God is real
titus
in evolution
snex
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. science is the only way we
have of learning about how the world works.
DJT
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Not only does this person need a visit from the clue fairy, he also
needs a visit from the punctuation and capitalization fairy.
For the record, I don't "believe in" evolution. I accept it as a
scientific fact, due to the preponderance of evidence. If this leads
you to curse me, then so be it. I'm not the one harmed by your
anger.
DJT
bul...@bellsouth.net
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
That's nice. hey, innit agin' the Bibble to curse people? I mean,
woddin't that make you a witch?
What a moron.
Boikat
raven1
>evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
>in evolution
Err, "so what?" comes to mind...
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
Ken Rode
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Two things... (1) Populations evolve, individuals don't. You won't be
changing as a result of evolution. (2) I don't believe in evolution,
but I do accept the evidence for it. To you, this likely amounts to
the same thing. Go ahead: curse me out. That might make you happy, but
it won't affect me at all.
Lexington Victoria-Rice
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
>
What - are you a wizard?
--
"Fundamentalists can kiss my left behind."
Some bumper sticker or t-shirt.
Lucifer
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Loki, at a guess, though it's hard to tell with some fundynuts.
Timberwoof
"titus" <duc...@epix.net> wrote:
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Well, you've convinced me!
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
Level 1 Linux technical support: Read The Fscking Manual!
Level 2 Linux technical support: Write The Fscking Code Yourself!
Bobby Bryant
"titus" <duc...@epix.net> writes:
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you
> beleve in evolution
Curse away. That won't change reality.
--
Bobby Bryant
Reno, Nevada
Remove your hat to reply by e-mail.
Bobby Bryant
I think for this kind of bottom feeder, repeat visits mean Loki, while
post and run means honest crank.
Bobby Bryant
>> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you
>> beleve in evolution
>
> Not only does this person need a visit from the clue fairy, he also
> needs a visit from the punctuation and capitalization fairy.
Yes, that made me cringe far more than the threatened cursing did.
Kelsey Bjarnason
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Truly a compelling argument. Such a vast quantity of accompanying evidence
to support it, too.
--
Do not contact me at kbjar...@ncoldns.com
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by "titus" <duc...@epix.net>:
>evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
>in evolution
Run along now, duckboy...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Rolf
"titus" <duc...@epix.net> skrev i melding
news:XINWh.4265$Oc.2...@news1.epix.net...
> evolution is make beleve
You can't type (maybe you can't spell either?) even a short sentence and you
have the nerve to pretend you know anything about the theory of evolution?
Go away and don't come back before you are dry behind your ears.
>no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Nobody wants to change you, please go on with your faith and stupidity, it
doesn't bother me the least.
Go ahead and curse us all, God won't touch a hair on your head anyway, he
knows you don't know what you are talking about.
>
Robert Carnegie
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
I believe, and I do not fear your cursing. Now follow the example of
the President: give up strong liquor and, depending who you ask,
cannabis and cocaine.
Kermit
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Curse away.
Kermit
Mark VandeWettering
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Why would you do that? Is that the Christian thing to do? What happened
to that whole "judge not, lest ye be judged" thing?
Mark
Ken Rode
> Op Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:14:02 -0700, schreef Ken Rode:
>
> > I don't believe in evolution, but I do accept the evidence for it.
>
I was just (unsuccessfully) drawing a distinction between belief
without evidence and the acceptance of an explanation given the
evidence that underlies that explanation. I don't believe in
evolution, but I do believe it true that evolution is a reasonable
explanation of the evidence. Did this help?
Noelie S. Alito
I suspect the world as a whole would be a better place if he hadn't.
:-(
Noelie
P.S. I'm baa-ack!
--
<myfirstname>@<capital_of_texas>.rr.com
"Rhyming with 'goalie' for over 46 years."
Pip R. Lagenta
>Op Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:14:02 -0700, schreef Ken Rode:
>
>> I don't believe in evolution, but I do accept the evidence for it.
>
>That's funny. Please explain.
It is the evidence that has established evolution as a fact. Belief
is beside the point, and not necessary.
