me that the way they are running the case is
>>> totally and complete insane.
>>
>> No, I'm pointing out that you don't have any attorneys, and it's a
>> figment of your mental disease. Seek medical attention, you need
>> help.
>>
>> DJT
>
> You keep harping on the same issue.
Because you are mentally unbalanced. If you were not, I'd have no reason
to keep pointing it out to you.
> Intellectual monomania.
No, mere consistency.
>
> Why don't you vary and spice it up a bit.
I don't need to. You are in need of medical attention, and it's best to
say it directly.
>
> Like do it in another languange.
>
> El loco grinco!
That's not any recognizable language.
>
> Good going mrs gozlowski
I'm not who you think I am. That's another sign of your mental illness.
Get help.
DJT
Great Dayne
> > Like do it in another languange.
>
> > El loco grinco!
>
> That's not any recognizable language.
Spanish, idiot
Dana Tweedy
The word "grinco" is not Spanish, or any other language. and your snippet
doesn't follow the rules of Spanish language.
Please seek medical attention.
DJT
Great Dayne
> Great Dayne wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 11:23 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> >>> Like do it in another languange.
>
> >>> El loco grinco!
>
> >> That's not any recognizable language.
>
> > Spanish, idiot
>
> The word "grinco" is not Spanish
It is slang senor.
Dana Tweedy
> On Nov 5, 12:13 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>> Great Dayne wrote:
>>> On Nov 5, 11:23 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Like do it in another languange.
>>
>>>>> El loco grinco!
>>
>>>> That's not any recognizable language.
>>
>>> Spanish, idiot
>>
>> The word "grinco" is not Spanish
>
> It is slang senor.
'Grinco" is not even Spanish slang.
So, when are you going to get around to addessing the other parts of my
posts that you've been snipping away?
DJT
Skinny Cartman
> Great Dayne wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 12:13 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> >> Great Dayne wrote:
> >>> On Nov 5, 11:23 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Like do it in another languange.
>
> >>>>> El loco grinco!
>
> >>>> That's not any recognizable language.
>
> >>> Spanish, idiot
>
> >> The word "grinco" is not Spanish
>
> > It is slang senor.
>
> 'Grinco" is not even Spanish slang.
Yes it is it was simply a typo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gringo
Gringo is a Spanish word used in Mexico and other parts of Latin
America, generally to denote people from the United States.
John Harshman
> Great Dayne wrote:
>> On Nov 5, 12:13 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>>> Great Dayne wrote:
>>>> On Nov 5, 11:23 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Like do it in another languange.
>>>>>> El loco grinco!
>>>>> That's not any recognizable language.
>>>> Spanish, idiot
>>> The word "grinco" is not Spanish
>> It is slang senor.
>
> 'Grinco" is not even Spanish slang.
>
> So, when are you going to get around to addessing the other parts of my
> posts that you've been snipping away?
>
> DJT
>
John Wilkins
<jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
"Eunt"? What is "eunt"? Conjugate the verb, "to go" !
Brian: Er, "Ire". Er, "eo", "is", "it", "imus", "itis", "eunt".
Centurion: So, "eunt" is...?
Brian: Third person plural present indicative, "they go".
Centurion: But, "Romans, go home" is an order. So you must use...?
[He twists Brian's ear]
Brian: Aaagh ! The imperative !
Centurion: Which is...?
Brian: Aaaagh ! Er, er, "i" !
Centurion: How many Romans?
Brian: Aaaaagh ! Plural, plural, er, "ite" !
Great Dayne
> Please seek medical attention.
You mean this part of your posts?
You need to go get your eyes checked.
Seriously. You appear to be blind or stupid.
Also, a new approach for your "consistency".
Why don't you just say "you are crazy infinity" to save you time,
energy and post count?
Reddfrogg
Which still doesn't address the fact that you need medical help.
DJT
Great Dayne
Blind boy blind.
Reddfrogg
> On Nov 5, 12:13 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > Please seek medical attention.
>
> You mean this part of your posts?
