Hi
For Life
Steven J.
> Hi
>
I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
characters long.
-- Steven J.
For Life
Hello
> -- Steven J.
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
CreateThis
Goodbye
<plonk>
Cemtech
lack...@gmail.com says...
> Hi
No I'm not!!
Oh...
Hi =)
--
Steve "Chris" Price
Associate Professor of Computational Aesthetics
Amish Chair of Electrical Engineering
University of Ediacara "A fine tradition since 530,000,000 BC"
For Life
> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
>
> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>
> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> >> characters long.
>
> >Hello
>
> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
yes.
For Life
> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>
> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> >> characters long.
>
> >Hello
>
> Goodbye
Why so hasty to leave?
> <plonk>
For Life
> In article <1177206942.888997.137...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> lacksa...@gmail.com says...
>
> > Hi
>
> No I'm not!!
That's spelled 'high'.
> Oh...
>
> Hi =)
jidiot...
Perplexed in Peoria
"For Life" <lack...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1177377157.6...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 23, 7:41 pm, Cemtech <c...@cox.net> wrote:
> > In article <1177206942.888997.137...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> > lacksa...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > > Hi
> >
> > No I'm not!!
>
> That's spelled 'high'.
>
> > Oh...
> >
> > Hi =)
>
> jidiot...
That is spelled j'idiot. It is a contraction of 'Je sui idiot'.
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
>On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
>> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
>> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>>
>> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
>> >> characters long.
>>
>> >Hello
>>
>> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>
>yes.
Good. Go post it to alt.flame.
--
For Life
> On 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, the following appeared in
>
> >On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>
> >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> >> >> characters long.
>
> >> >Hello
>
> >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>
> >yes.
>
> Good. Go post it to alt.flame.
I want to post it here, if that's OK with you.
If it's not, tough.
For Life
wrote:
> "For Life" <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1177377157.6...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 23, 7:41 pm, Cemtech <c...@cox.net> wrote:
> > > In article <1177206942.888997.137...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> > > lacksa...@gmail.com says...
>
> > > > Hi
>
> > > No I'm not!!
>
> > That's spelled 'high'.
>
> > > Oh...
>
> > > Hi =)
>
> > jidiot...
>
> That is spelled j'idiot. It is a contraction of 'Je sui idiot'.
That's "sui*s*"
t'idiot...
For Life
> On 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, the following appeared in
>
> >On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>
> >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> >> >> characters long.
>
> >> >Hello
>
> >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>
> >yes.
>
> Good. Go post it to alt.flame.
Why?
Mark Isaak
> On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
>> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
>> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>>
>> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
>> >> characters long.
>>
>> >Hello
>>
>> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>
> yes.
Since you admit you don't have anything both meaningful and rational to
post, perhaps you should not post.
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering
skyeyes
> Hi
'Lo
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
>On Apr 24, 2:06 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, the following appeared in
>> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
>> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>>
>> >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
>> >> >> characters long.
>>
>> >> >Hello
>>
>> >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>>
>> >yes.
>>
>> Good. Go post it to alt.flame.
>
>I want to post it here, if that's OK with you.
Well then *do it*! Don't be coy; shit or get off the pot;
don't stand there holding the door open, etc., etc.
>If it's not, tough.
Sure; that's what killfiles exist for.
--
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
>On Apr 24, 2:06 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, the following appeared in
>> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
>> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>>
>> >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
>> >> >> characters long.
>>
>> >> >Hello
>>
>> >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>>
>> >yes.
>>
>> Good. Go post it to alt.flame.
>
>Why?
Because they know how to deal with those who act as you do.
--
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
F
================================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Author:
"Deception by Design: The Intelligent Design Movement in America"
http://www.redandblackpublishers.com/deceptionbydesign.html
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Perplexed in Peoria
"For Life" <lack...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1177377049....@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> > On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
> > talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> > >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
> >
> > >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> > >> characters long.
> >
> > >Hello
> >
> > Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>
> yes.
Ok, I'll bite.
Could you explain your nym? Does it indicate:
- You favor increased funding for the biological sciences?
- You wish to see endangered species preserved?
- You wish to see people who commit certain crimes put away for that long?
- You only eat things after they are dead?
- You only eat them while they are alive?
- You don't care much about life in general, but you do oppose capital
punishment, euthanasia, and stem cell research?
- You think that life here on earth is irrelevant, since you look forward
to another kind of life which happens after death?
- You are engaged in a psych research project studying responses to null
stimuli? You count the number of responders, and then report this number
in your next posting?
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by "Perplexed in Peoria"
<jimme...@sbcglobal.net>:
I'd go with "How long he/she/it intends to post zero
content".
--
Cemtech
lack...@gmail.com says...
> On Apr 23, 7:41 pm, Cemtech <c...@cox.net> wrote:
> > In article <1177206942.888997.137...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> > lacksa...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > > Hi
> >
> > No I'm not!!
>
> That's spelled 'high'.
Not according to the way you spell below.
> > Oh...
> >
> > Hi =)
>
> jidiot...
id10t
> > --
> > Steve "Chris" Price
> > Associate Professor of Computational Aesthetics
> > Amish Chair of Electrical Engineering
> > University of Ediacara "A fine tradition since 530,000,000 BC"
>
>
>
--
Advice when in a crowd of creationists:
"If you act like a dumbshit, they'll treat you as an equal"
J.R."Bob" Dobbs
For Life
> On 24 Apr 2007 04:45:50 -0700, the following appeared in
>
>
>
> >On Apr 24, 2:06 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, the following appeared in
> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
> >> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>
> >> >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> >> >> >> characters long.
