Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.
Suzanne
> On Nov 21, 2:37 am, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > Andre Lieven wrote:
>
> > <snip>
>
> > > You have been SHOWN NASA's OWN list of directors. Are you
> > > so INSANE that you trust a tee-vee show's unsupported claim
> > > OVER NASA's ?
>
> > Umm, yes. She believes the bible, believes that god holds conversations with
> > her, and needs no evidence for things because she has a feeling for it.
>
> Indeed. She provides excellent evidence that religion = brain damage
> and
> immorality.
>
> > She is NEVER wrong.
> > In fact when I used the word inane to describe something she wrote she
> > informed us that I meant insane because there was no such word as inane.
> > Naturally she was right and I was wrong and it took a LOT of work on my part
> > to get the word put in dictionaries and on the web to make it look like she
> > was wrong.
>
> As she is now, with her lunatic claim that VB headed NASA,
>
Oooops....I quoted the History Channel. I am not the History Channel.
>
and her
> REFUSAL to address the FACTS of the list of NASA heads that is
> complete and that doesn't at all list VB in any such position.
>
This is how rumors get started.
>
> She's a lying hypocrite. A perfect example of the quality of a
> religious
> cretinist.
>
> > Just dig that dictionary out of the backpack in the trunk at the bottom left
> > of the closet in your hallway to see how thorough I was.
>
> <g>
>
> Andre
>
Must be a big closet if there is a whole trunk at the
bottom left of it.
>
Suzanne
Ye Old One
<leil...@hotmail.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>On Nov 21, 9:33 am, Andre Lieven <andrelie...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> On Nov 21, 2:37 am, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Andre Lieven wrote:
>>
>> > <snip>
>>
>> > > You have been SHOWN NASA's OWN list of directors. Are you
>> > > so INSANE that you trust a tee-vee show's unsupported claim
>> > > OVER NASA's ?
>>
>> > Umm, yes. She believes the bible, believes that god holds conversations with
>> > her, and needs no evidence for things because she has a feeling for it.
>>
>> Indeed. She provides excellent evidence that religion = brain damage
>> and
>> immorality.
>>
>> > She is NEVER wrong.
>> > In fact when I used the word inane to describe something she wrote she
>> > informed us that I meant insane because there was no such word as inane.
>> > Naturally she was right and I was wrong and it took a LOT of work on my part
>> > to get the word put in dictionaries and on the web to make it look like she
>> > was wrong.
>>
>> As she is now, with her lunatic claim that VB headed NASA,
>>
>Oooops....I quoted the History Channel. I am not the History Channel.
Trying to shift the blame is a very dishonest trick. As I've told you
before CHECK your facts BEFORE posting.
>>
>and her
>> REFUSAL to address the FACTS of the list of NASA heads that is
>> complete and that doesn't at all list VB in any such position.
>>
>This is how rumors get started.
>>
>> She's a lying hypocrite. A perfect example of the quality of a
>> religious
>> cretinist.
>>
>> > Just dig that dictionary out of the backpack in the trunk at the bottom left
>> > of the closet in your hallway to see how thorough I was.
>>
>> <g>
>>
>> Andre
>>
>Must be a big closet if there is a whole trunk at the
>bottom left of it.
Harpic!
>>
>Suzanne
--
Bob.
If brains were taxed, you would get a rebate.
All-seeing-I
Boikat
Oh? Where's that happening, or, are you watching reruns of "Xena:
Warrior Princess", again, Mr. Cambrian Mammal = Trilobite? (FYI:
"Xena" was not a documentary either. I just thought I'd let you in on
that, in case you wee confused.)
Boikat
guscubed
What has this long-winded, playground argument have to do with the
protagonists' genders? I find it impossible to read your comment in
anything but the most patronising of tones, but you are no doubt
unaware of what paternalistic morons you and 'Reverse Sexism' Nashton
really are.
This is not to your credit either
Ye Old One
It is not amusing to see one very demented woman making such a fool of
herself.
And talking of making a fool of oneself - what word did you actually
mean to use instead of "wooping"?
--
Bob.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid but you're abusing the privilege.
All-seeing-I
>
> - Show quoted text -
It is You that turns it into a sexist issue.
The fact is, Suzanne = woman,
She happens to be wooping up on them = men.
That is a direct observation of the facts.
And she is doing a rather good job too. They have to resort to the use
of lies, embellishments, and tricks' But she does not.
Why is that?
All-seeing-I
The fact is Ye` Ole Boob, Suzanne does not have to use lies and
distortions to make her points. But you do.
Why is that?
>
> And talking of making a fool of oneself - what word did you actually
> mean to use instead of "wooping"?
You really should broaden your horizons.
Ye Old One
You started it.
>
>The fact is, Suzanne = woman,
As far as we know.
>She happens to be wooping up on them = men.
Well, it would help if you actually used a real word.
>
>That is a direct observation of the facts.
The facts are that she has been well and truly thrashed by people with
a lot more knowledge that she, or you for that matter, can ever hope
to muster.
>
>And she is doing a rather good job too.
Of making a complete an utter fool of herself? Sure.
> She has to resort to the use
>of lies, embellishments, and tricks' But they do not.
Text corrected.
>
>Why is that?
>
Because, like you, she is profoundly stupid.
Madman (aka Mudbrain) is on record as claiming:-
Science causes disease.
That 3.5% actually means 25%...
That the actor Paul Newman was a creationist...
That "Dr." Kent Hovind has made lots of *scientific* discoveries...
That wars have been fought because some scientific finding discredited
some facet of some religion...
To have a "higher education" than most posters to this news group...
To understand how geologists determine the age of any given sample of
rock...
