. One might think that there should be several organizations "supporting good science, the teaching of evolution, and opposition to teaching any form of creationism in public schools." Maybe even more than several. And one would be right to think so.
11 Civil liberties organizations 35 Educational organizations 17 Religious organizations 61 Scientific and scholarly organizations
My thanks to the Coalition for Excellence in Science and Math Education for the following list.
....................................
Organizations supporting good science, the teaching of evolution, and opposition to teaching any form of creationism in public schools.
African Americans For Humanism (AAH) American Civil Liberties Union: Position Statement On Creationism And Public Schools American Humanist Association: A Statement Affirming Evolution As A Principle Of Science Americans For Religious Liberty Americans United For Separation Of Church And State Council For Democratic And Secular Humanism (CODESH) Freedom From Religion Foundation Humanist Association Of Canada Institute For First Amendment Studies: The Case For Evolution The National Committee For Publication Education And Religious Liberty People For The American Way
EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
American Association Of Physics Teachers American Association Of University Women Arkansas Science Teachers Association Association of College and University Biology Educators (1999) Association Of Pennsylvania State College And University Biologists Authors of Biology Texts (1999) The BSCS Position On The Teaching Of Biology The Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (1995): Position On The Teaching Of Evolution For Voices For Evolution California Science Teachers Association Iowa Department Of Public Instruction Iowa Council Of Science Supervisors Michigan Science Teachers Association National Association Of Biology Teachers (1980) National Association Of Biology Teachers (2000) National Association Of Biology Teachers: Scientific Integrity National Association Of Biology Teachers: The Teaching Of Evolution National Conference on Teaching Evolution (2000) National Council For The Social Studies National Education Association National Science Supervisors Association National Science Teachers Association (1973,1982) National Science Teachers Association (1985) National Science Teachers Association (1997) New York State Science Supervisors Association North Carolina Science Teachers Association North Carolina Math and Science Education Network Oklahoma Science Teachers Association Science Museum Of Minnesota (1995) Science Teachers Association Of New York State (1980) Syracuse Parent-Teacher Association University Of Alabama At Huntsville Faculty Senate University Of California Academic Council Of The Academic Senate The University Of Queensland (Australia) Board Of The Faculty Of Science Utah Science Teachers Association Wisconsin Department Of Public Instruction
RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
American Jewish Congress American Scientific Affiliation Center For Theology And The Natural Sciences Central Conference Of American Rabbis Episcopal Bishop Of Atlanta, Pastoral Letter General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) (2002) The General Convention Of The Episcopal Church Lexington Alliance Of Religious Leaders The Lutheran World Federation Roman Catholic Church (1981) Roman Catholic Church (1996) Unitarian Universalist Association (1977) Unitarian Universalist Association (1982) United Church Board For Homeland Ministries United Methodist Church United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1982) United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1983)
SCIENTIFIC AND SCHOLARLY ORGANIZATIONS
Academy Of Science Of The Royal Society Of Canada Alabama Academy Of Science American Anthropological Association American Anthropological Association (2000) American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1923) American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1972) American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1982) American Association For The Advancement Of Science (Commission on Science Education) American Association For The Advancement Of Science (2002) American Association Of Physical Anthropologists American Astronomical Society (2000) American Geophysical Union American Geophysical Union (1999) American Institute Of Biological Sciences American Astronomical Society American Society Of Biological Chemists American Chemical Society American Geological Institute American Psychological Association American Physical Society American Society Of Parasitologists Association for Women Geoscientists (1998) Australian Academy of Science California Academy Of Sciences Ecological Society of America (1999) Genetics Society of America Geological Society Of America Geological Society of America (2001) Geological Society of Australia (1995) Georgia Academy Of Science (1980) Georgia Academy Of Science (1982) History of Science Society Iowa Academy Of Science (1982) Statement Of The Position Of The Iowa Academy Of Science On Pseudoscience (1986) Iowa Academy Of Science (2000) Kentucky Academy Of Science Kentucky Academy Of Science (1999) Kentucky Paleontological Society Statement on the Teaching of Evolution (1999) Louisiana Academy Of Sciences National Academy Of Sciences (1972) National Academy Of Sciences (1984) National Academy Of Sciences (1998) North American Benthological Society (2001) North Carolina Academy Of Science North Carolina Academy Of Science (1997) New Orleans Geological Society New York Academy Of Sciences Ohio Academy Of Science Ohio Academy Of Science (2000) Ohio Math and Science Coalition (2002) Oklahoma Academy Of Sciences The Paleontological Society Sigma Xi, Louisiana State University Chapter, Baton Rouge, Louisiana Society For Amateur Scientists Society For Integrative and Comparative Biology (2001) Society For The Study Of Evolution Society Of Systematic Biologists (2001) Society Of Vertebrate Paleontology (1986) Society Of Vertebrate Paleontology (1994) Southern Anthropological Society Virginia Academy Of Science (1981) West Virginia Academy Of Science
> One might think that there should be several organizations "supporting > good science, the teaching of evolution, and opposition to teaching > any form of creationism in public schools." Maybe even more than > several. And one would be right to think so.