>
> >> >> >Hello
>
> >> >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>
> >> >yes.
>
> >> Good. Go post it to alt.flame.
>
> >I want to post it here, if that's OK with you.
>
> Well then *do it*! Don't be coy; shit or get off the pot;
> don't stand there holding the door open, etc., etc.
I'm waiting for the right time.
For Life
> On 24 Apr 2007 05:41:34 -0700, the following appeared in
>
>
>
> >On Apr 24, 2:06 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, the following appeared in
> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
> >> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>
> >> >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> >> >> >> characters long.
>
> >> >> >Hello
>
> >> >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>
> >> >yes.
>
> >> Good. Go post it to alt.flame.
>
> >Why?
>
> Because they know how to deal with those who act as you do.
You mean... unlike yourself?
For Life
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, For Life wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>
> >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> >> >> characters long.
>
> >> >Hello
>
> >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>
> > yes.
>
> Since you admit you don't have anything both meaningful and rational to
> post, perhaps you should not post.
And you...?
For Life
For Life
For Life
> On Apr 21, 6:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
> 'Lo
Hi
For Life
wrote:
> "For Life" <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1177377049....@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
no to all.
For Life
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:10:39 GMT, the following appeared in
> talk.origins, posted by "Perplexed in Peoria"
>
>
>
>
>
> >"For Life" <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1177377049....@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
no
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
>On Apr 24, 5:34 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On 24 Apr 2007 04:45:50 -0700, the following appeared in
>> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>> >On Apr 24, 2:06 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >> On 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, the following appeared in
>> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >> >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
>> >> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
>> >> >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
>> >> >> >> characters long.
>> >> >> >Hello
>> >> >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
>> >> >yes.
>> >> Good. Go post it to alt.flame.
>> >I want to post it here, if that's OK with you.
>> Well then *do it*! Don't be coy; shit or get off the pot;
>> don't stand there holding the door open, etc., etc.
>I'm waiting for the right time.
Uh-huh. HANL
<snip>
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
I mean unlike those who, like yourself, act like 4-year-olds
with a secret. So that would, indeed, be unlike myself.
Thanks for noticing.
--
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
Incorrect by observation. Care to try again?
--
Cemtech
lack...@gmail.com says...
> On Apr 24, 11:04 am, Mark Isaak <eci...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:10:49 -0700, For Life wrote:
> > > On Apr 22, 3:42 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> > >> On 22 Apr 2007 04:31:12 -0700, the following appeared in
> > >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > >> >On Apr 22, 1:50 am, "Steven J." <steve...@altavista.com> wrote:
> > >> >> On Apr 21, 7:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi
> >
> > >> >> I think it's time you posted something to this group more than two
> > >> >> characters long.
> >
> > >> >Hello
> >
> > >> Hello. Have anything both meaningful and rational to post?
> >
> > > yes.
> >
> > Since you admit you don't have anything both meaningful and rational to
> > post, perhaps you should not post.
>
> And you...?
This is the worst Turing Test yet. Somebody sober up the programmers!
For Life
> Hi
Out of curiosity, which Usenet group would you consider to be the
smarter of the two?
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/browse_frm/thread/26a2ad9b5e4cad5a/592b719606819557
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame/browse_frm/thread/521c8fe79686be35/78a5de13a3272bbd
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
>On Apr 21, 8:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>
>Out of curiosity, which Usenet group would you consider to be the
>smarter of the two?
The one where no one answers his/her/its own posts with
inane questions?
<snip>
For Life
> On 29 Apr 2007 05:44:25 -0700, the following appeared in
>
> >On Apr 21, 8:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi
>
> >Out of curiosity, which Usenet group would you consider to be the
> >smarter of the two?
>
> The one where no one answers his/her/its own posts with
> inane questions?
Congratulations, you have just admitted to being a bumbling idiot! How
do you feel?
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
>On Apr 29, 5:56 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On 29 Apr 2007 05:44:25 -0700, the following appeared in
>> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >On Apr 21, 8:55 pm, For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi
>>
>> >Out of curiosity, which Usenet group would you consider to be the
>> >smarter of the two?
>>
>> The one where no one answers his/her/its own posts with
>> inane questions?
>
>Congratulations, you have just admitted to being a bumbling idiot!
...says the moron who responds to his/her/its own posts...
> How
>do you feel?
About 30 IQ points ahead of you. Why do you ask?
For Life
> On 30 Apr 2007 05:04:51 -0700, the following appeared in
> >Congratulations, you have just admitted to being a bumbling idiot!
>
> ...says the moron who responds to his/her/its own posts...
You put way too much effort into responding.
> > How
> >do you feel?
>
> About 30 IQ points ahead of you. Why do you ask?
and you're still doing it!
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by For Life <lack...@gmail.com>:
Not for long; you lack a lot.
Bye, troll; HANL.
skyeyes
For Life
> On 1 May 2007 03:29:30 -0700, the following appeared in
>
> >On May 1, 1:16 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On 30 Apr 2007 05:04:51 -0700, the following appeared in
> >> talk.origins, posted by For Life <lacksa...@gmail.com>:
> >> >Congratulations, you have just admitted to being a bumbling idiot!
>
> >> ...says the moron who responds to his/her/its own posts...
>
> >You put way too much effort into responding.
>
> >> > How
> >> >do you feel?
>
> >> About 30 IQ points ahead of you. Why do you ask?
>
> >and you're still doing it!
>
> Not for long;
excellent!
> you lack a lot.
> Bye, troll;
who taught you a lesson...
at least, I hope I did. Unless the only reason you left was because I
was "trolling", which can't be the case...