Among others, yes.
>
> You need to go get your eyes checked.
Tell you what. You go talk to your doctor about your belief you are
president, and the "camera" and the TV set talking to you, and I'll go
to the optometrist. Deal?
>
> Seriously. You appear to be blind or stupid.
Again, I'm not the one with the paranoid delusions.
>
> Also, a new approach for your "consistency".
>
> Why don't you just say "you are crazy infinity" to save you time,
> energy and post count?
Because just saying "you are crazy" doesn't convey what I'm trying to
tell you. It's obvious you are suffering from mental illness, but
that is irrelevant to your claims. I'm asking you to seek mental
help because you need medical attention, and it's my job to help those
in need of medical care.
Note that my saying you need mental help is not an argument, or a
refutation of your claims. It's simply a plea for you to get the help
you need.
DJT
Great Dayne
> On Nov 6, 9:49 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
> > Seriously. You appear to be blind or stupid.
>
> Again, I'm not the one with the paranoid delusions.
You have exhibited paranoia, the delusion that you can beat GOD, what
you
refer to as the entity.
What you call the entity is GOD.
Now when you are in your cell, the officers who bring you your food
will tell you that you aren't really in a cell, it is just a clever
ruse to make you
think you are in a cell ...
John Harshman
medical attention. As do I, and several other people. And so should you.
Your condition can't be pleasant for you.
Reddfrogg
> On Nov 6, 11:01 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 6, 9:49 am, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > Seriously. You appear to be blind or stupid.
>
> > Again, I'm not the one with the paranoid delusions.
>
> You have exhibited paranoia, the delusion that you can beat GOD, what
> you
> refer to as the entity.
I've never claimed that I could beat God, or do I refer to God as "the
entity". You have me mistaken for someone else.
>
> What you call the entity is GOD
I don't call anyone, or thing "the entity". Again, you are
mistaken, and it's a sign of your delusion that you don't accept
that.
>
> Now when you are in your cell, the officers who bring you your food
> will tell you that you aren't really in a cell, it is just a clever
> ruse to make you
> think you are in a cell ...
What makes you think I am going to be in any "cell"? Haven't you
noticed that the world isn't following your script?
DJT
Mitchell Coffey
> In article <vMydnYeDmNol32nX4p2d...@giganews.com>, John Harshman
Would that be "Romans" or "the house" you direct should return to
their place of origin? Be clear.
Mitchell
Tapestry
Have you noticed how quiet it has been on usenet?
Reddfrogg
No, it's a pretty regular day here. Have you sought medical attention
for your delusions yet?
DJT
Desertphile
Big nose!
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
heekster
Romani, ite domum.
Ite is the imperative plural form of the verb.
The preposition is omitted when domus or the names of towns are used.
Domum is the accusative case.
If you told a single person to "Go to Rome", it would be simply,
"I Romam."
Eunt means, "They go".
"Life of Brian" has a hilarious scene in which Brian is writing this
phrase as graffiti on the walls in incorrect Latin (ROMANES EUNT
DOMUS) .
Instead of punishing him, the centurion corrects his grammar.
In fact;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIAdHEwiAy8&feature=related
heekster
wrote:
>In article <vMydnYeDmNo...@giganews.com>, John Harshman
Subsequently,
Bigus Dickus.
"He has a wife, you know. Her name is Incontinentia Buttocks."
John Harshman
heekster
<jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
Now, ask yourself, why does Harshman refer to himself in the third
person?
John Harshman
have followed my suggestion.
Klaus Hellnick
People called Romane, they go, the house?
John Harshman
"Romanes", of course.
Free Lunch
<khel...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in talk.origins:
"The Life of Brian" is your clue -- yes, the Latin was dreadful. The
soldier was offended and demanded that the miscreant correct the writing
on the wall.
John Wilkins
<jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
To describe "The Romans, they go to the house" of course...
heekster
<jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
Ah, no, it was not.
>Though you don't seem to
>have followed my suggestion.
Ask for your denarii back.