> 11 Civil liberties organizations > 35 Educational organizations > 17 Religious organizations > 61 Scientific and scholarly organizations
> My thanks to the Coalition for Excellence in Science and Math > Education for the following list.
[snip]
Actually it is the good people of the National Center for Science Education that are behind this. They actually provide the text of many of the statements these organizations have made as well as making the lists you provided in your post at:
"...I think that science would have never have achieved much progress if it had always imagined unknown obstacles hidden round every corner." - Arthur Eddington, _Stars and Atoms_, 1929, p. 20.
(VoiceOfReason) wrote: >. >One might think that there should be several organizations "supporting >good science, the teaching of evolution, and opposition to teaching >any form of creationism in public schools." Maybe even more than >several. And one would be right to think so.
>11 Civil liberties organizations >35 Educational organizations >17 Religious organizations >61 Scientific and scholarly organizations
>My thanks to the Coalition for Excellence in Science and Math >Education for the following list.
>....................................
>Organizations supporting good science, the teaching of evolution, and >opposition to teaching any form of creationism in public schools.
Pagano replies: Here papa fox57 (mis)leads his reader's to believe that the detailed statements from each and every group supports: 1. good science (whatever papa fox57 might mean by that) 2. the teaching of evolution 3. and opposition to teaching creationism in the public schools. This is not the case.
Papa fox57 lists two documents from the Roman Catholic Church below from 1981 and 1986. Neither of these documents say anything about supporting good science, neither of them say anything about supporting the "teaching" of evolution, and neither of them say anything about opposition to creationism in the public schools.
Furthermore these documents are records of addresses which the Pope gave to the members of Pontifical Academy of Sciences not to the Roman Catholics of the world. Academy members are advisors to the Pope and chosen by the members themselves not by the Church. Many of its members are not even Catholic.
In the 1996 Address referenced by papa fox57's link, Pope John Paul II endorses----in whole----Pope John XII Encyclical, "Humani Generis," which was critical of the misuse of scientific theories (treating theories as known fact as neoDarwinism is) and critical of evolutionism (polygenesis predicted by darwinism is contrary to Catholic doctrine) and placed constaints on the "study" of evolution.
Finally paragraph 245 of the Second Edition of the Catechism of the Catholic Church written for the members of the Church as doctrine and promulgated under the same Pope John Paul II states, "[Creation] is not the product of any [material] necessity whatever, nor of blind fate or chance." The very opposite is taught in most schools. That is, Big Bangism and Evolutionism teach that law and chance are solely responsible and no appeal to the Creator is necessary.
Does the Catholic Church support the current method of teaching purely naturalistic evolution, does she support science guided by Naturalism, and is she against the teaching creationism? Uneqivocally no. And if papa fox57 gets this so terribly wrong wonder how many of the other organizations don't support what he claims.