>
--
內躬偕爻,虜,齯滌`偕爻,虜,齯滌`偕爻,虜,齯滌`偕爻,虜,齯滌`偕爻,
Pip R. Lagenta Pip R. Lagenta Pip R. Lagenta Pip R. Lagenta
�虜,齯滌`偕爻,虜,齯滌`偕爻,虜,齯滌`偕爻,虜,齯滌`偕爻,虜,齯滌
-- Pip R. Lagenta
President for Life
International Organization Of People Named Pip R. Lagenta
(If your name is Pip R. Lagenta, ask about our dues!)
<http://home.comcast.net/~galentripp/pip.html>
(For Email: I'm at home, not work.)
Pip R. Lagenta
Boswell
>evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
>in evolution
I will curse you if you believe in whatever it is you believe in, you
scum sucking sodomizer of syphilitic warthogs!"
Dale Kelly
> grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. science is the only way we
> have of learning about how the world works.--
science is a FARCE, only philosophy and inference, as per Leibniz have
real information, NOTHING can be known empirically
--
Dale
http://www.vedantasite.org
Ken Rode
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:27:32 -0700, snex wrote:
> > grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. science is the only way we
> > have of learning about how the world works.--
>
> science is a FARCE, only philosophy and inference, as per Leibniz have
> real information, NOTHING can be known empirically
You don't know that.
> Dalehttp://www.vedantasite.org
Skitter...@yahoo.com
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:27:32 -0700, snex wrote:
>
> > grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. science is the only way we
> > have of learning about how the world works.--
>
> science is a FARCE, only philosophy and inference, as per Leibniz have
> real information, NOTHING can be known empirically
Smack yourself in the head with a hammer three times and times see if you
can still say that with a straight face. Or are you afraid you might be
wrong and that the Real World exists after all?
Skitter the Cat
--
The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
Great Speed, Great Retention
1 GB/Day for only $8.95
Thurisaz the Einherjer
In short: GET LOST.
--
Romans 2:24 revised:
"For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you
cretinists, as it is written on aig."
My personal judgment of monotheism: http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
Von R. Smith
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
Is it comfortable under that bridge?
snex
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:27:32 -0700, snex wrote:
> > grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. science is the only way we
> > have of learning about how the world works.--
>
> science is a FARCE, only philosophy and inference, as per Leibniz have
> real information, NOTHING can be known empirically
"the problem of induction exists, therefore i can claim any stupid
superstition i want is true, neener neener" is not a valid argument,
either inductively or deductively.
>
> --
> Dalehttp://www.vedantasite.org
Earle Jones
"titus" <duc...@epix.net> wrote:
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
*I curse you out too stupid motherfucker asshole.
earle
*
Nick Keighley
<snip semantically null post>
GOD is REAL, unless a type declaration to the contrary is made
--
Nick Keighley
Earle Jones
*
Noelie/Goalie!
Welcome back. You don't look a day over 45!
And how's dad and the Supremes?
earle
*
Ferrous Patella
> Noelie
>
>
> P.S. I'm baa-ack!
Dude! I noticed the 8997 score in my Xnews and was going like, "Who the
heck is that?"
Good to see you again.
--
Ferrous Patella
"Her vocabulary was as bad as, like, whatever."
Annual English Teachers' awards for best student
metaphors/analogies found in actual student papers
skyeyes
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
As a former born-again Christian and OEC, let me assure you that
there's nothing make-believe about evolution. It's backed up by
mountains of evidence.
To say that we "believe in" evolution the same way you "believe in"
creation is misleading. Evolution *is*. We know that. It's
reality. "Believing in" it has nothing to do with its factuality.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
skyeyes
> Op Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:14:02 -0700, schreef Ken Rode:
>
> > I don't believe in evolution, but I do accept the evidence for it.
>
> That's funny. Please explain.
Creationists think we "believe in" evolution as though it were a
religious doctrine, with about as much evidence as any religious
doctrine has. In that sense, we *don't* "believe in" evolution - we
know evolution to be reality, because it's where the preponderance of
the evidence points.