You're claiming that you did not post this?
>> Now, ask yourself: why did Harshman post "Romani eunt domus"?
If you were alluding to LOB, you fucked it up, by saying Romani in
lieu of Romanes. IOW, you ruined the joke.
HAND
John Harshman
And if it's not done by sunrise I'll cut your balls off.
John Harshman
It was me simulating you asking yourself. Keep up here.
>> Though you don't seem to
>> have followed my suggestion.
>
> Ask for your denarii back.
>
> You're claiming that you did not post this?
>>> Now, ask yourself: why did Harshman post "Romani eunt domus"?
>
> If you were alluding to LOB, you fucked it up, by saying Romani in
> lieu of Romanes. IOW, you ruined the joke.
That's what this was all about? A spelling flame?
heekster
<jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
Your simulation needs some work.
>
>>> Though you don't seem to
>>> have followed my suggestion.
>>
>> Ask for your denarii back.
>>
>> You're claiming that you did not post this?
>>>> Now, ask yourself: why did Harshman post "Romani eunt domus"?
>>
>> If you were alluding to LOB, you fucked it up, by saying Romani in
>> lieu of Romanes. IOW, you ruined the joke.
>
>That's what this was all about? A spelling flame?
No, son, LOL, if I flamed you, there'd nothing left but bucky balls.
John Harshman
for no apparent reason. Was that it?
Walter Bushell
heekster <heek...@ifiwxtc.net> wrote:
Maybe the Roman wanted to go home.
--
A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard.
Great Dayne
LOL!
Because I posted a song from 42 years ago from a squeaky clean band
you want to go put
mike nesmith under surveillance. While you are at it, why don't you
put greg brady from the
brady bunch show and greg brady from the brady bunch movie under
surveillance along with mrs brady
so she can do another wesson oil television commercial.
You really need to get help for your insanity.
heekster
<jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
No, not at all, you're thinking of MP & the Holy Grail:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
Reddfrogg
I have no idea what you are talking about here. I've never wanted to
place Mike Nesmith under surveillance, nor do I have the ability to do
such a thing. I don't even click on your links. When did this
supposedly happen?
> While you are at it, why don't you
> put greg brady from the
> brady bunch show and greg brady from the brady bunch movie under
> surveillance along with mrs brady
> so she can do another wesson oil television commercial.
I have no ability to put anyone under surveillance. This is another
of your delusons. You need to seek medical attention.
>
> You really need to get help for your insanity.
You keep forgetting, it's not me who is having the paranoid
delusions.
Again, you seem to realize your own mental illness, and try to project
it onto others. All I can do is urge you to seek mental help.
DJT
John Harshman
gregwrld
> so she can do another wesson oil television commercial.
>
> You really need to get help for your insanity.
Mike Nesmith has been under surveillance
for a while now. But don't tell him...
gregwrld
Michael
Yes you have to go ask the judge. He denied you?
You know why? Because you are certifiably insane.
Reddfrogg
What judge? I've never been in contact with any judge.
> You know why? Because you are certifiably insane.
Once again, I need to remind you that You are the one who imagines
there to be a judge, and a conspiracy against you.
I have no contact with a judge. I have no means of setting up
surveillance on anyone. You are having paranoid delusions, and need
to get treatment for them. See your doctor as soon as you can.
DJT
Picasso Renoir Hilton
>
> - Show quoted text -
The best part robot robbie was when you put on my tv thou shalt not
post, then
tried to take advantage of your wrongdoing
Ye Old One
Met him many years ago when the Monkeys came to Gloucester on tour.
All of them were very nice. Only had a brief chat as my mate (he was
doing the lights) sneaked me in.
Took my wife to see their show that evening, very entertaining.
--
Bob.
Reddfrogg
wrote:
Seeing personal messages sent by your TV is an example of your
paranoia. I didn't send you any such messages, and it shows you are
suffering from delusions. Seek help.
> then
> tried to take advantage of your wrongdoing
Again, I had nothing to do with anything you are imagining. It's part
of your disease process. Chemical imbalances in the brain are
nothing to fool around with. See your doctor.