>African Americans For Humanism (AAH) >American Civil Liberties Union: Position Statement On Creationism And >Public Schools >American Humanist Association: A Statement Affirming Evolution As A >Principle Of Science >Americans For Religious Liberty >Americans United For Separation Of Church And State >Council For Democratic And Secular Humanism (CODESH) >Freedom From Religion Foundation >Humanist Association Of Canada >Institute For First Amendment Studies: The Case For Evolution >The National Committee For Publication Education And Religious Liberty >People For The American Way
>EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
>American Association Of Physics Teachers >American Association Of University Women >Arkansas Science Teachers Association >Association of College and University Biology Educators (1999) >Association Of Pennsylvania State College And University Biologists >Authors of Biology Texts (1999) >The BSCS Position On The Teaching Of Biology >The Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (1995): Position On The >Teaching Of Evolution For Voices For Evolution >California Science Teachers Association >Iowa Department Of Public Instruction >Iowa Council Of Science Supervisors >Michigan Science Teachers Association >National Association Of Biology Teachers (1980) >National Association Of Biology Teachers (2000) >National Association Of Biology Teachers: Scientific Integrity >National Association Of Biology Teachers: The Teaching Of Evolution >National Conference on Teaching Evolution (2000) >National Council For The Social Studies >National Education Association >National Science Supervisors Association >National Science Teachers Association (1973,1982) >National Science Teachers Association (1985) >National Science Teachers Association (1997) >New York State Science Supervisors Association >North Carolina Science Teachers Association >North Carolina Math and Science Education Network >Oklahoma Science Teachers Association >Science Museum Of Minnesota (1995) >Science Teachers Association Of New York State (1980) >Syracuse Parent-Teacher Association >University Of Alabama At Huntsville Faculty Senate >University Of California Academic Council Of The Academic Senate >The University Of Queensland (Australia) Board Of The Faculty Of >Science >Utah Science Teachers Association >Wisconsin Department Of Public Instruction
>RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
>American Jewish Congress >American Scientific Affiliation >Center For Theology And The Natural Sciences >Central Conference Of American Rabbis >Episcopal Bishop Of Atlanta, Pastoral Letter >General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) (2002) >The General Convention Of The Episcopal Church >Lexington Alliance Of Religious Leaders >The Lutheran World Federation >Roman Catholic Church (1981) >Roman Catholic Church (1996) >Unitarian Universalist Association (1977) >Unitarian Universalist Association (1982) >United Church Board For Homeland Ministries >United Methodist Church >United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1982) >United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1983)
>SCIENTIFIC AND SCHOLARLY ORGANIZATIONS
>Academy Of Science Of The Royal Society Of Canada >Alabama Academy Of Science >American Anthropological Association >American Anthropological Association (2000) >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1923) >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1972) >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1982) >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (Commission on >Science Education) >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (2002) >American Association Of Physical Anthropologists >American Astronomical Society (2000) >American Geophysical Union >American Geophysical Union (1999) >American Institute Of Biological Sciences >American Astronomical Society >American Society Of Biological Chemists >American Chemical Society >American Geological Institute >American Psychological Association >American Physical Society >American Society Of Parasitologists >Association for Women Geoscientists (1998) >Australian Academy of Science >California Academy Of Sciences >Ecological Society of America (1999) >Genetics Society of America >Geological Society Of America >Geological Society of America (2001) >Geological Society of Australia (1995) >Georgia Academy Of Science (1980) >Georgia Academy Of Science (1982) >History of Science Society >Iowa Academy Of Science (1982) >Statement Of The Position Of The Iowa Academy Of Science On >Pseudoscience (1986) >Iowa Academy Of Science (2000) >Kentucky Academy Of Science >Kentucky Academy Of Science (1999) >Kentucky Paleontological Society Statement on the Teaching of >Evolution (1999) >Louisiana Academy Of Sciences >National Academy Of Sciences (1972) >National Academy Of Sciences (1984) >National Academy Of Sciences (1998) >North American Benthological Society (2001) >North Carolina Academy Of Science >North Carolina Academy Of Science (1997) >New Orleans Geological Society >New York Academy Of Sciences >Ohio Academy Of Science >Ohio Academy Of Science (2000) >Ohio Math and Science Coalition (2002) >Oklahoma Academy Of Sciences >The Paleontological Society >Sigma Xi, Louisiana State University Chapter, Baton Rouge, Louisiana >Society For Amateur Scientists >Society For Integrative and Comparative Biology (2001) >Society For The Study Of Evolution >Society Of Systematic Biologists (2001) >Society Of Vertebrate Paleontology (1986) >Society Of Vertebrate Paleontology (1994) >Southern Anthropological Society >Virginia Academy Of Science (1981) >West Virginia Academy Of Science
>> One might think that there should be several organizations "supporting >> good science, the teaching of evolution, and opposition to teaching >> any form of creationism in public schools." Maybe even more than >> several. And one would be right to think so.