John Wilkins
Hi Noelie.
I really am working on that Omphalos scan, truly (I don't have a
scanner, and have to rely on a coworker).
Great to see you back.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
Noelie S. Alito
Alito-wise, we just survived a [medical] family
emergency. I'm happy to report that when it comes
to grace under pressure, my whole family rocks!
BTW, although I joke about "Cousin Sam" being the
black sheep of the family, he is no relative of ours.
We'd much rather own up to relatives such as the
[now ex-]drug dealer and to the convicted credit card
thief.
Noelie, enjoying her current manic phase
(God, I'm wonderful....)
--
Ask me about collectible nosehair clippers!
Noelie S. Alito
> news:462BF945...@deadspam.com by Noelie S. Alito:
>
>> Noelie
>>
>>
>> P.S. I'm baa-ack!
>
> Dude! I noticed the 8997 score in my Xnews and was going like, "Who the
> heck is that?"
>
> Good to see you again.
Xnews score 8997!? I blush....
Mark Isaak
He only said that God is real, not good. He still rejects God and
Christianity.
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering
Gerry Murphy
"titus" <duc...@epix.net> wrote in message
news:XINWh.4265$Oc.2...@news1.epix.net...
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
>
Foul varlet! If you dare utter that curse you'll feel the wrath of
my neutrino laser cannon, against which there is no defense.
raven1
Err, Squire, won't the neutrinos just pass thru 'im without effect...?
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
edwar...@verizon.net
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
I should _hope_ god isn't real. If he is, he's got a lot of explaining
to do.
(Bet he gets really PO'd at all these religious wackos who blaime him
for everything.)
And what does God say when he sneezes? "Me bless me" sounds downright
weird.
Ken Rode
In keeping with the King James Version, I would expect that God uses
good English grammar, like "I bless Me." or possibly "We bless Us." if
He uses the royal pronouns.
Bob Casanova
talk.origins, posted by Ferrous Patella
<mail1...@pop.net>:
>news:462BF945...@deadspam.com by Noelie S. Alito:
>
>> Noelie
>>
>>
>> P.S. I'm baa-ack!
>
>Dude! I noticed the 8997 score in my Xnews and was going like, "Who the
>heck is that?"
>
>Good to see you again.
"Dude"? Dudette, maybe? ;-)
Welcome back, Noelie!
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Robert Carnegie
If God sneezes, is there anyone left to hear what he says?
(Beware "The Coming of the Great White Handkerchief"!)
Ferrous Patella
--
Ferrous Patella
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:33:22 GMT, the following appeared in
> talk.origins, posted by Ferrous Patella
> <mail1...@pop.net>:
>
>>news:462BF945...@deadspam.com by Noelie S. Alito:
>>
>>> Noelie
>>>
>>>
>>> P.S. I'm baa-ack!
>>
>>Dude! I noticed the 8997 score in my Xnews and was going like, "Who the
>>heck is that?"
>>
>>Good to see you again.
>
> "Dude"? Dudette, maybe? ;-)
>
> Welcome back, Noelie!
I though "Dude" as a interjection was genderless. Kinda like the last
couple of generations version of my generations "Wow" (best delivered by
the hippy girl on the Smothers Brothers Show.)
--
Ferrous Patella
Well, I had to make you less then 9000 so you would be a different color
than Chez Watt (gotta have priorities, ya know). I forget who 8998 and
8999 are. They seem to have fallen off the radar.
I must admit to being crestfallen to let the ownership of
rhymeswithgoaliefanclub.com lapse when I heard you were no longer pursuing
your science writer career.
--
Robert Carnegie
raven1 wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:21:55 -0400, "Gerry Murphy"
> <gerry...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"titus" <duc...@epix.net> wrote in message
> >news:XINWh.4265$Oc.2...@news1.epix.net...
> >> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> >> in evolution
> >>
> >
> >Foul varlet! If you dare utter that curse you'll feel the wrath of
> >my neutrino laser cannon, against which there is no defense.
>
> Err, Squire, won't the neutrinos just pass thru 'im without effect...?
Yeah, but the cannon won't. You ever been hit by a neutrino
accelerator laser? evenethe hand-held model.
Bob Casanova
>news:5uar23thggfbju35i...@4ax.com by Bob Casanova:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:33:22 GMT, the following appeared in
>> talk.origins, posted by Ferrous Patella
>> <mail1...@pop.net>:
>>
>>>news:462BF945...@deadspam.com by Noelie S. Alito:
>>>
>>>> Noelie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> P.S. I'm baa-ack!
>>>
>>>Dude! I noticed the 8997 score in my Xnews and was going like, "Who the
>>>heck is that?"
>>>
>>>Good to see you again.
>>
>> "Dude"? Dudette, maybe? ;-)
>>
>> Welcome back, Noelie!
>
>I though "Dude" as a interjection was genderless. Kinda like the last
>couple of generations version of my generations "Wow" (best delivered by
>the hippy girl on the Smothers Brothers Show.)
I thought it was intended as a salutation, but what do I
know; I don't even text-message.
Noelie S. Alito
Ah, the ol' Blame the Coworker trick!
I patented that: Pay up!
> Great to see you back.
Great to be back, and see many of my faves currently posting.
Noelie
--
The best way to get information out of Usenet is
not to post a question, but the wrong information.
--Dwight D. Eisenhower
John Wilkins
Some of my best friends are ex-drug dealers. Hell, *I'm* an ex-drug
dealer (for about 3 weeks and one garbage back full of crappy leaf).
>
>
>
> Noelie, enjoying her current manic phase
> (God, I'm wonderful....)
You are that.
Cemtech
says...
> evolution is make beleve no changing me i will curse you out if you beleve
> in evolution
MmmmmmIbelieveinevolution! =b
Actually I don't believe in evolution anymore than I believe in gravity.
It's there, no belief required.
--
=========================================
"Hell even my spellchecker knows. Everytime it finds
'creationism' it recommends 'cretinism'! - Steve Price
Cemtech
says...
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:27:32 -0700, snex wrote:
>
> > grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. science is the only way we
> > have of learning about how the world works.--
>
> science is a FARCE
Stop using a computer then, ya hypocrite.
--
Advice when in a crowd of creationists:
"If you act like a dumbshit, they'll treat you as an equal"
J.R."Bob" Dobbs
er...@swva.net
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:27:32 -0700, snex wrote:
> > grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. science is the only way we
> > have of learning about how the world works.--
>
> real information, NOTHING can be known empirically
>
> --
> Dalehttp://www.vedantasite.org
Do you have any evidence for that? <8^)
Eric Root
Robert Carnegie
> Hi Noelie.
>
> I really am working on that Omphalos scan, truly (I don't have a
> scanner, and have to rely on a coworker).
>
> Great to see you back.
You're scanning your navel??
Heck, send her a scan of anyone else's navel, she'll never know. Most
likely.
John Wilkins
Given the size of mine, she'd probably be able to guess it wasn't mine
if it could fit in a single A4 scan.
[Noelie sent me a copy of Gosse's Omphalos for scanning. I've been
distratcted and without a scanner.]
John Wilkins
> On Apr 22, 9:21 pm, Dale Kelly <dale.ke...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:27:32 -0700, snex wrote:
> > > grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. science is the only way we
> > > have of learning about how the world works.--
> >
> > science is a FARCE, only philosophy and inference, as per Leibniz have
> > real information, NOTHING can be known empirically
Bit of a problem in your Leibniz interpretation - as *he* thought
science could in fact know real essences empirically (check his
commentary on Locke's Essay, called New Essays in Human Understanding).
> >
> > --
> > Dalehttp://www.vedantasite.org
>
> Do you have any evidence for that? <8^)
>
> Eric Root
Walter Bushell
Nick Keighley <nick_keigh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 Apr, 19:21, "titus" <duck...@epix.net> wrote:
>
> <snip semantically null post>
>
> GOD is REAL, unless a type declaration to the contrary is made
>
>
> --
> Nick Keighley
But Goddess is type matrix.