DJT
Skinny Cartman
No, it is an example of failed govt mind control and failed govt
arguments trying
to profit from your own wrongdoing.
heekster
<jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
Congratulations. Your attempt at projection is a success.
DJT
Once again. Make an appointment with your doctor. Speak to him
about this "mind control" idea. Talk to him about the kinds of
things you've been accusing me of. See if he doesn't recognize them
as symptoms of your mental illness.
"Mind control" is presently beyond the capablity of any government
agency. Your ideas about anyone's 'wrongdoing" are part of the
delusion.
Get help, I implore you
DJT
Great Dayne
Now the first question any competent mental health professional when a
person
comes before claiming to be under government surveillance would ask,
given the fact
that the government does indeed place people under surveillance would
be "what reason
would the government have to place you under surveillence?" The fact
that you have missed that
first step shows how unqualified you are here on usenet to make a
determination.
Dana Tweedy
>> "Mind control" is presently beyond the capablity of any government
>> agency. Your ideas about anyone's 'wrongdoing" are part of the
>> delusion.
>>
>> Get help, I implore you
>
> Now the first question any competent mental health professional when a
> person
> comes before claiming to be under government surveillance would ask,
> given the fact
> that the government does indeed place people under surveillance would
> be "what reason
> would the government have to place you under surveillence?
Good question. What's your answer?
Actually, the first question a mental health professional would ask is "why
do you think you are under surveillance in the first place". If you tell
them because your television is talking to you, and that you see imaginary
cameras, then that health professional is rightly going to conclude you are
having paranoid delusions.
>" The fact
> that you have missed that
> first step shows how unqualified you are here on usenet to make a
> determination.
Since you don't have any reason to be under surveillance, why do you imagine
yourself to be?
DJT
Great Dayne
> Great Dayne wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 1:43 pm, DJT <mousede...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> >> "Mind control" is presently beyond the capablity of any government
> >> agency. Your ideas about anyone's 'wrongdoing" are part of the
> >> delusion.
>
> >> Get help, I implore you
>
> > Now the first question any competent mental health professional when a
> > person
> > comes before claiming to be under government surveillance would ask,
> > given the fact
> > that the government does indeed place people under surveillance would
> > be "what reason
> > would the government have to place you under surveillence?
>
> Good question. What's your answer?
So now I have to run the entire interview myself, since you are by
your
own admission quite unqualified to do so.
I guess I will continue it below.
> >" The fact
> > that you have missed that
> > first step shows how unqualified you are here on usenet to make a
> > determination.
>
> Since you don't have any reason to be under surveillance, why do you imagine
> yourself to be?
Oh you already knew as if you were psychic what my explanation was
going
to be and concluded all by yourself that my answer wasn't good enough
for you.
We are done playing this game.
I know how to handle this.
Dana Tweedy
>>
>> Good question. What's your answer?
>
> So now I have to run the entire interview myself, since you are by
> your
> own admission quite unqualified to do so.
One doesn't have to be a mental health professional to ask you questions.
> I guess I will continue it below.
Why not answer the question? Why do you think you are under surveillance?
>
>
>>> " The fact
>>> that you have missed that
>>> first step shows how unqualified you are here on usenet to make a
>>> determination.
>>
>> Since you don't have any reason to be under surveillance, why do you
>> imagine yourself to be?
>
> Oh you already knew as if you were psychic what my explanation was
> going
> to be and concluded all by yourself that my answer wasn't good enough
> for you.
No, I'm asking you a question. You don't have a reason to be under
surveillance, why do you imagine yourself to be?
>
> We are done playing this game.
> I know how to handle this.
The best way to "handle this" would be for you to go see your doctor. You
need mental help.
DJT
Great Dayne
Sorry this isn't the AFC championship game, where you fumble
the ball and we just give it back to you.
Dana Tweedy
Either way, you still need mental help. Please consult your doctor and get
under treatment.
