Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Google + debate
9 views
Skip to first unread message
Metspitzer
May 25, 2012, 4:14:03 PM5/25/12
to
I love intelligent conversation and I hope to one day have one. In
the mean time, if any of you guys that have a big difference of
opinion would like to air them in public, I would love to see it.
the mean time, if any of you guys that have a big difference of
opinion would like to air them in public, I would love to see it.
marc.t...@wanadoo.fr
May 29, 2012, 11:55:53 AM5/29/12
to
posts as you never reply to the group's comments: does it mean that
you consider that no intelligent conversation is possible with the
people in the group (you say: "I hope to one day have one"!) and
actually despise the people in the group?
Metspitzer
May 29, 2012, 12:17:49 PM5/29/12
to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 08:55:53 -0700 (PDT), marc.t...@wanadoo.fr
wrote:
My week attempt at humor.
I was trying to imply that I wish "I" would, one day, have an
intelligent conversation. Until then, I will just listen to the
people in the group that do have intelligent conversations.
My humor does not usually go over well on Usenet. I don't know why I
keep trying.
Google Plus has the ability for two people, or more, to hash it out
face to face and record it for the world. I would like to see that
happen with some of the regulars here in the group. I sure wasn't
suggesting that I would be among them.
wrote:
I was trying to imply that I wish "I" would, one day, have an
intelligent conversation. Until then, I will just listen to the
people in the group that do have intelligent conversations.
My humor does not usually go over well on Usenet. I don't know why I
keep trying.
Google Plus has the ability for two people, or more, to hash it out
face to face and record it for the world. I would like to see that
happen with some of the regulars here in the group. I sure wasn't
suggesting that I would be among them.
marc.t...@wanadoo.fr
May 29, 2012, 4:39:49 PM5/29/12
to
On 29 mai, 18:17, Metspitzer <Kilow...@charter.net> wrote:
> My week attempt at humor.
>
> I was trying to imply that I wish "I" would, one day, have an
> intelligent conversation. �Until then, I will just listen to the
> people in the group that do have intelligent conversations.
>
> My humor does not usually go over well on Usenet. �I don't know why I
> keep trying.
>
> Google Plus has the ability for two people, or more, to hash it out
> face to face and record it for the world. �I would like to see that
> happen with some of the regulars here in the group. �I sure wasn't
> suggesting that I would be among them.
I understand your caution as some of the group may be particularly
> My week attempt at humor.
>
> I was trying to imply that I wish "I" would, one day, have an
> intelligent conversation. �Until then, I will just listen to the
> people in the group that do have intelligent conversations.
>
> My humor does not usually go over well on Usenet. �I don't know why I
> keep trying.
>
> Google Plus has the ability for two people, or more, to hash it out
> face to face and record it for the world. �I would like to see that
> happen with some of the regulars here in the group. �I sure wasn't
> suggesting that I would be among them.
aggressive or sarcastic or sufficient or all three at once!
I think humour should be used with great caution, I would say only as
a defense against an explicit attack.
0 new messages