> If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
I want a cannon in my chest, and X-Ray vision.
> If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
How about selective calorie absorption?
Is there a suggestion box somewhere?
--
Dan
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
- Chief Inspector Dreyfus
I'd like the day vision of an eagle, the night vision of a cat, the
sense of smell of a dog, the hearing frequency range of a dolphin, the
hearing acuteness and directionality of an owl, the sprint capability of
a cheetah, the strength of an ox, the running endurance of a wolf,
double the intelligence of today's smartest humans, the ability to see
into the near infrared and far ultraviolet.
For starters...
Desirable? No doubt opinions will vary, a lot.
Frankly, I don't expect many genetic changes to be made apart
from removal of obvious defects. I am not sure, but I suspect
that many changes would make breeding with the rest of the
population more difficult or less likely.
Whatever the case, machine evolution will be a lot faster, and
pose far fewer ethical problems. I expect that as well as
machine organs, we will soon have brain implants, to improve
memory, perception, and logic.
Within a few hundred years there will, for many people, be
serious doubt about where the person ends and the machine
begins. With network hookups, there will probably be a lot of
doubt where one person begins and the other ends.
Cordially;
Friar Broccoli
Robert Keith Elias, Quebec, Canada Email: EliasRK (of) gmail * com
Best programmer's & all purpose text editor: http://www.semware.com
--------- I consider ALL arguments in support of my views ---------
I want the cabling for the photo receptors in my eyes put on the back
and not out front. It ruins resolution and makes a blind spot for the
cabling to find a place to run through.
--
Creationist Math:
Solve x^2 + 2x - 15 = 0
A miracle happens!
X = 1
Creationist Trig: Draw curve then plot points
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_in_the_Bottle
--
"A great many people think they are thinking when
they are merely rearranging their prejudices."
- William James, psychologist
In the long term an eye in the back of the head and an eye at the end
of a finger. In the short term the eradication of the dog^H^H^Hgod
gene.
Personally, I hope they come up with a way of propagating the species
without the requirement for sexual intercourse. The contact is unsanitary,
the exertion is excessive, and the posture is ridiculous.
Then, and only then, can you take on the Haarlem Globetrotters.
I would fix the broken genes relating to ascorbic acid production.
However, this would no doubt enrage Pastafarians, who could no longer don their
official pirate regalia and shout "Aaargh, me scurvy shipmates!".
I think we should get shark's teeth, not so much that they would be
sharper and wreak havoc on elementary school playgrounds, but because I
just had the last teeth in my mouth pulled by a dentist and I would
rather have new teeth move forward than wear these dentures.
I need some solid food!
--
"Fundamentalists can kiss my left behind."
Some bumper sticker or t-shirt.
> If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
Definitely a penis in each index finger. I want to be shaking as many
hands as I can do...
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
Marsupial pouches. Our huge heads and upright posture combine to make
childbirth fairly difficult.
--
[The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]
Richard Clayton
"Remember, always be yourself. Unless you suck." — Joss Whedon
Getting Christian Creationists to catch up with St. Augustine.
--
Aaron Clausen
mightym...@gmail.com
*I* wouldn't mind if obviously defective genes and traits like cystic fibroses
etc. was removed.
*I* would fancy a richer sensation of color. Say we splice in a couple more
types of color sensitive cones that trigger further into the infrared and
ultraviolet while still providing a contiguous coverage. Maybe somehow altering
the cone responsible for triggering the most frequently on green frequency
photons so that it fits in closer to the middle of the zones covered by the
"red" and "blue" cones.
Not very creative, I know, but *I* wouldn't mind a plain old "tune up" of all
the other standard senses as well. It would be nice.
Maybe scientists could figure out more efficient ways to vaccinate people via
genetics, so that we come into life with "preloaded" immune systems (more so
than they already are).
A more efficient metabolism
Longer lifespans
better regenerative powers possibly even to the extent of regrowing severed
limbs or organs (which leads to a wish for better organ redundancy as well)
And the list goes on and on, etc. etc.
Wishful thinking is really just that. Is there a point to your question?
Perhaps some kind of giant albino shouting gorilla...
"If there is reincarnation, I'd like to come back as Warren Beatty's
fingertips."
--Woody Allen
--
Mike Dworetsky
(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
>If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
>engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
The capacity for vitamin production would be nice, along with some
form of photosynthetic effect, so that people could live on sunlight!
And while we're at it the ability to re grow limbs, internal organ and
teeth would be nice.
--
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you".
attrib: Pauline Réage.
-
www.eac-nudis.com = Evil Atheist Conspiracy NNTP / Usenet Distributed Intelligence System...
How about a long-haul terrorist sensing satellite?
How about suggesting character traits that should survive and those
that are not desirable?
>
> Personally, I hope they come up with a way of propagating the species
> without the requirement for sexual intercourse. The contact is
> unsanitary,
> the exertion is excessive, and the posture is ridiculous.
>
So what you're really saying is you're neurotic, lazy and self conscious? :)
> If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
>
The ability to reach out over USENET and strangle idiots.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
*That* sounds like a great idea!
--
Seppo P.
What's wrong with Theocracy? (a Finnish Taliban, Oct 1, 2005)
I think the character trait of beginning threads on subjects which
are completely off tangent, and then using them to engage in some kind
of psuedo-Socratic exposition in some vain attempt to make some point
which is known only to the original poster is an undesirable trait and
should be engineered out of the species.
Mark
That's what the cattle prods are for.
Yes, the future is intelligent, self-replicating long-haul space-faring
robots. They would no doubt consider humans to be terrorists.
Some may not view this as an improvement, though.
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering
> If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
Desertphile to get a girlfriend.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Buffy has super strength; why don't we just load her up
like one of those little horses?" -- Anya
I read a science fiction book series with a similar premise.
Unfortunately it more or less caused the collapse of human civilization,
since autotrophs don't really *need* each other.
Maybe I can convince them I'm goodlife.
They moved to the Netherlands? Why am I *always* the last to
get the memo?!?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
>If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
>engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
An increase in rationality, so that frauds and demagogues
can't frighten people with lies about myths like hell and
Satan.
Nah, they're on the Globetrotter Homeworld these days....
>Therion Ware wrote:
>> On 19 Apr 2007 16:04:14 -0700, Ian Chua wrote in message
>> <1177023854.9...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>> If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
>>> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
>>
>> The capacity for vitamin production would be nice, along with some
>> form of photosynthetic effect, so that people could live on sunlight!
>
> I read a science fiction book series with a similar premise.
>Unfortunately it more or less caused the collapse of human civilization,
>since autotrophs don't really *need* each other.
We may not need each other, but I think we could count on us needing
the trappings of civilisation, music systems, big screen TVs,
computers and so on, and hence needing each other to make them!
--
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you".
attrib: Pauline Réage.
http://www.city-of-dis.com/p_q.asp?I1=69597&I2=69121
The begining...
> Therion Ware wrote:
> > On 19 Apr 2007 16:04:14 -0700, Ian Chua wrote in message
> > <1177023854.9...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>:
> >
> >> If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
> >> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
> >
> > The capacity for vitamin production would be nice, along with some
> > form of photosynthetic effect, so that people could live on sunlight!
> I read a science fiction book series with a similar premise.
> Unfortunately it more or less caused the collapse of human civilization,
> since autotrophs don't really *need* each other.
"Unfortunately?" The collapse of human civilizaion would be a GOOD
thing.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"I've hired myself out as a tourist attraction." -- Spike
> On 19 Apr 2007 16:04:14 -0700, Ian Chua <ic...@purdue.edu> wrote:
>
>> If you think the human race have evolved to the extent that it can
>> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
>
> Desertphile to get a girlfriend.
Weren't you waiting for some girl to devolve sufficiently?
How's that going?
;-)
My hope that some parallel branch of life would evolve something that would
date me is still unfullfilled!
--
Martin Kaletsch
> By what metric?
The number of species that have gone extinct and will go extinct
because of Humanity.
> I thought you were a hermit? Hermits don't have (or want) girlfriends.
>
> But perhaps you should go out more, meet new people.
Hee! People suck limes. Goats are superior.
If you add the equipment of a stallion, I'm all yours. ;->
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
What, bridle, saddle, blinkers, and a crop?
*cold shower*
You want us to have hooves and a long flowing tail?
So, species have a moral value intrinsically? All of them, or just the
cute and cuddly ones?
> Desertphile <deser...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 21, 12:05 pm, Martin Andersen <d...@ikke.nu> wrote:
> > > Desertphilewrote:
> > > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:11:44 GMT, Richard Clayton
> > > > <pockZIGetnZIG...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Therion Ware wrote:
> > > >>> On 19 Apr 2007 16:04:14 -0700, Ian Chua wrote in message
> > > >>> <1177023854.902677.291...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>:
> > >
> > > >>>> If you think thehumanrace have evolved to the extent that it can
> > > >>>> engineer its future, what aspects of improvement would be desirable?
> > > >>> The capacity for vitamin production would be nice, along with some
> > > >>> form of photosynthetic effect, so that people could live on sunlight!
> > >
> > > >> I read a science fiction book series with a similar premise.
> > > >> Unfortunately it more or less caused the collapse ofhumancivilization,
> > > >> since autotrophs don't really *need* each other.
> > >
> > > > "Unfortunately?" The collapse ofhumancivilizaion would be a GOOD
> > > > thing.
> >
> > > By what metric?
> >
> > The number of species that have gone extinct and will go extinct
> > because of Humanity.
> So, species have a moral value intrinsically? All of them, or just the
> cute and cuddly ones?
Mostly the cute and cuddly ones: I don't like the parasites.
However, most species deserve to exist, and humans have a moral
and ethical responsibility to let them exist: which, out of
ignorance and greed we have failed to do. Best that humanity got
out of the way and let everyone else exist.
All, even bedbugs should be preserved in zoos. There is a cry out about
polar bears, which no one considers cuddly. Doctors have even found uses
for leeches.
So evolution is basically an immoral process, for it clearly doesn't
respect the rights of species to exist, given that 99% or so of them are
extinct.
You are Catherine the Great, and I claim my five bucks.