>> 11 Civil liberties organizations >> 35 Educational organizations >> 17 Religious organizations >> 61 Scientific and scholarly organizations
>> My thanks to the Coalition for Excellence in Science and Math >> Education for the following list. > [snip]
> Actually it is the good people of the National Center for Science > Education that are behind this. They actually provide the text > of many of the statements these organizations have made as well > as making the lists you provided in your post at:
"...I think that science would have never have achieved much progress if it had always imagined unknown obstacles hidden round every corner." - Arthur Eddington, _Stars and Atoms_, 1929, p. 20.
T Pagano <not.va...@address.net> wrote: > On Sun, 16 May 2004 15:19:25 +0000 (UTC), papa_fo...@hotmail.com > (VoiceOfReason) wrote:
> >. > >One might think that there should be several organizations "supporting > >good science, the teaching of evolution, and opposition to teaching > >any form of creationism in public schools." Maybe even more than > >several. And one would be right to think so.
> >11 Civil liberties organizations > >35 Educational organizations > >17 Religious organizations > >61 Scientific and scholarly organizations
> >My thanks to the Coalition for Excellence in Science and Math > >Education for the following list.
> >....................................
> >Organizations supporting good science, the teaching of evolution, and > >opposition to teaching any form of creationism in public schools.
> Pagano replies: > Here papa fox57 (mis)leads his reader's to believe that the detailed > statements from each and every group supports: > 1. good science (whatever papa fox57 might mean by that) > 2. the teaching of evolution > 3. and opposition to teaching creationism in the public schools. > This is not the case.
> Papa fox57 lists two documents from the Roman Catholic Church below > from 1981 and 1986. Neither of these documents say anything about > supporting good science, neither of them say anything about > supporting the "teaching" of evolution, and neither of them say > anything about opposition to creationism in the public schools.
Then lets try:
The Church is always interested in research concerning the knowledge of the universe, whether physical, bilogical or psychological.
It is only through humble and assiduous study that it learns to dissociate the essential of faith from scientific systems of a given age, especially when a culturally influenced reading of the Bible seems to be linked to an obligatory cosmology.
The age-old relationships between the Church and science have brought Catholics to a more current understanding of the sphere of their faith, to a sort of intellecutal purification and to a conviction that scientific study deserves a commitment to unbiased research which is, in the final analyisis, a service to truth and to humanity itself.
We would add that the Church recognises with gratitude all that it owes to research and to science.
Pope John Paul II, 9 May 1983 Discourse to Scientists on the 350th Anniversary of the Publication of Galileo's _Dialoghi_
> Furthermore these documents are records of addresses which the Pope > gave to the members of Pontifical Academy of Sciences not to the Roman > Catholics of the world. Academy members are advisors to the Pope and > chosen by the members themselves not by the Church. Many of its > members are not even Catholic.
Though the Academy chooses its members, they must be approved by the Pope.
> In the 1996 Address referenced by papa fox57's link, Pope John Paul II > endorses----in whole----Pope John XII Encyclical, "Humani Generis," > which was critical of the misuse of scientific theories (treating > theories as known fact as neoDarwinism is) and critical of > evolutionism (polygenesis predicted by darwinism is contrary to > Catholic doctrine) and placed constaints on the "study" of evolution.
But does not forbid the research the study of evolution, from within those constraints.
> Finally paragraph 245 of the Second Edition of the Catechism of the > Catholic Church written for the members of the Church as doctrine and > promulgated under the same Pope John Paul II states, "[Creation] is > not the product of any [material] necessity whatever, nor of blind > fate or chance." The very opposite is taught in most schools. That > is, Big Bangism and Evolutionism teach that law and chance are solely > responsible and no appeal to the Creator is necessary.
> Does the Catholic Church support the current method of teaching purely > naturalistic evolution, does she support science guided by Naturalism,
A silly question. If it did then it would pretty much be saying it wasn't needed. OTOH, it does state that scientific and revealed truth flow from the same spring. (This is not to say that evolution, the subject of this group, can be fully accepted as a scientific "truth.")
> and is she against the teaching creationism? Uneqivocally no.
It, along with the rest of us, waits for a scientific creationism.
And if
> papa fox57 gets this so terribly wrong wonder how many of the other > organizations don't support what he claims.
This from someone who argues from a theological standpoint, but can't seem to figure out how theology is done.
> Regards, > T Pagano
See you next week.
[snip] -- macaddicted Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
> >> One might think that there should be several organizations "supporting > >> good science, the teaching of evolution, and opposition to teaching > >> any form of creationism in public schools." Maybe even more than > >> several. And one would be right to think so.
> >> My thanks to the Coalition for Excellence in Science and Math > >> Education for the following list. > > [snip]
> > Actually it is the good people of the National Center for Science > > Education that are behind this. They actually provide the text > > of many of the statements these organizations have made as well > > as making the lists you provided in your post at:
Interestingly, to my knowledge, not one of these groups has tried to modify its statements in order to minimize the "misinterpretation" that is often claimed by 3rd parties (e.g. commentators from the fundamentalist right) who like to pretend that the groups don't really accept evolution.
> >. > >One might think that there should be several organizations "supporting > >good science, the teaching of evolution, and opposition to teaching > >any form of creationism in public schools." Maybe even more than > >several. And one would be right to think so.
> >11 Civil liberties organizations > >35 Educational organizations > >17 Religious organizations > >61 Scientific and scholarly organizations
> >My thanks to the Coalition for Excellence in Science and Math > >Education for the following list.
> >....................................
> >Organizations supporting good science, the teaching of evolution, and > >opposition to teaching any form of creationism in public schools.
> Pagano replies: > Here papa fox57 (mis)leads his reader's to believe that the detailed > statements from each and every group supports: > 1. good science (whatever papa fox57 might mean by that) > 2. the teaching of evolution > 3. and opposition to teaching creationism in the public schools. > This is not the case.
I'm used to Pagano's posts having numerous errors, and once again he lives down to his reputation.
> Papa fox57 lists two documents from the Roman Catholic Church below > from 1981 and 1986. Neither of these documents say anything about > supporting good science, neither of them say anything about > supporting the "teaching" of evolution, and neither of them say > anything about opposition to creationism in the public schools.
Well, about these and the rest of Pagano's claims, let see what some of the actual text of the document has to say:
"In his Encyclical Humani generis (1950), my predecessor Pius XII had already stated that there was no opposition between evolution and the doctrine of the faith about man and his vocation..."
"Today, almost half a century after the publication of the Encyclical, fresh knowledge has led to the recognition that evolution is more than a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory has been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The convergence, neither sought nor fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted independently is in itself a significant argument in favour of this theory."
There is also further discussion of the conditional support for science and evolution. To make a long story short, while the physical body may be of this world, there must also be room for man's soul. Since science does not delve into the spiritual, there is no conflict. There is further discussion of philosophy and theology, which is of course irrelevant to science.
Is this sufficient for now Pagano? Or would you care to make an ass of yourself with the remaining 100+ organizations?
> >African Americans For Humanism (AAH) > >American Civil Liberties Union: Position Statement On Creationism And > >Public Schools > >American Humanist Association: A Statement Affirming Evolution As A > >Principle Of Science > >Americans For Religious Liberty > >Americans United For Separation Of Church And State > >Council For Democratic And Secular Humanism (CODESH) > >Freedom From Religion Foundation > >Humanist Association Of Canada > >Institute For First Amendment Studies: The Case For Evolution > >The National Committee For Publication Education And Religious Liberty > >People For The American Way
> >EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
> >American Association Of Physics Teachers > >American Association Of University Women > >Arkansas Science Teachers Association > >Association of College and University Biology Educators (1999) > >Association Of Pennsylvania State College And University Biologists > >Authors of Biology Texts (1999) > >The BSCS Position On The Teaching Of Biology > >The Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (1995): Position On The > >Teaching Of Evolution For Voices For Evolution > >California Science Teachers Association > >Iowa Department Of Public Instruction > >Iowa Council Of Science Supervisors > >Michigan Science Teachers Association > >National Association Of Biology Teachers (1980) > >National Association Of Biology Teachers (2000) > >National Association Of Biology Teachers: Scientific Integrity > >National Association Of Biology Teachers: The Teaching Of Evolution > >National Conference on Teaching Evolution (2000) > >National Council For The Social Studies > >National Education Association > >National Science Supervisors Association > >National Science Teachers Association (1973,1982) > >National Science Teachers Association (1985) > >National Science Teachers Association (1997) > >New York State Science Supervisors Association > >North Carolina Science Teachers Association > >North Carolina Math and Science Education Network > >Oklahoma Science Teachers Association > >Science Museum Of Minnesota (1995) > >Science Teachers Association Of New York State (1980) > >Syracuse Parent-Teacher Association > >University Of Alabama At Huntsville Faculty Senate > >University Of California Academic Council Of The Academic Senate > >The University Of Queensland (Australia) Board Of The Faculty Of > >Science > >Utah Science Teachers Association > >Wisconsin Department Of Public Instruction
> >RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
> >American Jewish Congress > >American Scientific Affiliation > >Center For Theology And The Natural Sciences > >Central Conference Of American Rabbis > >Episcopal Bishop Of Atlanta, Pastoral Letter > >General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) (2002) > >The General Convention Of The Episcopal Church > >Lexington Alliance Of Religious Leaders > >The Lutheran World Federation
> >Roman Catholic Church (1981) > >Roman Catholic Church (1996) > >Unitarian Universalist Association (1977) > >Unitarian Universalist Association (1982) > >United Church Board For Homeland Ministries > >United Methodist Church > >United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1982) > >United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1983)
> >SCIENTIFIC AND SCHOLARLY ORGANIZATIONS
> >Academy Of Science Of The Royal Society Of Canada > >Alabama Academy Of Science > >American Anthropological Association > >American Anthropological Association (2000) > >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1923) > >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1972) > >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (1982) > >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (Commission on > >Science Education) > >American Association For The Advancement Of Science (2002) > >American Association Of Physical Anthropologists > >American Astronomical Society (2000) > >American Geophysical Union > >American Geophysical Union (1999) > >American Institute Of Biological Sciences > >American Astronomical Society > >American Society Of Biological Chemists > >American Chemical Society > >American Geological Institute > >American Psychological Association > >American Physical Society > >American Society Of Parasitologists > >Association for Women Geoscientists (1998) > >Australian Academy of Science > >California Academy Of Sciences > >Ecological Society of America (1999) > >Genetics Society of America > >Geological Society Of America > >Geological Society of America (2001) > >Geological Society of Australia (1995) > >Georgia Academy Of Science (1980) > >Georgia Academy Of Science (1982) > >History of Science Society > >Iowa Academy Of Science (1982) > >Statement Of The Position Of The Iowa Academy Of Science On > >Pseudoscience (1986) > >Iowa Academy Of Science (2000) > >Kentucky Academy Of Science > >Kentucky Academy Of Science (1999) > >Kentucky Paleontological Society Statement on the Teaching of > >Evolution (1999) > >Louisiana Academy Of Sciences > >National Academy Of Sciences (1972) > >National Academy Of Sciences (1984) > >National Academy Of Sciences (1998) > >North American Benthological Society (2001) > >North Carolina Academy Of Science > >North Carolina Academy Of Science (1997) > >New Orleans Geological Society > >New York Academy Of Sciences > >Ohio Academy Of Science > >Ohio Academy Of Science (2000) > >Ohio Math and Science Coalition (2002) > >Oklahoma Academy Of Sciences > >The Paleontological Society > >Sigma Xi, Louisiana State University Chapter, Baton Rouge, Louisiana > >Society For Amateur Scientists > >Society For Integrative and Comparative Biology (2001) > >Society For The Study Of Evolution > >Society Of Systematic Biologists (2001) > >Society Of Vertebrate Paleontology (1986) > >Society Of Vertebrate Paleontology (1994) > >Southern Anthropological Society > >Virginia Academy Of Science (1981) > >West Virginia Academy Of Science