DJT
Tapestry
Either way, this isn't elementary school where you get do overs.
This is final.
You are a mental retard.
Were you parents brother and sister?
Dana Tweedy
>>> Sorry this isn't the AFC championship game, where you fumble
>>> the ball and we just give it back to you
>>
>> Either way, you still need mental help.
>
> Either way, this isn't elementary school where you get do overs.
Why would I need a "do over"?
> This is final.
Like all your other "finals"?
> You are a mental retard.
Even if this were true, you are still in need of mental help. See your
doctor as soon as possible.
> Were you parents brother and sister?
Why would it matter? I'm not the one having paranoid delusions, and I'm
not the one in need of medical attention. Please get help before you hurt
yourself, or someone else.
DJT
Tapestry
> Tapestry wrote:
> > You are a mental retard.
> > Were you parents brother and sister?
>
> Why would it matter?
Because you are a retarded stupid insipid fat bastard, you inbred
mental midget!
Dana Tweedy
Again, how would that matter? The issue here is your need for medical
attention for your delusions, paranoia, and possible violent behavior.
Whatever I am, is entirely irrelevant to that fact. Please seek medical
attention before you harm yourself, or anyone else.
DJT
Ye Old One
Oh dear! Are the meds not working today Mr Nutjob?
Get your caregiver to up the dosage.
--
Bob.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid but you're abusing the privilege.
Great Dayne
> Tapestry wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 12:24 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> >> Tapestry wrote:
>
> >>> You are a mental retard.
> >>> Were you parents brother and sister?
>
> >> Why would it matter?
>
> > Because you are a retarded stupid insipid fat bastard, you inbred
> > mental midget!
>
> Again, how would that matter?
>
http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/s/seventh-sign-script-transcript-demi.html
"Attorneys were unable to get a stay of execution for Jimmy
Zaragoza...
...the "Word of God Killer," whose parents were
brother and sister."
Dana Tweedy
Again, the issue here is your need for medical attention. Whatever you
imagine me to be is irrelevant. Quoting from a fictional film is also
irrelevant.
So, to get back to the issue. Get medical attention. Make an appointment
with your doctor before you harm yourself, or others.
DJT
Great Dayne
> Great Dayne wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 3:16 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> >> Tapestry wrote:
> >>> On Nov 9, 12:24 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> >>>> Tapestry wrote:
>
> >>>>> You are a mental retard.
> >>>>> Were you parents brother and sister?
>
> >>>> Why would it matter?
>
> >>> Because you are a retarded stupid insipid fat bastard, you inbred
> >>> mental midget!
>
> >> Again, how would that matter?
>
> >> Whatever I am, is entirely irrelevant to that fact.
>
>
> > "Attorneys were unable to get a stay of execution for Jimmy
> > Zaragoza...
> > ...the "Word of God Killer," whose parents were
> > brother and sister."
>
> So, to get back to the issue.
The issue is your wasting time.
Dana Tweedy
>
>> So, to get back to the issue.
>
> The issue is your wasting time.
Even if I were wasting time, (and I'm not) you still need medical
attention. Get yourself to a doctor, before you harm yourself, or others.
DJT
Great Dayne
> Great Dayne wrote:
> > On Nov 10, 11:45 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> snip
>
>
>
> >> So, to get back to the issue.
>
> > The issue is your wasting time.
>
> Even if I were wasting time
Which you are.
I will let the lurkers out there decide.
Reddfrogg
you've already heard from some of the lurkers. In any case, you need
medical attention. Please contact your doctor as soon as possible.
DJT
Great Dayne
> On Nov 11, 12:18 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 10, 5:47 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > Great Dayne wrote:
> > > > On Nov 10, 11:45 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > snip
>
> > > >> So, to get back to the issue.
>
> > > > The issue is your wasting time.
>
> > > Even if I were wasting time
>
> > Which you are.
> > I will let the lurkers out there decide.
>
> you've already heard from some of the lurkers.
I already showed you by definition that lurkers don't post.
Did that just fall right out of your brain?