That trilobites were Cambrian mammals... [that one still makes me
laugh]
And that he has "created genes" and not evolved ape genes...
That linguists have traced all the world's languages to the Middle
East region and back to around the same time as the bible claims Noah
and his sons rebuilt mankind.
Claimed that talk.origin's moderator was a troll.
Claimed cigarettes do not cause cancer.
Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
Certainly I don't.
--
Bob.
Ye Old One
Then why does she - so consistently?
> and
>distortions to make her points. But you do.
Care to find a single lie from me? Go on, I dare you.
>
>Why is that?
Why does she lie all the time? The same reason you do, abject
stupidity.
>
>>
>> And talking of making a fool of oneself - what word did you actually
>> mean to use instead of "wooping"?
>
>You really should broaden your horizons.
Oh come on Mudbrain, you must have had a real word in what passes for
your mind. What was it?
guscubed
We must be reading entirely different posts. However, I take this as
an observation in support of the Downing effect, an abservation that
those unhinderd by the burden intelligence are very poor at estimating
the intelligence of others
As to why you come across as a patronising asshole: why would it seems
remarkable to you that a woman can debate effectively against more
than one opponent (even though she isn't in this case)?
Suzanne
blame so much from yourself by attacking others
verbally.
>
Suzanne
Suzanne
>
It's nice of you to mention it.
>
Suzanne
Suzanne
>
Wow! Thank you.
>
Suzanne
Mike Painter
<snip>
>>
>> It is rather amusing to see one woman wooping up on 7 or 8 guys.-
>> Hide quoted text -
>>
> It's nice of you to mention it.
You two should discuss religion for a while. Be sure and tell All-seeing-I
that God tells you what is right before you start the conversation.
I'll bet that within ten posts you will both be telling the other one how
you are and praying that the other see the light.
Ye Old One
You are TOTALLY delusional.
>>
>Suzanne
--
Bob.
The truth is like ice water, it shocks you when it hits you, but no
one's ever died from it. Do yourself a favour and try it sometime.
Ye Old One
Unlike you I don't have any blame to shift.
Suzanne
got through to you that the Lord loves you more than
you could humanly imagine. You are worth it all.
>
Suzanne
Suzanne
>
Suzanne
Free Lunch
wrote in talk.origins:
>On Nov 23, 3:37�am, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:02:36 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I
>> <ap...@email.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
...
>> > It is rather amusing to see one woman wooping up on 7 or 8 guys.
>>
>> It is not amusing to see one very demented woman making such a fool of
>> herself.
>>
>> And talking of making a fool of oneself - what word did you actually
>> mean to use instead of "wooping"?
>>
>> --
>> Bob.
>>
>I would gladly appear to be a fool to you, if anything
>got through to you that the Lord loves you more than
>you could humanly imagine. You are worth it all.
Strangely, you do more to remind me why I abandoned religion and the
foolish claims that are made by those who are religious. You're doing
great as an innoculation.
Suzanne
>
> > and
> >distortions to make her points. But you do.
>
> Care to find a single lie from me? Go on, I dare you.
>
>
>
> >Why is that?
>
> Why does she lie all the time? The same reason you do, abject
> stupidity.
>
to you than you understand.
>
Suzanne
Suzanne
any sense. Why would someone that sees the light
tell another person that sees the light that they don't
see the light? I guess this shows that you can't see
in the dark. He is just trying to extend a candle to you.
>
Suzanne
Suzanne
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:33:51 -0800 (PST), Suzanne
since you like to shout it out. : ) The repairman has
knocked on your door many times, most probably,
and you didn't recognize this.
>
Suzanne
Ye Old One
More proof of your gross dishonesty.
>>
>Suzanne
--
Bob.
You are depriving a village somewhere of an idiot.
Ye Old One
There you go again - another lie.
>>
>> > and
>> >distortions to make her points. But you do.
>>
>> Care to find a single lie from me? Go on, I dare you.
>>
>You saying that people lie to you, for starters.
And a second lie from you in one post.
>>
>>
>> >Why is that?
>>
>> Why does she lie all the time? The same reason you do, abject
>> stupidity.
>>
>You apparently believe your own lies.
I don't lie. However, from you we have had nothing but lies in this
and any other thread you post in.
I don't like liars.
I really don't like you.
Ye Old One
You succeed - amazingly well.
>if anything
>got through to you that the Lord loves you more than
>you could humanly imagine.
The last thing I would ever want if your evil god to love me.
> You are worth it all.
You are worthless, except as an example of how brain dead creationist
cretins like you are.
>>
>Suzanne
--
Bob.
People may not always remember exactly what you said, but they will
always remember just how bright you made them feel.
Ye Old One
<leil...@hotmail.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>On Nov 26, 12:22 am, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> Suzanne wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> It is rather amusing to see one woman wooping up on 7 or 8 guys.-
>> >> Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > It's nice of you to mention it.
>>
>> You two should discuss religion for a while. Be sure and tell All-seeing-I
>> that God tells you what is right before you start the conversation.
>> I'll bet that within ten posts you will both be telling the other one how
>> you are and praying that the other see the light.
>>
>Your last sentence is not very clear.
We all know how very bad your reading comprehension is.
> It doesn't make
>any sense. Why would someone that sees the light
>tell another person that sees the light that they don't
>see the light? I guess this shows that you can't see
>in the dark. He is just trying to extend a candle to you.
Only because he wants to use it to destroy anything with intelligence.
>>
>Suzanne
--
Bob.
You have not been charged for this lesson - learn from it rather than
continuing to make a fool of yourself.
Ye Old One
You know, they really don't come much dumber than you.
>>
>Suzanne
Desertphile
> I would gladly appear to be a fool to you....
You are doing a great job with that.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz