Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Darwin vs Reality, the painful divorce" a report, from ENV, the

79 views
Skip to first unread message

Thrinaxodon

unread,
May 13, 2013, 9:41:13 AM5/13/13
to

Davej

unread,
May 13, 2013, 10:19:19 PM5/13/13
to
On May 13, 8:41 am, Thrinaxodon <biolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/05/darwinism_versu072061.html
>

More drivel. The rather silly request from a judge in a murder trial
to guess at an unknowable mental state has exactly what to do with
science or scientific evidence?

Burkhard

unread,
May 14, 2013, 6:09:06 AM5/14/13
to
> --
>

Dear sir
I'm very sorry to hear that you enjoy inflicting pain on others and
are generally a judgemental piece of crap. While I appreciate that
you'd like some ideology that justifies your base instincts, it is not
the job of the biological sciences to make you feel good about
yourself. However,there are a couple of religious and secular
ideologies just in, who'll provide you with any type of justification
you may want to burn the wicked - with an almost unlimited choice of
types of "wicked behaviour" which will almost certainly cater also for
your pet peeves. If all fails, try a psychologist who'll convince you
that your deep desire to harm others is nothing but a healthy outlet
for the difficult relationship had with your father,and should be
embraced fully.
Kind regards etc pp

Roger Shrubber

unread,
May 14, 2013, 6:39:46 AM5/14/13
to
margaritas ante porcos

Ron O

unread,
May 14, 2013, 7:04:59 AM5/14/13
to
On May 13, 8:41�am, Thrinaxodon <biolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
What do you expect from a bunch of dishonest clowns that have to start
lying in the title of their web page.

Ron Okimoto

Thrinaxodon

unread,
May 15, 2013, 11:51:06 AM5/15/13
to
This is a "creation/evolution" newsgroup. I thought it could belong
here.

Bob Casanova

unread,
May 15, 2013, 1:06:02 PM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:51:06 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Thrinaxodon
<biol...@gmail.com>:
Actually, of the three only talk.origins is a defined
"creation/evolution" newsgroup. Sci.skeptic (where I'm
reading this) is about paranormal claims (although it seems
to attract discussions about religion), and from the group
name I suspect alt.talk.creationism is pretty much for
creationists.
--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov

Thrinaxodon

unread,
May 16, 2013, 8:57:30 AM5/16/13
to
On May 15, 1:06�pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:51:06 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Thrinaxodon
> <biolo...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 14, 7:04�am, Ron O <rokim...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On May 13, 8:41 am, Thrinaxodon <biolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/05/darwinism_versu072061.html
>
> >> > --
>
> >> > Thrinaxodon
>
> >> > A cynodont in a kitchen.
>
> >> What do you expect from a bunch of dishonest clowns that have to start
> >> lying in the title of their web page.
>
> >> Ron Okimoto
>
> >This is a "creation/evolution" newsgroup. I thought it could belong
> >here.
>
> Actually, of the three only talk.origins is a defined
> "creation/evolution" newsgroup. Sci.skeptic (where I'm
> reading this) is about paranormal claims (although it seems
> to attract discussions about religion), and from the group
> name I suspect alt.talk.creationism is pretty much for
> creationists.
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> �the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> �'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>
> - Isaac Asimov- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I was reading it from t.o. I was reffering to talk.origins.

Bob Casanova

unread,
May 16, 2013, 1:23:55 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 05:57:30 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Thrinaxodon
<biol...@gmail.com>:

>On May 15, 1:06�pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:51:06 -0700 (PDT), the following
>> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Thrinaxodon
>> <biolo...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 14, 7:04�am, Ron O <rokim...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> On May 13, 8:41 am, Thrinaxodon <biolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/05/darwinism_versu072061.html
>>
>> >> > --
>>
>> >> > Thrinaxodon
>>
>> >> > A cynodont in a kitchen.
>>
>> >> What do you expect from a bunch of dishonest clowns that have to start
>> >> lying in the title of their web page.
>>
>> >> Ron Okimoto
>>
>> >This is a "creation/evolution" newsgroup. I thought it could belong
>> >here.
>>
>> Actually, of the three only talk.origins is a defined
>> "creation/evolution" newsgroup. Sci.skeptic (where I'm
>> reading this) is about paranormal claims (although it seems
>> to attract discussions about religion), and from the group
>> name I suspect alt.talk.creationism is pretty much for
>> creationists.

>I was reading it from t.o. I was reffering to talk.origins.

That's the problem with referring to "this newsgroup" in
crossposts, and why I've set up my attribution intro to note
the group in which I read it (see above).

Ron O

unread,
May 17, 2013, 6:34:59 AM5/17/13
to
I meant the Discovery Institute's creationist web page that you are
citing.

Ron Okimoto

Desertphile

unread,
May 17, 2013, 9:05:30 PM5/17/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 06:41:13 -0700 (PDT), Thrinaxodon
<biol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/05/darwinism_versu072061.html

Ever noice how the web site www.evolutionnews.org never posts anything
about evolution?


--
"I'm often irrelevant. It confuses people." --- Archie Goodwin

Walter Bushell

unread,
May 22, 2013, 9:47:45 AM5/22/13
to
In article
<15fe3752-f42d-4474...@p14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
Now that's about the nicest FOAD message that I've seen this month.

--
Gambling with Other People's Money is the meth of the fiscal industry.
me -- in the spirit of Karl and Groucho Marx

0 new messages