As to why, mr 666, you are wasting time, I will let the lurkers out
there decide.
Reddfrogg
> On Nov 11, 1:46 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 11, 12:18 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 10, 5:47 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Great Dayne wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 10, 11:45 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > snip
>
> > > > >> So, to get back to the issue.
>
> > > > > The issue is your wasting time.
>
> > > > Even if I were wasting time
>
> > > Which you are.
> > > I will let the lurkers out there decide.
>
> > you've already heard from some of the lurkers.
>
> I already showed you by definition that lurkers don't post.
Until they do.
> Did that just fall right out of your brain?
I don't see why it's relevant. In any case, make an appointment with
your doctor.
>
> As to why, mr 666, you are wasting time, I will let the lurkers out
> there decide.
I'm not wasting my time by trying to persuade you to get help.
You've already heard what the 'lurkers' think.
DJT
Great Dayne
> On Nov 11, 12:51 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 11, 1:46 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 11, 12:18 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 10, 5:47 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Great Dayne wrote:
> > > > > > On Nov 10, 11:45 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > snip
>
> > > > > >> So, to get back to the issue.
>
> > > > > > The issue is your wasting time.
>
> > > > > Even if I were wasting time
>
> > > > Which you are.
> > > > I will let the lurkers out there decide.
>
> > > you've already heard from some of the lurkers.
>
> > I already showed you by definition that lurkers don't post.
>
> Until they do.
And by definition they are no longer a lurker.
Have you always been this stupid?
>
> > Did that just fall right out of your brain?
>
> I don't see why it's relevant.
Because it contradicts your premise.
The fact that you can't see that shows your mental impairment.
>
> > As to why, mr 666, you are wasting time, I will let the lurkers out
> > there decide.
>
> I'm not wasting my time
No, you are wasting time period.
As to why, I will let the lurkers decide.
Reddfrogg
> On Nov 11, 1:58 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 11, 12:51 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 11, 1:46 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 11, 12:18 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Nov 10, 5:47 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Great Dayne wrote:
> > > > > > > On Nov 10, 11:45 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > snip
>
> > > > > > >> So, to get back to the issue.
>
> > > > > > > The issue is your wasting time.
>
> > > > > > Even if I were wasting time
>
> > > > > Which you are.
> > > > > I will let the lurkers out there decide.
>
> > > > you've already heard from some of the lurkers.
>
> > > I already showed you by definition that lurkers don't post.
>
> > Until they do.
>
> And by definition they are no longer a lurker.
Yet the "lurkers" don't seem to support your position.
> Have you always been this stupid?
Have you always been this mentally disturbed? Get help for your
illness.
>
>
>
> > > Did that just fall right out of your brain?
>
> > I don't see why it's relevant.
>
> Because it contradicts your premise.
My 'premise' is that you need mental help. See your doctor.
> The fact that you can't see that shows your mental impairment.
Again, being incomprehensible is not my problem. See your doctor.
>
>
>
> > > As to why, mr 666, you are wasting time, I will let the lurkers out
> > > there decide.
>
> > I'm not wasting my time
>
> No, you are wasting time period.
> As to why, I will let the lurkers decide
The lurkers have already delivered their opinion. You need mental
help.
DJT
John Harshman
Actually, I think you are wasting your time. Nothing you do will make
any impression on him. He won't get help no matter what you say. Or he
may, but not because of anything you tell him. I'm suspecting he
probably isn't dangerous, though he makes threats from time to time.
Dick C.
f47c5a...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:
Agreed, Great Dayne needs medical attention, badly.
>
> DJT
>
>
--
Dick #1349
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
~Benjamin Franklin
Home Page: dickcr.iwarp.com
email: dic...@gmail.com
Skinny Cartman
> On Nov 11, 1:32 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 11, 1:58 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 11, 12:51 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 11, 1:46 pm, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Nov 11, 12:18 pm, Great Dayne <ihavethecode...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Nov 10, 5:47 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Great Dayne wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Nov 10, 11:45 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > snip
>
> > > > > > > >> So, to get back to the issue.
>
> > > > > > > > The issue is your wasting time.
>
> > > > > > > Even if I were wasting time
>
> > > > > > Which you are.
> > > > > > I will let the lurkers out there decide.
>
> > > > > you've already heard from some of the lurkers.
>
> > > > I already showed you by definition that lurkers don't post.
>
> > > Until they do.
>
> > And by definition they are no longer a lurker.
>
> Yet the "lurkers" don't seem to support your position.
Which part of 'lurkers don't post' don't you understand, idiot?
Dana Tweedy
>>> And by definition they are no longer a lurker.
>>
>> Yet the "lurkers" don't seem to support your position.
>
> Which part of 'lurkers don't post' don't you understand, idiot?
The part where they do post, as shown before.
You need mental help. Please go see your doctor.
DJT
Bruce Stephens
> Skinny Cartman wrote:
[...]
>> Which part of 'lurkers don't post' don't you understand, idiot?
>
> The part where they do post, as shown before.
I presume he's taking the position that lurkers by definition don't
post, so anybody who posts is not a lurker.
In that case, of course, no lurkers can be shown to support either of
your positions (though it's astonishingly difficult to imagine that
anybody would support Great Dane's delusions).
> You need mental help. Please go see your doctor.
Still sound advice.
Skinny Cartman
+use...@cenderis.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> writes:
> > Skinny Cartman wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Which part of 'lurkers don't post' don't you understand, idiot?
>
> > The part where they do post, as shown before.
>
> I presume he's taking the position that lurkers by definition don't
> post, so anybody who posts is not a lurker.
>
> In that case, of course, no lurkers can be shown to support either of
> your positions
That is my position, idiot, and that supports my contention!
Dana Tweedy
The lurkers who have spoken up say you need mental help. I concurr.
DJT
Great Dayne
Lurkers don't post.
Dickless.
Dana Tweedy
Some of them do, and those who have, say you need medical attention. If
you are leaving things up to the lurkers to decide, you've got your decsion.
> Dickless.
Strange signature, but it's not up to me to describe yourself....
DJT
Great Dayne
> Great Dayne wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 3:10 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> >> Skinny Cartman wrote:
> >>> On Nov 12, 12:47 pm, Bruce Stephens <bruce
> >>> +use...@cenderis.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>> "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> writes:
> >>>>> Skinny Cartman wrote:
>
> >>>> [...]
>
> >>>>>> Which part of 'lurkers don't post' don't you understand, idiot?
>
> >>>>> The part where they do post, as shown before.
>
> >>>> I presume he's taking the position that lurkers by definition don't
> >>>> post, so anybody who posts is not a lurker.
>
> >>>> In that case, of course, no lurkers can be shown to support either
> >>>> of your positions
>
> >>> That is my position, idiot, and that supports my contention!
>
> >> The lurkers who have spoken up
>
> > Lurkers don't post.
>
> Some of them do,
tHEN THEY ARE NOT A LURKER, YOU MENTAL RETARD!
Dana Tweedy
If the person spends most of their time lurking, they are a lurker.
In any case, you need to seek medical help. Everyone, including the
lurkers can see that.
DJT
Skinny Cartman
Again, let me phrase it again for this mental retard.
I am going to let those that read the group AND DONT POST AT ALL
decide
for themselves.
Now you are so mentally retarded, you will reply as if that makes your
original mistake that
you made go away and you simply keep posting until you get the last
post and
that will make everyone forget you were wrong about something as long
as you
get the last post in as you suppose, then you win, or some such other
retarded inane drivel ...
Dana Tweedy
>> If the person spends most of their time lurking, they are a lurker.
>>
>> In any case, you need to seek medical help. Everyone, including the
>> lurkers can see that.
>
> Again, let me phrase it again for this mental retard.
> I am going to let those that read the group AND DONT POST AT ALL
> decide
> for themselves.
Which they have. You need mental help.
>
> Now you are so mentally retarded, you will reply as if that makes your
> original mistake that
> you made go away and you simply keep posting until you get the last
> post and
> that will make everyone forget you were wrong about something as long
> as you
> get the last post in as you suppose, then you win, or some such other
> retarded inane drivel ...
I didn't make an "orginal mistake". You need mental help, and everyone,
including the lurkers can see that.
Please see your doctor.
DJT
Tapestry
> Skinny Cartman wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 4:32 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> >> If the person spends most of their time lurking, they are a lurker.
>
> >> In any case, you need to seek medical help. Everyone, including the
> >> lurkers can see that.
>
> > Again, let me phrase it again for this mental retard.
> > I am going to let those that read the group AND DONT POST AT ALL
> > decide
> > for themselves.
>
> Which they have. You need mental help.
>
No you need mental help. I already posted that they DONT POST PERIOD!
>
>
> > Now you are so mentally retarded, you will reply as if that makes your
> > original mistake that
> > you made go away and you simply keep posting until you get the last
> > post and
> > that will make everyone forget you were wrong about something as long
> > as you
> > get the last post in as you suppose, then you win, or some such other
> > retarded inane drivel ...
>
> I didn't make an "orginal mistake". You need mental help, and everyone,
> including the lurkers can see that.
I will let the lurkers ie those that read here and dont post decide
for themselves.
See, some people dont let usenet to make them think or make up their
minds, especially coming
from a low life scumbag mental midget like you.
Dana Tweedy
> On Nov 13, 11:46 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>> Skinny Cartman wrote:
>>> On Nov 12, 4:32 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>>
>> snip
>>
>>>> If the person spends most of their time lurking, they are a lurker.
>>
>>>> In any case, you need to seek medical help. Everyone, including the
>>>> lurkers can see that.
>>
>>> Again, let me phrase it again for this mental retard.
>>> I am going to let those that read the group AND DONT POST AT ALL
>>> decide
>>> for themselves.
>>
>> Which they have. You need mental help.
>>
>
> No you need mental help. I already posted that they DONT POST PERIOD!
Except when they do.
>
>>
>>
>>> Now you are so mentally retarded, you will reply as if that makes
>>> your original mistake that
>>> you made go away and you simply keep posting until you get the last
>>> post and
>>> that will make everyone forget you were wrong about something as
>>> long as you
>>> get the last post in as you suppose, then you win, or some such
>>> other retarded inane drivel ...
>>
>> I didn't make an "orginal mistake". You need mental help, and
>> everyone, including the lurkers can see that.
>
> I will let the lurkers ie those that read here and dont post decide
> for themselves.
They have. You need mental help.
> See, some people dont let usenet to make them think or make up their
> minds, especially coming
> from a low life scumbag mental midget like you.
How can anyone make up their minds about you without reading your postings?
Please, see your doctor.
DJT
John Harshman
> Tapestry wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 11:46 am, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>>> Skinny Cartman wrote:
>>>> On Nov 12, 4:32 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:
>>> snip
>>>
>>>>> If the person spends most of their time lurking, they are a lurker.
>>>>> In any case, you need to seek medical help. Everyone, including the
>>>>> lurkers can see that.
>>>> Again, let me phrase it again for this mental retard.
>>>> I am going to let those that read the group AND DONT POST AT ALL
>>>> decide
>>>> for themselves.
>>> Which they have. You need mental help.
>>>
>> No you need mental help. I already posted that they DONT POST PERIOD!
>
> Except when they do.
Hasn't this gone on long enough? He's saying that a lurker is a person
who reads but doesn't post. By posting, a lurker becomes no longer a
lurker and therefore not a valid case of knowing what a lurker thinks.
It is, in fact, impossible to know what a lurker thinks, unless you get
that information from a source outside usenet, for example the voices in
your head. Stop arguing about the stupid definition, and move on.
Great Dayne
You have voices in your head?
Please consult a mental health professional.
Reddfrogg
John isn't the one who thinks he's president.
> Please consult a mental health professional.
good advice. You first.
DJT